Discussion | Articles | Blogs | Books | Contact Us | Chat | Shop | autism reality - documentary
  WrongPlanet.net
User Stats
To keep our community running smoothly we need your support.
Become a monthly supporter!

   Members: 34,127
   Online Now: 629



People Online:
Visitors: 516
Members: 113
New Today: 12
New Yesterday: 22
Latest: sadiejean34

  Aspie Affection
Support Wrong Planet!
Massachusetts tries to recriminalize pot
1, 2  Next  
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> Politics, Philosophy, and Religion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ed
Odd Duck
Odd Duck


Joined: Dec 20, 2004
Age: 65
Posts: 1869
Location: central Massachusetts

PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:32 am    Post subject: Massachusetts tries to recriminalize pot Reply with quote

I received the following email from Marijuana Policy Project:

Quote:
Dear Edward Hall:

Last November, 65% of Massachusetts voters removed the possibility of jail for simple marijuana possession, making adults' possession of an ounce or less a civil infraction punishable only by a $100 fine.

Despite this overwhelming mandate from voters, several bills have been introduced that would undermine the new law. If all of the bills were to pass, the places where the penalty would be reduced to a $100 fine would be shrunken to be almost meaningless. Together, the bills would recriminalize marijuana on municipal land and property, within 1,000 feet of school property, and in cars, allow good government workers to be fired for off-hours marijuna use, and subject those possessing marijuana to searches.

Please contact your legislators in opposition to these bills today. Although so far the bills have not received a hearing, they can move with almost no notice, so it's important you speak up now. These bills are insulting to voters and would pour more state money into the wasteful war on marijuana users.

Here's an overview of the bad bills that have been introduced:

HB 1536 states that the new law wouldn't "apply to persons found to be in possession of marijuana within a school, school yard, play ground, public library, municipal owned land, municipal owned building, or municipal owned vehicle." HB 1536 is in the Joint Committee on Judiciary.

HB 4006 would criminalize the possession of marijuana in a school zone, which includes within 1,000 feet of a school — even if it is out of session — and within 100 feet of a public park. The penalty would be a two-and-a-half year mandatory minimum, with a maximum sentence of 15 years in prison! HB 4006 has not been assigned to committee since being introduced on March 20.

HB 1763 states that "notwithstanding any law or special law to the contrary, school committees, employers, and people in charge of places open to the public shall be free to make rules and regulations prohibiting the use or possession of any amounts of marijuana on school grounds, places of employment, and places open to the public." HB 1763 has been in the Joint Committee on Judiciary since its introduction on January 16.

HB 4007 would criminalize the possession of marijuana while driving a vehicle. HB 4007 has not been assigned to committee since being introduced on March 20.

SB 1586 would increase penalties for the possession of marijuana by anyone in a vehicle to a fine of at least $1,000 and a suspension of one's drivers' license for up to 90 days. SB 1586 was referred to the Joint Committee on Judiciary on January 16.

SB 1825 states that nothing contained in the new law or any other law would restrict police officers from conducting searches based on probable cause that marijuana is present in a motor vehicle, in a container, or on a person. It would also allow governmental employers to adopt, modify, and enforce drug testing policies and promulgate restrictions regarding employment and licensing based on the use or possession of marijuana. SB 1825 was referred to Joint Committee on Judiciary since its on January 16.

Question 2 specifically removed all penalties for possessing an ounce or less of marijuana, expect for a $100 civil fine, forfeiture of the marijuana, and drug education for those under the age of 18. While Massachusetts is facing a $1.5 billion deficit, legislators are trying to spend voters' money to gut their law and lock up more marijuana users. It's time to raise your voice.

Please forward this alert to others in Massachusetts so they too can get involved by taking action. Thank you for supporting the Marijuana Policy Project and all of our allies.

