Discussion | Articles | Blogs | Books | Contact Us | Chat | Shop | Search
  WrongPlanet.net
User Stats
   Members: 22,744
   Online Now: 411



People Online:
Visitors: 242
Members: 169
New Today: 4
New Yesterday: 21
Latest: Stiltz

Search
Google
Web WP.net



  Aspie Affection
Support Wrong Planet Awareness!
44,000 Generations of Bacteria offer proof of Evolution
1, 2, 3  Next  
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> News and Current Events
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
monty
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Sep 05, 2007
Posts: 2511

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:11 pm    Post subject: 44,000 Generations of Bacteria offer proof of Evolution Reply with quote

http://www.newscientist.com/channel/life/dn14094-bacteria-make-major-evolutionary-shift-in-the-lab.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DukeGallison
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl


Joined: Feb 24, 2008
Age: 24
Posts: 170

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Cambrian Explosion is still the biggest scientific argument against evolution. That and the lack of transitional fossils between species supposed to have "evolved."
_________________
DeviantArt: http://jmg124.deviantart.com/
LiveJournal: http://jmg124.livejournal.com/
RPG Reviews: http://jmgreviews.wikidot.com/
Encyclopedia Anthropia: http://anthropia.wikidot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
monty
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Sep 05, 2007
Posts: 2511

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

But this bacterial experiment has the 'missing fossils' - they are alive in a deep freeze and have been thawed to repeat the process, and to study the genetics behind it all.

And the Cambrian Explosion (a 20 million year period) doesn't do anything to disprove evolution. Biologists accept the idea of punctuated equillibrium - occasional developments may lead to a sudden expansion of a group of organisms, and as they expand their range and differentiate, they form new species at a rate much faster than is ordinarily seen.

Quote:
Punctuated equillibrium was based on the find that some fossil lineages show long periods of stasis, accompanied by sudden bursts of change. Gould and others proposed that most species find their way into a stable ecological niche, and are then under no pressure to change until there's a sudden ecological shift, such as a climate change or mass extinction.

http://arstechnica.com/journals/science.ars/2006/10/6/5532


On the other hand, the Cambrian Explosion does more than argue against young Earth creationism - it demolishes it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Diamonddavej
Velociraptor
Velociraptor


Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Age: 36
Posts: 452
Location: Ireland

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I find it very curious how American evangelical Christians try to defend their faith via science, and see science as such a threat. I think this may have something to do with the esteem and respect that science has in American culture.

Here in Ireland, though the importance of religion has diminished in the last 20 years, there is a huge separation between religion and science, a implicit recognition that they do not answer questions in the same way. Here in Ireland there is a long standing feeling that science and technology (industry) are "English", that the Irish are instead a nation of "Poets and Scholars", thus science was never that important. This science v's religion seems very strange.

All in all, a faith that recognizes that science does not and cannot comment on matters of faith (and vice versa) is far more resistant to the "Acid of Science".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
monty
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Sep 05, 2007
Posts: 2511

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Even though I was raised on the other side (Anglican/Episcopal religious tradition), there was a similar separation of religion and science. The Bible was not understood as a literal science text, and religion was seen as something that was essential to guide science on moral and ethical issues. I think in the case of US fundamentalists, they start from a base of literal innerrancy, which leads them to scientifically indefensible positions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ragtime
Legal Eagle Eye


Joined: Nov 03, 2006
Age: 29
Posts: 7802
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, in 44,000 generations, bacteria changes a little bit. I'm so surprised.

Rolling Eyes

It's called mutation.

This, it should be noted, has absolutely nothing to do with any possible large-scale
change over time from, say, a bacterium to a human being. Such fairytales are not to be
taken seriously.
_________________
I shaved off my goatee so that my wife could read my facial expressions better. She feels much happier and closer to me now. (Just thought I'd share this advice for any other bearded members.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
monty
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Sep 05, 2007
Posts: 2511

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ragtime wrote:
Wow, in 44,000 generations, bacteria changes a little bit. I'm so surprised.

Rolling Eyes

It's called mutation.

This, it should be noted, has absolutely nothing to do with any possible large-scale
change over time from, say, a bacterium to a human being. Such fairytales are not to be
taken seriously.



