Community Discussion Forum
Chat
Info and Media
Articles
Autism Talk TV
Books
Wiki
Contact Alex
Shop
Log in
|
Register
WP Members: > 70,000
New Today:
10
New Yesterday:
30
Wrong Planet Autism Forum Index
->
Autism Politics, Activism, and Media Representation
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
[quote="Mummy_of_Peanut"]I spent my entire high school days in dire unhappiness, due to the anti-intellectual mob. I was called a 'snob', as they assumed I thought I was better than then. But, I was just good at school work and shy and never even considered that I might be 'better' than anyone else. I hope (and think) things are changing, for my daughter's sake.[/quote]
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Topic review
Author
Message
DoodleDoo
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 8:57 pm
Post subject:
I have suffered and benefited form my sharp intellectual focus.
In my option anti-intellectualism is a grave treat to aspies.
If you look at all of the genocides in the last century this was often a main motivation.
Pol Pot in Cambodia and Joseph Stalin are prime examples of this. In there efforts to eliminate "intellectuals" they caused mass suffering and death to everyone and gravely damage the countries they ruled.
Vito
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:15 pm
Post subject:
Well, in country I live, the anti-intellectualism is only an issue among the older working class people due to the nature of previous communist regime that perceived intelectuals as people who can actually think for themselves and are therefore threat to socialism
. But today the anti-intellectualism seems not to be an issue. Even at primary school, I got teased and bullied a lot, but never because of my intellect; quite the opposite, although I was usually excluded from any class activities because I was uncool and weird, whenever there was some school competition in any logical subject (games such as chess, checkers or expanded version of tic-tac-toe, mathematics), I got almost always unanimously chosen by my class to represent them.....
Mummy_of_Peanut
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 3:07 pm
Post subject:
I spent my entire high school days in dire unhappiness, due to the anti-intellectual mob. I was called a 'snob', as they assumed I thought I was better than then. But, I was just good at school work and shy and never even considered that I might be 'better' than anyone else. I hope (and think) things are changing, for my daughter's sake.
NathanealWest
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:51 am
Post subject:
TheygoMew wrote:
You have to fight back and stand up for yourself but if you've had to deal with non stop negativity with no back up then you feel like you can't BUT you can. Start coming up with things to say back. Reverse their negativity by saying what the person said to you in reverse which could apply to them. It's the only way the person will even stop to think about what they've said. It's hard at first if you can't even understand the person was being rude in the first place so you have to learn the signs so you can say something back. Otherwise, they keep doing it because they can get away with it. It gives them a sense of power.
It's a power trip. Control. Where would anyone be without intellectuals?
No man, the people who will begin to bully are just not the type to listen to what their victim says and reflect about themselves. All that will probably happen with your suggestion is that the situation will probably just intensify. Bullies are cowards. Play their game, return a power that is greater than their own and they will drop it.
aghogday
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:41 pm
Post subject:
TheChamelion wrote:
rachel_519 wrote:
I consider "nerd" to be a complement. Some people like to make fun of nerds, but I think the best approach is to say, "Yep, I'm a nerd and proud of it," and try not to let their opinions affect you. I know bullying can be hard to deal with, but the most important thing is that you are happy with who you are. If being intellectual is one of you greatest gifts, why should you be ashamed of that?
I've never understood people who consider intellectual bullying to be offensive... How is being intellectual supposed to be a bad thing!?
Or people who call you a nerd and then 'dumb, idiot or retarded' Don't you realise how idiotic you sound!? First you insult someone for being smart and then you try to say they're not smart? :facepalm:
But if anyone ever insults you for these reasons don't let them know it's basically them complementing you and contradicting themselves. That way you can make them look like an idiot, whilst complimenting you and at the same time stop them from saying something that might actually be offensive...
Winning.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nerd
Quote:
Nerd is a derogatory slang term for a person typically described as intellectual, socially-impaired, and obsessive who spends inordinate amounts of time on unpopular, obscure, or highly technical pursuits, or relating to topics of fiction or fantasy, to the exclusion of more mainstream activities.[1][2][3] Nerds are considered to be awkward, shy, and unattractive.[4] Thus, a nerd is often excluded from physical activity and considered a loner by others, or will tend to associate with a small group of like-minded people. As with other pejoratives, nerd has been reappropriated by some as a term of pride and group identity.
