Paradox?

Post Reply New Topic

Money represents value. It has no intrinsic value. ( as the old Russian proverb said, " if it were not for the poor the rich would have to eat their money") However, increasing money does not increase value. Sure you have more dollar bills but each bill is worth less.
Suppose, I counterfeited $1. Considering how small a percentage of the economy that would be, no inflation would result. However, I would have $1 of value!! !
The paradox is that printing money does not increase goods and services. However, if only a tiny bit were counterfeited it would!! ! *
I wonder how much money one can counterfeit before it triggers inflation.
* It’s like creating a symbol that creates a tangible commodity! And that is obviously absurd!

I can take that counterfeit $1 and get $1 worth of goods for it. I get $1 worth of actual value. So by creating an IOU I have created actual value! However, society will not suffer ( there will be no inflation because $1 is too little to impact the economy). That is the paradox!
PS; I am not arguing economics or the benefits of inflationary spending. I am putting forth a mathematical paradox. Perhaps I have discovered a paradox on my own?
I love paradoxes! Here are some of my favorites.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raven_paradox
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unexpected_hanging_paradox
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_paradox
Here is a site with a list of paradoxes!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_paradoxes

“But once people find out your $1 is fake, the person owning it at that time will lose $1, essentially he has been robbed of that amount of money.”
trollcatman
But if no one discovers that it is counterfeit, no one will lose and I will have an extra $1 of value. Yes, I did not stipulate that the $1 was a perfect counterfeit. However, if it is, the paradox works.
……………………….
“ but you still are affecting the money supply”
trollcatman

Yes, you are affecting the money supply. However, you are not reducing the value of every dollar. Therefore, the paradox still works. There is no way counterfeiting one dollar can add to inflation.

Only marginally on-topic, if you pay for something with $2 bills, some people will be stupid enough to think that they are counterfeit.

From http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2005-03-08/news/0503080089_1_bolesta-pole-baltimore-county:

“If you print a counterfeit dollar bill you can then spend it to get a dollar's worth of goods and or services. So it increases value ..to you. But it doesnt increase value for society.”
naturalplastic
True, but my gain ( by creating a mere symbol) in actual value is not compensated for by a loss in any other part of the economy.
“But it doesnt increase value for society. Its just like if you pulled a gun on someone and took the money out of their wallet. Except the victim would be not just one person, but everyone”
naturalplastic

And how will everyone be affected ( there money will not be worth less) ? How will anyone be affected if I counterfeit $1?

“Everyone's dollars would be worth one millionth of a cent less because you Xeroxed the bill, including that one dollar you xeroxed itsself because you xeroxed it! But you would be ahead by 99 point 99999999 cents. “
Trollcatman
Does being poorer by 1/1,000,000 of a cent even make sense?

It isn't a paradox. If you simply printed off 1 dollar, the inflation obviously would not really exist- but this is no more a paradox than the fact that increasing the temperature by 0.01 degree has no noticeable effect. The fact is that if you increased the temperature by 0.01 degrees several times, you would never notice any difference from the previous temperature increment- but you'd start to notice that the temperature was beginning to feel warmer than the starting point. The realization may come suddenly, after it has been warm enough to notice for some time (you just havent thought about it yet). Same here. If you printed off a dollar and bought soda with it- you'd be increasing the number of sodas sold-but only by one- and if price was determined in a continuous fashion by an algorithm that took into account units sold and at what previous price, rather than corporate managers who just come to the conclusion that the price must be raised because demand has increased a noticeable amount - then the price of soda would increase ever so slightly (assuming money was continuous and not broken into a multiple of cents). This makes a non-zero but small contribution to inflation- so no paradox.

?????
That has nothing to do with what we are talking about.
No one loses any money. If they are aware or not that they have not lost any money makes no difference.

Basically the paradox is this.
1. I create a symbol of value ( the $1) and I can purchase $1 of goods. I gain $1 in actual value
2. NO ONE loses any money.
Therefore, by creating a mere symbol I have created actual value. That is the paradox.
I really do not understand why that is so hard to understand. The only way that it is not a paradox is if 2 is not true. Show me how ANYONE loses ANY money if I counterfeit a $1. If you cannot then it is a paradox.