Hate crime statistics deflate "Islamophobia" myth

Page 1 of 7 [ 103 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

12 Jan 2013, 12:31 pm

Quote:
Hate-Crime Stats Deflate ‘Islamophobia’ Myth
  • Islamists inflate the number of anti-Muslim crimes in order to silence critics.
A detailed analysis of FBI statistics covering ten full calendar years since the 9/11 terrorist attacks reveals that, on a per capita basis, American Muslims, contrary to spin, have been subjected to hate crimes less often than other prominent minorities. From 2002 to 2011, Muslims are estimated to have suffered hate crimes at a frequency of 6.0 incidents per 100,000 per year – 10 percent lower than blacks (6.7), 48 percent lower than homosexuals and bisexuals (11.5), and 59 percent lower than Jews (14.8). Americans should keep these numbers in mind whenever Islamists attempt to silence critics by invoking Muslim victimhood.

The federal government defines a hate crime as a “criminal offense against a person or property motivated in whole or in part by an offender’s bias against a race, religion, disability, ethnic origin, or sexual orientation.” Though statutes mandating harsher punishments for hatred-inspired acts raise the specter of thought crimes, emphasize group identity over the individual, and seemingly favor certain victims over others, the FBI’s tracking of such deeds shines important light on the state of the nation. Annual reports assembled from local law-enforcement data are accessible on the website of the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting Program. Especially useful is Table 1 of each compilation, which summarizes the number of incidents, offenses, victims, and known offenders for hate crimes committed against members of different groups.

No class of hate crimes has seen more fluctuation than anti-Muslim ones. The norm was a few dozen incidents per year in the late 1990s, but the number jumped from 28 in 2000 to 481 in 2001, a spike attributed to post-9/11 backlash. However, it dropped to 155 in 2002 and held remarkably steady through 2006, before falling again to 115 in 2007, 105 in 2008, and 107 in 2009.

What a surprise. It's pretty much as we thought. Muslims are attacked far less often than people from other minorities - they're targeted less than black people in the U.S. - and the minority groups that are most persecuted are gay people and Jews (some of which, in Europe, are often carried out by violent and uncivilised Muslim immigrants), and attacks on Muslims for being Muslims (it goes without saying that any attack on a minority for being a minority shouldn't happen) simply don't merit a special word when it happens. Especially not one that has been used to silence people critical of Islam.

Comments? It's nice to see that we can let a little reality in to the likes of CAIR's fantastical lies.



Last edited by Tequila on 12 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

12 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm

Just appending this story, as it's sort of relevant to the discussion:

Quote:
EXPOSÉ: No-go Areas for Jews in Europe
  • Israel has room for all Jews and welcomes them, but that does not have any bearing on what is going on in Europe. Rabbi Lau predicted that European Jewish history is nearing its end.
Surprised that Israelis entering Jordan are required to deposit religious Jewish items, like skullcaps and tefillin, for "security reasons?

It's happening in many European countries as well, where Jews are once again in grave danger and Judeophobia has become the common currency of politics.

Jews in Denmark have just been warned by Israeli officials not to appear publicly wearing Jewish religious symbols such as yarmulkes or stars of David in order to avoid increasing anti-Israel and anti-Semitic altercations. “We advise Israelis who come to Denmark and want to go to the synagogue to wait to don their skull caps until they enter the building and not to wear them in the street, irrespective of whether the areas they are visiting are seen as being safe,” said Israel’s ambassador to Denmark, Arthur Avnon.



anongamer
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 42

12 Jan 2013, 1:26 pm

Yet they use this excuse all the time to exclude themselves from non-muslims (the infidels). Look at this muslim-only housing development.

http://rouse-hill-times.whereilive.com. ... ourhood-5/

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/nati ... 6549857355

Quote:
"I can only imagine the repercussions if a developer were to advertise a new Judeo-Christian housing estate; they would be hung, drawn and quartered," Mr Williams said.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

12 Jan 2013, 1:29 pm

Exactly. Segregation and separation are a common theme of Muslim life in the UK too. In certain towns and cities, you have Muslim areas and non-Muslim areas.



anongamer
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 42

12 Jan 2013, 1:54 pm

No you have muslim and everyone (including muslim) areas. Non-muslims wouldn't dream of going to a muslim area.

