Page 1 of 3 [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 45,472
Location: Houston, Texas

05 Dec 2012, 11:04 am

http://news.yahoo.com/analysis-obama-co ... nance.html


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!

Now proficient in ChatGPT!


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

05 Dec 2012, 11:08 am

Tim_Tex wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/analysis-obama-could-risk-going-over-cliff-081447326--finance.html


It is very likely. He wants to crash the economy then pick up the pieces (he along with his proto-fascist buddies). Not unlike what FDR did back in 1933 only more thoroughly.

ruveyn



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

05 Dec 2012, 11:31 am

ruveyn wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/analysis-obama-could-risk-going-over-cliff-081447326--finance.html


It is very likely. He wants to crash the economy then pick up the pieces (he along with his proto-fascist buddies). Not unlike what FDR did back in 1933 only more thoroughly.

ruveyn


I thought that was Hoover. :roll:



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

05 Dec 2012, 12:04 pm

Tax giveaways for the rich and austerity for the poor is doing wonders for the economy of Europe. I think maybe Obama should just become a conservative and let the Republicans do whatever they want. Sign every Republican piece of tax cutting social safety net gutting legislation they want and make it the law of the land. Veto all stimulus bills. Undo all labor laws. Get rid of the minimum wage. Bring back child labor and mandatory unpaid overtime. And outlaw collective bargaining with the threat of jail time for any worker that tries to start a union. Accomplish the ultimate wet dream of every conservative. We could accomplish what Milton Freedman's proto-fascist "Chicago Boys" did in Chile, only without a military junta to shoot the disenfranchised rioters dead. What the American people need now is brutal punishment. Then maybe the American people will finally wake up and elect politicians who will pursue real progressive reform.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

05 Dec 2012, 12:07 pm

marshall wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/analysis-obama-could-risk-going-over-cliff-081447326--finance.html


It is very likely. He wants to crash the economy then pick up the pieces (he along with his proto-fascist buddies). Not unlike what FDR did back in 1933 only more thoroughly.

ruveyn


I thought that was Hoover. :roll:


Hoover was chicken to do it thoroughly. FDR was not. But Hoover was just as much a statist philosphically was Wilson before him and FDR after him.

ruveyn



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 45,472
Location: Houston, Texas

05 Dec 2012, 12:13 pm

ruveyn wrote:
marshall wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/analysis-obama-could-risk-going-over-cliff-081447326--finance.html


It is very likely. He wants to crash the economy then pick up the pieces (he along with his proto-fascist buddies). Not unlike what FDR did back in 1933 only more thoroughly.

ruveyn


I thought that was Hoover. :roll:


Hoover was chicken to do it thoroughly. FDR was not. But Hoover was just as much a statist philosphically was Wilson before him and FDR after him.

ruveyn


You forgot Harding and Coolidge.


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!

Now proficient in ChatGPT!


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

05 Dec 2012, 12:15 pm

Tim_Tex wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
marshall wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/analysis-obama-could-risk-going-over-cliff-081447326--finance.html


It is very likely. He wants to crash the economy then pick up the pieces (he along with his proto-fascist buddies). Not unlike what FDR did back in 1933 only more thoroughly.

ruveyn


I thought that was Hoover. :roll:


Hoover was chicken to do it thoroughly. FDR was not. But Hoover was just as much a statist philosphically was Wilson before him and FDR after him.

ruveyn


You forgot Harding and Coolidge.


Coolidge was the LEAST statist of the lot. Harding was a buffoon and he does not count except they he let his cronies run amok.

ruveyn



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

05 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm

I am not persuaded that the Republicans will go to the mat for the top two percentiles.

While there is a lot of money in those two percentiles, all the money in the world isn't going to save you from the wrath of voters who will experience the intransigence of the Republicans on behalf other people.

The political calculus appears to me to favour the President. He doesn't have to face the voters in two years time and he is unlikely to lose the Senate at the mid-terms. On the other hand, if the Republicans are to make gains, they are going to have to demonstrate that they have a plan, and that it is a plan that is going to make things better for the people who really count in their base: workers and small business people in the states where they cannot afford to lose House seats.