Social intelligence is recognized by most social animals.
The Star Quarterback that is the straight A student does not normally fall within these parameters.
The term started to lose it's perjorative value starting in the 80's with the technological revolution, Huey Lewis and the News, and the song "It's Hip to be Square"; the song and movie ''Weird Science", and movies like "Revenge of the Nerds".
Thursday Night NBC TV has moved from "Cheers" to "Friends" to 21st century "The Office".
Society is moving away from the historical social paradigm norm of humanity; it is reflective both in media, and real life.
Obsessive interests like the development of Computer and Video Game software, is behind a great deal of cultural change that is still distant, but moving ever closer to "Nerd", as the standard rather than the odd.
Of course it depends, to a large degree, on which part of culture one is currently part of.
When people use those unfavorable terms along with Nerd it's not about impairments in general IQ, it's about impairments in social intelligence, communicated for the most part through non-verbal language.
Some people with Autistic traits are fully unaware of deficiencies in this area, but those whom are interacted with, at times, notice it almost immediately in communication. It's hard to say how someone will respond to reduced or unusual non-verbal social communication, most people are tactful enough not to make fun of it.
And to the point made in the last couple of posts, communication from those whom are highly intelligent with a mix of communication impairments, may come across in communication as an intellectual bully without being aware of it, or intending it.
Interesting though, Wiki's definition of Nerd, generally approximates that of Aspergers in the DSMIV, even moving into some of the clinical features, like problems with motor coordination.
I thought Nerd had lost it's appeal as an actual term of offense by now. I was called much worse things than that in middle school. Nerd would have been a relief. I thought Nerd had lost it's popularity in the 50's from when "the Fonz" used it in the old TV show "Happy Days"; it wasn't really presented as a real insult on that old TV show.
Insulting intelligence whether it is social or academic based can be tough on the other person, and for those that have never really questioned their own intelligence social and/or academic, the understanding of academic and/or social bullying in it's subtle forms, can be hard to understand and empathize with.
Some people are insulted in both ways, at least folks that are blessed with high levels of intelligence don't have to feel the full sting of both types of insults.
aghogday
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:22 pm
Post subject:
youngxmagexofxmyths wrote:
And if you're here to argue, you might aswell just go on to some other thread or topic.
Two of the biggest issues of autism is social/communication issues, and not seeing other points of view. When that is mixed in conversation with intelligence, it is often seen as intellectual bullying by others, whether it is intended or not.
It's not likely that many individuals with Aspergers are aware they are even doing this, but there is evidence of it here, on this internet site, when one does not perceive another as meeting a standard norm of intelligence.
It's often expressed in comments on spelling and grammar, but dismissing one's argument and their prescence on differences of opinions, is an example of what could hurt another individuals feelings, in some cases.
A good historical example of intellectual bullying was that of Al Gore's debates with George W. It was an issue of unacceptable social communication in non-verbal body language, as Gore did not respect the personal space of Bush in the debate, as well as, whether intended or not, a belittling of Bush's intellect through the lack of emotional tact.
Intellectual bullying is as real as physical bullying, however the one that intellectually bullies, particularly in the case when there are social-communication issues, may have no idea that they are coming across that way.
Any problems with Aspegers and intelligence and the general public, is more likely one of misunderstanding intent or social/communication by either party in a conversation.
The anti-intellectual movement is a societial phenomenon, that is usually based on larger scale events, when morals and philsophy do not meet eye to eye.
It started long ago when philosophy and science did not match religious ideology, and continues today the same, with death threats to philosphers, that would dare to make an ethics argument that the personhood of a newborn and a fetus, is not that much different.
The same moral offenses against intellectualism, can be felt from Aspies, just as easily, depending on what the issue is that does not meet one's standard of morality.
Aspergers is a disorder of social communication, but normal intelligence is the only requirement to be diagnosed. Actual studies on Aspergers intelligence suggest it is a few points underneath the rest of society.
So, it is not likely that anti-intellectualism, per intelligence alone, is any more of a problem for Aspies than for anyone else on average in the general population.
Problems with communication, though, do lead to misunderstandings with others, it is extremely hard to avoid that, when one has an inherent social-communication impairment.
The highest of intelligent people reflect those with personalities like Bill Gates and those with personalities like Bill Clinton.
One was seen as social, one was not, but in their personal dealings with their subordinates both were seen as intellectual bullies whether they personally were aware of it or not, by those subordinates.
Clinton was considered intellectually elite, but his social intelligence and abilities were phenomenal as well.
Obama is considered intellectually elite. So, was John Kerry who displayed average intelligence in school.
Gates, with his IQ that was as high as Clinton's, is not normally considered as one of the intellectually elite of society, even as a director now of a world wide charity.
He presents few controversial views nor is he particularly outspoken on issues that would normally be considered as issues that evoke anti-intellectual sentiment in society.
Just from a statistical point of view, since intelligence has not been objectively measured as higher than the general population among aspies, it is likely the social-communication problems are the main source of problems in dealing with others on a day to day basis; the role that normal intelligence plays is not likely that much different that what others encounter in day to day life.
However, in those cases where higher intelligence mixes with social communication problems the likelyhood of unintentional intellectual bullying against others naturally increases. And, it very likely results in responses, that are not always received well.
I like the planet of the apes analogy; today the ape that is reducing the opportunity and the ability for speech, are the machines created by the humans that naturally limit the opportunity and ability for speech.
Those humans that created the machines were in part those that possessed the intellect of systemizers. While it is a form of intellect, it is not normally the source of the type of anti-intellectualism that is commonly attributed to the philosophers, artists, and writers whose ideas don't match the moral norms of society. Science is an exception, but it is not the issue, that it was on a historical basis.
Bill Clinton, with his extreme intelligence of both types, considered himself unpopular and was bullied as a youth, but he attributed it to being overweight.
http://thenewsforall.com/bill-clinton-bullied-overweight/
And. ironically, a very large study done several years ago, found that although indviduals with autism are reported by many sources as the targets of bullies, individuals with Autism with the co-morbid of ADD/ADHD bully others, at a rate of four times higher than the general population and others with autism not diagnosed with ADD/ADHD. Speculated causes are both pent-up energy and the fact that those that are bullied are more likely to bully, themselves.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070517100417.htm
Who_Am_I
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 8:42 pm
Post subject:
Quote:
And if you're here to argue, you might aswell just go on to some other thread or topic.
lol@antintellectualism sucks, but don't challenge my ideas!
androbot2084
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 7:28 pm
Post subject:
In the movie the "Planet of the Apes" the apes rose up and started to oppress humans so much that humans eventually lost the ability to speak
TheygoMew
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 6:28 pm
Post subject:
You have to fight back and stand up for yourself but if you've had to deal with non stop negativity with no back up then you feel like you can't BUT you can. Start coming up with things to say back. Reverse their negativity by saying what the person said to you in reverse which could apply to them. It's the only way the person will even stop to think about what they've said. It's hard at first if you can't even understand the person was being rude in the first place so you have to learn the signs so you can say something back. Otherwise, they keep doing it because they can get away with it. It gives them a sense of power.
It's a power trip. Control. Where would anyone be without intellectuals?
TheChamelion
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 2:38 pm
Post subject:
rachel_519 wrote:
I consider "nerd" to be a complement. Some people like to make fun of nerds, but I think the best approach is to say, "Yep, I'm a nerd and proud of it," and try not to let their opinions affect you. I know bullying can be hard to deal with, but the most important thing is that you are happy with who you are. If being intellectual is one of you greatest gifts, why should you be ashamed of that?
I've never understood people who consider intellectual bullying to be offensive... How is being intellectual supposed to be a bad thing!?
Or people who call you a nerd and then 'dumb, idiot or retarded' Don't you realise how idiotic you sound!? First you insult someone for being smart and then you try to say they're not smart? :facepalm:
But if anyone ever insults you for these reasons don't let them know it's basically them complementing you and contradicting themselves. That way you can make them look like an idiot, whilst complimenting you and at the same time stop them from saying something that might actually be offensive...
