Community Discussion Forum
Chat
Info and Media
Articles
Autism Talk TV
Books
Wiki
Contact Alex
Shop
Log in
|
Register
WP Members: > 75,000
New Today:
26
New Yesterday:
34
Wrong Planet Autism Forum Index
->
Autism Politics, Activism, and Media Representation
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
[quote="DW_a_mom"][quote="Nekaru"]The hearing to fight the restraining order is this Friday. Which is why I'm asking. Is it possible she's already had his rights removed for when he turns 18 (as in declared him incompetent before he even turns 18 ) and that's why she's asking for a 3 year renewal on it. Or is she just asking 3 years in hope that the judge will overlook the fact he'll be 18 next year? Is there anyway of knowing ahead of time?[/quote] I think you need to remove your focus from the restraining order, and keep your mind on where and if you can help your friend regardless of a restraining order, within the legal parameters exisring for you with or without such an order. Your focus on that factor seems like a dead end to me. I'm pretty sure there are ways to remove restraining orders after they are in place, btw, so you can afford to let some time pass. I am also pretty sure you would have a right to make an appearance in court when she tries to extend the order to plead your side by apologizing for what came across as rash or erratic behavior (she couldn't have gotten the order unless that was the case) and reiterate that the only reason you took any of those actions was because you were genuinely concerned for your friend. But you aren't going to be effective with that unless you start approaching all of this smarter. What I'm suggesting is that you stop panicking and start doing. Don't ask us what the law is, do some research and find out what it is. Doing that will show to the court you are responsible and rational. Do I think the mom could have finalized a guardianship this far ahead of his 18th birthday? No, I do not, but she will certainly have been working on the related documents. Getting the result you want in court is never a matter of showing up in court and providing a spur of the moment emotional appeal. It always requires preparation and an understanding of the law. We aren't lawyers; we can't do that for you (and even if we were, we wouldn't for a variety of practical reasons). If you want to get anything straightened out in this you need preparation and an understanding of the law. Which is why I suggested you do your homework. Demonstrate through mature and carefully thought out actions that you are interested in your friend's welfare first and foremost, and demonstrate that you are no threat by acting like a responsible adult, doing your homework, and going through the proper channels with well prepared petitions. Plus, the family cannot harass you if you are in a law library doing research, or quietly writing up everything you know that could prove competence. You'll remove some of the power they have over you. Right now they know every move you are going to make and every worry you have because you've published it, and that gives them power. If you genuinely believe they are not working in your friend's best interest, then you need to take some of your own power back by getting your own homework done. To be honest, I have no idea at all if you have any chance at the "win" you want, but I still think the process I've suggested is worth it, because if nothing else it will help you get your head on straight about what has happened and what could happen. IMHO. Also ... If trying to dig into the legal research is too overwhelming, see if you can find a local legal aid organization. They might be able to help you with the basic process questions. I know that nothing I'm suggesting is easy, but nothing about empowerment ever is.[/quote]
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Topic review
Author
Message
munch15a
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:46 am
Post subject:
DW mom your advice seems to be good as Australian I know nothing about the legal system there so will defer to yourself as a simply practicality thing he may be competent but un aware of his options or he may be unable to take care of himself but because of the treatment he has goten from his family in which case he does need a career but a inderpended one how when you can have no contact with him will he get this.
but in any case you need to be smart this problem will be fixed in time your job is to make it less time though being smart and not to do anything stupid.
and I agree there is nothing you can do right now you should be speading your energis into fighting for when he becomes 18
Nekaru
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 11:01 pm
Post subject:
Sorry for no reply but there's been no word from him or anyone around him. I've half given up as there's nothing I can do to help him except wait here till April11th when he turns 18. If he doesn't contact then or give some sign of his breakaway I don't know what to do, it could possibly mean his mother won and broke him. I hope to god not, but what is there left to do?
Nurylon
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:01 am
Post subject:
He goes to school. His mother pays (with his SSI money) for him to go to a private special-needs school, where his classmates have all been told not to lend him a cell phone or anything he can communicate with. His access to the phone and the internet is also taken away t home, and he is watched 24/7 by "caregivers". The crap was stepped up since he tried to communicate he wanted out of the situation. I imagine if he wrote down what to say in court, the "caregivers" would be able to read it, and might take away his pen and paper.
Stefan10
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:06 am
Post subject:
I have a few questions, which you might or might not have answered already, although either way I cannot tell:
- What are her motives for isolating him(has he just been recently diagnosed?)
