Oldavid wrote:
iBlockhead wrote:
Which ones on this list of over 1,300 articles have you read?
It is amusing to me that if I use the criterion you want (throwing out any religious-tinged drivel based on Abrahamic religions), I am a part of "institutionalised ignorance" and "the cult of Materialism," which are really nothing more than ID strawmen.
It doesn't matter which I've read. You read the ones that interest you and if you don't like what they say you take it up with the author of the article. Institutionalised ignorance says that you will not and cannot.
The main "religious-tinged drivel" that I abhor is the "ram-it-down-your-throat-without-any justification" Materialism that is always and everywhere in the popular media and classrooms.
Take your "evolutionarily superior" wheels and roll around fantasy-land.
No, it does matter. This website explicitly claims it supports the Genesis account of creationism in at least one of the articles. If you want to try to state on other threads about how intellectually superior you are to everyone else here, don't link a random site you never read which actually disputes the foundation of everything you said. Of course, the last major ID proponent on WP said, when shown the Wedge Document, that lying to get a certain objective is perfectly OK (it is what the Wedge Document basically is - a plan to ease ID in so it supplants at a later time the more complicated collection of facts which best fit the observations/experiments/etc.), so it wouldn't be a surprise to me if your posts are just facades to promote ID.
So, which ones on your link which you supplied did you read, or have read on other websites?
10 May 2015, 7:11 am
