| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| How important are pictures in your thinking and communication? |
| I'd be lost without pictures |
|
46% |
[ 23 ] |
| Pictures are very important for me |
|
20% |
[ 10 ] |
| Pictures are quite important for me |
|
6% |
[ 3 ] |
| I am probably a visual processor but it's no big deal |
|
4% |
[ 2 ] |
| I am not primarily a visual processor |
|
14% |
[ 7 ] |
| I don't care cos I don't really talk to people |
|
8% |
[ 4 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 49 |
|
| Author |
Message |
ZKatchoo Butterfly


Joined: Nov 03, 2009 Age: 28 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Classes are actually quite difficult for me as I learn primarily from written words or pictures. It must be visual in some form.
I have gotten to the point where I try to write down everything the teacher says so I can look at it later and learn it then.
Because I deal with words like they are mini-pictures for my brain and I cannot absorb anything orally.
One of the reasons I hate the phone so much is that I simply can't process what is happening because of a lack of visuals. Do you guys hate the phone too? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Rain_Bird Deinonychus


Joined: Mar 19, 2007 Age: 20 Posts: 367 Location: Ohio
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think in both pictures and words, depending on the situation and which way of thinking is more efficient for whatever I'm thinking about. I do tend to have to draw pictures just to explain things quite frequently, but that might be more a problem with the people I'm explaining things to rather than with me. _________________ ~*Jen*~
Visit my blogs:
http://w00tnsuch.blogspot.com (technology, video games, computers, and random nerdery)
http://seasandsuns.blogspot.com (short stories) |
|
| Back to top |
|
seaequalsdancer Butterfly


Joined: Aug 27, 2009 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
I definitely think and learn easiest visually or just by doing it. If someone tries to explain how to do something to me without showing me it is quite useless. When reading instructions I often just have to work out how to do it on my own and will get frustrated if someone tries to help me by giving verbal input. But I am quite good good at figuring out most things on my own, I guess because from a very early age I got used to being my own teacher.
For example I really wanted to learn how to knit, but learning how o do something like knitting through written instruction, even with step by step pictures, seemed totally absurd to me. I needed to take a class and have someone show me in front of my what I was supposed to do. After that it was quite easy. It is the same with cooking. I hate cookbooks without photos of the finished project because it is so difficult for me to understand what it is going to amount to unless I see it. So I'd rather watching cooking shows than read cookbooks.
In college classes that were all lecture were kind of difficult unless they involved a lot of participation and problem solving. Luckily when it came to my major there were pictures for everything since I majored in art history I never thought about it in such a way until somewhat recently, but I think that one of the reasons I really love art history is that it allows me to learn about many different things through someone's visual interpretation. But I also always wrote EVERYTHING the professor said because I needed hugely detailed notes. Just by writing what they said it helped me process it even if I never really read back much. Just by listening I wouldn't have remembered nearly as much. I would also sometimes even copy text in my own writing because by copying it it helped me remember what I was reading much better.
I also think that my extreme ability to learn easily through pictures allows me to b one the seemingly few people who can put a piece of Ikea furniture together easily and without wanting to kill someone The fact that it is all diagrams and no worded instructions makes great sense to me, while frustrating most of the general population haha. |
|
| Back to top |
|
xalepax Random Videomaker


Joined: Feb 25, 2009 Posts: 1850 Location: YouTube
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would be as lost I could be without it! Words have hard to get to me, doesnt matter if its written or spoken but if I get to see the same information in an image it solves life way easier
I keep remembering members of this forum by their avatar. To think of the avatar makes its way easier to notice the nickname....
Oh yeah I love photography and videomaking...makes even more sense.... _________________ I am female and 35, these are My words: *be yourself and try your best*
|
|
| Back to top |
|
j0sh Phoenix


Joined: Nov 19, 2008 Age: 32 Posts: 747 Location: Tampa, Florida
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I cannot think in pictures at all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
hotaru Raven


Joined: Nov 24, 2008 Age: 22 Posts: 105 Location: Can already hear the commentary... ick!
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I only think in images when I'm developing one of my stories... or while thinking of things I can't post here, if you get my drift.  _________________ Peach baby, peach baby (David Ragan's from GA, that's why!)
Also a fan of- The X Files, Sailor Moon and the Vancouver Canucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
EB Butterfly