- If he has always been diagnosed, then how did he make friends and meet people? I'd assume she would always have had him isolated, if her motives were caused by his autism. If not, then what initiated the isolation? Apparently there was a time when he was able to have friends right?
- Does he not go to school? If not, is he home-schooled? Has this always been the case?
- Can he take care of himself? If so, I don't see how his mother can get him labeled as incompetent unless her sole case is his autism. If that is the reasoning then I'd assume an impartial psychologist or psychiatrist will make this assessment, and if he is truly able to live as a self-sufficient adult then there is no purpose to label him as incompetent just because his mother(when he turns 18 years old, she'll be a noncustodial parent) says so.
- Where do his other family members stand? I'm sure if his mother is truly doing something wrong somebody else would interfere, correct?
I'm sorry if this seems a bit probing, but I think you were vague when describing the setting and the entire context hasn't been revealed.
The following is what I would do in such a situation:
It seems to me that the authorities can play it off as an internal family matter for now, but once your friend gains that small period of freedom to organize things I'm sure he'll have more power in self-determination. Somehow it must be communicated to him, so that he may effectively utilize his self-sufficiency(assuming he has it; if not then there is nothing you or he can or should do) and freedom to build a case against a declaration of incompetence from his mother. I don't think any court will automatically assign such an important, life-changing, label without reason to, and the more indecisive the court is due to a strong case from your friend's side the higher the chance he will gain freedom as an adult. Lastly, make a case that his autism doesn't make him incompetent, if that is true. Educate them about autism. It might be a matter of ignorance and an assumption on the deterministic official's part that since he has autism, he MUST be incompetent. Make it clear that is certainly not true. I hope, although I don't know at all, that he has enough time between his 18th birthday and whenever his mother plans to take him to court so that he may organize his thoughts and abilities without intrusions and hindrances, intentionally and unintentionally, from others. Any self-sufficient person should be able to do this, even if it is much harder for somebody with such a disability. The reward of freedom is far too great not to put the extra work in. It sounds to me, from all of the information available, that your friend isn't very active in determining his own future. Somehow he needs to try more. No adult should have that much control over another self-sufficient adult, regardless of their relations. Currently, the most important and only thing he can do is prepare. Once he turns 18, he should swiftly and with a planned, level, and mature plan take action and develop a case against a label of incompetence. It shouldn't be too hard if he isn't severely disabled, which I assumingly infer from your label of "high functioning."
Also make sure the definition of incompetence is clear, and utilize that. Just because somebody isn't able to provide for themselves doesn't mean it is due to an inherent or developed mental disability. I'd use that as a counterargument if their reasoning for incompetence doesn't have any substance to prove it is caused by his autism rather than correlated with his autism.
In the end however, I am not qualified and that is only what I would do. A lawyer whom is educated of autism and know your friend well enough to assess his abilities will be the best resource and tool to succeed.
Nurylon
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 7:15 pm
Post subject:
DW said "They are not the enemy, they are his family." I beg to differ. The fact that they are his family makes it even more revolting that they are doing this. They sure ACT like the enemy. If it looks like an smells like it is , cuz I'll be damned before I taste it. They are not his true family if thye treat him like that. A family protects you. The word "family" should mean "people who care and know you an know and help meet your needs and you do the same for them". It shouldn't mean "people who have some of your DNA whose mercy you must live under".
younginflavor18
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:08 am
Post subject:
After reading this, I feel sorry for your friend having to endure 17 years of abuse from his mom. His mother isn't fit to be a parent because of her abuse and neglect towards him. Most mothers of autistic children would never abuse, neglect, and isolate their children from the outside world. I hope that you do whatever you can to help your friend on his behalf.
mooniestar
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 2:38 am
Post subject:
It's been well over 2 months... is this over? Is this solved? It makes me worried. Doesn't anyone else feel worried?
_Book_Worm_
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 1:49 am
Post subject:
It sounds like she has munchausen by proxy syndrome.
AspieRoss
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2011 4:19 pm
Post subject: He can sue her for Emancipation!
EMANCIPATION - The legal term used to describe the point at which parents are no longer responsible for their children and children are no longer answerable to their parents. This usually occurs at the age of 18. However, emancipation may sometimes occur earlier if and when the parent and child have agreed to live independently, the child has joined the military, the child has married, or a court has granted an appropriate petition to declare a child emancipated. Emancipation also affects a child's legal rights and responsibilities.
The child must sue the parent to terminate parental rights and gain emancipation, essentially they are declared an adult.
TheygoMew
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:24 pm
Post subject:
It doesn't sound like the mother is autistic. Possibly a personality disorder.
She didn't wear sunglasses in the court over sensory issues, she wore them out of being paranoid. She's very manipulative and controlling. She's stunting him and not caring if she hurts him.
I have no good advice except hopefully he can defend himself somehow. Does he have family elsewhere that he can go to? I've had to leave my own family who were abusive.
DW_a_mom
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 6:37 pm
Post subject:
Nekaru wrote:
So... if someone NOT ME, or affiliated with me in any way but is acting upon their own interest (he has other friends) was there the exact day he turns 18? (In Cali) and went to pick him up and take him away from her house and he WANTED to go. (Remember he wants to escape her... if she hasn't totally changed his thinking by then.) Would it be kidnapping? Or is there ANY charge she could press against the person picking him up? Since she won't have been able to declare him incompetent at that time.
I think if it happens like that it'd give him more of a chance to fight her when she petitions it, because he'll be 1. Away from the house and have access to legal information and help by that friend. And 2. Be able to get a lawyer and prove he's not incompetent. Also 3. Be able to choose his own psychiatrist to be evaluated by instead of that one that's under her pay.
Yay or nay plan?
Running away is never a good plan. He isn't going to win in court just by not physically being there; it would be taken as a huge strike against him, and probably all of you. What you have suggested isn't what responsible, mature people DO. Right now ALL of you need to act mature and responsible, and not as if you are living in some spy fantasy novel. His family are not his captors, even if looks that way from your descriptions. They are his family.
He has EVERY RIGHT to meet with a lawyer before his 18th birthday and be prepared for this hearing. If he hasn't had that ability, all he will have to do at the first hearing should be to SAY so, "I challenge this and have not been allowed access to my own representation."
If his friends want to arrange for an attorney to contact him on his birthday, in case he hasn't been able to meet with an attorney on his own, that can probably be done, and the lawyer will be able to insist on a PRIVATE meeting, assuming the friend agrees, and would be able to make the arguments in my last paragraph in court on his behalf.
Glad to hear you are doing research. Keep going, see if you can find what factors have weighed in whose favors in these types of hearings.
Gedrene
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:42 pm
Post subject:
Nekaru wrote:
Lost the hearing, judge made the RO for 3 years. ( I think she was against me due to that appeal I started, since it made her look bad. Since she kinda went from nice and fair in the first hearing, to a grade a b**** within the 6 months of the RO.)
Sorry about not getting back to everyone sooner, was kinda depressed and torn up over that...
But I've been researching like DW_a_mom said, and I think I found some good news...
First of all, yes, the mother did mention she'd try to declare him unfit to take care of himself in the court hearing. That was her and her lawyers response to me saying it'd make no sense to make it for 3 years if in 6 months when he turns 18, he could simply take himself off it...
But through research I found,
http://www.disabilityrightsca.org/pubs/500501.pdf
She CANNOT declare him incompetent before he is 18. She has to do it when he's 18 or it's a restraining of rights before the child reaches the age of majority (doesn't allow them to prove the parent wrong.)
So... if someone NOT ME, or affiliated with me in any way but is acting upon their own interest (he has other friends) was there the exact day he turns 18? (In Cali) and went to pick him up and take him away from her house and he WANTED to go. (Remember he wants to escape her... if she hasn't totally changed his thinking by then.) Would it be kidnapping? Or is there ANY charge she could press against the person picking him up? Since she won't have been able to declare him incompetent at that time.
I think if it happens like that it'd give him more of a chance to fight her when she petitions it, because he'll be 1. Away from the house and have access to legal information and help by that friend. And 2. Be able to get a lawyer and prove he's not incompetent. Also 3. Be able to choose his own psychiatrist to be evaluated by instead of that one that's under her pay.
Yay or nay plan?
Yea. This is clearly unfair.
number2
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:16 pm
Post subject:
When I was 14 I was phyically abused by a family member, I was too afarid to tell anyone because I thought I was the cause of all the problems and I slowly became more angry inside.
Nekaru
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 7:03 am
Post subject:
Lost the hearing, judge made the RO for 3 years. ( I think she was against me due to that appeal I started, since it made her look bad. Since she kinda went from nice and fair in the first hearing, to a grade a b**** within the 6 months of the RO.)
Sorry about not getting back to everyone sooner, was kinda depressed and torn up over that...
But I've been researching like DW_a_mom said, and I think I found some good news...
First of all, yes, the mother did mention she'd try to declare him unfit to take care of himself in the court hearing. That was her and her lawyers response to me saying it'd make no sense to make it for 3 years if in 6 months when he turns 18, he could simply take himself off it...
But through research I found,
http://www.disabilityrightsca.org/pubs/500501.pdf
She CANNOT declare him incompetent before he is 18. She has to do it when he's 18 or it's a restraining of rights before the child reaches the age of majority (doesn't allow them to prove the parent wrong.)
So... if someone NOT ME, or affiliated with me in any way but is acting upon their own interest (he has other friends) was there the exact day he turns 18? (In Cali) and went to pick him up and take him away from her house and he WANTED to go. (Remember he wants to escape her... if she hasn't totally changed his thinking by then.) Would it be kidnapping? Or is there ANY charge she could press against the person picking him up? Since she won't have been able to declare him incompetent at that time.
I think if it happens like that it'd give him more of a chance to fight her when she petitions it, because he'll be 1. Away from the house and have access to legal information and help by that friend. And 2. Be able to get a lawyer and prove he's not incompetent. Also 3. Be able to choose his own psychiatrist to be evaluated by instead of that one that's under her pay.
Yay or nay plan?
DW_a_mom
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:54 am
Post subject:
Nekaru wrote:
The hearing to fight the restraining order is this Friday. Which is why I'm asking. Is it possible she's already had his rights removed for when he turns 18 (as in declared him incompetent before he even turns 18 ) and that's why she's asking for a 3 year renewal on it. Or is she just asking 3 years in hope that the judge will overlook the fact he'll be 18 next year?
Is there anyway of knowing ahead of time?
I think you need to remove your focus from the restraining order, and keep your mind on where and if you can help your friend regardless of a restraining order, within the legal parameters exisring for you with or without such an order. Your focus on that factor seems like a dead end to me. I'm pretty sure there are ways to remove restraining orders after they are in place, btw, so you can afford to let some time pass.
I am also pretty sure you would have a right to make an appearance in court when she tries to extend the order to plead your side by apologizing for what came across as rash or erratic behavior (she couldn't have gotten the order unless that was the case) and reiterate that the only reason you took any of those actions was because you were genuinely concerned for your friend. But you aren't going to be effective with that unless you start approaching all of this smarter.
What I'm suggesting is that you stop panicking and start doing. Don't ask us what the law is, do some research and find out what it is. Doing that will show to the court you are responsible and rational. Do I think the mom could have finalized a guardianship this far ahead of his 18th birthday? No, I do not, but she will certainly have been working on the related documents. Getting the result you want in court is never a matter of showing up in court and providing a spur of the moment emotional appeal. It always requires preparation and an understanding of the law. We aren't lawyers; we can't do that for you (and even if we were, we wouldn't for a variety of practical reasons).
If you want to get anything straightened out in this you need preparation and an understanding of the law. Which is why I suggested you do your homework.
Demonstrate through mature and carefully thought out actions that you are interested in your friend's welfare first and foremost, and demonstrate that you are no threat by acting like a responsible adult, doing your homework, and going through the proper channels with well prepared petitions.
Plus, the family cannot harass you if you are in a law library doing research, or quietly writing up everything you know that could prove competence. You'll remove some of the power they have over you. Right now they know every move you are going to make and every worry you have because you've published it, and that gives them power. If you genuinely believe they are not working in your friend's best interest, then you need to take some of your own power back by getting your own homework done.
To be honest, I have no idea at all if you have any chance at the "win" you want, but I still think the process I've suggested is worth it, because if nothing else it will help you get your head on straight about what has happened and what could happen.
IMHO.
Also ... If trying to dig into the legal research is too overwhelming, see if you can find a local legal aid organization. They might be able to help you with the basic process questions.
I know that nothing I'm suggesting is easy, but nothing about empowerment ever is.
Forums ©
Read more Articles on Wrong Planet
Wrong Planet is a Registered Trademark.
Copyright 2004-2013,
Wrong Planet, LLC and Alex Plank
. Alex does
public speaking for Autism.
Advertise on Wrong Planet
Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet
|
Privacy Policy
Subscribe:
Wrong Planet News
Wrong Planet Forums