Post a Muhammed Cartoon!
Muhammad (((:~{>
Muhammad playing Little Orphan Annie (((8~{>
Muhammad as a pirate (((P~{>
Muhammad as Moshe Dayan (((P~{>
Muhammad on a bad turban day ))):~{>
Muhammad with sand in his eye(((;~{>
Muhammad wearing sunglasses (((B~{>
Muhammad giving the raspberry. (((:~{>
Giving Muhammad the raspberry. ;-P
Mohammad with a lit bomb in his turban *-O)):~{> zh3gl.jpg
Mohammad with a lit bomb in his turban *~@:~{>
Mohammed, full of booze and pork, pukes up Allah (((:~Oالله
Intoxicated Mohammed (((‡o{Þ
High Mohammed ((( ¦o) >
The devil mo ]:~{>
Sombrero Mohommed ⊂∫≡(:~{>>
Mohammed with a bomb in his turban. *@(((:~{>>
Mohammed with a nuclear bomb in his turban. @=(((:~{>
Carmen Miranda Mohammed ڨڭڿۺ((:~{>
Muhammed without beard O:-|
Muhammed without beard; or Jesus O:-)
Muhammed having a vision) O8-)
Muhammed with goatee) O:-)*
Muhammad pissed off that his favourite goat ran away (((B-|>
Muhammad being shot by Starship Enterprise =-o * * * (((:~{>
Mohammed with a lit fuse coming out of his turban *-(((:~{>
Mohammed on a *really* bad turban day )8(:~{>
Muhammad sees a Danish cartoonist !((((8~{o>
Muhammad turns Christian (((+:~{>
Muhammad imitates Charles Manson ((((x8~{>
Muhammad wears his Johnny Carson “Great Carsoni” turban (((0))):~{>
Muhammad after going quail hunting with Dick Cheney (:(:(:((8~>:::::::::::::
Saudi Arabian/oil shiek version of Muhammad (($$(((:~{>
Muhammad wearing his personalized designer turban (((MOE)));~{>
Muhammad wearing his “elevator” turban ((((((((((((((;~{>
Osama bin Laden dressed up as Muhammad on Halloween (((:~{>
Osama bin Laden dressed up as Muhammad on Halloween with an improvised explosive device in his turban (((*-O(((((:~{>
Muhammad is not pleased with Muhammad emoticons ((((;~{[>
Bow-legged dickless GAY cowboy BLIAR in chaps & spurs, being
manipulated like a puppet by some DOG (God):
. . . . . . . . ./
. | . . . . . . | . . . . //////=[*
=|(:~0> ==+=|
. | . . . . . . | . . . . \\\\\\=[*
. . . . . . . . .\
Bow-legged dickless GAY cowboy Mohammed in chaps & spurs, being manipulated like a puppet by some Jew (historically accurate):
. . . . . . . . ./
. | . . . . . . | . . . . //////=[*
=|((:~0> ==+=|
. | . . . . . . | . . . . \\\\\\=[*
. . . . . . . . .\
Animé mocon (happy)
~~~~~
~~~~~
(^
hmm won’t take less than caracther so here goes without the nose!
Animé mocon (happy)
~~~~~
~~~~~
(^_^)
¥
Mo sees a Danish cartoonist
~~~~~
~~~~~
(¬_¬)
¥
Mo got deaddrunk
~~~~~
~~~~~
(*.*)
¥
Mo is out of control!! ! (and furious)! AND HAS A BOMB IN HIS TURBAN!
O-*
~~~~~
~~~~~
(@_@)
¥
Angry Mohammad = (( }8-q>
Mohammed hungry (((:~{>…
Mohammed is a vampire (((:~{I=
Mohammed is a vampire and hungry (((:~{I=…
Mohammed dressed up as Osama bin Laden dressed up as Mohammed on Halloween (((:~{>
Mohammed in jail ((###
Gorge Bush sit down on Mohammed 3(((:~{>
Jesus sit down on Mohammed O3(((:~{>
ampir-Mohammed’s tooth has broken (((:~{L
Vampir-Mohammed’s tooth has broken, but Mohammed still hungry (((:~{L…
Mohammed in rainy weather 3:::::(((:~{>
The lightning strikes in Mohammed from a cloud 3Z(((8~|o>
Mohammed holds a bomb by his teeth (((:~{Q>
Mohammed in white paranja [:]
Playful Mohammed in white paranja [;]
Egyptian god Ra O))(:~{>
https://hodja.wordpress.com/2006/02/22/muhammed-smiley/
You agree with them? How So?
What was the reason for the massacre again? Was it or was it not because they "insulted the Prophet"? If it was because they "insulted the Prophet" then surely that's a good enough reason to connect the Charlie Hebdo massacre to Islam?
If someone made a cartoon that made fun of Jesus, then yes, christians may be offended but rarely have I ever heard of christians reacting to such a thing by going out and killing the cartoonists.
