Homer_Bob
Bazinga!
Joined: Jan 06, 2009
Age: 24
Posts: 1286
Location: New England
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 7:18 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
I'd prefer someone shorter and lighter than me.
_________________
I have to feel sorry for myself. I’m the only one who cares. Just like I’m the only one who’ll have sex with me.
Excuse me. I’m going to go wander the streets alone. Invisible, unwanted and unloved, a pathetic shadow in a city with no heart. -Raj |
|
| Back to top |
|
hale_bopp
All Kinds of Freak
Joined: Nov 03, 2004
Age: 28
Posts: 14837
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The_Face_of_Boo wrote: | | techstepgenr8tion wrote: | | The_Face_of_Boo wrote: | | hale_bopp wrote: | I don't really like any smaller than 200 pounds.. just over 90kgs.
Slender guys just don't do it for me. |
but i thought you wanted to marry me, I am just 60 kg! |
Put some meat on those bones Mr. Runway! |
Don't you think 90 kg is too much for a 5'3" (~160cm)? |
Yes. 60kg is a good weight for someone of your height.
_________________
www.aspergersgirl.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
puddingmouse
cheesecake demolisher
Joined: Apr 25, 2010
Age: 26
Posts: 7028
Location: Mega City 3
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can put up with underweight guys, but not underweight girls. For both genders I go as far as the low end of obese.
Guys: BMI 18-32
Girls: BMI 22 - 32.
_________________
The mess has ended. Go home in pieces. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Vito
Blue Jay
Joined: Dec 20, 2011
Age: 21
Posts: 99
Location: Czech Republic
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I do not have a weight range in dating, since I take looks into the account only a little bit. I cannot even say what is my favorite weight of a girl, it depends mainly on body structure. However, my sister once commented that I seem to like not really thin girls. I must say, that my current girlfriend (height 160cm - approximatelly 5'3") weighed around 45 kg (100 pounds) when we met which I thought it is not enough (she said that it was due to sudden loss of appetite and that she plans to get a bit heavier). Now she revolves around 52 kg (115 pounds) and I must say that I like it a lot more.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
Comp_Geek_573
Phoenix
Joined: Sep 28, 2011
Age: 28
Posts: 546
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My least favorite weight is actually severely anorexic (like so thin she literally looks like a perambulating skeletion.) My second least favorite weight is super-super-obese (but higher than the "morbidly obese" mark BMI-wise.) Anything other than that, I can love. So my BMI range is about from 15 to 50. Mine's currently hanging in the 22-23 range. I've been at 24.x, but never hit the dreaded 25 mark (190 lb for me.)
_________________
Your Aspie score: 98 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 103 of 200
You seem to have both Aspie and neurotypical traits
AQ: 33 |
|
| Back to top |
|
Wolfheart
Phoenix
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
Age: 23
Posts: 2971
Location: Kent, England
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is probably the most ideal body, in terms of weight range, I'd say 45-70kg, depending on how tall they are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
hale_bopp
All Kinds of Freak
Joined: Nov 03, 2004
Age: 28
Posts: 14837
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Wolfheart wrote: |
This is probably the most ideal body, in terms of weight range, I'd say 45-70kg, depending on how tall they are. |
Is it just me or does she have a really massive head?
_________________
www.aspergersgirl.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
hyperlexian
loves the man who typed too much and ran outta spa
Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Age: 41
Posts: 21969
Location: with bucephalus
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 4:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hale_bopp wrote: | | Wolfheart wrote: |
This is probably the most ideal body, in terms of weight range, I'd say 45-70kg, depending on how tall they are. |
Is it just me or does she have a really massive head? |
hahaha i was trying so hard not to say anything. i didn't notice the size of her head, but i DID notice the photoshopped waistline (hint: look at the uneven horizon line and the broken waves behind her). sorry Wolfheart, her figure doesn't exist (at least, not on her).
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postp5043493.html#5043493 |
|
| Back to top |
|
Wolfheart
Phoenix
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
Age: 23
Posts: 2971
Location: Kent, England
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 4:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hale_bopp wrote: |
Is it just me or does she have a really massive head? |
I guess it's just the way the photo was taken, her head looks bigger in proportion to her body, she is also rated the 8th sexiest woman in world. |
|
| Back to top |
|
hyperlexian
loves the man who typed too much and ran outta spa
Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Age: 41
Posts: 21969
Location: with bucephalus
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 4:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
here's Kelly Brook with no Photoshop. she looks quite great but you can see her hip to waist ratio is more realistic in these candid photos. and her butt is a lot flatter. also... her head is a more normal size.
EDIT: interestingly, there seems to have been an "enhancement".
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postp5043493.html#5043493 |
|
| Back to top |
|
The_Face_of_Boo
A savage
Joined: Jun 17, 2010
Age: 31
Posts: 9260
Location: Beirut ,Lebanon
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 4:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wolfheart's fantasy busted!
btw, she looks better in the unphotoshoped version. |
|
| Back to top |
|
hyperlexian
loves the man who typed too much and ran outta spa
Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Age: 41
Posts: 21969
Location: with bucephalus
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The_Face_of_Boo wrote: | Wolfheart's fantasy busted!
btw, she looks better in the unphotoshoped version. |
actually i agree. she is a natural beauty and looks beautiful with no makeup. and her figure looks nice in the candid pics.
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postp5043493.html#5043493 |
|
| Back to top |
|
Wolfheart
Phoenix
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
Age: 23
Posts: 2971
Location: Kent, England
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 4:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hyperlexian wrote: | here's Kelly Brook with no Photoshop. she looks quite great but you can see her hip to waist ratio is more realistic in these candid photos. and her butt is a lot flatter. also... her head is a more normal size.
EDIT: interestingly, there seems to have been an "enhancement". |
Of course but not everyone stays at the exact weight, she has good proportion in her body and she looks naturally good even in those photos, most celebrities don't look as half as good without make up or when they are caught in candid photos. The weight of a person can change over a year, perhaps she did carb cycling and exercised prior to those modelling shoots. Even those photos are flattering for photos that are candid. |
|
| Back to top |
|
hyperlexian
loves the man who typed too much and ran outta spa
Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Age: 41
Posts: 21969
Location: with bucephalus
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
you missed what i said completely....
the pics you posted were photoshopped to give her a bigger butt and narrower waist. also she had a boob job. so the figure you like best does not exist on that particular female. i am sure someone out there may have a figure like that, but she doesn't.
i don't think people realise how much the media can manipulate our preferences and expectations.
EDIT: also, i think she looks better in her natural state. i thought you would too because you prefer women with no makeup.
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postp5043493.html#5043493 |
|
| Back to top |
|
hale_bopp
All Kinds of Freak
Joined: Nov 03, 2004
Age: 28
Posts: 14837
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 4:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wolfheart, it's photoshopped to hell. You're in denial.
And she looks better not photoshopped imo too.
_________________
www.aspergersgirl.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
