Community Discussion Forum
Chat
Info and Media
Articles
Autism Talk TV
Books
Wiki
Contact Alex
Shop
Log in
|
Register
WP Members: > 70,000
New Today:
7
New Yesterday:
29
Wrong Planet Autism Forum Index
->
LGBT Discussion
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
[quote="AstroGeek"][quote="richardbenson"]I wasnt looking for anyone to agree with me on any definition dude. i was expressing my opinion on what i think true ghey really is and sombody had a flipout over it, thats all. i think alot more people would be accepting of homosexuals is they werent so far out there with there awful getup. i guess i'm just not a scene whore and dont understand the whole "culture" of it all[/quote] I don't see what qualifies you to set standards for what is "truly gay." Nor anyone else. It is not some society where one must perform some ritual before each meeting, or a political party where one must agree with the 10 Founding Principles. It is being attracted to someone of the same sex and being able to live with it (I am paraphrasing visagrunt's definition here, because I think it's a good one). Although personally I do not find really effeminate guys attractive, I have no problem with those that do. That would be as ridiculous as me (a musical theatre lover) having a problem with someone who loves [i]Cats [/i](which I think is stupid and plotless) and saying that they're not true musical fans because the show they really like doesn't have a story to it and shouldn't qualify as theatre. And why should homosexuals have to conform to societal norms to be accepted? If we did that then we'd all be in the closet. Really, that thinking is actually kind of sexist (this is an academic point--not an accusation). It shows an expectation for people to follow traditional gender roles. Men shouldn't be allowed to be flamboyant or dress up because it goes against what is seen as normal for a man to do? Perhaps this reaction just reflects my tendency to discard pragmatism in favour of ideals--I don't see why anyone should have to conform to social standards and expectations (unless they'd somehow be hurting someone--after all, we want people to all follow the same rules of the road). I'd reply to your statement that what we need to change are society's expectations to get acceptance, rather than change the people who are trying to be accepted. And by the way, I do not really fit any of the stereotypes you mention, so am not saying this out of self-defence. I am not overly masculine, but certainly not feminine. I spend as little time as possible choosing my clothes, never buy any expensive clothing (it goes on my list of "frivolous" things) unless it's expensive because it's made to last, half the time forget to comb my hair in the morning, have a very traditional taste in décor, am extremely into science, and am fairly introverted (like to call myself an opinionated introvert). About the only way that I fit gay stereotypes is that I love show tunes. And ABBA, which isn't normal for a straight guy. Oh, and I'm extremely neat, but that comes more from my AS and a borderline obsessive compulsive personality than anything. I might not be anything like a gay stereotype, and they might not be people I'd be well matched to be best friends with, but that doesn't mean I think less of them.[/quote]
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Topic review
Author
Message
AstroGeek
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:38 pm
Post subject:
richardbenson wrote:
I wasnt looking for anyone to agree with me on any definition dude. i was expressing my opinion on what i think true ghey really is and sombody had a flipout over it, thats all.
i think alot more people would be accepting of homosexuals is they werent so far out there with there awful getup.
i guess i'm just not a scene whore and dont understand the whole "culture" of it all
I don't see what qualifies you to set standards for what is "truly gay." Nor anyone else. It is not some society where one must perform some ritual before each meeting, or a political party where one must agree with the 10 Founding Principles. It is being attracted to someone of the same sex and being able to live with it (I am paraphrasing visagrunt's definition here, because I think it's a good one). Although personally I do not find really effeminate guys attractive, I have no problem with those that do. That would be as ridiculous as me (a musical theatre lover) having a problem with someone who loves
Cats
(which I think is stupid and plotless) and saying that they're not true musical fans because the show they really like doesn't have a story to it and shouldn't qualify as theatre.
And why should homosexuals have to conform to societal norms to be accepted? If we did that then we'd all be in the closet. Really, that thinking is actually kind of sexist (this is an academic point--not an accusation). It shows an expectation for people to follow traditional gender roles. Men shouldn't be allowed to be flamboyant or dress up because it goes against what is seen as normal for a man to do? Perhaps this reaction just reflects my tendency to discard pragmatism in favour of ideals--I don't see why anyone should have to conform to social standards and expectations (unless they'd somehow be hurting someone--after all, we want people to all follow the same rules of the road). I'd reply to your statement that what we need to change are society's expectations to get acceptance, rather than change the people who are trying to be accepted.