Let's remember that Republicans lost the popular vote in the House of Representatives election this year. It does not take a major swing for their marginal seats to disappear. There is a base that will vote Republican until the moon goes blue from cold--but it is not enough of a base to prevent such a swing.


_________________
--James


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

05 Dec 2012, 5:06 pm

visagrunt, to be quite blunt Obama probably doesn't care if the country goes off the fiscal cliff.



AgentPalpatine
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,881
Location: Near the Delaware River

05 Dec 2012, 7:18 pm

There are multiple parts to the so-called "fiscal cliff"

1. The expiring reduction of the Social Security (SS) employee (but not employer) payroll tax (2 percent of SS wages) and extended unemployement insurance benefits, expires 12/31/2012. Take-home employee pay will be reduced starting 1/1/2013. Unemployment Insurance benefit reduction has a seperate but related timetable.

2. Expiring Federal Income Tax (FIT) provisions (often refered to as the "Bush Tax Cuts"), expires 12/31/2012. Take-home employee pay will be reduced as soon as new withholding tables are effective post-12/31/2012 (the tables have not been released yet).

3. Expiring FIT provisions ("Extenders package") of a grab-bag of personal and corporate provisions, credits, deductions, and rules (look it up if you're interested), effective 12/31/2011. Will start to impact tax returns filed starting Jan 2013 for tax year 2012 (That is not a typo).

4. Mandatory budget cuts ("Sequestration") required by the Budget Control Act (BCA) of 2011. Timetable is a little confusing on this one, but starts to phase in fairly early in 2012.

5. Mandatory reductions in Medicare reimbursement rates, required by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (as amended several times since), also has a confusing timetable.

We also have...

6. The continuing resolution to operate the US government expires March 31, 2012, which means the US Government will be unable to operate non-essential functions (go to 1995 for court rulings on what stays open).

7. The US Government is almost up against it's borrowing authority, and congress will be asked to increase the borrowing authority (Debt Limit), the exact timing will depend on the above items.

Depending on where you sit on the US political spectrum, some pieces of these items may interest you in one way or another. One key point that should be noted is that parts of the "cliff" kick in at different times.



noxnocturne
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Nov 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,693
Location: Harassing Muggles

06 Dec 2012, 12:27 am

marshall wrote:
Tax giveaways for the rich and austerity for the poor is doing wonders for the economy of Europe. I think maybe Obama should just become a conservative and let the Republicans do whatever they want. Sign every Republican piece of tax cutting social safety net gutting legislation they want and make it the law of the land. Veto all stimulus bills. Undo all labor laws. Get rid of the minimum wage. Bring back child labor and mandatory unpaid overtime. And outlaw collective bargaining with the threat of jail time for any worker that tries to start a union. Accomplish the ultimate wet dream of every conservative. We could accomplish what Milton Freedman's proto-fascist "Chicago Boys" did in Chile, only without a military junta to shoot the disenfranchised rioters dead. What the American people need now is brutal punishment. Then maybe the American people will finally wake up and elect politicians who will pursue real progressive reform.


This argument about tax giveaways for the rich has gotten so old. I would have thought liberals would have gotten more creative by now.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

06 Dec 2012, 8:19 am

AgentPalpatine wrote:
There are multiple parts to the so-called "fiscal cliff"

1. The expiring reduction of the Social Security (SS) employee (but not employer) payroll tax (2 percent of SS wages) and extended unemployement insurance benefits, expires 12/31/2012. Take-home employee pay will be reduced starting 1/1/2013. Unemployment Insurance benefit reduction has a seperate but related timetable.

2. Expiring Federal Income Tax (FIT) provisions (often refered to as the "Bush Tax Cuts"), expires 12/31/2012. Take-home employee pay will be reduced as soon as new withholding tables are effective post-12/31/2012 (the tables have not been released yet).

3. Expiring FIT provisions ("Extenders package") of a grab-bag of personal and corporate provisions, credits, deductions, and rules (look it up if you're interested), effective 12/31/2011. Will start to impact tax returns filed starting Jan 2013 for tax year 2012 (That is not a typo).

4. Mandatory budget cuts ("Sequestration") required by the Budget Control Act (BCA) of 2011. Timetable is a little confusing on this one, but starts to phase in fairly early in 2012.