Joined: May 23, 2009 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think largely in moving pictures and sound. I'd guess the movie part would fall under pictures but I don't think that I think in words as in visable words but would hearing spoken words in your head (in my own voice or a made up voice when in a movie story) be thinking in words?
What I mean by thinking in movies is that I often act out stories in my head and I see them in my head as movies if that makes any sense. I see the characters acting out the story and hear them talking and stuff as if I was watching a movie (but the quality isn't as good and the characters are animated since I watch and prefer animated characters to live characters). The few dream I can remember were also movie like but not under my full control like the movies in my head (well mostly under my control).
Also I talk to myself in my head and just hear the words in my voice without any pictures (like right now I'm typing this and saying it in my head to myself as I type the exact words I'm saying in my head. Proper spelling doesn't translate though).
I may be over thinking this (I tend to do that. That and rambling).
For the record I don't know if I have AS or not but I might and I'm sure I'm not NT. _________________ I hate phones. |
|
| Back to top |
|
SpongeBobRocksMao The SpongeBob Freak! :D


Joined: Oct 19, 2008 Age: 16 Posts: 2596 Location: SpongeBob's Pineapple (England really!)
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess I'd be lost without pictures. Although my mind kinda thinks more in cartoons, which is actually just pictures put together to form a moving drawing!  _________________ Who lives in a pineapple under the sea?
SpongeBobRocksMao!
Absorbent and yellow and porous is he!
SpongeBobRocksMao! |
|
| Back to top |
|
Wikan Yellow-bellied Woodpecker


Joined: Dec 10, 2008 Age: 22 Posts: 68 Location: Pécs
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I have to agree with this, but what about NVLD? It's supposed to be a part of autism, but isn't it quite the opposite of a depicting mind? |
|
| Back to top |
|
psychointegrator Tufted Titmouse


Joined: Oct 09, 2009 Age: 35 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:16 pm Post subject: Re: Thinking in pictures |
|
|
| Blindspot149 wrote: |
BUT I only just realised how dependent I actually am on pictures.
|
I would feel quite crippled without my visual thinking.
This post reminded me of situation long ago that might make sense to some.
My prior significant other and I dosed with ayahuasca (legally).
As usual, it's a complete and utter visual/audio/everything experience for me. It feels as if it is existence in another reality (while never leaving the brain).
She on the other hand reported that her entire experience was that of emotion. A pure emotional journey.
I can not comprehend what that means! Perhaps in a quasi-intellectual way it is possible to taste the smallest flavor from the meaning. Overall, I simply seem unable to understand without the visual (perhaps more to the "emotion,' dunno). |
|
| Back to top |
|
Sati Phoenix


Joined: Sep 03, 2009 Age: 24 Posts: 533
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JohnnyD017 wrote: | Just use your hands. Pretend youre acting out the drawings in the air as you talk. Thats what i would do
| Sati wrote: | | I would be lost - literally! - without pictures. I cannot follow verbal directions - I need to have a map to look at. |
That could be auditory processing disorder which I know a bit about, having been recently diagnosed with it... I think its a subtype called "Tolerance Fading Memory" and basically means you have poor working auditory memory. As long as your visual memory is fine, it *could* be a CAP thing. Of course you may already know this  |
Yep I do have CAPD. |
|
| Back to top |
|
beejay Pileated woodpecker


Joined: Sep 12, 2009 Age: 30 Posts: 195 Location: Wilmington, North Carolina
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think in pictures. It has always been easier to learn things via television and picture books rather than books with no pictures, and it is easier to learn any of those ways than to be simply told something. When I was a kid, I would always find the history/geography/science books with the most and largest pictures; when I went to checkout counter at the library (by the way, do those places exist anymore?), I would have a stack of coffee table books that weighed as much as I did.
And yes, I hate telephones; I hate them with a passion. I hate to talk to people on the phone, and I hate to hear a phone ring. _________________ My fellow Americans. As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball, but tonight I say, we must move forward, not backward, upward, not forward, and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom. |
|
| Back to top |
|
AmberEyes Not a label


Joined: Sep 27, 2008 Posts: 1471 Location: The Lands where the Jumblies live
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
There might be two different mind tracks or learning loops for interpreting the world:
-Observation
(Visual and sensory experiential, physical environment)
-Social interaction
(Verbal and social participation, social eye cues, perspective taking, social environment)
If one loop's weak, perhaps a person could concentrate more on developing the other loop to compensate.
Perhaps someone might see the world as a set of sensory experiences to observe and may be unaware that socialising is important. Perhaps, for them, socialising would be a lower priority or difficult because they'd process the surrounding physical environment before the social eye cues?
Perhaps they'd see the world as vast and full of objects and the nature, and humans as only a small part of this larger world.
That would be my guess anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|