They come to the communal areas to take advantage of work, but then complain about how non-muslim it is. (ie. women wearing skimpy clothing, restaurants serving pork, people drinking and gambling etc)

Our Cronulla riots was partly caused by this, groups of muslim men going to beaches treating the local girls like crap. Even their muslim leaders say that girls in bikinis deserve to be raped.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taj_El-Din_Hilaly

Quote:
In October 2006, Hilaly delivered a Ramadan sermon in Arabic in which he made statements concerning female clothing which proved highly controversial. The key part of these was:
If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats' or the uncovered meat? The uncovered meat is the problem. If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred."
—Taj El-Din Hilaly

He also said, "in the state of zina, the responsibility falls 90 per cent of the time on the woman. Why? Because she possesses the weapon of enticement (igraa)."


When will western society realise that Islam is incompatible with 21st century society?

They literally live (in their minds) in the middle east of the 6th century. Part of being a muslim is living by the Hadiths. That is, living by the actions and statements of Mohammed. Mohammed, was a man that lived in 570-673 AD. All the beliefs, superstitions, customs and traditions are based on that time. Marriage to children is ok because Mohammed did then. Many of their customs are based on the lack of hygiene and health at the time (read Najasat & Taharat) about using stones after using the toilet - because toilet paper didn't exist. Many of their customs are based on nomadic society (the clothing). They are doing it because Mohammed and his family did it (regardless that it was 1500 years ago), and so should they if they want to be a good muslim.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadith



Last edited by anongamer on 12 Jan 2013, 2:08 pm, edited 3 times in total.

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

12 Jan 2013, 2:00 pm

Tequila wrote:
Quote:
Hate-Crime Stats Deflate ‘Islamophobia’ Myth
  • Islamists inflate the number of anti-Muslim crimes in order to silence critics.
A detailed analysis of FBI statistics covering ten full calendar years since the 9/11 terrorist attacks reveals that, on a per capita basis, American Muslims, contrary to spin, have been subjected to hate crimes less often than other prominent minorities. From 2002 to 2011, Muslims are estimated to have suffered hate crimes at a frequency of 6.0 incidents per 100,000 per year – 10 percent lower than blacks (6.7), 48 percent lower than homosexuals and bisexuals (11.5), and 59 percent lower than Jews (14.8). Americans should keep these numbers in mind whenever Islamists attempt to silence critics by invoking Muslim victimhood.

The federal government defines a hate crime as a “criminal offense against a person or property motivated in whole or in part by an offender’s bias against a race, religion, disability, ethnic origin, or sexual orientation.” Though statutes mandating harsher punishments for hatred-inspired acts raise the specter of thought crimes, emphasize group identity over the individual, and seemingly favor certain victims over others, the FBI’s tracking of such deeds shines important light on the state of the nation. Annual reports assembled from local law-enforcement data are accessible on the website of the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting Program. Especially useful is Table 1 of each compilation, which summarizes the number of incidents, offenses, victims, and known offenders for hate crimes committed against members of different groups.

No class of hate crimes has seen more fluctuation than anti-Muslim ones. The norm was a few dozen incidents per year in the late 1990s, but the number jumped from 28 in 2000 to 481 in 2001, a spike attributed to post-9/11 backlash. However, it dropped to 155 in 2002 and held remarkably steady through 2006, before falling again to 115 in 2007, 105 in 2008, and 107 in 2009.

What a surprise. It's pretty much as we thought. Muslims are attacked far less often than people from other minorities - they're targeted less than black people in the U.S. - and the minority groups that are most persecuted are gay people and Jews (some of which, in Europe, are often carried out by violent and uncivilised Muslim immigrants), and attacks on Muslims for being Muslims (it goes without saying that any attack on a minority for being a minority shouldn't happen) simply don't merit a special word when it happens. Especially not one that has been used to silence people critical of Islam.

Comments? It's nice to see that we can let a little reality in to the likes of CAIR's fantastical lies.


It is interesting to note that Jews are more than twice as likely to be attacked for being Jewish than Blacks are likely to be attacked for being Black.

Even in the U.S. it is not entirely safe for Jews. In other place, however, it is much worse for Jews.

ruveyn



anongamer
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 42

12 Jan 2013, 2:13 pm

Oh. They hate Christmas too.

