US intelligence wants ability to censor satellite images
Page 1 of 1 [ 10 posts ]
Quote:
he head of a US intelligence agency told the Associated Press that commercial satellite services like Google Earth may need to be censored in the future in order to protect American interests.
Vice Admiral Robert Murrett, who heads the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, spends his days helping the government map the planet and studying imagery. Once the exclusive domain of the government, commercial satellite imagery has attained high-enough resolutions that the government is thinking about ways to restrict its use in times of war or other emergency situations.
"If there was a situation where any imagery products were being used by adversaries to kill Americans, I think we should act," he said in the interview. "I think we may need to have some control over things that are disseminated. I don't know if that means buying up all the imagery or not. I think there are probably some other ways you can do it."
The reference to "buying up all the imagery" refers to the government's practice of purchasing all commercially-available satellite data on Afghanistan during the early days of the conflict there. While buying up all available images may be one solution to the problem, the government may also be able to exert a different kind of pressure, as it provides nearly $1 billion in grants to major US imagery firms.
As the imagery market becomes international, though, the competing demands of local governments may be more difficult to sort out. The issue is already becoming tricky for companies like Google that offer popular products using satellite imagery. Google has already faced requests from Vice President Cheney to remove images of his residence and from the Indian government to blur sensitive military sites. Headlines in the UK have already claimed that Iraqi insurgents are using Google Earth to attack British troops.
Certain disruptive technologies (peer-to-peer file sharing comes to mind) are difficult to stuff back inside the bag once they've been unleashed on the world, and and satellite mapping may someday be one of them. For now, though, the number of commercial satellites is still quite limited, and the companies that do the mapping well are few in number. As that changes, the US government—and all other governments—will find it harder and harder to control the information that is produced.
Vice Admiral Robert Murrett, who heads the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, spends his days helping the government map the planet and studying imagery. Once the exclusive domain of the government, commercial satellite imagery has attained high-enough resolutions that the government is thinking about ways to restrict its use in times of war or other emergency situations.
"If there was a situation where any imagery products were being used by adversaries to kill Americans, I think we should act," he said in the interview. "I think we may need to have some control over things that are disseminated. I don't know if that means buying up all the imagery or not. I think there are probably some other ways you can do it."
The reference to "buying up all the imagery" refers to the government's practice of purchasing all commercially-available satellite data on Afghanistan during the early days of the conflict there. While buying up all available images may be one solution to the problem, the government may also be able to exert a different kind of pressure, as it provides nearly $1 billion in grants to major US imagery firms.
As the imagery market becomes international, though, the competing demands of local governments may be more difficult to sort out. The issue is already becoming tricky for companies like Google that offer popular products using satellite imagery. Google has already faced requests from Vice President Cheney to remove images of his residence and from the Indian government to blur sensitive military sites. Headlines in the UK have already claimed that Iraqi insurgents are using Google Earth to attack British troops.
Certain disruptive technologies (peer-to-peer file sharing comes to mind) are difficult to stuff back inside the bag once they've been unleashed on the world, and and satellite mapping may someday be one of them. For now, though, the number of commercial satellites is still quite limited, and the companies that do the mapping well are few in number. As that changes, the US government—and all other governments—will find it harder and harder to control the information that is produced.
This has me riled!
Discuss.
although e.g. possible toeeorists of could find out the layout of say, an airbase and they could easily access the hangers if they know where they are.
manalitwist wrote:
You know what this is about dont you, Iraqi resistance use coordinates taken from google earth to target invader forces.
Unless they update much more frequently than they do here I really don't see how much of an advantage it could give them over using maps and their eyes. It's not like they use GPS bombs. The images of my area are about a year old and that is one of the more recent updates. BTW I can see a red blur in front of my house that is my truck
_________________
"Strange is your language and I have no decoder Why don't make your intentions clear..." Peter Gabriel
parts wrote:
manalitwist wrote:
You know what this is about dont you, Iraqi resistance use coordinates taken from google earth to target invader forces.
Unless they update much more frequently than they do here I really don't see how much of an advantage it could give them over using maps and their eyes. It's not like they use GPS bombs. The images of my area are about a year old and that is one of the more recent updates. BTW I can see a red blur in front of my house that is my truck
They use it for targeting mortars and missiles.
_________________
Make mine a super frapalapi with double cream lots of Aspartame choc chip cookies a lump of lard and make it a big one
I'm just saying the info on Google Earth is not very new and they probably could do better with a decent range finder, binoculars and someone with forward observing experience to adjust fire.
_________________
"Strange is your language and I have no decoder Why don't make your intentions clear..." Peter Gabriel
Page 1 of 1 [ 10 posts ]
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
My Theory Of Intelligence. |
13 Jan 2024, 6:29 pm |
Management might finally stop questioning my intelligence |
19 Mar 2024, 1:36 pm |
House Intelligence Chairman - National Security threat |
14 Feb 2024, 4:18 pm |