| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Rynok
Velociraptor
Joined: Jun 11, 2008
Age: 23
Posts: 413
Location: San Antonio, Texas
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:17 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Cyberman wrote: | | Cynic wrote: | | Rynok wrote: | | If you want experienced, just hire an escort. I don't understand how their sexual experience really matters if your looking for a long-term relationship. Is it possible your the first person that's taken interest in him perhaps? |
You must ask yourself why no one took interest in him at 18, or 21, or 25? Nearly everyone has lost their virginity by the time they hit adulthood, so obviouslly someone who's a virgin at 40 isn't going to be appealing to anyone.
| Rynok wrote: |
| Cynic wrote: | Why should they when there are plenty of better choices?
|
How do you define better choices? You can't only date people that have already been on the dating field.
Humans would go extinct because everyone has to start somewhere, and if no-one was willing to be the "first"...you see my point. |
Anyone who hasn't had a partner in their teens can't be very desirable or they would have been taken long before then. |
The flaw in your logic is that you assume everyone to be "easy." |
Exactly! Thankyou Cyberman.
Just because you don't have sex doesn't mean your worthless and an "untouchable".
The point I'm trying to make is this:
Having sex doesn't make a man worthwhile.
Would you date him if he had to pay for his only sexual experience?
If so, then how is that any different?
If not, then now we have to change our story from "He has no sexual experience" to "He has no sexual experience that was freely given to him". (Which means he went to Craigslist for his sex instead of via an escort)
If that still doesn't count, because it wasn't really "love" then we have to change our story again.
Maybe you should just disregard all men over 40 that haven't had multiple free loving sexual encounters, with say...10 women? 20?
Where exactly do you draw the line when you make judgements like that?
This would be similar to saying, "I only date men with facial hair!"...and then refusing to date a guy that is clean shaven...even though he could get facial hair if he wanted. (he might even grow it just for you! But no, your too good for the currently clean shaven men, there is no first chance for them).
Statistically, only about 50% make it out of high school w/o having sex, and the ones that are still virgin after college have generally made a conscious choice about it. Personally, I would prefer a girl that stands by their morals, rather than one who gets drunk and sleeps with the next guy they see. I got high expectations though I guess  |
|
| Back to top |
|
Sorenna
Sea Gull
Joined: May 13, 2008
Posts: 235
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Rynok wrote: | Would you date him if he had to pay for his only sexual experience?
|
Never. Nor anyone who paid for any of their sexual experiences. To be fair, I would not want to date a guy who has had a lot of partners, etiher.
Come to hink of it, I would love to date a 40 year old virgin. If there are any on here, feel free to PM. 
Ciao. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Cynic
Butterfly
Joined: Mar 23, 2008
Age: 34
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rynok wrote: | | Just because you don't have sex doesn't mean your worthless and an "untouchable". |
You'll find that people look for the same qualities in partners, and nobody wants someone that nobody else likes.
| Rynok wrote: | | Would you date him if he had to pay for his only sexual experience? |
As women want guys with money, all men will have to pay for sex in one way or another. |
|
| Back to top |
|
ManErg
Velociraptor
Joined: Apr 05, 2006
Posts: 429
Location: Searching for diamonds in a sulphur mine
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Cynic wrote: | | Anyone who hasn't had a partner in their teens can't be very desirable or they would have been taken long before then. |
How should we deal with this huge social problem of undesirable 20 year olds? A mass culling of all virgins over the age of 20? After all, we shouldn't have to put up with these 'undesirables' breathing the air and eating the food that's needed by the desirables. Think how much better the world would look with the ugly's all gone. How can anybody possibly be of any value to the world if they get to the ripe old age of 20 and are still a virgin?
Of course I'm being sarcastic and I assume you are, too
_________________
The shoddier the merchandise -- the more it needs promoting |
|
| Back to top |
|
Cyberman
Phoenix
Joined: Apr 25, 2008
Posts: 872
Location: Telos
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| He thinks he's being "scientific." |
|
| Back to top |
|
Dieselsmoke
Tufted Titmouse
Joined: Oct 13, 2007
Posts: 31
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What's bad about it........?
Your money is your own...you don't get told to take the trash out...you go out without clean underwear if you want...there's no one to nag about where you've been......sleep naked without being called a pervert....do laundry when you run outta socks.....leave the car low on gas.....get up late on Sunday.....watch what ever damn channel you want...have the a/c at what ever temperature you like....
BUT, never having to ask if it's okay to cut your toenails in the kitchen.. PRICELESS.
_________________
Hey ! I'm doin' my best. |
|
| Back to top |
|
ManErg
Velociraptor
Joined: Apr 05, 2006
Posts: 429
Location: Searching for diamonds in a sulphur mine
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 5:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
^ you got it, Dieselman!!!!!
More seriously, I'd rather be a 40 year old virgin than these 2 examples that show that you can lose it before 20 and still be an evil scumbag.
Scumbag 1
Scumbag 2
_________________
The shoddier the merchandise -- the more it needs promoting |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