Quote:
SYDNEY'S Lakemba Mosque has issued a fatwa against Christmas, warning followers it is a ''sin'' to even wish people a Merry Christmas.

http://www.theage.com.au/national/chris ... 2bsr2.html



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

12 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm

anongamer wrote:
No you have muslim and everyone (including muslim) areas. Non-muslims wouldn't dream of going to a muslim area.


Some non-Muslims do live in Muslim areas, but these are in many cases people who can't afford to move out or can't afford somewhere better. In general, though, it's segregated up here. There isn't a mixing of people. In many cases people outside work people stick to their own.

As I keep saying: unless the people are allowed to have their say (mass immigration, and especially not mass Muslim immigration, would never have happened if the people had been listened to), we're sowing the seeds of future conflict, tension and intimidation. And this is all down to politicians, who ignore their public with impunity and they're the ones left to pick up the pieces.

anongamer wrote:
They come to the communal areas to take advantage of work, but then complain about how non-muslim it is. (ie. women wearing skimpy clothing, restaurants serving pork, people drinking and gambling etc)


To which the correct response is: I invite you to emigrate to Saudi Arabia, and take your bigoted, Dark Age view of the world with you.

anongamer wrote:
Our Cronulla riots was partly caused by this, groups of muslim men going to beaches treating the local girls like crap. Even their muslim leaders say that girls in bikinis deserve to be raped.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taj_El-Din_Hilaly


That's not forgetting the string of gang rapes committed on Australian beaches by Lebanese Muslim men committed in Sydney about twelve years ago, or the long-running scandal in the UK where gangs of - often middle-aged Muslim men - exploited, drugged and raped underage teenage girls, often those girls who have had a pretty rough start in life anyway. This has been going on in numerous locations where there are large Muslim populations.

Quote:
In October 2006, Hilaly delivered a Ramadan sermon in Arabic in which he made statements concerning female clothing which proved highly controversial. The key part of these was:
If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats' or the uncovered meat? The uncovered meat is the problem. If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred."
—Taj El-Din Hilaly

He also said, "in the state of zina, the responsibility falls 90 per cent of the time on the woman. Why? Because she possesses the weapon of enticement (igraa)."


I've heard this speech before. I think it's absolutely despicable.

And, yes, in Islam, a woman being raped is always the woman's fault, it seems.

anongamer wrote:
When will western society realise that Islam is incompatible with 21st century society?


It absolutely is completely incompatible with fundamental freedom, liberty, tolerance and simple respect for human life. It's a religion of the Dark Ages that, unlike Christianity in most cases in the West, simply hasn't really moved on.

Muslims can move on from the 7th Century, can mitigate the effects of their religion (and most do - perhaps even without thinking about it) but the religion itself can't. It's poison and I wish we'd never heard of it.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

12 Jan 2013, 2:24 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Even in the U.S. it is not entirely safe for Jews. In other place, however, it is much worse for Jews.


Yes - there are several European cities where you are virtually asking to be attacked for being an observant Jew, like oh, Malmö in Sweden for instance (and when Jews are attacked, the city's mayor will blame the attack on the policies of the Israeli government!). Horrible, grey place.



xenon13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,638

12 Jan 2013, 2:28 pm

The FBI has zero trust in the Muslim community as they specialise in sending criminals loaded with mucho dinero to the mosques in a bid to recruit people for phony terrorist plots designed to create Victories in the War of Terror. Thus, to expand the police state. If I was an American Muslim I'd be very reluctant to report anything to the police...



thomas81
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland

12 Jan 2013, 2:39 pm

Discriminative violence and hate crimes arent the be all and end all of discrimination. There is also treatment in the workplace, treatment by public service officials, treatment by private companies and general treatment in the public domain.
I'd be interested to see figures that compare these themes with that of other groups.

