Discussion
|
Articles
|
Blogs
|
Books
|
Contact Us
|
Chat
|
Shop
|
Search
Log in
|
Register
User Stats
Members:
22,990
Online Now:
431
People Online:
Visitors:
287
Members:
144
New Today:
7
New Yesterday:
25
Latest:
Lyrathecat
Search
Web
WP.net
Support Wrong Planet Awareness!
Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index
->
Autism Politics, Activism, and Media Representation
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
[quote="Spokane_Girl"]I think it was okay of them to do. Urinating in places instead of in the bathroom is unsanitary so it's not okay, the fact he is a danger to other people because the fact he was nearly knocking down kids and elderlies, not okay. And fighting also not okay. I'm assuming they mean psychical fight. Everyone has every right to be safe at their own church. No one should be given the special privilege to act that way because of their autism or any other condition they have. But I don't see why they had to ban the mother too instead of the boy only.[/quote]
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Topic review
Author
Message
ToadOfSteel
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:20 pm
Post subject:
Everchanging wrote:
It'll be better for him in the long run not to be exposed to that mind-rotting filth.
If what you say is true, then my brain must be rotten down to the stem. Except, uh, it isn't...
Pandora
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 5:43 am
Post subject:
It might have been somewhat better if this lad and his mum could have sat right up the back of the church so if he started to get agitated, he could have been taken outside.
Spokane_Girl
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 10:46 pm
Post subject:
Going to church isn't an NT thing. It's a religious thing. Not all god believers go to church either. My boyfriend for example and my parents.
And preludeman, the church didn't bann him because he's autistic, they banned him because he was disruptive.
I had read an article on this and it said the mother said his behavior was exaggerated or lies. So who knows what he really did. My opinion stays the same if all that is really true about him and the mother was just saying that in self defense.
preludeman
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 10:27 pm
Post subject: My Two Cents.
And some of you wonder why I do not tell people in my church I have AS. I am not disruptive, yet it is bigoted for any faith to do this. They need to find the "root cause" , and try to help him.
Yupa
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 5:23 pm
Post subject:
greenblue wrote:
I hardly understand why people go the church
For comfort and meaning.
greenblue
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 4:17 pm
Post subject:
Spokane_Girl wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Giving it another thought, I see that the child is low-functioning, right? then very likely he would feel uncomfortable there, and the mother taking him to church is being HER responsability in that case, for everything that could happen, and well, is a low-functioning autistic person able to understand religion, in the first place?
Maybe. LFA isn't mental retardation who are autistic.
They have normal IQ's too or above normal but they just can't take care of themselves very well because they struggle with self help skills. Incontinence is common in LFA. Droopy and Amanda Baggs are en example of what LFA is. Droopy was the one who showed me LFA's aren't mentally retarded just by watching her videos on youtube. Yes there are some LFA's out there who are retarded. I have heard some people with autism also have mental retardation or people with mental retardation also have autism.
well, I didn't imply that was mental retardation, just that it seemed very likely that going to church and doing all the stuff they do there, would not make any sense for him, I mean, it must have something to do with social skills and stuff NTs take for granted, and understanding the concept of why people do this, and likely he would rather just do the things that he likes, alone. I hardly understand why people go the church
Probably he was being forced to go there because of the mother's beliefs, he seems unhappy there. It would have been better to bring the church to home, in a matter of speaking. Although, he probably wouldn't care or even like that.
CRACK
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 2:47 pm
Post subject:
I say: good for them for kicking out an obviously problematic individual rather than going limp-**** just because he is mentally handicapped. It isn't fair for the other churchgoers.
Everchanging
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 2:17 pm
Post subject:
It'll be better for him in the long run not to be exposed to that mind-rotting filth.
CockneyRebel
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 1:53 pm
Post subject:
Ticker wrote:
It's unfair to the other people to keep a monster like that at the church. If a person can't control their behaviors and they harm others or disrupt public functions then they have absolutely no business being with other people. Purposely urinating in public is repulsive and disgusting. The boy shouldn't be taken out of his home if he is that bad. And quite blaming nasty behavior as being an autistic problem because he obviously has more wrong with him them autism to act like that.
