Page 1 of 2 [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,739
Location: the island of defective toy santas

17 Nov 2014, 11:44 pm

American wrote:
The voters who are swayed by the left's "war on women" and "conservatives are racist" nonsense are the problem. If every voter had to answer one of three randomly selected questions from the citizen test before being allowed to vote, Obama would not have had a chance in 2012, even with all of the Democrats' shady voting shenanigans.

how many bubbles are in this bar of soap? Image



LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

18 Nov 2014, 4:47 am

trollcatman wrote:
The debt doesn't need to be repaid. It just needs to be refinanced, and currently the US gov can do that at very low interest. There are countries with way more debt/GDP and they doing fine.


As an American, I support selling Treasury paper and encouraging world leaders to load their national vaults with it. We can cite the 75% statistic and tell them, "no worries, debt to GDP is just 75%, keep filling your vaults with our paper, guys". We do this with our middle eastern trading partners for their oil. We get their natural resources, and they get our paper to stack in their vaults. It's a good trade ... for us ;)

How long with this game go on ? Where America gets the world's natural resources in exchange for paper ? Someday the music stops, and the paper becomes worthless.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 59,887
Location: Stendec

18 Nov 2014, 9:29 am

auntblabby wrote:
I like George Carlin's take on things-

"Everybody complains about politicians. Everybody says they suck. Well, where do people think these politicians come from? They don't fall out of the sky. They don't pass through a membrane from another reality. They come from American parents and American families, American homes, American schools, American churches, American businesses and American universities, and they are elected by American citizens. This is the best we can do folks. This is what we have to offer. It's what our system produces: Garbage in, garbage out. If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're going to get selfish, ignorant leaders." - George Carlin

We get the government that we deserve.


_________________
 
No love for Hamas, Hezbollah, Iranian Leadership, Islamic Jihad, other Islamic terrorist groups, OR their supporters and sympathizers.


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

18 Nov 2014, 11:57 am

khaoz wrote:
Because the average Conservative voter has not a clue how our government operates. To be convinced by the Conservative party that everything wrong with America is a result of Obama policies when it is Conservative politicians and their surrogates who are responsible for 90% of the current American hell.

http://www.politicususa.com/2014/11/08/ ... gress.html


The average conserve voter has more than a clue of how our government operates. The Constitution of the U.Sey. is in shambles and principled conservatives are rightfully upset about that. Our government has become a Neo-Fascist Abomination.

ruveyn



MSBKyle
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2014
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 339
Location: Kent, Ohio

18 Nov 2014, 12:55 pm

Obama has showed America his corruption and destructive policies. He is the one who made it impossible for democrats to win in the midterm elections. People voted for republicans not necessarily because they like republicans or are republicans. They voted for the republicans so that no one who shares Obama's policies and ideaology would win. People have woken up to see what a fraud and a liar Obama is. No one likes Obama anymore. He is as unpopular as ever right now. The Obama love has died a long time ago.



sonofghandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)

18 Nov 2014, 2:31 pm

zer0netgain wrote:
Never mind that DEMOCRATS controlled the Senate for the last 6 years and REFUSED to bring any Republican bills to the floor (particularly budget ones) for debate.


I think the midterms were in large part due to frustrations with a lot of failed promises by the Democrats more than anything else.

And I would urge you to check any fact checking website on the internet to assess your claims that the Democratic controlled Senate was the major hold up. Out of the 300 some-odd bills where votes are reportedly being "held up," well over 10% were nothing more than purely symbolic ACA repeal, and the majority of the remainder are still in one committee or the other being revised and reviewed. If you are interested, there are dozens of websites out there that track the current status of legislation. I'd bookmark your favorite so that you don't look like a fool be repeating something untrue about one that you heard from some source that you want to be pals with.


_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche


sonofghandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)

18 Nov 2014, 2:34 pm

MSBKyle wrote:
People voted for republicans not necessarily because they like republicans or are republicans. They voted for the republicans so that no one who shares Obama's policies and ideaology would win.


Here is my problem with that statement:

Pretty much every single liberal measure on a state ballot in the nation passed.

Marijuana legalization. Abortion rights. Even 4 staunchly conservative states where a minimum wage hike was voted in.


_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche


GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...

18 Nov 2014, 2:47 pm

The problem is that people like a lot of democrat policies, but they don't like democrat politicians, and many don't see democrats as being like them. It's still all about wedge issues and culture wars (except on pot).

If democrats stopped insisting on everyone being so ideologically pure, they could make progress on a lot of economic issues.


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,739
Location: the island of defective toy santas

18 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm

if only democrats would grow some balls and get a clue, the GOP are stealing their lunch and making them pay for it! where is harry Truman when we need him?



sonofghandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)

18 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm

khaoz wrote:
"trolling" my caboose. It's a story, and it's a reality.


To be fair, the wording of the thread title does tread the trolling line, IMO.


_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,739
Location: the island of defective toy santas

18 Nov 2014, 4:23 pm

sonofghandi wrote:
khaoz wrote:
"trolling" my caboose. It's a story, and it's a reality.


To be fair, the wording of the thread title does tread the trolling line, IMO.

how 'bout "dysfunction of the midterms"? when people vote for pols who have indicated their will to make more governmental gridlock, how is that not dysfunctional?



sonofghandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)

18 Nov 2014, 4:27 pm

American wrote:
If every voter had to answer one of three randomly selected questions from the citizen test before being allowed to vote, Obama would not have had a chance in 2012, even with all of the Democrats' shady voting shenanigans.