Sources of these suggest appalling discrimination in western society
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8t7L3ONWjnk[/youtube]


_________________
Being 'normal' is over rated.

My deviant art profile


xenon13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,638

12 Jan 2013, 2:43 pm

This father reported his concerns about his kid to the police, and guess what the FBI does. They make his kid the star in their new production, War of Terror Victory in Portland, Christmas Tree Bomber foiled at last second. Only that the whole idea of a Christmas Tree bomb was the FBI's and they pestered him incessantly, cajoled and bribed him into it using every psychological technique in the book. The proof that would prove conclusively that the FBI entrapped the kid of course was conveniently not produced as a result of a "dead battery"... yes the FBI is arguing this in court! The recording showing that it was all the FBI's idea they said was not recorded at all because of a dead battery on the listening device. That alone should be grounds for throwing it out of court. Oh, and Portland rejoined some War of Terror project to funnel money into expanding the police state after this little caper. But anyway, the lesson of this story is, if you are a Muslim with a son and you are worried that he is angry and interested in jihad, don't, don't, don't call the police. They are not your friend.



anongamer
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 42

12 Jan 2013, 2:49 pm

Quote:
There is also treatment in the workplace


At least in Australia, muslims arn't employed much in office roles in private companies. I'm guessing it is pretty similar in the UK due to their over-representation in small business (taxis, small stores/take aways etc).

In Australia, although there are anti-discrimination laws, it is fine to say a person will not be an fit for the organisation or team. Friday night drinks as well as office parties is still a pretty big thing here (workplaces still provide free alcohol here) so someone that they know will not participate (and possibly object to) in it nor be able to chat to team mates without being easily offended would not be hired in most places. In this area, they only have themselves to blame.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

12 Jan 2013, 3:13 pm

thomas81 wrote:
Discriminative violence and hate crimes arent the be all and end all of discrimination. There is also treatment in the workplace, treatment by public service officials, treatment by private companies and general treatment in the public domain.
I'd be interested to see figures that compare these themes with that of other groups.


Bring them on. If they were discriminated against regularly, the likes of CAIR would be screaming about it from the rooftops. They're not, because in the vast majority of instances they're either treated fairly or even leniently compared to non-Muslims.

I'll bet you £50 that there is no (or almost) evidence of the discrimination that you go on about, and I bet you any amount of money that black people - called "slaves" in Arabic! - and Jews are more discriminated against. If there is, there would be endless complaining (and no doubt intimidation and violence in some instances too).

I'm still waiting for the Islamists to make their case. They have singularly failed to do so. All these Hamas affiliates are worthy of is open mockery and derision.

thomas81 wrote:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8t7L3ONWjnk[/youtube]


If you actually looked at what the journalist said about this story, she said that in the vast majority of cases, Americans were open and friendly to Muslims wearing the hijab. Even when the journalist wore the niqab - you know, the Islamic black tent - more people stared at her (because anyone wearing it is making a spectacle of themselves), but she received pretty much no abuse off anyone.

Back to the drawing board with this.

Here's how 'Islamophobic' westeners are, apparently - produced for an Egyptian fundamentalist Islamic niqab-only TV channel. Fill yer boots!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7aaigRFYxs[/youtube]



anongamer
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 42

12 Jan 2013, 3:23 pm

I can't believe they think that is discrimination (nijab video).

Who would hire someone who's views are totally different to everyone elses. Especially in the role that woman was applying for (something requiring a commerce degree) would be management or general finance role. That means dealing with a lot of people. May be different if it was a repetitive factory job where your performance is solely the amount of pieces you complete, but no one wants to deal with just eyes 8 hours a day.

Wearing the nijab means you are separating yourself from society. If you want to live so separate from society, why do you expect them to be inclusive of you when it suits you?



thomas81
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland

12 Jan 2013, 3:28 pm

anongamer wrote:
I can't believe they think that is discrimination (nijab video).

Who would hire someone who's views are totally different to everyone elses. Especially in the role that woman was applying for (something requiring a commerce degree) would be management or general finance role. That means dealing with a lot of people. May be different if it was a repetitive factory job, but no one wants to deal with just eyes 8 hours a day.

Wearing the nijab means you are separating yourself from society. If you want to live so separate from society, why do you expect them to be inclusive of you when it suits you?


The hijab and the burkha are two seperate things. The burkha is the scarf which covers everything but the eyes. Typically they are worn by no one but the most conservative of muslim housewives. Most orthodox muslim women wear only the hijab which leaves the oval of the face visible. I see no reason why a hijab wearer should be excluded from applying from a high profile management job or equivalent, much less the rest of society. The only reason could be wilfull ignorance and bigotry.


_________________
Being 'normal' is over rated.

My deviant art profile