Should bare human female mammary areolae be legal in public?
I think a largge part has to do wth women in westrnn societies and othres that are highly criticall of sex seem usualy taught at yuong age that they haev to be modest and sexuly "pious" (becuse if they aernt, they may be considred a whore or a slut), and so thir more reactioinry to anythng sexual than men are, who dont have that emphasised as much to them.
_________________
Níb caram-si, á Áes catha
Here are indecent exposure laws by state.
http://statelaws.findlaw.com/criminal-l ... -exposure/
Some of them are quite vague. For example,
(1) A person shall not knowingly make any open or indecent exposure of his or her person or of the person of another.
(2) A person who violates subsection (1) is guilty of a crime, as follows:
(a) Except as provided in subdivision (b) or (c), the person is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or a fine of not more than $1,000.00, or both.
(b) If the person was fondling his or her genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or, if the person is female, breasts, while violating subsection (1), the person is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 2 years or a fine of not more than $2,000.00, or both.
(c) If the person was at the time of the violation a sexually delinquent person, the violation is punishable by imprisonment for an indeterminate term, the minimum of which is 1 day and the maximum of which is life.
The Law doesn't define "open or indecent exposure of his or her person", and would presumably be up to the cops or the judge to decide what that means. A person labeled "sexually delinquent" could be put away for life. Michigan prosecutors must be licking their chops.
(2) Indecent exposure is a petty misdemeanor.
The Hawaiian law only says "genitals." So, bare bosoms must be fine.
In Florida, with all of those European tourists
http://statelaws.findlaw.com/florida-la ... -laws.html
Just be quick to deny any "lewd intent."
In Texas, surprisingly
bare boobies are perfectly okay. Unless Texas somehow regards boobies as "genitals."
Utah is more explicit
(a) an act of sexual intercourse or sodomy;
(b) exposes his or her genitals, the female breast below the top of the areola, the buttocks, the anus, or the pubic area;
(c) masturbates; or
(d) any other act of lewdness.
(2) (a) A person convicted the first or second time of a violation of Subsection (1) is guilty of a class B misdemeanor, except under Subsection (2)(b).
(b) A person convicted of a violation of Subsection (1) is guilty of a third degree felony if at the time of the violation:
...
(3) A woman's breast feeding, including breast feeding in any location where the woman otherwise may rightfully be, does not under any circumstance constitute a lewd act, irrespective of whether or not the breast is covered during or incidental to feeding.
Interesting--a dame may show some cleavage, but no portion of the breast below the top of the areola. Unless she is breastfeeding. Then, Utah law is not offended.
PrncssAlay
Deinonychus
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 321
Location: Midwest, Southwest, Northwest, California
Maybe it was cold that day...
I was at a college baseball game early in the season in the mid 1990s. It had been warm but was cooling down as the sun got low in the sky. One undergraduate girl walked by and it was quite clear that she didn't have a bra underneath her t-shirt because of the way the nipples were hard and poking the fabric out.
As she walked by, each section in turn gave her a standing ovation. Well, the males in each section, anyway.
Had it been a male streaker, the ladies would have been greatly disappointed ...
Had it been a male streaker, the ladies would have been greatly disappointed ...
When I was twenty, I had heart surgery. On the day before the surgery, they did a catheterization. I was flat on my back on a table, totally nude, while the best looking nurse I saw in that hospital the whole time I was there was working to slide a tube through my femoral artery from the region immediately next to the groin up to the heart. At no time during the procedure did that nurse look the least bit impressed nor did I hear any ooh's or ah's from her. Definitely no standing ovation for me.
If it's legal for big, fat hairy dudes to walk around shirtless, I can think of no sane reason why female nipples are considered "obscene."
Caught an unfortunate eye-full of man boobs while out for my morning run today. I really didn't need to see some sweaty Jabba the Hut, sans shirt, mowing his lawn, but I managed to survive the encounter.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
PrncssAlay
Deinonychus
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 321
Location: Midwest, Southwest, Northwest, California
Man boobs on riding lawn mowers must be a "thing" this year, as I also have had two or three of those encounters. I was surprised at my "ick" reaction because with clothing on all body types are about equal to me. (I basically only care about what is between the ears.)
Uga! Boonowa tweepi, ha, ha. Spasteelia a bunkadunka.
Race a spuce adoobla!
I think that the standard Feminist logic is that nobody sexually objectifies male mammary areolae, which means that they are neither offensive nor disgusting, and may consequently be flaunted in public displays.
Some people sexually objectify female mammary areolae (even when the distance from the actual genital organs is known), which makes them both offensive and disgusting, and necessary to hide from view, except when breastfeeding or participating in a Feminist rally.
The female areolae of other species, though, may be presented with impunity, as the males of their species do not objectify them sexually.
The adoptive mother of Romulus and Remus gets off on two counts
1. She is breastfeeding, and
2. She in non-human.
Beyond that, Feminists and others who share their sensitivities will surely stay the Hell away from art galleries, which are hotbeds of patriarchy, sexual objectification and visual debauchery.
I'm looking forward to the day when Femen shows up to protest a Gauguin exhibit.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
NY Can Take Legal Action Against County's Ban on Female Tran |
09 Apr 2024, 5:13 pm |
First human implanted with neuralink |
03 Feb 2024, 6:55 pm |
Overstimulation and shutting down in public |
03 Apr 2024, 11:31 am |
Truth social going public and merging |
22 Mar 2024, 2:47 pm |