Page 1 of 1 [ 14 posts ] 

beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

30 May 2015, 12:33 am

I've always sucked at chess, even as a little kid being trained. I could never get that game.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


xenocity
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2014
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,282
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan

30 May 2015, 12:49 am

Some people just aren't able to play strategy based games.
There are other games you are probably good at.


_________________
Something.... Weird... Something...


Misery
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2011
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,163

30 May 2015, 2:25 am

Chess is one of the most complicated and hard to master games there is; it takes ALOT of time and practice to get good at it. Slow progress is not abnormal.



Tripolar
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 19
Location: Arizona

30 May 2015, 2:49 am

Chess seems on the surface to be very much about logic, but a large part of being good at it is the ability to predict your opponent's moves. I play relatively well, but I can't predict my opponent's moves. I usually end up making a Xanatos Gambit to deal with this.


_________________
Whatever I say, remember these words: No offense intended unless I clearly state otherwise.


Jory
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 2 Jun 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,520
Location: Tornado Alley

31 May 2015, 4:33 pm

I had a strong interest in chess for a while but eventually gave up on it entirely. You need to devote a stupid amount of your life to it if you want to be even slightly good at it, and I wasn't quite that obsessed.

Another problem with chess is that the openings have been so over-studied and over-analyzed that the first twenty or so moves are more about memorization than skill. That's why if I ever play chess again, it'll only be Chess 960, a.k.a. random chess, in which the pieces on the back row are placed randomly to ensure that neither player can have an advantage by memorizing those played-to-death openings.



wbport
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 220

31 May 2015, 5:17 pm

"Chess is a sea where the elephant may bathe and the gnat may drink," is an Indian proverb I've seen in at least one chess book. It isn't enough to memorize opening moves, it is vitally important to know why a move is being made, what plan it is a part of. Don't get a book too far ahead of where you are now--if you can browse a page or two at a bookstore, follow it, and learn from it that might be a book you want to buy and study. A tutor can also help.

"A Forrest Gump of Chess"



Misery
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2011
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,163

31 May 2015, 10:28 pm

Jory wrote:
I had a strong interest in chess for a while but eventually gave up on it entirely. You need to devote a stupid amount of your life to it if you want to be even slightly good at it, and I wasn't quite that obsessed.

Another problem with chess is that the openings have been so over-studied and over-analyzed that the first twenty or so moves are more about memorization than skill. That's why if I ever play chess again, it'll only be Chess 960, a.k.a. random chess, in which the pieces on the back row are placed randomly to ensure that neither player can have an advantage by memorizing those played-to-death openings.



I had this same experience with it.

I'm sorry, but a game of "strategy" loses it's appeal when TWENTY FREAKING MOVES IN A ROW are all basically ONE move played entirely from memory. Just... ugh.

I liked chess way back when, but then I ran into THAT. Thanks, but no. I'll go back to games where I have to come up with every individual move myself, thanks...



wbport
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 220

01 Jun 2015, 12:56 pm

Like any recreation, if you don't enjoy it then don't play it. There are very few openings that go that deep without any latitude for preference moves rather than forcing moves unless you are trying to play at master level. It isn't necessary to study openings that you can never be forced to play. People who enjoy playing now at the "shark" level also enjoyed at when they were at the "guppy" or "flounder" level or they wouldn't have stuck with it, much less made the effort to improve.



lostonearth35
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jan 2010
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,784
Location: Lost on Earth, waddya think?

01 Jun 2015, 6:26 pm

I'm not even good at checkers. Not only that, but it increases my boredom rather than relieves it.

In fact, even though playing board games was something of a big family tradition with my parents, the games frequently bore me, no pun intended. Like Monopoly. We used to play it when I was a little girl and I'd get bored, cranky and lucky if I didn't start bawling. It was only really because I was amused by the miniature game pieces that I'd play. I really like Charades, though, but it's been forever since I got to play that.

My brother liked chess and used to play it with our cousin when we were younger. Is there something wrong with getting bored by such things? Does it mean you're not smart? :(



Andreger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2014
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 525
Location: Russia - worst country ever

03 Jun 2015, 2:29 am

For me chess are to abstract. While I love playing wargames, I can't deal why goddamn cavalry in chess (horse) moves only by angle, or why pawn can't attack forward and move backward... There are more limitations than in soccer!
I learned myself to play chess rather good but I never really loved it.
And yes, to master in chess one needs tons of practice. So if you don't like chess - I don't advice you spending plenty of time in attempts to master it. Really, it's overrated that chess players are all great strategists and high-class intellectuals, they are often not.
Like Harry Kasparov, Russian chess grandmaster who went into politics and was completely unable to act with any strategy there. So playing chess is not the thing that can define one's intelligence or possible success in life.



staremaster
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,628
Location: New York

03 Jun 2015, 12:14 pm

I periodically get to play chess with my father. He uses "knight forks" very effectively, to the point where I sometimes prioritize his knights as targets by sacrificing my own bishops early in the game.



Andreger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2014
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 525
Location: Russia - worst country ever

03 Jun 2015, 3:25 pm

staremaster wrote:
I periodically get to play chess with my father. He uses "knight forks" very effectively, to the point where I sometimes prioritize his knights as targets by sacrificing my own bishops early in the game.


When I play I prefer to exchange my bishops with enemy knights - still unable to master bishops. And I prefer maneuver warfare so generally I agree with equal, same-figure exchanges if the don't mess up my ranks. Often finish with 5-6 figures on the board, for both sides together.



gaz34
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jul 2014
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 128

07 Jun 2015, 7:43 am

I used to play chess on yahoo games but got fed up because I suck at it. It gets kind of boring when you're always losing all the time and taking ages to make a move. :roll:



AnonymousAnonymous
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 69,878
Location: Portland, Oregon

12 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm

I sucked at chess too. In fact, I lost all the time to the point when I just gave up playing chess.


_________________
Silly NTs, I have Aspergers, and having Aspergers is gr-r-reat!