And by the way, I do not really fit any of the stereotypes you mention, so am not saying this out of self-defence. I am not overly masculine, but certainly not feminine. I spend as little time as possible choosing my clothes, never buy any expensive clothing (it goes on my list of "frivolous" things) unless it's expensive because it's made to last, half the time forget to comb my hair in the morning, have a very traditional taste in décor, am extremely into science, and am fairly introverted (like to call myself an opinionated introvert). About the only way that I fit gay stereotypes is that I love show tunes. And ABBA, which isn't normal for a straight guy. Oh, and I'm extremely neat, but that comes more from my AS and a borderline obsessive compulsive personality than anything. I might not be anything like a gay stereotype, and they might not be people I'd be well matched to be best friends with, but that doesn't mean I think less of them.
DiabloDave363
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:11 pm
Post subject:
im straight and i bought a scarf the other day...and not for the cold, i just think it looks good on me. stereotypes suck. i mean, one day i wore brown cutoff shorts and a tight purple shirt. my dad and sister said i look gay. it reallllly hurt, not tht they called me gay, but tht they just said tht in the first place...
PIC OF MY SCARF
TrzkT
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:54 pm
Post subject:
I'm a fairly masculine gay male,
I think some guys are just feminine and some girls are just macho, and there are people like me somewhere in between.
I have a gay coworker, and he's completely opposite of me, he's outgoing and flamboyant lol... and I enjoy him, even though we barely understand each-other, I just appreciate it, and try to be that way with everyone.
I've never paid much attention to stereotype (unless someone is stereotyping me or someone else) , because I know these are stupid generalizations. I mean, I don't operate on stereotypes, I try to pretend they don't exist.
I would have to agree the parades and glitter and rainbows and all that kind of brings these stereotypes upon us, but it would be wrong to stifle that...imo.
I love the color gray, but I wouldn't have that in the place of the rainbow flag.
In a way, the wildness does strike a contrast to lgbt people in their daily lives, that I think could probably be beneficial to us as a minority.... perhaps...
Maybe gay pride is partly a show put on to get a rise out of the sourpusses that want to get upset about it? *shrugs*
anyways, I hate stereotypes, they really suck,
but I do think a lot of people are changing their opinions of lgbt people, and there is nothing wrong with a guy being flamboyant or a girl being macho, people are themselves and should be that way.
I do know when I see someone wearing a rainbow, it really brightens my day.
just my thoughts
somewhat random, somewhat relevant
Melpomene
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 4:09 am
Post subject:
I dislike the gay stereotype and people who adhere to it on purpose. A friend of a friend is an out of the closet gay male and he speaks in a very effeminate voice and is always flipping his hair back. However, when he's had a couple of drinks, his voice drops a whole octave and leaves his hair alone. I wonder why he feels he has to put on an act of sorts - we accept and respect his sexuality either way, and he doesn't need to convince us.
What I hate even more is the bias against people who sometimes act in a stereotypically gay way or have 'gay' interests. Take my boyfriend, who wears skinny jeans and decorative scarves and calls all of his friends 'sweetheart'. You wouldn't believe how many people have asked me if I know I'm dating a gay guy, and when he's going to come out of the closet (FYI: He did several years ago, as bisexual). They don't seem to realise how hurtful that is, nor how closed-minded it makes them seem. Men especially seem to be so scared of being seen as gay that they will do anything to avoid being associated with 'gayness'. I wonder why. A bisexual man wearing skinny jeans who wants to hug you don't immediately suck you into a big gay vortex, now does it?
Julia_the_Great
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:08 pm
Post subject:
Who doesn't? I really wish I didn't have trouble with people not believing me when I come out because I like some girly things.
Zen
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:55 pm
Post subject:
I'm about as far from a scene whore as you can get, but I don't feel that I'm more or less gay than anyone else who is attracted to males (except perhaps those who are also attracted to women
).
richardbenson
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:00 pm
Post subject:
I wasnt looking for anyone to agree with me on any definition dude. i was expressing my opinion on what i think true ghey really is and sombody had a flipout over it, thats all.
i think alot more people would be accepting of homosexuals is they werent so far out there with there awful getup.
i guess i'm just not a scene whore and dont understand the whole "culture" of it all
visagrunt
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:44 pm
Post subject:
richardbenson wrote:
A true gay guy would be attracted to a femmy guy just because he has the same parts? how about no. well, i can only speak for myself
(i'm bisexual and i find femminie guys unattractive as all hell) so where does this leave your opinion now?
At what point did we ever agree on the definitioin of a, "true gay guy?"
