Page 3 of 4 [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next


Which do you prefer?
Realplayer 14%  14%  [ 4 ]
Windows Media Player 86%  86%  [ 25 ]
Total votes : 29

TheAPERSON
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,301
Location: Green Hill Zone

09 Mar 2008, 4:42 am

In my opinion Realplayer is OK and Windows Media Player is psychadelic.


_________________
Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus and Aspies are from Wrong Planet.
Join the Nintendo Comedy Club


gamefreak
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,119
Location: Citrus County, Florida

19 Mar 2008, 8:54 pm

Windows Media Player because its not a Memory Hog and its made by Microsoft. Bill Gates is a smart man how knows what he`s doing which makes him my role model and the reason why Microsoft owns the market.[ Bill Gates is also a Fellow Aspie like us.]



lau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age: 75
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,618
Location: Somerset UK

19 Mar 2008, 10:00 pm

gamefreak wrote:
Windows Media Player because its not a Memory Hog...
Of course it is. Most of it is built into the unwieldy OS.

gamefreak wrote:
...and its made by Microsoft.
A definite liability.

gamefreak wrote:
Bill Gates is a smart man how knows what he`s doing
Yes... getting out of Microsoft before the crash'n'burn.

gamefreak wrote:
which makes him my role model and the reason why Microsoft owns the market.
Soon to be past tense.

gamefreak wrote:
[ Bill Gates is also a Fellow Aspie like us.]
No. He is not.


_________________
"Striking up conversations with strangers is an autistic person's version of extreme sports." Kamran Nazeer


Compiku
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 69

19 Mar 2008, 10:10 pm

Well, I have an old iPod I use, so most of my stuff is in iTunes. That said, I chose RealPlayer, because it can play all the same files that I put on my iPod, including the protected FairPlay files from the iTunes Store. But I only rarely use RealPlayer--most of the time, if I just want to hear some music, I use iTunes.

For web content, like embedded videos or MP3s, I would definitely say that, in my experience, QuickTime is a lot faster and more reliable than RealPlayer or WMP. Though this seems to be becoming less of an issue, as most videos I watch online now are in flash (like YouTube).

RealPlayer used to be one of the worst choices out there, as you had to hand over your email address to install it, and it kept shoving ads in your face and installing unwanted software, but the last couple versions have toned it down a bit, and the most recent version--which I use--is just about as good as WMP as far as those things go. That said, I don't think that RealPlayer will ever be able to shake its old reputation...

(I'm on Windows XP and Mac OS X 10.4, BTW)



TheAPERSON
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,301
Location: Green Hill Zone

20 Mar 2008, 4:05 am

I've decided to vote for Media Player even though my home computer has Realplayer. I think Windows MP is more friendly than RP, and Quicktime doesn't work on here.


_________________
Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus and Aspies are from Wrong Planet.
Join the Nintendo Comedy Club


KFleshman
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 16 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 23
Location: Oregon (I'd mention where, but you wouldn't know where it was)

20 Mar 2008, 4:43 pm

Audio: Foobar2000
Video: Media Player Classic or VLC

If I have to choose on the poll... anything but RealPlayer.



TheAPERSON
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,301
Location: Green Hill Zone

21 Mar 2008, 4:39 am

Media Player distracts me when it's using audio, that's why I like it.


_________________
Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus and Aspies are from Wrong Planet.
Join the Nintendo Comedy Club


gamefreak
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,119
Location: Citrus County, Florida

21 Mar 2008, 4:03 pm

TheAPERSON wrote:
Media Player distracts me when it's using audio, that's why I like it.


One of the reasons i like it.[The Skins and the cool screensavers.] Glad your on my side.

Question- Do you like SSBB for the WII so far.



gamefreak
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,119
Location: Citrus County, Florida

21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm

lau wrote:
gamefreak wrote:
Windows Media Player because its not a Memory Hog...
Of course it is. Most of it is built into the unwieldy OS.

gamefreak wrote:
...and its made by Microsoft.
A definite liability.

gamefreak wrote:
Bill Gates is a smart man how knows what he`s doing
Yes... getting out of Microsoft before the crash'n'burn.

gamefreak wrote:
which makes him my role model and the reason why Microsoft owns the market.
Soon to be past tense.

gamefreak wrote:
[ Bill Gates is also a Fellow Aspie like us.]
No. He is not.



Well, Windows is in fact a memory hog and will have to agree with that. However Windows is also a Very Customizable OS and is very easy to use and has support with many files across multiple gaming platforms, Mac, and other OSes. Windows also has support for a lot more hardware and software as opposed to Linux and Mac.[ Linksys WIFI cards don`t work on linux and its hard to find good software.] I use Media Player and it works with Ipods and just about any MP3 Player out there and has plenty of file extensions.



lau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age: 75
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,618
Location: Somerset UK

21 Mar 2008, 4:41 pm

gamefreak wrote:
Well, Windows is in fact a memory hog and will have to agree with that.

:)

gamefreak wrote:
However Windows is also a Very Customizable OS

How about rephrasing that.. "is the very LEAST Customizable OS".

gamefreak wrote:
and is very easy to use and has support with many files across multiple gaming platforms, Mac, and other OSes.

I'm not sure what this means. Yes, you can play games on Windows.

gamefreak wrote:
Windows also has support for a lot more hardware and software as opposed to Linux and Mac.
No.

gamefreak wrote:
[ Linksys WIFI cards don`t work on linux and its hard to find good software.]
They do, except the ones where they haven't released enough information to get a working driver.

gamefreak wrote:
I use Media Player and it works with Ipods and just about any MP3 Player out there and has plenty of file extensions.
Plenty, maybe. All, I don't think so.


_________________
"Striking up conversations with strangers is an autistic person's version of extreme sports." Kamran Nazeer


roygerdodger
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Jul 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,527
Location: High Point, North Carolina

21 Mar 2008, 4:46 pm

Windows Media Player, for sure.



deep-techno
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jan 2006
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,080
Location: Exeter, UK

23 Mar 2008, 6:20 am

TheAPERSON wrote:
Which do you prefer?


Neither. iTunes is better than both of them.


_________________
If the phrase "you are what you eat" is correct, technically we must all be cannibals.


Qaletaqa
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 13
Location: Belgium

23 Mar 2008, 9:19 am

I use Media Player Classic with the K-Lite Codec Pack for video and iTunes for music.

I don't like the current Windows Media Player and i definatly don't like Realplayer.