Community Discussion Forum
Chat
Info and Media
Articles
Autism Talk TV
Books
Wiki
Contact Alex
Shop
Log in
|
Register
WP Members: > 70,000
New Today:
8
New Yesterday:
25
Wrong Planet Autism Forum Index
->
Autism Politics, Activism, and Media Representation
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
[quote="Xelebes"]I believe that the second article might have some truth to it. There may be doctors out there who are diagnosing with either the wrong incentives (Insurance Company A will not pay for further treatments, or will not pay treatments over B amount of dollars, if the patient does not have a Class C diagnosis,) or there is someone exploiting the vague criteria given for Asperger's. Autism Spectrum requires you to have noticable neurological development problems. This includes physical impairments, either with dexterity (ex. building, tying, writing) or with gross motor movements (ex. running, jumping, balancing) and cognitive impairments. If this person does not have those clear distinctions, then that person may just have a social disability (schizoid, NVLD, sociophobia.) Right now the DSM-IV-TR is too vague with respect to this. DSM-V does not look like it is going to be much better. ICD-10 looks to have better guidelines.[/quote]
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Topic review
Author
Message
Longshanks
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:23 pm
Post subject:
I would trust Mamoud Achmadinajab before I would trust the NY Times.
Xelebes
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:58 pm
Post subject:
tall-p wrote:
I thought it was odd that one of the authors, the psychiatrist, mentioned "Peter Pan Syndrome." That "disorder" is not in the DSM.
Peter Pan syndromes are a class of syndromes where the person is developmentally challenged from entering normal adulthood. This includes Autism, Williams and Downs.
Xelebes
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:42 pm
Post subject:
I believe that the second article might have some truth to it. There may be doctors out there who are diagnosing with either the wrong incentives (Insurance Company A will not pay for further treatments, or will not pay treatments over B amount of dollars, if the patient does not have a Class C diagnosis,) or there is someone exploiting the vague criteria given for Asperger's. Autism Spectrum requires you to have noticable neurological development problems. This includes physical impairments, either with dexterity (ex. building, tying, writing) or with gross motor movements (ex. running, jumping, balancing) and cognitive impairments. If this person does not have those clear distinctions, then that person may just have a social disability (schizoid, NVLD, sociophobia.) Right now the DSM-IV-TR is too vague with respect to this. DSM-V does not look like it is going to be much better. ICD-10 looks to have better guidelines.
vermontsavant
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:05 am
Post subject:
all of these new definitions are beyond bizzare.i dont think we will fully know what all this means until may of 2013.and sadly enough i think we will be dealing with these rediculous articles for long time to come.i have never heard autism refered to as peter pan syndrome,has anyone else heard this.the new york times will get payback sunday thanks to Tom brady and the New England Patriots.
Verdandi
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:51 pm
Post subject:
New ADHD? ADHD's criteria are not vague. If anything, in particular ways, they are entirely too specific (criteria written for children and not adults) which means that adults either go undiagnosed or misdiagnosed as PI instead of combined.
fiooo
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:57 pm
Post subject:
fraac wrote:
Oh. Then why are they changing it? Or does nobody know and that's what the fuss is about?
Probably because of all the misdiagnoses and the criteria is too vague. It's sort of like the new ADHD... I predict that one day, doctors will check for neurological 'abnormalities' for things such as ADHD and Aspergers using brain scans. I hate to say it, but a lot of psychology is pure BS. Someday, when the brain and neurological and psychological differences are physiologically mapped to the brain, doctors will recall the present dark age where practitioners still use the DSM.
Verdandi
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:56 pm
Post subject:
If you look up Asperger's Syndrome for the DSM-5, the rationale explains their reasons for changing it.
Short version: In practical application, what you get diagnosed with depends more on where you go to be diagnosed than it does on which symptoms you show.
fraac
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:39 pm
Post subject:
Oh. Then why are they changing it? Or does nobody know and that's what the fuss is about?
Verdandi
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:40 pm
Post subject:
fraac wrote:
Well that's exactly what the proposed DSM changes do. Practically though it's a good question. Suddenly lots of passably weird people will have nowhere to go, which won't help them psychologically.
Is it? My understanding is that the intended goal is related to the fact that the majority of people already diagnosed with autism, AS, or PDD-NOS will meet these criteria.
There's also social communication disorder (I think that's what it called) in DSM-5.
tall-p
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:07 pm
Post subject:
I thought it was odd that one of the authors, the psychiatrist, mentioned "Peter Pan Syndrome." That "disorder" is not in the DSM.
fraac
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:51 pm
Post subject:
Well that's exactly what the proposed DSM changes do. Practically though it's a good question. Suddenly lots of passably weird people will have nowhere to go, which won't help them psychologically.
Verdandi
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:39 pm
Post subject:
How can you be autistic but not diagnosable?
fraac
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:35 pm
Post subject:
It gets close to an important point though. I wouldn't be diagnosed with anything now (or maybe I would
now
but not a couple of years ago, and hopefully not in future). Yet I'm still autistic. It's abundantly useful for people to know that about themselves.
Verdandi
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:23 pm
Post subject:
The article's riddled with numerous factual inaccuracies, and the writer seems to assume that anyone who has an AS diagnosis now would not meet the criteria for an ASD diagnosis. He also focused on speech delays as a necessary part of "true autism" when an ASD diagnosis requires no such thing.
Dhawal
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:12 pm
Post subject:
Desperate measures to justify the removal of aspergers from DSM 5 through media propoganda? Slimy b******ds, always picking on the weak. Before you know they'll make aspie a despised word through media propoganda. Much like communism or anarchism.
Forums ©
Read more Articles on Wrong Planet
Wrong Planet is a Registered Trademark.
Copyright 2004-2013,
Wrong Planet, LLC and Alex Plank
. Alex does
public speaking for Autism.
Advertise on Wrong Planet
Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet
|
Privacy Policy
Subscribe:
Wrong Planet News
Wrong Planet Forums