I think it is highly presumptuous to lay out rules about what does and does not qualify as "truly gay." As far as I am concerned, if you are sexually attracted primarily to people of the same sex, then you are a homosexual. If you life your life within the context of your homosexual orientation (i.e. no hiding behind a cover marriage with a woman), then you qualify as gay.
It does not matter a whit whether the men that you are attracted to are twinks, drag queens, femmes, leathermen, bears, cubs, gym bunnies, show queens or just the boy next door. Your attraction to men is, perforce, going to be different from mine, and each of ours is going to be different from the gay man down the street. Each of us is just as much a, "true gay guy," as the next one.
Quote:
leave a message after the tone. beep...
that and i'm very open minded. so dont worry about my replys on here. if they were offensive or out of line i'm shure i'd hear about it
I havent made friends kissing ass or being myself. so now i just dont care,
i'm confidant (i hope before i passaway, someone will really enjoy my company however.)
I would be happier if your claim to open mindedness were backed up with statements of opinion that reflected open mindedness.
I do not for a moment suggest that there is anything wrong with what you find attractive and what you find unattractive. But I do suggest that there is something wrong when you call into question the validity of what other men find attractive by suggesting that those men are not, "true gay guys."
richardbenson
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Post subject:
A true gay guy would be attracted to a femmy guy just because he has the same parts? how about no. well, i can only speak for myself
(i'm bisexual and i find femminie guys unattractive as all hell) so where does this leave your opinion now?
leave a message after the tone. beep...
that and i'm very open minded. so dont worry about my replys on here. if they were offensive or out of line i'm shure i'd hear about it
I havent made friends kissing ass or being myself. so now i just dont care,
i'm confidant (i hope before i passaway, someone will really enjoy my company however.)
Aerith
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:58 am
Post subject:
richardbenson wrote:
How am I contradicting myself? yes a homosexual is one who is inlove with the same sex, what I am saying is if you are a homosexual
(a true one :wink: ) you wouldnt be attracted to a boy who acts like a girl, and vice versa.
According to the dictionary definition (the one I gave is equivalent to nearly every other dictionary definition one would find) the true homosexual would be attracted to men who have the male genitalia, regardless of whether they act like what you think a man should act like or not. A true gay guy would be attracted to the femmy man as well.
richardbenson wrote:
I know what gender is dude give me a break, you're thinking of transgenderd people. (wich can be homosexual) but i'm saying a
true
homo isnt a woman trapped in a mans body or a man trapped in a womans body. also i've seen very masculine guys like dudes like themselves and very girly girl girls all up on girl.
I'm arguing that a gay man who acts effeminate is not necessarily transgendered. Out of the dozens of effeminate gay men I've known, I only know of one who actively felt wrong in her body. The rest are happy with having a male body and the respective genitalia. They're not women trapped in male bodies.
richardbenson wrote:
you dont have to be a person with the wrong parts inlove, you can have the same parts and be totally in love thats my definition of homosexuality
Cool, but your definition is, admittedly a minority. It's also rather...vague.
richardbenson wrote:
I know, so black and white! but its the only way i roll
It's not the only way if you put some effort into being open-minded. It's not that difficult.
Aside from that, even if you refuse to be open-minded, please, at least try not to be offensive in your ignorance. You won't make many friends at that way...
richardbenson
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:34 pm
Post subject:
richardbenson wrote:
Supporting a stereotype? Hardly. The whole definition of homosexual is liking the same sex, which means girls like girls and boys like boys, In my opinion its not girls who act like boys and boys who act like girls. As I've said before if I want to go out with a girl I'll do that one, not go out with a dude who acts like a girl.
Aerith wrote:
I reiterate that you're confusing sex with gender yet again. Additionally, in the process of doing so, you manage to, seemingly unwittingly, contradict yourself.
According to my trusty Funk & Wagnalls, a homosexual is one who is "attracted by or in love with persons of the same sex." Gender, that is how they act, is not in question. By this definition, a
true
homosexual would be one who is attracted to only one's own sex, regardless of how they act, dress, or whatever else.
On another note, I'd like to politely ask you two consider the fact that not everyone fits into the standard binary system of gender. Some men really are paragons of masculinity. The same goes for some women. However, most people fluctuate somewhere in between the two gender extremes.
How am I contradicting myself? yes a homosexual is one who is inlove with the same sex, what I am saying is if you are a homosexual
(a true one
) you wouldnt be attracted to a boy who acts like a girl, and vice versa.