Winning.
TheChamelion
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 2:26 pm
Post subject:
I don't believe spreading awareness of anti intellectualism would help us much. And spreading awareness about autism wouldn't help much either. I think instead awareness needs to be spread about how humans tend to bully anyone who's different (Basically just like spreading awareness about 'gay rights', racism and autism) but on a society wide level. (Meaning letting the world know picking on someone because they're different in
any
way is unacceptable.)
I also don't believe we're picked on because of intellectualism or our abilities but because we're just in general very 'different' and often an easy target. It may seem like that's a leading cause in abuse but I think it's just one of the more blatant things about most of us. If you're smart, you're a target because you're different. If you're not too good at social skills, you're a target because you're different. If you're overweight, you're a target because you're different. If you're short, you're a target because you're different.
I can relate almost every kind of bullying/trouble I've seen in my life to being because someone is different.
This theory could also be supported in the fact that most bullies or the more popular people are usually very 'normal' or 'average'.
(Sorry if I misinterpreted you. I do that most of the time. And sorry if you misinterpret this, I couldn't think of a good way to put what I was thinking into easily interpretable words...)
rachel_519
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:39 pm
Post subject:
I consider "nerd" to be a complement. Some people like to make fun of nerds, but I think the best approach is to say, "Yep, I'm a nerd and proud of it," and try not to let their opinions affect you. I know bullying can be hard to deal with, but the most important thing is that you are happy with who you are. If being intellectual is one of you greatest gifts, why should you be ashamed of that?
Tollorin
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:37 pm
Post subject:
Being aspie do not necessary mean being intelligent.
Sweetleaf
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:33 pm
Post subject:
youngxmagexofxmyths wrote:
All I know is that its a problem that fits me and plenty other Aspies that I know. All I'm saying is that its just A contributer, not The major contributer.
Also, there is the idea of it affecting Aspies indirectly. Intellectualism encourages reasoning, questioning, and critical thinking. Anti intellectualism therefore discourages it and therefore an anti intellectual would prefer to look at an aspie, consider him/her a freak, and never question this judgement. With intellect comes depth and that has helped some people see me for who I am rather than just a freak. But anti intellectualism only makes some one superficial and shallow, thus when they encounter an autistic person, they'de most likely consider that person a freak, and then ascociate difference with inferority.
And if you're here to argue, you might aswell just go on to some other thread or topic.
Alright I certainly do like reasoning, questioning and critical thinking, I guess I just don't see why one has to fit the nerd or geek stereotype to be intellectually minded. I guess my point was more it seems society is a bit superficial so people tend to dislike people for not fitting in or being unusual....for instance people don't dislike nerds because they are smart they dislike them because stereo-typically they are socially akward......if that makes any sense.
Also supposedly its a good thing to go to college and get good grades in society, but then most schools do not really encourage intellectualism they just encourage memorizing useless information and trying to fit people into boxes...so anti-intellectualism does seem to be an issue in society I was just confused on how exactly it relates to AS.......not trying to argue or anything just discussing it so sorry if I offended.
youngxmagexofxmyths
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:18 pm
Post subject:
All I know is that its a problem that fits me and plenty other Aspies that I know. All I'm saying is that its just A contributer, not The major contributer.
Also, there is the idea of it affecting Aspies indirectly. Intellectualism encourages reasoning, questioning, and critical thinking. Anti intellectualism therefore discourages it and therefore an anti intellectual would prefer to look at an aspie, consider him/her a freak, and never question this judgement. With intellect comes depth and that has helped some people see me for who I am rather than just a freak. But anti intellectualism only makes some one superficial and shallow, thus when they encounter an autistic person, they'de most likely consider that person a freak, and then ascociate difference with inferority.
And if you're here to argue, you might aswell just go on to some other thread or topic.
Forums ©
Read more Articles on Wrong Planet
Wrong Planet is a Registered Trademark.
Copyright 2004-2013,
Wrong Planet, LLC and Alex Plank
. Alex does
public speaking for Autism.
Advertise on Wrong Planet
Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet
|
Privacy Policy
Subscribe:
Wrong Planet News
Wrong Planet Forums