Page 4 of 5 [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

14 Dec 2013, 2:31 pm

sonofghandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)

16 Dec 2013, 10:35 am

ArrantPariah wrote:


Quote:
Why are record numbers of Americans on food stamps? Because record numbers of Americans are in poverty. Why are people falling through the cracks? Because there are cracks to fall through. It is simply astonishing that in this rich nation more than 21 million Americans are still in need of full-time work, many of them running out of jobless benefits, while our financial class pockets record profits, spends lavishly on campaigns to secure a political order that serves its own interests, and demands that our political class push for further austerity. Meanwhile, roughly 46 million Americans live at or below the poverty line and, with the exception of Romania, no developed country has a higher percent of kids in poverty than we do. Yet a study by scholars at Northwestern University and Vanderbilt finds little support among the wealthiest Americans for policy reforms to reduce income inequality.


_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,794
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

16 Dec 2013, 11:15 am

sonofghandi wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:


Quote:
Why are record numbers of Americans on food stamps? Because record numbers of Americans are in poverty. Why are people falling through the cracks? Because there are cracks to fall through. It is simply astonishing that in this rich nation more than 21 million Americans are still in need of full-time work, many of them running out of jobless benefits, while our financial class pockets record profits, spends lavishly on campaigns to secure a political order that serves its own interests, and demands that our political class push for further austerity. Meanwhile, roughly 46 million Americans live at or below the poverty line and, with the exception of Romania, no developed country has a higher percent of kids in poverty than we do. Yet a study by scholars at Northwestern University and Vanderbilt finds little support among the wealthiest Americans for policy reforms to reduce income inequality.


God help the affluent if the rest of us ever smarten up, and quit thinking that we're also just billionaires in waiting.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


sonofghandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)

16 Dec 2013, 11:33 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
God help the affluent if the rest of us ever smarten up, and quit thinking that we're also just billionaires in waiting.


I think the most disturbing part of the article is "with the exception of Romania, no developed country has a higher percent of kids in poverty than we do."


_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,794
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

16 Dec 2013, 11:35 am

sonofghandi wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
God help the affluent if the rest of us ever smarten up, and quit thinking that we're also just billionaires in waiting.


I think the most disturbing part of the article is "with the exception of Romania, no developed country has a higher percent of kids in poverty than we do."


Agreed. :(


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


ZenDen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2013
Age: 81
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,730
Location: On top of the world

19 Dec 2013, 3:58 pm

As far as a "war on the poor" I think m. Romney said it best: IT'S JUST GOOD BUSINESS.

Rich people are in business to make money. The more money (and according to m.r.: tax breaks as well) the better. If stupid, slow moving people get in the way rich people will run them over or leave them in the dust. What happens to them isn't m. Romney's fault or responsibility; all he's doing is making money legally (following laws he sponsored) and government money to support him is just good for the country. He thinks people should pull themselves up by their own bootstraps like he and his kids have had to do.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,470
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

19 Dec 2013, 4:26 pm

ZenDen wrote:
As far as a "war on the poor" I think m. Romney said it best: IT'S JUST GOOD BUSINESS.

Rich people are in business to make money. The more money (and according to m.r.: tax breaks as well) the better. If stupid, slow moving people get in the way rich people will run them over or leave them in the dust. What happens to them isn't m. Romney's fault or responsibility; all he's doing is making money legally (following laws he sponsored) and government money to support him is just good for the country. He thinks people should pull themselves up by their own bootstraps like he and his kids have had to do.



Image

Actually it is the responsibility of the government to serve the people, that includes the poor, but I suppose its just better to ignore the problem of poverty and hope it just goes away. Its probably a good thing Mit Romney didn't win the election if he thinks he's so far above social responsibility.


_________________
We won't go back.


ZenDen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2013
Age: 81
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,730
Location: On top of the world

19 Dec 2013, 4:44 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
ZenDen wrote:
As far as a "war on the poor" I think m. Romney said it best: IT'S JUST GOOD BUSINESS.

Rich people are in business to make money. The more money (and according to m.r.: tax breaks as well) the better. If stupid, slow moving people get in the way rich people will run them over or leave them in the dust. What happens to them isn't m. Romney's fault or responsibility; all he's doing is making money legally (following laws he sponsored) and government money to support him is just good for the country. He thinks people should pull themselves up by their own bootstraps like he and his kids have had to do.



Image

Actually it is the responsibility of the government to serve the people, that includes the poor, but I suppose its just better to ignore the problem of poverty and hope it just goes away. Its probably a good thing Mit Romney didn't win the election if he thinks he's so far above social responsibility.


It's time for people to notice that the government representation we receive is far from the days of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. In those days the idea was to throw out the British and build this country. Now politicians are interested in acquiring power and votes and money and the fate of the average American is left in the capable hands of m.romney and republican and democrat friends.

I believe things will get only worse because I can't see any factor that is strong enough to regulate those in power. Except in winning elections politicians don't seem to care at all for the welfare of the people. And as public unions (what a filthy situation) care less about the average citizen than politicians and with the back of the REAL unions broken, it's something close to slavery we'll be seein'.