I know what gender is dude give me a break, you're thinking of transgenderd people. (wich can be homosexual) but i'm saying a
true
homo isnt a woman trapped in a mans body or a man trapped in a womans body. also i've seen very masculine guys like dudes like themselves and very girly girl girls all up on girl.
you dont have to be a person with the wrong parts inlove, you can have the same parts and be totally in love thats my definition of homosexuality
I know, so black and white! but its the only way i roll~
signed, The pig.
Aerith
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:16 pm
Post subject:
Zen wrote:
Another thing is that it tends to be those loud minorities who are the ones who make change happen.
Agreed.
richardbenson wrote:
Aerith, life not planned out is chaos. I like for things to have at least some order.
"Different strokes for different folks." That's all I can say.
richardbenson wrote:
Supporting a stereotype? Hardly. The whole definition of homosexual is liking the same sex, which means girls like girls and boys like boys, In my opinion its not girls who act like boys and boys who act like girls. As I've said before if I want to go out with a girl I'll do that one, not go out with a dude who acts like a girl.
I reiterate that you're confusing sex with gender yet again. Additionally, in the process of doing so, you manage to, seemingly unwittingly, contradict yourself.
According to my trusty Funk & Wagnalls, a homosexual is one who is "attracted by or in love with persons of the same sex." Gender, that is how they act, is not in question. By this definition, a
true
homosexual would be one who is attracted to only one's own sex, regardless of how they act, dress, or whatever else.
On another note, I'd like to politely ask you two consider the fact that not everyone fits into the standard binary system of gender. Some men really are paragons of masculinity. The same goes for some women. However, most people fluctuate somewhere in between the two gender extremes.
richardbenson
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:03 pm
Post subject:
Aerith, life not planned out is chaos. I like for things to have atleast some order. supporting a sterotype? hardly. the whole difinition of homosexual is liking the same sex, wich means girls like girls and boys like boys, In my opinion its not girls who act like boys and boys who act like girls. as i've said before if i want to go out with a girl I'll do that one, not go out with a dude who acts like a girl
Zen
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 6:36 pm
Post subject:
Another thing is that it tends to be those loud minorities who are the ones who make change happen.
Aerith
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 11:50 am
Post subject:
Zen wrote:
visagrunt wrote:
I find it ironic that gay men (in particular) can be so intolerant of difference.
Now, I grant you that the drag queens, the femme bois and the leathermen all create extreme images that tend to distance us from the mainstream, but I don't see that as a bad thing. After all, the contrast with the stereotypes serves to "normalize" GLBT people in the community.
Agreed totally.
So you want to be the type who blends in with everyone else? Good for you. So do I. But I can't dictate how anyone else chooses to identify or express themselves any more than I want them to do the same for me.
I don't find it ironic that any particular group would be intolerant of difference. If they'd be tolerant, they wouldn't be a very cohesive group.
Another factor to take note of is that the loudest groups (figuratively) are not necessarily the largest groups, and, hence, not necessarily representative of an entire population. This is true in general. It's true across individual criteria such as gender, race, sexuality, culture/nationalism, politics, and nearly everything.
A third factor is that:
Quote:
"Stereotypes wouldn't be stereotypes if they weren't true."
Again, stereotypes tend to feature the characteristics of the loudest groups. Hence, taking the gay community as an example, the lithping, limp-wristed, meth-addicted bunch have the largest media presence, both due to population, attention garnered, and general...loudness. This group outshines all others, much like the sun does to all other celestial objects at midday. Thus, the entire population gets stereotyped via the characteristics of that group.
richardbenson wrote:
those ghey parades and flags are exactly why i never go. most homosexuals bring grief on themselves with that silly getup, like its ok to be proud of who you are and all but leave your G-string and glitter at home
Also i never undestood likeing the same sex but having them act the opposite sex.
it kind of defeats the purpose to me, in being a true homo.
First of all, the parades, the glitter, and the flags are important to some people. If you can't understand it, at least be respectful of it. At the very least, you'll make more friends that way.
Second, you're stipulating that sex is directly related to gender. Just because you are cis-gendered does not mean that everyone else should be as such.
As for purpose, there shouldn't be one. By defining one and implying that it is noble, you are, in essence, supporting a stereotype. One of your own, of course, but nonetheless a stereotype.
Only by being accepting and open-minded can one break free from stereotypes and stereotyping others. If that's your intent, that is.
Forums ©
Read more Articles on Wrong Planet
Wrong Planet is a Registered Trademark.
Copyright 2004-2013,
Wrong Planet, LLC and Alex Plank
. Alex does
public speaking for Autism.
Advertise on Wrong Planet
Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet
|
Privacy Policy
Subscribe:
Wrong Planet News
Wrong Planet Forums