SoMissunderstood
Velociraptor
Joined: 18 Mar 2014
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 481
Location: Sydney, Australia
People make fun of Jesus and the pope all the time, a lot people blame the Jews for just about everything including burning the toast. What's wrong with making fun of Muhammad?
They do not make a big deal out of the fact that the Kim dynasty is humanistic--or that Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were atheists. Why blame the Charlie Hebdo massacre on 1.6 billion people?
Poking fun at there religions prophet is not blaming all those said people
Correct, and I'm not criticizing anyone for printing drawings of Muhammad. The problem is when people on message boards, comment sections and so on criticize those said people.
_________________
“He who controls the spice controls the universe.”
People make fun of Jesus and the pope all the time, a lot people blame the Jews for just about everything including burning the toast. What's wrong with making fun of Muhammad?
They do not make a big deal out of the fact that the Kim dynasty is humanistic--or that Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were atheists. Why blame the Charlie Hebdo massacre on 1.6 billion people?
Because the perpetrators claim that the massacre was done in the name of Islam. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold did not and neither did they ever claim that they committed the Columbine High School massacre in the name of atheism. When they stop claiming that such massacres are in revenge for "insulting the Prophet", then we'll stop making a deal out of the fact that they're muslims.
The persecution of relgious people in North Korea is done in the name of atheism and humanism, as was the Jonestown massacre.
_________________
“He who controls the spice controls the universe.”
People make fun of Jesus and the pope all the time, a lot people blame the Jews for just about everything including burning the toast. What's wrong with making fun of Muhammad?
They do not make a big deal out of the fact that the Kim dynasty is humanistic--or that Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were atheists. Why blame the Charlie Hebdo massacre on 1.6 billion people?
Because the perpetrators claim that the massacre was done in the name of Islam. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold did not and neither did they ever claim that they committed the Columbine High School massacre in the name of atheism. When they stop claiming that such massacres are in revenge for "insulting the Prophet", then we'll stop making a deal out of the fact that they're muslims.
The persecution of relgious people in North Korea is done in the name of atheism and humanism, as was the Jonestown massacre.
The Jonestown massacre was a mass murder-suicide that came as a result of a religious cult, not atheism, and was planned by the cult leader Jim Jones. The persecution of religious people in North Korea is due to a socialist/communist ideology, like Stalinism, not atheism.
People make fun of Jesus and the pope all the time, a lot people blame the Jews for just about everything including burning the toast. What's wrong with making fun of Muhammad?
They do not make a big deal out of the fact that the Kim dynasty is humanistic--or that Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were atheists. Why blame the Charlie Hebdo massacre on 1.6 billion people?
Because the perpetrators claim that the massacre was done in the name of Islam. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold did not and neither did they ever claim that they committed the Columbine High School massacre in the name of atheism. When they stop claiming that such massacres are in revenge for "insulting the Prophet", then we'll stop making a deal out of the fact that they're muslims.
The persecution of relgious people in North Korea is done in the name of atheism and humanism, as was the Jonestown massacre.
The Jonestown massacre was a mass murder-suicide that came as a result of a religious cult, not atheism, and was planned by the cult leader Jim Jones. The persecution of religious people in North Korea is due to a socialist/communist ideology, like Stalinism, not atheism.
And my friend Angus is no true Scotsman, because he eats his porridge with sugar. Jonestown was a cult, but not a religious one; Jim Jones even stated that one of the main reason why the cult was founded was his own distaste of religion. Your argument can also be used to say that the IS is not a muslim organization because the Qur'an prohibits the taking of any life that God has made sacred.
_________________
“He who controls the spice controls the universe.”
People make fun of Jesus and the pope all the time, a lot people blame the Jews for just about everything including burning the toast. What's wrong with making fun of Muhammad?
They do not make a big deal out of the fact that the Kim dynasty is humanistic--or that Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were atheists. Why blame the Charlie Hebdo massacre on 1.6 billion people?
Because the perpetrators claim that the massacre was done in the name of Islam. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold did not and neither did they ever claim that they committed the Columbine High School massacre in the name of atheism. When they stop claiming that such massacres are in revenge for "insulting the Prophet", then we'll stop making a deal out of the fact that they're muslims.
The persecution of relgious people in North Korea is done in the name of atheism and humanism, as was the Jonestown massacre.
The Jonestown massacre was a mass murder-suicide that came as a result of a religious cult, not atheism, and was planned by the cult leader Jim Jones. The persecution of religious people in North Korea is due to a socialist/communist ideology, like Stalinism, not atheism.
And my friend Angus is no true Scotsman, because he eats his porridge with sugar. Jonestown was a cult, but not a religious one; Jim Jones even stated that one of the main reason why the cult was founded was his own distaste of religion. Your argument can also be used to say that the IS is not a muslim organization because the Qur'an prohibits the taking of any life that God has made sacred.
