Discussion
|
Articles
|
Blogs
|
Books
|
Contact Us
|
Chat
|
Shop
|
Search
Log in
|
Register
User Stats
Members:
23,674
Online Now:
544
People Online:
Visitors:
391
Members:
153
New Today:
23
New Yesterday:
28
Latest:
gfmom
Search
Web
WP.net
Support Wrong Planet Awareness!
Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index
->
Autism Politics, Activism, and Media Representation
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
[quote="Kaleido"][quote="sartresue"]D'Aut descriptions dictionary topic Dazzling Decisive Dedicated Deep Delightful Dependable Detailed Determined Devoted Dynamic decently depicted! :D[/quote] I like that list very much :D[/quote]
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Topic review
Author
Message
Pandora
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:16 am
Post subject:
I think he knows not to vote for it but I agree, disease is the worst and the most inaccurate of the D words in describing autism. I voted for difference but think it is often a disability to some degree.
lau
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 5:13 am
Post subject:
DiabloDave363 wrote:
is this lik a poll for a derogatory term for autism?
No. It is unlike such a thing.
DiabloDave363 wrote:
i think they all are. im more offended by disease though.
In that case, don't vote for it.
DiabloDave363
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:58 pm
Post subject:
is this lik a poll for a derogatory term for autism? i think they all are. im more offended by disease though.
traveller011212
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 10:22 pm
Post subject:
I like disability because by using a more neutral terms it feels like we are cheapening what we have gone through by declaring some PC term. Also, I want others to see how they themselves view AS.
Until society realizes that those of us with AS have a different view of the world, which is born with us and doesn't simply 'make us stronger in the end,' only shows us how tender this subject is to us. One thing I notice on this site is that people often quote popular research on autism and even some more esoteric work on AS, but few actually try to figure it out on their own.
Until a few years ago the only research has been by people who just want their number of publications to rise with no concern for the content. At around 2005 is when a great deal of research the disproves the previous research was released. This research centers around 'why' (the 'how to treat' and 'how to assimilate' research has been pretty good, but could use better 'why' to be more focused).
My personal favorite is a book that I can't find the reference to at the moment. It is written by a female councelor about Asperger's in relationships. She got some of it right, but much of it was a bit off base. She actually went so far as to say that every relationship is physically abusive.
cinderannie
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 12:38 am
Post subject:
I picked Distinction. After all, it isn't necessarily a bragging term. Something can be distinctly bad.
And I liked it better than "difference" because that's so overused.
Although I appreciate the honesty of those who admit the disability part of it. Sometimes it's seriously frustrating.
jamescampbell
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 12:49 pm
Post subject:
Vexcalibur wrote:
It is a dysfunction.
Quote:
A state of not functioning normally.
That's the first result for define:dysfunction.
but what is normal but a fiqment of our imagnation
earthmonkey
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 2:09 am
Post subject:
I voted disability, but it is also a difference, so ideally I would've voted for both. There are those on the spectrum who don't consider themselves disabled based upon honest perception of themselves, so difference seems more widely applicable. But, disability is particularly descriptive of the kinds of issues we face in the society at large.
hyper_alien
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 2:30 pm
Post subject:
i call it a disability caus it is.
Hector
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 8:50 pm
Post subject:
debility - too serious a word for the great majority of people with an AS diagnosis
deviance - makes me feel like such a rebel for something I had no control over. When people refer to homosexuals as "sexual deviants" I think there's a manipulative undercurrent at work that masks the real story. Similarly with people who are born with AS, which is everyone with AS
difference - doesn't serve to explain what makes me different
disease - misleading for a few obvious reasons
distinction - makes it seem like I should get some award for having AS. Flattering, but not terribly honest
disturbance - strikes me as being the consequence of a traumatic event, which is untrue
deficiency/disability/disorder/dysfunction - maybe
Lene
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 6:59 pm
Post subject:
I chose 'deviant' (because I like the word). If I had to add my own label, I'd make it 'delightfully deranged'...
kraken
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 12:34 pm
Post subject:
velodog wrote:
Kris94 wrote:
my teacher said i was 'defective' in front of the class once.
I got really upset and cried later.
i was only 7 at the time though.
That is a very crass way to treat a young child. My first post in this thread was the day before my Diagnosis.
Agreed there. There's no excuse for treating any child in this fashion. Ever.
kraken
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 12:33 pm
Post subject:
The World Health Organization defined disability in 1976 as,
“an existing difficulty in performing one or more activities which, in accordance with a person’s age, sex, and normative social role, are generally accepted as essential components of daily living, such as self-care, social relations, and economic activity"
I think the key phrase here is 'normative social role'. Given that part of an Asperger's diagnosis is clinically significant social impairment, I suspect that disability is the best word to use here. Asperger's is also linked to higher risk for depression and anxiety, if I am recalling correctly, which is consistent with research findings for physical disability.
I think it's important to keep in mind that disability is not in this context suggesting an inability to function, but rather greater difficulty in doing so that would be normatively expected. These very difficulties constitute many of the topics for discussion on this board, do they not?
Oh, and three cheers for sociology!
deathchibi
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 1:22 am
Post subject:
disease is the most wrong one.
and i have to find books about asperger/autism in the
"
diseases
" section in my "
public
library
" and that would
give people the wrong ideas on us.
normally_impaired
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 12:50 am
Post subject:
I never liked the words "disability" and "disorder", although I could see how at times "disability" could be used to describe Asperger's, there aren't many things I am completely unable to do as a result of it. I also have Tourette's Syndrome, and there isn't one single thing that I am completely unable to do as a result of it, so I don't call that a disability at all.
As for Disorder, I can't stand that term. "Dis" meaning "without", disorder means essentially the same as "Out of order", like a broken vending machine. Does AS mean that my brain is broken since it is not in order? I don't think so.
I also have ADD, which stands for "Attention Deficit Disorder", Attention Deficit means "without attention", or more literally "can't pay attention", so it's out of order. Essentially, the way that sounds, I would almost say that a vending machine with a broken selection button has ADD since it can't pay attention to your input and is thus out of order.
Claradoon
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 11:07 pm
Post subject:
I would have said 'difference' but I like 'distinction' better. It conveys a truth about Asperger's - different and good, both.
Forums ©
Wrong Planet
TM
Copyright 2004-2009,
Alex Plank
and
Yellow Sneaker Media, LLC
Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet
Subscribe:
Wrong Planet News
Wrong Planet Forums
Privacy Policy
Asperger's is not a disease