| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
atxa
Velociraptor
![]()
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: 422
|
 Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 7:33 pm Post subject: Leopard vs Tiger (Speed) |
 |
|
Hello,
Is there a big difference of speed between Tiger and Leopard ?
Cause I'm gonna get a Mac Mini (1.83), before he came with Tiger.
I chose this one cause it's the cheapest, I'll add more ram and I'll change the drive for a 7200 rpm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
bikermark
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Joined: Aug 07, 2007
Age: 49
Posts: 51
Location: NW Pennsylvania
|
| Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 7:53 pm Post subject: Smartass Alert!!! |
|
|
According to my quick check on wiki, the Leopard tank, made in the 1960's, was rated at 40 mph, while the Tiger I tank was rated at 23 mph. Either one could ram stuff, but I don't know what their rpm's were.
Mark |
|
| Back to top |
|
atxa
Velociraptor
![]()
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: 422
|
| Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 8:05 pm Post subject: Re: Smartass Alert!!! |
|
|
| bikermark wrote: | According to my quick check on wiki, the Leopard tank, made in the 1960's, was rated at 40 mph, while the Tiger I tank was rated at 23 mph. Either one could ram stuff, but I don't know what their rpm's were.
Mark |
I'm sorry, but I was talking about Apple Macintosh, OS X 10.4 (Tiger) and OS X 10.5 (Leopard). |
|
| Back to top |
|
polarity
Toucan
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Posts: 274
|
| Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd say go for Leopard. Tiger came out before all new Macs had Intel chips, and was patched for intel compatability, so it's Intel compatability may be a bit slower than Leopard, which has been coded to run better on Intel systems. Can't say I've really noticed a huge speed increase, but a lot of the features of Leopard make working with it a little quicker.
_________________
You aren't thinking or really existing unless you're willing to risk even your own sanity in the judgment of your existence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
pakled
"Bless his Heart"
Joined: Nov 13, 2007
Age: 50
Posts: 2544
|
| Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dangit axta, ya stole my line!...
the Leopard also is more accurate, has a higher sustained rate of fire, and better armor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Jonny
Velociraptor
Joined: Feb 10, 2005
Posts: 431
Location: London, UK
|
| Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I find Leopard faster. My macbook came with Tiger. |
|
| Back to top |
|
wolphin
Deinonychus
Joined: Aug 16, 2007
Posts: 394
|
| Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Leopard's not necessarily "faster" but it is more stable, so it's better in that way.
Sometimes more stable means faster, too. Finder in tiger used to beachball all the time when it would get stuck doing things. Now Finder in leopard is multi-threaded or something and is a lot faster responding when part of it is stuck. |
|
| Back to top |
|
polarity
Toucan
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Posts: 274
|
| Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Leopard more than likely has much better support for multi core processors (multithreading) While Tiger could run on dual G4 systems, thats quite different from the modern Core2Duos in most Macs.
_________________
You aren't thinking or really existing unless you're willing to risk even your own sanity in the judgment of your existence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Tim_Tex
Bender in Human Form
Joined: Jul 03, 2004
Age: 28
Posts: 17357
Location: San Marcos, Texas
|
| Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I currently have Leopard on my new computer (which I bought just 3 hours ago).
_________________
When you need something, that's a responsibility, that only an adult...of my maturity...Bunnies!!!
~Meatwad, Aqua Teen Hunger Force |
|
| Back to top |
|
atxa
Velociraptor
![]()
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: 422
|
| Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tim_Tex wrote: | | I currently have Leopard on my new computer (which I bought just 3 hours ago). |
Another new Mac user, Cool !
I'll get mine next week. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Jonny
Velociraptor
Joined: Feb 10, 2005
Posts: 431
Location: London, UK
|
| Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wolphin wrote: | Leopard's not necessarily "faster" but it is more stable, so it's better in that way.
Sometimes more stable means faster, too. Finder in tiger used to beachball all the time when it would get stuck doing things. Now Finder in leopard is multi-threaded or something and is a lot faster responding when part of it is stuck. |
Yup! I even noticed when right clicking on a file in Finder, the menu pops up musch faster. |
|
| Back to top |
|
z0rp
Toucan
Joined: Jan 05, 2008
Posts: 282
Location: New York, USA
|
| Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Tim_Tex wrote: | | I currently have Leopard on my new computer (which I bought just 3 hours ago). |
What's your new computer? I'm assuming a mac, though you could be a hacker for all I know and get it the other way as I and plenty others have done.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