Please learn what your fallacies mean before you accuse me of making them. Atheism is not a set of beliefs, it is simply an absence of belief in gods, that's it. Jim Jones and his "church" may not of believed in gods but that does not mean that the Jonestown Massacre was in the name of a lack of belief in gods, in the same way that both Stalin and Hitler had moustaches but it wasn't because of their moustaches that they were ruthless dictators.
The difference in the case of Charlie Hebdo was that the massacre happened specifically because of them mocking Muhammed, the Islamic Prophet, not merely the fact that the perpetrators were muslims.
thomas81
Veteran
Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland
meanwhile, religious figureheads that are rightly or wrongly revered by a billion people are fair game but don't you dare give it to old Lizzy and her spawn. Whether or not he went too fair is a moot point, the threshold of offence is subjective. You want to play the 'freedom of speech is an absolutist right' card? I will call your bluff.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/bbc- ... ck-5036991
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/bbc- ... ck-5036991
Frankie Boyle is not going to get his head cut off. Nobody is banning jokes about the queen. He is free to continue make them.
It is not really surprising he got axed from the Beeb, they are funded by royal charter.
The Beeb is not a jurisdiction. Democracy exist in a jurisdiction. The Beeb is an organisation, that make editorial decisions.
I'm sure there are plenty of wannabe Frankie Boyle that would love to be on TV, just because he has go on TV, doesn't mean he has special TV rights.
WP is not a jurisdiction, you don't have the right to force them to publish anything you want. You are publishing through them, at their discretions. Otherwise become your own publisher.
The right to speak is not the right to be heard.
thomas81
Veteran
Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/bbc- ... ck-5036991
Frankie Boyle is not going to get his head cut off. Nobody is banning jokes about the queen. He is free to continue make them.
It is not really surprising he got axed from the Beeb, they are funded by royal charter.
The Beeb is not a jurisdiction. Democracy exist in a jurisdiction. The Beeb is an organisation, that make editorial decisions.
I'm sure there are plenty of wannabe Frankie Boyle that would love to be on TV, just because he has go on TV, doesn't mean he has special TV rights.
WP is not a jurisdiction, you don't have the right to force them to publish anything you want. You are publishing through them, at their discretions. Otherwise become your own publisher.
The right to speak is not the right to be heard.
I made another eloquent response in another thread so i will just quote myself.
How is it not to do with free speech? Boyle has made some jestful remarks and someone decided he needs shut down.
Whether or not someone believes he should be killed is a moot point, the point is someone in the western media circle that champion free speech have decided that under certain narratives people deserve to be protected from some views. So why are devout muslims less deserving of the same protection?
viewtopic.php?t=275537
How is it not to do with free speech? Boyle has made some jestful remarks and someone decided he needs shut down.
Whether or not someone believes he should be killed is a moot point, the point is someone in the western media circle that champion free speech have decided that under certain narratives people deserve to be protected from some views. So why are devout muslims less deserving of the same protection?
viewtopic.php?t=275537
Apparently you are missing the point about the BBC not being a legal jurisdiction, and him being under contract.
He is free to take it to court to challenge the control, or an employment tribunal if relevant.
Any company can set condition where someone can be dismissed, and more so for contracts. There are labour laws, and they offer some employment protection.
This is nothing to do with freedom of speech, he has already spoken, and can speak about it some more.
Personally I don't care what he says about the queen. I'm not a Monarchist.
You realise the BBC, was quoted by question time, as having guideline that censored criticism of Mohamed. So yes they are conservative in their internal censorship, but this doesn’t affect Frankie Boyle's freedom of speech in the UK. He might try Channel 4 which has held alternative Queen's speeches.
The word “eloquence” means, among other things a persuasive argument, but you haven’t convinced me you actaully understand the context of freedom of speech. You fall into the trap of thinking of freedom of speech overrules the rights of publisher/broadcasters (other’s freedom of speech). When freedom of speech is just that, the right to say something. It doesn’t protect you an against consequences for what you say, except where you would be detained, or prevented from ever voicing your views, or tortured, etc.
Frankie Boyle is not silenced, he has a captive audience and this is good publicity.
A freedom of speech issue would be, the French government banning Holocaust denial, or even Charlie Hebdo.
Charlie Hebdo firing a particular cartoonist, is not a freedom of speech issue. It is an employment/editorial issue.
The fact the several European countries ban Holocaust denial is hypocritical. No, I'm not a Holocaust denier nor do I like them.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
FB post that bothered me |
29 Jan 2024, 10:50 pm |
Post a Pest |
10 Feb 2024, 8:27 pm |
Has taken me years to get up the courage to post |
13 Jan 2024, 12:59 am |
If it is a cute animal video post it |
05 Mar 2024, 2:03 pm |