Perhaps you have missed some of the reports where self identified consistently conservatives and those who get their news exclusively from Fox tend to score the lowest on current events knowledge.

And as for shady voting shenanigans, perhaps you should consider that it took me over 5 hours of standing in line in my inner city district to vote, and saw dozens of people give up waiting. Not to mention that several of those living on my street were not on the rolls, only to discover that they had been victims of a voter purge as a "fraud prevention" measure. Not to mention that in 2012, the Republicans maintains a significant majority in the House despite the Democratic House candidates receiving more than 1.5 million more votes.

But to be honest, I think the absolute biggest reason the Democrats lost this go around wasn't because people like Republicans so much as a lot refused to vote because of all the failed Democratic promises. Primarily a complete lack of progress on immigration reform (low Hispanic turnout in most regions) and a failure to do anything about wage inequality, minimum wage, and stagnant wages despite much rhetoric flying about fixes (around a dismal 20% youth vote).
Combine that with some pretty effective fear rallying of the Republican base and you get yourself a whole lot of red seats.


_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche


sonofghandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)

18 Nov 2014, 4:30 pm

auntblabby wrote:
where is harry Truman when we need him?


I think a young Republican Teddy Roosevelt would be better in our current state. Although he would likely be labelled a raging commie socialist in today's political climate.


_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,739
Location: the island of defective toy santas

18 Nov 2014, 4:32 pm

sonofghandi wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
where is harry Truman when we need him?


I think a young Republican Teddy Roosevelt would be better in our current state. Although he would likely be labelled a raging commie socialist in today's political climate.

in any case, I hope warren does an Obama.



GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...

18 Nov 2014, 4:53 pm

auntblabby wrote:
if only democrats would grow some balls and get a clue, the GOP are stealing their lunch and making them pay for it! where is harry Truman when we need him?


That's true too...

All the democrats did this cycle is run from Obama. They didn't run for anything.

Also, they continue to allow the republicans define who they are--godless, gay, baby killers, who want your guns!

As long as that image remains, the Democrats will continue to lose ground with Hispanics and the working class in the south.

I'm not saying the Democrats should abandon things like abortion/gay rights and gun control, but they need to allow candidates a bit more room on those issues in various regions.

Also, they need to get back to a more pro-working class economic message like Elizabeth Warren has and abandon all that 3rd way Clinton BS that helped to crash the economy...

I mean, we have 2.5 million children a year experiencing homelessness at some point because our economic system is so broken... We really need to fix it and we can't do it without building coalitions... And you cannot build coalitions with people you're constantly attacking and belittling for believing in god, etc...

The democrats DO need to grow some balls, but they also need to stop getting so caught up in ideological conflict and stop letting perfection be the enemy of the good.

We need to find that golden mean.


This is just another reason we need to start teaching classics again.


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


American
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 285

18 Nov 2014, 8:34 pm

sonofghandi wrote:

Perhaps you have missed some of the reports where self identified consistently conservatives and those who get their news exclusively from Fox tend to score the lowest on current events knowledge.


Maybe you can link to that? It depends on what you ask people about. How many Democrats thought that Sarah Palin said she could see Russia from her house? How many Democrats are well-informed about Obama's scandals? Maybe if Obama watched Fox News he would find out about his Administration's wrongdoings earlier. . .

Quote:
And as for shady voting shenanigans, perhaps you should consider that it took me over 5 hours of standing in line in my inner city district to vote, and saw dozens of people give up waiting. Not to mention that several of those living on my street were not on the rolls, only to discover that they had been victims of a voter purge as a "fraud prevention" measure. Not to mention that in 2012, the Republicans maintains a significant majority in the House despite the Democratic House candidates receiving more than 1.5 million more votes.


Maybe they weren't on the rolls because they weren't permitted or registered to vote for whatever reason. In 2012, Obama got 100% of the vote in some precincts. Right. Some precincts had over 100% turnout. How does that happen? How did Al Franken miraculously win in 2008 after a recount where he kept getting further and further ahead? Why do Democrats win the vast majority of close races? I think that, in many races, a Republican candidate needs to win by a comfortable margin so that the Democrats don't "find" a thousand ballots here or there until their candidate wins. Why are Democrats so opposed to voter ID laws if they don't engage in fraud?

Quote:
But to be honest, I think the absolute biggest reason the Democrats lost this go around wasn't because people like Republicans so much as a lot refused to vote because of all the failed Democratic promises. Primarily a complete lack of progress on immigration reform (low Hispanic turnout in most regions) and a failure to do anything about wage inequality, minimum wage, and stagnant wages despite much rhetoric flying about fixes (around a dismal 20% youth vote).
Combine that with some pretty effective fear rallying of the Republican base and you get yourself a whole lot of red seats.


Also, almost all of the Republican gains in 2014 were in Red states. Iowa, which is arguably a purple state, is an exception. States like Minnesota and Michigan should have been in play. That Republicans had to fight so hard for seats in Red states during a mid-term election when Obama and the Democrats are screwing everything up, is troubling. Also, another problem is that it seems to me (I could be wrong) that Democrat Senators (incumbents) have a lot easier time holding onto their seats than Republican incumbents. For example, Norm Coleman was essentially tied with Al Franken in 2008, yet the seat was not even in play this election.