Jim Jefferies on US gun control
If you do it properly, it should be painless. Like putting a dog down--they feel nothing. Using the incorrect medications and doses is your fault, not the fault of the means. It's like those people who blow their faces off/apart with a shotgun--they messed up.
And did you know that women often shoot themselves in the chest instead of the head when using a firearm for suicide (look it up, it's true)? That's not going to be painless, and it's because of not wanting to mess up their heads.
If you do it properly, it should be painless. Like putting a dog down--they feel nothing. Using the incorrect medications and doses is your fault, not the fault of the means. It's like those people who blow their faces off/apart with a shotgun--they messed up.
And did you know that women often shoot themselves in the chest instead of the head when using a firearm for suicide (look it up, it's true)? That's not going to be painless, and it's because of not wanting to mess up their heads.
Have you been in that situation? How do you know it would be painless "if done right"? Even for the dog.
Yeah, and anyone that has surgery knows what it's like (minor procedures too). Instant fade to black.
Of course, intravenously is quicker than orally, but it'll come on quickly enough once it's absorbed in the gut. It'll probably be more pleasant with the latter, as you'll feel the sedatives working on you slower--a calm and happy feeling until your body shuts down painlessly (you'll be unconscious by that time).
Jumping off a high enough building is probably painless too if done right (and everyone has access to such), but people do worry about the mess (yeah, it's pretty odd how people do, but they do).
thomas81
Veteran
Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland
a lot of ad hominem against Jim Jefferies but no actual rebuttals or deconstruction of what he said. Thats a pretty big indictment of the quality of the pro gun argument.
Most Americans I know look down on Europe and Canada for several reasons, one because of high taxes. SOCIALISM! they scream.
Maybe our guns will spare us that fate. We want the government to fear us. We want the government thinking that at any momement a group of citizens could rise up and gun them down with super-power assualt weapons, if they dare take away our freedoms.
In Colorado there were two Democrat gun-control sentators that got recalled after passing a gun control law, because Conservative Democrats like their guns. This put the fear in the other Democrats to shutup about gun control. This event has its own wikipage now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado_r ... tion,_2013
I fisked the same guy the last time someone posted this, I don't feel the need to do so again:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=266478
Really, if this is the best argument for gun control you can come up with, you're even worse at this than I thought, and I thought you were really bad before.
_________________
“The totally convinced and the totally stupid have too much in common for the resemblance to be accidental.”
-- Robert Anton Wilson
In the United States, at least, until its Second Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America is repealed or amended, it remains one of our supreme laws of the land. In 2010 and 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that the Second Amendment was an individual, personal right guaranteed by the Constitution (in fact, all nine justices, conservative and liberal agreed with that determination) and that the Second Amendment provisions were incorporated to the several states and their local governments.
Given this recent overall review of the Second Amendment and the landmark statuses of its two Court cases, it is extremely unlikely that the matter will be revisited in the next generation, at least.
Of course, the Congress or the legislatures of the several states could attempt to repeal or amend the Second Amendment. In fact, it is the only possible way that the current status would change.
_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)
• What business is it of any foreigner what we do over here? If he’s afraid of guns in this country then simply stay out. Last time I checked, bullets aren't capable of trans-oceanic flight.
As he said in his routine-
He came into the country legally, pays his taxes and maintains a positive contribution which gives him the right to say what he thinks while he's in America.
Paying taxes is probably the only contribution he makes here. He sure as hell fails as a comedian.
And it gives me the right to say he eats dicks, too
Since I was born here I am a native of America and I’ll call foreigners foreigners if I want.
And its still a valid point. Killing yourself via other means requires more effort.
With all the guns I have I must have killed myself dozens of times by that logic. In fact, as I write this there’s a .40 caliber Glock in the drawer only inches from my hands. Why do I feel no compulsion to off myself?
Its still valid that if you can afford to buy guns on the black market in Australia or any other country then its unlikely you're an amateur criminal.
For some reason pro-gun people can't figure that part out in their heads.
Then I guess I need to get into the black market in Australia where I could make a fortune….
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
.
Hunting is in many countries, even in big brother UK. The difference in America though you have military grade weapons with unnecessarilly high rates of fire available in everyday retailers. The popularity of hunting is not an argument for publically available assault rifles though which was the main thrust of the stand up routine above.
Not hardly.
In reality, there are people in prison for the simple crime of possessing a weapon with a defect that allowed it to shoot several shots very quickly.
US citizens can often acquire machine guns, but it is quite a difficult and lengthy process to get the permits. I have never seen such a weapon in any gun shop.
Remember that what people call assault rifles are not military grade weapons at all. They just have some cosmetic/design features that may be found on some military grade weapons.
_________________
Yeah, and anyone that has surgery knows what it's like (minor procedures too). Instant fade to black.
Of course, intravenously is quicker than orally, but it'll come on quickly enough once it's absorbed in the gut. It'll probably be more pleasant with the latter, as you'll feel the sedatives working on you slower--a calm and happy feeling until your body shuts down painlessly (you'll be unconscious by that time).
Jumping off a high enough building is probably painless too if done right (and everyone has access to such), but people do worry about the mess (yeah, it's pretty odd how people do, but they do).
If you really wanted a guaranteed painless suicide, one approach would be to use a method that would result in death so fast that you would be obliterated faster than the nerve impulses could travel to the brain. Being struck by an asteroid a half mile in diameter comes to mind.
_________________
I usually just ignore videos anyway. I don't want to waste ten minutes listening to a bunch of drivel that I could read in one minute.