It's one thing if a person can't help such incontinence issues to the point of needing Depend's. From what I was reading, this boy was wetting himself on purpose, so that he wouldn't have to stay at the church. Those are two different things, all together. He didn't do it, all the time. Only when he was angry.
CockneyRebel
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 1:49 pm
Post subject:
Spokane_Girl wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Giving it another thought, I see that the child is low-functioning, right? then very likely he would feel uncomfortable there, and the mother taking him to church is being HER responsability in that case, for everything that could happen, and well, is a low-functioning autistic person able to understand religion, in the first place?
Maybe. LFA isn't mental retardation who are autistic.
They have normal IQ's too or above normal but they just can't take care of themselves very well because they struggle with self help skills. Incontinence is common in LFA. Droopy and Amanda Baggs are en example of what LFA is. Droopy was the one who showed me LFA's aren't mentally retarded just by watching her videos on youtube. Yes there are some LFA's out there who are retarded. I have heard some people with autism also have mental retardation or people with mental retardation also have autism.
Take a look at Sue Ruben, for example. She tested as mentally retarded, until she started using a keyboard to speak. After she learned to use the keyboard, she tested with an IQ of 136.
Spokane_Girl
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 9:07 pm
Post subject:
greenblue wrote:
Giving it another thought, I see that the child is low-functioning, right? then very likely he would feel uncomfortable there, and the mother taking him to church is being HER responsability in that case, for everything that could happen, and well, is a low-functioning autistic person able to understand religion, in the first place?
Maybe. LFA isn't mental retardation who are autistic.
They have normal IQ's too or above normal but they just can't take care of themselves very well because they struggle with self help skills. Incontinence is common in LFA. Droopy and Amanda Baggs are en example of what LFA is. Droopy was the one who showed me LFA's aren't mentally retarded just by watching her videos on youtube. Yes there are some LFA's out there who are retarded. I have heard some people with autism also have mental retardation or people with mental retardation also have autism.
Yupa
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 5:39 pm
Post subject: Re: Autistic banned from Mass
pinkiepie wrote:
I was watching CNN a few days ago, and I found some news that I thought might interest you:
A severely autistic 13-year old and his mom were banned from attending mass at their local church in Minnesota. The church's reason why they did what they did was that the boy was "disruptive and dangerous." Why? He fights, urinates, and almost knocked over children and elderly people. So they filed a restraining order against the boy and his mom so that none of those things would happen again.
So what do you think of that?
They didn't kick him out because he was autistic. They kicked him out because he did stupid, inappropriate stuff that everyone knows is wrong.
greenblue
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 5:05 pm
Post subject:
Giving it another thought, I see that the child is low-functioning, right? then very likely he would feel uncomfortable there, and the mother taking him to church is being HER responsability in that case, for everything that could happen, and well, is a low-functioning autistic person able to understand religion, in the first place?
Ticker
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 4:03 pm
Post subject:
It's unfair to the other people to keep a monster like that at the church. If a person can't control their behaviors and they harm others or disrupt public functions then they have absolutely no business being with other people. Purposely urinating in public is repulsive and disgusting. The boy shouldn't be taken out of his home if he is that bad. And quite blaming nasty behavior as being an autistic problem because he obviously has more wrong with him them autism to act like that.
GreatCeleryStalk
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 2:04 pm
Post subject:
slowmutant wrote:
Latin Masses sare pretty rarely said these days. Maybe they should try 19th century Spain.
I used to say them rather frequently, mostly because I enjoy them. They're becoming more common lately, from what I understand, and it is possible to find one in many larger diocese.
They're a pretty neat experience from a sensory perspective, provided they're not low masses.
Forums ©
Wrong Planet
TM
Copyright 2004-2008,
Alex Plank
and
Yellow Sneaker Media, LLC
Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet
Subscribe:
Wrong Planet News
Wrong Planet Forums
Privacy Policy
Asperger's is not a disease