5. Mandatory reductions in Medicare reimbursement rates, required by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (as amended several times since), also has a confusing timetable.

We also have...

6. The continuing resolution to operate the US government expires March 31, 2012, which means the US Government will be unable to operate non-essential functions (go to 1995 for court rulings on what stays open).

7. The US Government is almost up against it's borrowing authority, and congress will be asked to increase the borrowing authority (Debt Limit), the exact timing will depend on the above items.

Depending on where you sit on the US political spectrum, some pieces of these items may interest you in one way or another. One key point that should be noted is that parts of the "cliff" kick in at different times.


I will tell you what will happen. Obama will declare an "emergency" and he will govern (rule?) by executive order for God knows how long. This actually could mean the under of the Republic under the 1787 Constituiton.

The really dreadful thing is that 90 percent of the public will go along with it.

ruveyn



Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,014
Location: New Orleans

06 Dec 2012, 10:58 am

This is how a government files for Chapter 11.

There is no way to make it work, the Board of Directors is hopeless.

Debt need to be paid, price for services raised, and expenses cut.

That was obvious when they came up with a plan that would kick in after the election, and then go into action within six weeks.

It was the best Congress could come up with to avoid the blame.

As for the Government, it is meaningless, because the debt ceiling is the real fight. No new taxes will be paid before spending limits are reached, which will further reduce Government when no agreement is made.

Government workers will be sent home without pay, States will not get Grants, so they will layoff many, and gridlock will rule for two years.

Point being, next election, both can claim to have fought, cuts will add up, and two years of higher tax. We will be mostly out of Afganistan, and somewhere around a balanced budget.

No one goes on record as being soft on defense, it still gets cut.

Banks and Wall Street are going to get Re-Regulated, have higher Capital Reserves, and I hope a transaction Tax. That we do not tax where most money changes hands is shocking.

It is, Throwing in the Towel. the fight was called because both parties were off punching in different corners.

Business is still good, the recession is with the people, for five years now, and is likely to last beyond Obama's term. All the 99 weekers, no new ones, no jobs, are being thrown over the side. The same for recent grads, as no one sees how and where new employment could happen.

Managed decline is the plan, we are sinking, but flooding some compartments will level the ship.

Will someone please invent a new bubble! We need something new that will lead to a recovery, that employs lots of useless people at good wages.

The Mexicans are self deporting, more will leave as the available money declines.

This is go long, a Hail Mary of Government, as we wait to see where the ball comes down in 2014.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

06 Dec 2012, 11:02 am

Inventor wrote:

This is go long, a Hail Mary of Government, as we wait to see where the ball comes down in 2014.


I think you are on to something.

ruveyn



Last edited by ruveyn on 07 Dec 2012, 10:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

06 Dec 2012, 2:30 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
visagrunt, to be quite blunt Obama probably doesn't care if the country goes off the fiscal cliff.


If that is, indeed, the case, then it is all the more incumbent upon the Republicans to put a plan on the table that will raise revenues, cut expenditure, and not create a knock-on recession in the process. And I will grant you that they seem to have come a long way to the middle--putting revenue on the table is an acknowledgement of reality that was long overdue.

But holding the line on the marginal tax rate for the top 2% strikes me as the wrong hill to die on.


_________________
--James


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

08 Dec 2012, 9:08 am

visagrunt wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
visagrunt, to be quite blunt Obama probably doesn't care if the country goes off the fiscal cliff.


If that is, indeed, the case, then it is all the more incumbent upon the Republicans to put a plan on the table that will raise revenues, cut expenditure, and not create a knock-on recession in the process. And I will grant you that they seem to have come a long way to the middle--putting revenue on the table is an acknowledgement of reality that was long overdue.
.


That is a practical impossibility. After digging a fiscal hole for over 80 years, there are no quick painless fixes. The most effective trace to follow is cut expenditures, raise taxes, repudiate part of the interest on our outstanding debt and not borrow money for the next ten years (no one would lend it to the U.S. anyway). This will be a big hit in the beginning but we can survive it and we will be better off 30 years from now. In the mean time, one way or the other, prepare to suffer.

ruveyn