Rob from rich,give to poor -> rob from poor,give to poor
And if you're sick and need expensive medical care or your kids need special education or your wife or mother has cancer or you can't get work locally and have no car etc.etc.etc.
leejosepho
Veteran
Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock
Yes. My father, now in his 80s, grew up "dirt poor", according to him, then ended up retiring at 40 following a successful period as a manufacturer of recreational vehicles ... and to me, he seemed much better off and we all got along much better while he was still a regular guy just like the rest of us.
_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================
And if you're sick and need expensive medical care or your kids need special education or your wife or mother has cancer or you can't get work locally and have no car etc.etc.etc.
Do you think this unfortunate state of affairs justifies theft, threat of force or the initiation of force?
ruveyn
And if you're sick and need expensive medical care or your kids need special education or your wife or mother has cancer or you can't get work locally and have no car etc.etc.etc.
Again, I disagree. The happiest and most inspiring person I ever knew never let sickness nor hard times destroy her spirit. She was my boss and friend for 10 years. When I first met her, she was doing very well. Had a lovely house, $60,000 car in the driveway, and a wonderful family. They were not without their problems, but overall things were good. Two years after working for her, she got sick, very sick. She needed a liver transplant and insurance wouldn't cover it. They lost everything. The house, the car, her job - everything. I remember asking her before the operation how she felt about her tragic situation and I will never forget her words. "It's only money, I'm still here," she said with a huge smile. And she meant it.
She recovered well from the surgery, but her family of 5 now lived in a 1 bedroom apartment with no transportation except for the teenage girls beater car. She was just as happy at this point as she was when I first met her, maybe moreso. Sadly, she died about a year ago from an unrelated cancer. She remained happy and broke up until her death.
My mother on the other hand was perpetually miserable. It was always about money with her. If she was rich (read married a guy with money), she'd complain about the car not being fancy enough, or the vacation not being long enough, etc., etc. When she was broke, she was equally miserable. It was never enough, not matter how much she had. She was miserable until the day she died.
My family's been through our own share of struggles from having a special needs kid and a disabled husband, to job loss and impending foreclosure on our dream home. So what, I still have my family, and every day I wake up feeling happy in knowing that I have the best family ever. No amount of money could ever change that.
Money doesn't buy happiness and it doesn't solve problems. It may sound cliche, but it's true. If you can say "it's only money" and mean it, you're in a good place, whether you have it or don't.
And if you're sick and need expensive medical care or your kids need special education or your wife or mother has cancer or you can't get work locally and have no car etc.etc.etc.
Do you think this unfortunate state of affairs justifies theft, threat of force or the initiation of force?
ruveyn
I suppose you will want these sick people to pay for the bullets that are to be used on them in your dystopia.
(*Note: The problem of seeming to never have enough can easily grow right alongside anyone's balance sheet.)
yes, exactly.
everyone needs a certain minimum amount of resources to survive, but like leejosepho has observed, it is never possible for some people to have "enough". their expenses and desires and wants rise along with their income.
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105
In extreme cases, yes, it is possible to redistribute income downward SO MUCH that the rich are no longer rich but impoverished. In actuality, that doesn't really happen in postindustrial societies.
[quote="xenon13"
I suppose you will want these sick people to pay for the bullets that are to be used on them in your dystopia.[/quote]
Can you distinguish between commission and omission. I do not propose initiating force against these unfortunate folk. I propose that any help they get be purely voluntary and not at taxpayer expense. If you want to help the Wretched of the Earth, then by all means do. But on YOUR nickel, not mine. And of others want to ignore the wretches they should not be forced to pay for their care.
ruveyn
His actions were hardly Marxist.
And there is the key that lefties overlook.
Robin hood stole from the rich to give to the poor. But he lived under an oppressive monarchy where the only ones who had any wealth were part of the government or royalty. So it could also be said that he stole from the government to give to the people.
Some Socialists & Communists want to recreate the situation by overly taxing private citizens with wealth to the point that the only ones who are wealthy are the government, thus oppressing the masses. Oh, but rest assured, they are only attempting to create income equality in the private sector. Unfortunately the only way to achieve that goal is to have all of the people equally poor.
