Soon, US and al-Qaeda will be seen as allies

Page 1 of 2 [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

16 Jun 2012, 1:22 pm

Jordanian MP: US Equipping Al-Qaeda in Syria, Region

Quote:
"… first of all, terrorism is a product of Americans and they were the ones who supported the Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and are now supporting the Al-Qaeda terrorism which has targeted Syria," Fowad Dabor told FNA in Amman on Saturday.

"These are the Americans are providing terrorists in Syria with all types of military, arms, logistic, training and financial aids. In fact, they are deployed in the region and claim to be fighting against terrorism, while they themselves are terrorists," the Jordanian legislator underscored.


And we will see what al CIAda really is. A tool to take down countries in the Middle East, and a vocal point of fear to use again western countries. The truth will be disgusting, and demonstrate the west's addiction to $$$$$.

After these militants, terrorists, paid mercenaries (or whatever you want to call them) are done in Syria, what country will they head to to destabilize them using the resources given to them?

Most soldiers have a feeling that this constant war is a farce. Why don't we listen to them a little more?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8rbHwMXMT8[/youtube]


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"


Lucywlf
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jun 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 450

16 Jun 2012, 1:49 pm

The American military industrial complex has been doing this for a long time. It's just that now they're doing it out in public.

This book was written by Major General Smedley Butler in 1936:

http://www.lexrex.com/enlightened/artic ... racket.htm



shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,295
Location: OK let's go.

16 Jun 2012, 1:55 pm

"Beware the military industrial complex..."


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWiIYW_fBfY&feature=related[/youtube]



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

16 Jun 2012, 2:19 pm

Unlikely



snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

16 Jun 2012, 3:05 pm

shrox wrote:
"Beware the military industrial complex..."


+1

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjcEk5dUXw0[/youtube]


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"


iBlockhead
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jun 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 408

16 Jun 2012, 4:35 pm

So the fact this is an Iranian newspaper with possible ties to the Revolutionary Guard does not stop you from thinking about it?



snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

16 Jun 2012, 4:51 pm

iBlockhead wrote:
So the fact this is an Iranian newspaper with possible ties to the Revolutionary Guard does not stop you from thinking about it?


Why not? Everyone is having a hard time believing what western media outlets report, which is why their viewship is in decline. Hillary Clinton also makes a point of this, that they are losing the "information war" And she says that people are turning more to outlets like Al Jazeera. But she neglects to state the fact that Al Jazeera is basically a western outlet.

Anyways, I have a hard time swallowing that they aren't in a relationship that benefits the west.


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"


iBlockhead
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jun 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 408

16 Jun 2012, 5:05 pm

snapcap wrote:
iBlockhead wrote:
So the fact this is an Iranian newspaper with possible ties to the Revolutionary Guard does not stop you from thinking about it?


Why not? Everyone is having a hard time believing what western media outlets report, which is why their viewship is in decline. Hillary Clinton also makes a point of this, that they are losing the "information war" And she says that people are turning more to outlets like Al Jazeera. But she neglects to state the fact that Al Jazeera is basically a western outlet.

Anyways, I have a hard time swallowing that they aren't in a relationship that benefits the west.


You have a hard time swallowing that not every single thing that supports your worldview is true...

So you go around claiming media bias for things you don't like on this forum, which includes you spamming with biased sources known particularly for conspiracy theories, especially against America...but it is OK when you like what they say since it is against America, that's fine. That's completely impartial.

I have a feeling I am going to try to nail Jell-O to a wall for the rest of this thread and might stop now...



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,091
Location: temperate zone

16 Jun 2012, 6:46 pm

The US helped to create Al Queda during the soviet occupation of Afganistan in the first place, and the US and Al Queda were know to be unwitting allies during the Bosnian crises - seeking to save Bosnian Muslims and ethnic Albanians from genocide.

So unlike the mythical never extant alliance between Al Queda and Saddam Hussien that was our justification for the Iraq war- the alliance between the USA and AL Queda has already been very real.

We are expanding our war against Al Queda by infiltrating Yemen, but Al Queda has benifited from the fall of secular arab dictators like Khaddaffi (whom the USA also hated) so they are both our enemies and our unwitting allies in the aftermath of the Arab spring. Elements who call themselves "Al Queda" may indeed be being armed in Syria by the USA. And AL Queda is a rival to the Iranian regime for influence in the middle east. So some deliberate witting alliance with some local Al Queda groups might be happening.



edgewaters
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,427
Location: Ontario

16 Jun 2012, 7:06 pm

I'm not very partial to whacky conspiracy theories, but this is just plain as the day, that AQ became something during the Afghan war and that was due to the American support - it was "The Base" and it provided logistics and training for the Mujahedeeen, all recruits and all supplies came via AQ. So any expertise or equipment the Americans loaned, would have been in the context of giving it to AQ, since they were the only interface with the Mujahedeen and training and logistics is what they did, and what the US wished to give. I don't buy for a second that the US wasn't interfacing via AQ, because it's not only unlikely, it's flat out impossible to have supported the Mujahedeen in that way except by assisting AQ.

And of course in the Yugoslav conflict, Syria, Libya etc we see the relationship clearly still exists. Secular regimes are being attacked by Islamic radical fundamentalists with US support. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that they're done with terrorizing the American populace, now that fear has neutralized their will to freedom, and a state security apparatus worthy of the Soviets is now in place should that ever change. Mission accomplished. Now it's time to set up quasi-Islamic theocracies all across the Middle East; it'll keep those pesky democrats and socialists under control. Lockheed Martin says "more Irans please".



snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

16 Jun 2012, 7:07 pm

iBlockhead wrote:
snapcap wrote:
iBlockhead wrote:
So the fact this is an Iranian newspaper with possible ties to the Revolutionary Guard does not stop you from thinking about it?


Why not? Everyone is having a hard time believing what western media outlets report, which is why their viewship is in decline. Hillary Clinton also makes a point of this, that they are losing the "information war" And she says that people are turning more to outlets like Al Jazeera. But she neglects to state the fact that Al Jazeera is basically a western outlet.

Anyways, I have a hard time swallowing that they aren't in a relationship that benefits the west.


You have a hard time swallowing that not every single thing that supports your worldview is true...

So you go around claiming media bias for things you don't like on this forum, which includes you spamming with biased sources known particularly for conspiracy theories, especially against America...but it is OK when you like what they say since it is against America, that's fine. That's completely impartial.

I have a feeling I am going to try to nail Jell-O to a wall for the rest of this thread and might stop now...


The events that took place after 9/11 simply don't add up to our cause we set forth to commit ourselves to. It's gone way beyond and it's had implications for US citizens. Too many "strange coincidences" to say 9/11 wasn't planned out beforehand. No, I won't believe the official story until it acknowledges these things. But they won't because it will only hurt their cause, I guarantee that. So they trudge on with half-truths and complete fabrications that taint anything that was true.

And no single source of information has shown that what I put forth is true. It's a collaboration of sources and history that led me to believe we are on a crusade of lies. I can think for myself, I don't need the media to explicitly form my views for me. I also accept that there are things I don't know about, but in all these posting of mine, I don't fine much if anything at all that counters what I've been saying. Anyone is free to point out something I said was wrong or misguided. I'm not here to defense what I feel is FALSE, I'm here to debate what is TRUE. Correct me! Don't let me living life believing in a lie! :wink: But back yourself up! Don't just say, "Unlikely".

Anyways, why should I be more biased towards western media? Can't you see that there are many reasons not to take those outlets so seriously?


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"


iBlockhead
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jun 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 408

16 Jun 2012, 7:15 pm

snapcap wrote:
The events that took place after 9/11 simply don't add up to our cause we set forth to commit ourselves to. It's gone way beyond and it's had implications for US citizens. Too many "strange coincidences" to say 9/11 wasn't planned out beforehand. No, I won't believe the official story until it acknowledges these things. But they won't because it will only hurt their cause, I guarantee that. So they trudge on with half-truths and complete fabrications that taint anything that was true...


Yep...Jell-O to a wall...you blame the Jews for that, too?



snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

16 Jun 2012, 7:16 pm

Lucywlf wrote:
The American military industrial complex has been doing this for a long time. It's just that now they're doing it out in public.

This book was written by Major General Smedley Butler in 1936:

http://www.lexrex.com/enlightened/artic ... racket.htm


Nice, I will try and check it out.

Are there any more contemporary books out there that touches upon this subject? I'm sick of looking through media articles and videos, and would like to read about the origins of such groups as al-Qaeda in a nice thick book.


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"


snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

16 Jun 2012, 7:19 pm

iBlockhead wrote:
snapcap wrote:
The events that took place after 9/11 simply don't add up to our cause we set forth to commit ourselves to. It's gone way beyond and it's had implications for US citizens. Too many "strange coincidences" to say 9/11 wasn't planned out beforehand. No, I won't believe the official story until it acknowledges these things. But they won't because it will only hurt their cause, I guarantee that. So they trudge on with half-truths and complete fabrications that taint anything that was true...


Yep...Jell-O to a wall...you blame the Jews for that, too?


Zionist Jews, Christian Zionists, the Saudi royal family isn't Jewish or Christian as far as I know of, but they take some of the blame, and I guess there were some regular knuckleheads mixed in with the exceptional knuckleheads that were involved as well.


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"


snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

16 Jun 2012, 7:21 pm

Are you saying there weren't any Jews involved?


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"


iBlockhead
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jun 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 408

16 Jun 2012, 7:22 pm

snapcap wrote:
Zionist Jews, Christian Zionists, the Saudi royal family isn't Jewish or Christian as far as I know of, but they take some of the blame, and I guess there were some regular knuckleheads mixed in with the exceptional knuckleheads that were involved as well.


So you are saying the United States is operating as a Zionist occupied government? Am I getting that right?