Sincerely,



Nathan Miller
Legislative Analyst
Marijuana Policy Project


Obviously we must be constantly vigilant to prevent our government from taking away our hard-won freedom. Evil or Very Mad
_________________
How can we outlaw a plant created by a perfect God?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Orwell
Outer Party Member
Phoenix


Joined: Aug 09, 2007
Age: 20
Posts: 9130
Location: Room 101

PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For crying out loud...

Is there even one reason why we shouldn't legalize pot?
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
ruveyn
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Sep 22, 2008
Age: 73
Posts: 5850
Location: New Jersey

PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orwell wrote:
For crying out loud...

Is there even one reason why we shouldn't legalize pot?


Count on this: Somewhere, somehow there is Some One who lives in constant terror that Somewhere, Somehow, Some One is having fun or experiencing pleasure.

ruveyn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orwell
Outer Party Member
Phoenix


Joined: Aug 09, 2007
Age: 20
Posts: 9130
Location: Room 101

PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ruveyn wrote:
Count on this: Somewhere, somehow there is Some One who lives in constant terror that Somewhere, Somehow, Some One is having fun or experiencing pleasure.

OK. But the Puritans failed on alcohol prohibition, and our modern hedonistic society mostly ignores them. Why can't we ignore them on the issue of pot too?
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
ed
Odd Duck
Odd Duck


Joined: Dec 20, 2004
Age: 65
Posts: 1869
Location: central Massachusetts

PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orwell wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Count on this: Somewhere, somehow there is Some One who lives in constant terror that Somewhere, Somehow, Some One is having fun or experiencing pleasure.

OK. But the Puritans failed on alcohol prohibition, and our modern hedonistic society mostly ignores them. Why can't we ignore them on the issue of pot too?


...because they want to put us in prison. Evil or Very Mad
_________________
How can we outlaw a plant created by a perfect God?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
gina-ghettoprincess
Last of my kind
Phoenix


Joined: Nov 09, 2008
Posts: 2812
Location: The Town That Time Forgot (UK)

PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why is marijuana illegal but cigarettes are legal? *semi-rhetorical question* Dumb law. Rolling Eyes
_________________
'Tvoi plastinki slushala ja,
I v kazhdoy nahodila sebja,
Zachem ostanovila menja?
Eva ja ljubila tebja...'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
vibratetogether
Supporting Member
Supporting Member


Joined: Aug 25, 2008
Age: 27
Posts: 589
Location: WA, USA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dussel
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jan 20, 2009
Posts: 1790
Location: London (UK)

PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orwell wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Count on this: Somewhere, somehow there is Some One who lives in constant terror that Somewhere, Somehow, Some One is having fun or experiencing pleasure.

OK. But the Puritans failed on alcohol prohibition, and our modern hedonistic society mostly ignores them. Why can't we ignore them on the issue of pot too?


A small remark: They were in the early days of the colonial period quite successful of doing so in their settlements in the New World. A lot of people do not recognize that the Pilgrim Fathers did not left England because England was not liberal enough, but because England was for their taste too liberal (pubs, theatres, music, public kissing, women wearing jewellery, etc.) and neither king or parliament were willing to change this.

It sounds strange, but democracy does not automatically imply freedom for the individual. In some monarchies, even absolute monarchies, you had more freedom for the individual to have the live they preferred than in some democratic republics in the past. One of the features of radical protestantism was (and is) a strange mixture of radical democratic ideas regarding government on one side and repression in the way the individual is able to make moral decision on the other side. You find this pattern in Scotland, within the radical English puritans, the Netherlands in 16th and 17th century, in Geneva under Calvin or Florence under Savonarola. They are closer to the Taliban or the current Mullah-Regime in Iran than to the liberal democracy.

I think this a still ongoing fight within the US, were a lot of those radical protestants settled and are part of the mainstream.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
xenon13
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Dec 14, 2008
Posts: 537

PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Prohibition lives in the "dry counties" , many in the Appalachian Mountains, where, by strange coincidence, white lightning moonshine is famously made.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ed
Odd Duck
Odd Duck


Joined: Dec 20, 2004
Age: 65
Posts: 1869
Location: central Massachusetts

PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dussel wrote:
Orwell wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Count on this: Somewhere, somehow there is Some One who lives in constant terror that Somewhere, Somehow, Some One is having fun or experiencing pleasure.