I also suppose you would say that even though we see parts of the Earth moving an inch or two a year, the ideas of tectonics and mountain building are also fairy tales. After all, there is no way continents could move thousands of miles when the Earth is only about 6000 years old?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orwell
Outer Party Member


Joined: Aug 09, 2007
Age: 19
Posts: 4268
Location: Room 101

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Speciation has been observed scores of times, both in the laboratory and in nature. Now we have a good example of a novel development (one which YECs often claim is impossible) and it is dismissed out of hand by a YEC. I'm so surprised. Rolling Eyes
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ancalagon
Sea Gull
Sea Gull


Joined: Dec 26, 2007
Posts: 243

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What's a "YEC"?
_________________
"If you can't explain something to a six-year-old, you really don't understand it yourself." -Einstein

"Don't think outside the box - find the box" -Andy Hunt & Dave Thomas
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
twoshots
Honorary Vertebrate


Joined: Nov 27, 2007
Posts: 2147
Location: NJ

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ancalagon wrote:
What's a "YEC"?

Young Earth Creationist
_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orwell
Outer Party Member


Joined: Aug 09, 2007
Age: 19
Posts: 4268
Location: Room 101

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ancalagon wrote:
What's a "YEC"?

Lucky you not to know this. Ignorance is bliss.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pobodys_Nerfect
Velociraptor
Velociraptor


Joined: Mar 11, 2008
Posts: 416

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow they were really lucky to witness evolution! What were the chances of this evolution taking place in those scientists' lifetimes?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pbcoll
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Posts: 1803
Location: England

PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

monty wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Wow, in 44,000 generations, bacteria changes a little bit. I'm so surprised.

Rolling Eyes

It's called mutation.

This, it should be noted, has absolutely nothing to do with any possible large-scale
change over time from, say, a bacterium to a human being. Such fairytales are not to be
taken seriously.



I also suppose you would say that even though we see parts of the Earth moving an inch or two a year, the ideas of tectonics and mountain building are also fairy tales. After all, there is no way continents could move thousands of miles when the Earth is only about 6000 years old?


Yes but fundamentalists are not interested in evidence - they will hypocritically take anything vaguely scientific that is in any way consistent with what they have already decided is true and claim it as 'proof' but there is no amount of contrary evidence that they will ever accept. Since at least St Thomas Aquin the attitude has been 'if I can find rational arguments in favour of what I will believe anyway, so much the better; otherwise I'll just appeal to revelation.' I suppose God created the fossil record for a laugh (is that the same reason why he presumably created smallpox and bubonic plague?)
_________________
I neither take revenge, nor beg for favours. (Rabindranath Tagore)

I am the steppenwolf that never learned to dance. (Sedaka)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orwell
Outer Party Member


Joined: Aug 09, 2007
Age: 19
Posts: 4268
Location: Room 101

PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pobodys_Nerfect wrote:
Wow they were really lucky to witness evolution! What were the chances of this evolution taking place in those scientists' lifetimes?

Pretty good, actually. Numerous speciation events have been observed in real-time.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ancalagon
Sea Gull
Sea Gull


Joined: Dec 26, 2007
Posts: 243

PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pbcoll wrote:
monty wrote:


I also suppose you would say that even though we see parts of the Earth moving an inch or two a year, the ideas of tectonics and mountain building are also fairy tales. After all, there is no way continents could move thousands of miles when the Earth is only about 6000 years old?


Yes but fundamentalists are not interested in evidence - they will hypocritically take anything vaguely scientific that is in any way consistent with what they have already decided is true and claim it as 'proof'

Many atheists are the same way.

Also, the tectonic plate analogy is deeply flawed -- tectonic plates are comparatively extremely simple. Their behavior can be predicted.
_________________
"If you can't explain something to a six-year-old, you really don't understand it yourself." -Einstein

"Don't think outside the box - find the box" -Andy Hunt & Dave Thomas
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> News and Current Events All times are GMT - 5 Hours
1, 2, 3  Next  
Page 1 of 3

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Wrong PlanetTM Copyright 2004-2008, Alex Plank and Yellow Sneaker Media, LLC
Alex Plank  Aspie Affection 

Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet

RSS Feed Add to Google Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe: Wrong Planet News  Wrong Planet Forums

Privacy Policy

Asperger's is not a disease

fine art