Can you distinguish between commission and omission. I do not propose initiating force against these unfortunate folk. I propose that any help they get be purely voluntary and not at taxpayer expense. If you want to help the Wretched of the Earth, then by all means do. But on YOUR nickel, not mine. And of others want to ignore the wretches they should not be forced to pay for their care.
Your ideal world is a world of horror and brutality. Life isn't free. No matter how much you pontificate "stealing is wrong" you will not be able to prevent a starving underclass from violently revolting against the rich if they decide to hoard all the wealth and resources. To them your failure to share is an act of violence and they will respond with violence. Also, it makes no sense for you to make moral proclamations against violence when you have no moral conscience yourself. There really is no logical right or wrong in the matter as the conflict is a conflict of basic values. There's no sense in arguing with a sociopath such as yourself so I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.
leejosepho
Veteran
Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock
Hypotheticals often lead to confusion and trouble, and that statement misses reality in at least two ways:
1) Starving people (contextually poor and destitute) would be too weak and broke for violent revolution;
2) "The rich" would not be guilty of hoarding just because they were not writing checks.
And then, of course:
... is not an acceptable way to speak to anyone around here.
_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================
Hypotheticals often lead to confusion and trouble, and that statement misses reality in at least two ways:
1) Starving people (contextually poor and destitute) would be too weak and broke for violent revolution;
2) "The rich" would not be guilty of hoarding just because they were not writing checks.
By existing in the proximity of starving people and refusing to do anything they are guilty of hoarding. I would have no qualms if they were robbed.
... is not an acceptable way to speak to anyone around here.
Do NOT patronize me.
Show me that that man is not a sociopath, the way he talks of people who he believes are "below" him. I've had it with the all the hateful sickness masquerading as "conservatism". Violence truly is the only language the irredeemably selfish and hateful understand. I'm sick of this whole damn site. f**k YOU ALL. f**k HUMANS. f**k THIS PLANET. And don't anyone bother saying anything back to me that you wouldn't have the gall to say to my face, lest I break it.
Hypotheticals often lead to confusion and trouble, and that statement misses reality in at least two ways:
1) Starving people (contextually poor and destitute) would be too weak and broke for violent revolution;
2) "The rich" would not be guilty of hoarding just because they were not writing checks.
By existing in the proximity of starving people and refusing to do anything they are guilty of hoarding. I would have no qualms if they were robbed.
... is not an acceptable way to speak to anyone around here.
Do NOT patronize me.
Show me that that man is not a sociopath, the way he talks of people who he believes are "below" him. I've had it with the all the hateful sickness masquerading as "conservatism". Violence truly is the only language the irredeemably selfish and hateful understand. I'm sick of this whole damn site. f**k YOU ALL. f**k HUMANS. f**k THIS PLANET. And don't anyone bother saying anything back to me that you wouldn't have the gall to say to my face, lest I break it.
That's not a very charitable attitude for someone demanding charity of others.
_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]
His actions were hardly Marxist.
And there is the key that lefties overlook.
Robin hood stole from the rich to give to the poor. But he lived under an oppressive monarchy where the only ones who had any wealth were part of the government or royalty. So it could also be said that he stole from the government to give to the people.
Some Socialists & Communists want to recreate the situation by overly taxing private citizens with wealth to the point that the only ones who are wealthy are the government, thus oppressing the masses. Oh, but rest assured, they are only attempting to create income equality in the private sector. Unfortunately the only way to achieve that goal is to have all of the people equally poor.
The (fictional) Robin Hood stole from the rich and PAID the "poor" because it was the "Poor" who provided services he needed.
_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]
During the Great Depression the amount of violence among the unemployed was rather low. Most crime was related to Prohibition, not to poverty and there was much blood spilled over who would control the trade in illegal booze.
As for my "ideal world", I don't have one. I have -this- world, the world I live in and I do the best I can in it.
I expect very little from people and I surely do not count on moral excellence. If it happens, that is good, but it is an accident. Most people follow the line of least resistance and try to do the best they can given the circumstances and their limitations. I am in no position to either expect or demand excellence or heroism from others.
Keep your expectations low and your door locked.
ruveyn
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Poor Things is a male take on feminism |
27 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm |
Poor level of suppourt in college |
12 Mar 2024, 7:52 am |
Is it odd I don't like it when people give me sympathy? |
03 Mar 2024, 1:58 pm |
Can someone give up Lent for Lent? |
16 Mar 2024, 3:32 pm |