OK. But the Puritans failed on alcohol prohibition, and our modern hedonistic society mostly ignores them. Why can't we ignore them on the issue of pot too?


A small remark: They were in the early days of the colonial period quite successful of doing so in their settlements in the New World. A lot of people do not recognize that the Pilgrim Fathers did not left England because England was not liberal enough, but because England was for their taste too liberal (pubs, theatres, music, public kissing, women wearing jewellery, etc.) and neither king or parliament were willing to change this.


Actually, the Pilgrims, who landed in Plymouth and formed Plymouth Colony, were not Puritans, and were far more tolerant than the Puritans, and believed in freedom of religion.

The Puritans landed later in Boston, and formed the Massachusetts Bay Colony, and grew greatly in number. It is these people who caused all the trouble Smile
_________________
How can we outlaw a plant created by a perfect God?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
ed
Odd Duck
Odd Duck


Joined: Dec 20, 2004
Age: 65
Posts: 1869
Location: central Massachusetts

PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ruveyn wrote:
count on this: Somewhere, somehow there is Some One who lives in constant terror that Somewhere, Somehow, Some One is having fun or experiencing pleasure.

ruveyn




lmao
_________________
How can we outlaw a plant created by a perfect God?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
NobelCynic
Deinonychus
Deinonychus


Joined: Nov 29, 2006
Age: 61
Posts: 350
Location: New Jersey, U.S.A.

PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is this really all that threatening. If the votes were there to pass the law in the first place one would think that there wouldn't be enough votes to water it down.

All that seems to be happening is that some of the bills are being refered to the "Joint Committee on Judiciary" which I assume means that all the committee members are smoking a joint. Laughing
_________________
I am not like normal people
I don't even like normal people
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ed
Odd Duck
Odd Duck


Joined: Dec 20, 2004
Age: 65
Posts: 1869
Location: central Massachusetts

PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NobelCynic wrote:
Is this really all that threatening. If the votes were there to pass the law in the first place one would think that there wouldn't be enough votes to water it down.

All that seems to be happening is that some of the bills are being refered to the "Joint Committee on Judiciary" which I assume means that all the committee members are smoking a joint. Laughing


I live within 1000 feet of two schools... they could lock me up for 15 years for smoking pot in my bedroom!

...besides which, I object like hell to being called a criminal. Evil or Very Mad
_________________
How can we outlaw a plant created by a perfect God?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Orwell
Outer Party Member
Phoenix


Joined: Aug 09, 2007
Age: 20
Posts: 9130
Location: Room 101

PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ed wrote:
...because they want to put us in prison. Evil or Very Mad

Us? I don't smoke pot, so they don't want to put me in prison.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
ed
Odd Duck
Odd Duck


Joined: Dec 20, 2004
Age: 65
Posts: 1869
Location: central Massachusetts

PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orwell wrote:
ed wrote:
...because they want to put us in prison. Evil or Very Mad

Us? I don't smoke pot, so they don't want to put me in prison.


sorry... "us" refers to the tens of millions of pot smokers in the US, and the tens of millions of pot smokers who live in other repressive regimes, like Great Britain. Very Happy
_________________
How can we outlaw a plant created by a perfect God?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> Politics, Philosophy, and Religion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
1, 2  Next  
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Wrong PlanetTM Copyright 2004-2010, Alex Plank and Yellow Sneaker Media, LLC
Alex Plank  Aspie Affection 

Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet

RSS Feed Add to Google Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe: Wrong Planet News  Wrong Planet Forums

Privacy Policy

Asperger's is not a disease

fine art


Enter your name and number below to call Alex Plank, Wrong Planet developer: