Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 1:25 pm Post subject: Re: Grover Norquist: A disgrace
Raptor wrote:
If Master_Pedant thinks Grover Norquist is a disgrace and that douchebag from The Young Turds goes off on a typically liberal vulgar tirade over him then that says a lot in favor of Norquist.
What's the matter? Scarred that the namby pamby, Alan Colmes left has been replaced with the angry, earthen left? Well, you should be, because the strong left is here to stay. _________________ http://www.voterocky.org/
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 2:16 pm Post subject: Re: Grover Norquist: A disgrace
Master_Pedant wrote:
Raptor wrote:
If Master_Pedant thinks Grover Norquist is a disgrace and that douchebag from The Young Turds goes off on a typically liberal vulgar tirade over him then that says a lot in favor of Norquist.
What's the matter? Scarred that the namby pamby, Alan Colmes left has been replaced with the angry, earthen left? Well, you should be, because the strong left is here to stay.
Joined: Mar 09, 2007 Posts: 4481 Location: Southeast U.S.A.
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 2:31 pm Post subject: Re: Grover Norquist: A disgrace
Master_Pedant wrote:
Raptor wrote:
If Master_Pedant thinks Grover Norquist is a disgrace and that douchebag from The Young Turds goes off on a typically liberal vulgar tirade over him then that says a lot in favor of Norquist.
What's the matter? Scarred that the namby pamby, Alan Colmes left has been replaced with the angry, earthen left? Well, you should be, because the strong left is here to stay.
You must have run out of things to do in trying to run the United States from Winnipeg.
As an accomplished vulgarian, I'm hardly a'feerd of some liberal crybaby with the Young Turds.
For everyone he impresses he turns a few off so I guess that's a good thing.
And remember, the hard (blow hard) left will never be as hard as the hard right in THIS country.
Now go back to playing with your toy American soldiers.
Last edited by Raptor on Tue Feb 21, 2012 8:59 pm; edited 1 time in total
Joined: Mar 09, 2007 Posts: 4481 Location: Southeast U.S.A.
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 2:36 pm Post subject: Re: Grover Norquist: A disgrace
Kraichgauer wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
Raptor wrote:
If Master_Pedant thinks Grover Norquist is a disgrace and that douchebag from The Young Turds goes off on a typically liberal vulgar tirade over him then that says a lot in favor of Norquist.
What's the matter? Scarred that the namby pamby, Alan Colmes left has been replaced with the angry, earthen left? Well, you should be, because the strong left is here to stay.
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 2:38 pm Post subject: Re: Grover Norquist: A disgrace
Raptor wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
Raptor wrote:
If Master_Pedant thinks Grover Norquist is a disgrace and that douchebag from The Young Turds goes off on a typically liberal vulgar tirade over him then that says a lot in favor of Norquist.
What's the matter? Scarred that the namby pamby, Alan Colmes left has been replaced with the angry, earthen left? Well, you should be, because the strong left is here to stay.
You must have run out of things to do in trying to trying to run the United States from Winnipeg.
As an accomplished vulgarian, I'm hardly a'feerd of some liberal crybaby with the Youg Turds.
For everyone he impresses he turns a few off so I guess that's a good thing.
And remember, the hard (blow hard) left will never be as hard as the hard right in THIS country.
Now go back to playing with your toy American soldiers.
Liberals will never be as hard as the right "in THIS country," huh?
As I recall, it was liberals like Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman who had carried THIS country to victory in the Second World War. Sounds like they were made of pretty hard stuff to me.
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 2:44 pm Post subject: Re: Grover Norquist: A disgrace
Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
Raptor wrote:
If Master_Pedant thinks Grover Norquist is a disgrace and that douchebag from The Young Turds goes off on a typically liberal vulgar tirade over him then that says a lot in favor of Norquist.
What's the matter? Scarred that the namby pamby, Alan Colmes left has been replaced with the angry, earthen left? Well, you should be, because the strong left is here to stay.
Amen to that, baby!
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
"baby"???
Are you two in love?
You'd just love that, wouldn't you?
Well, maybe you'd love that just a little too much, if Idaho Senator Larry Craig and Mayor of Spokane, Washington, Jim West are any indicators of what really lies beneath all that Republican homophobia.
Joined: Mar 09, 2007 Posts: 4481 Location: Southeast U.S.A.
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:05 pm Post subject: Re: Grover Norquist: A disgrace
Kraichgauer wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
Raptor wrote:
If Master_Pedant thinks Grover Norquist is a disgrace and that douchebag from The Young Turds goes off on a typically liberal vulgar tirade over him then that says a lot in favor of Norquist.
What's the matter? Scarred that the namby pamby, Alan Colmes left has been replaced with the angry, earthen left? Well, you should be, because the strong left is here to stay.
You must have run out of things to do in trying to trying to run the United States from Winnipeg.
As an accomplished vulgarian, I'm hardly a'feerd of some liberal crybaby with the Youg Turds.
For everyone he impresses he turns a few off so I guess that's a good thing.
And remember, the hard (blow hard) left will never be as hard as the hard right in THIS country.
Now go back to playing with your toy American soldiers.
Liberals will never be as hard as the right "in THIS country," huh?
As I recall, it was liberals like Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman who had carried THIS country to victory in the Second World War. Sounds like they were made of pretty hard stuff to me.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Roosevelt died in 1945 so he’s hardly a contemporary to Norquist. I doubt you’d like FDR, anyway. If things had been done his way post 9/11 all of the Arabs in this country would be thrown behind barbed wire for the duration of the WOT. Just ask any Japanese American that was around during WWII.
He was too in love with Stalin to be as effective of a wartime president as he could have been had he been a good hardcore conservative. By effective I mean securing a bigger chunk of Europe that the communists ultimately ended up with.
What makes FRD such an icon to the American left are his social policies and expansion of federal government power.
Truman dropped the ball in Korea by relieving MacArthur to keep him from whipping up on China.
I’m afraid your two examples of “hard right” don’t have much merit…
Joined: Mar 09, 2007 Posts: 4481 Location: Southeast U.S.A.
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:24 pm Post subject: Re: Grover Norquist: A disgrace
Master_Pedant wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Now go back to playing with your toy American soldiers.
I don't have any, but maybe I should buy some of these toys so as to melt over a fire pit.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I probably should go back to fund raising for Pat Martin.
Buy all you want and do whatever with them. It's amazing the assumptions you make just by my putting "Southeastern USA" under my user name five years ago when I registered here. Hell, I might not even live there any more and I'm not from there originally, anyway. I could be from Romania and see merit in the southern cause during the war between the states for reasons you'd never think of.
Too bad you can't find any Canadian toy soldiers to play with but I bet...............nah, I won't go there. I actually have a considerably higher opinion of Canada than you and your fellow countrymen on this forum have of the United States.
How much of the southern states have you seen, anyway, to form such opinions? I bet I've seen more of Canada than you have of the southern U.S.
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:48 pm Post subject: Re: Grover Norquist: A disgrace
Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
Raptor wrote:
If Master_Pedant thinks Grover Norquist is a disgrace and that douchebag from The Young Turds goes off on a typically liberal vulgar tirade over him then that says a lot in favor of Norquist.
What's the matter? Scarred that the namby pamby, Alan Colmes left has been replaced with the angry, earthen left? Well, you should be, because the strong left is here to stay.
You must have run out of things to do in trying to trying to run the United States from Winnipeg.
As an accomplished vulgarian, I'm hardly a'feerd of some liberal crybaby with the Youg Turds.
For everyone he impresses he turns a few off so I guess that's a good thing.
And remember, the hard (blow hard) left will never be as hard as the hard right in THIS country.
Now go back to playing with your toy American soldiers.
Liberals will never be as hard as the right "in THIS country," huh?
As I recall, it was liberals like Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman who had carried THIS country to victory in the Second World War. Sounds like they were made of pretty hard stuff to me.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Roosevelt died in 1945 so he’s hardly a contemporary to Norquist. I doubt you’d like FDR, anyway. If things had been done his way post 9/11 all of the Arabs in this country would be thrown behind barbed wire for the duration of the WOT. Just ask any Japanese American that was around during WWII.
He was too in love with Stalin to be as effective of a wartime president as he could have been had he been a good hardcore conservative. By effective I mean securing a bigger chunk of Europe that the communists ultimately ended up with.
What makes FRD such an icon to the American left are his social policies and expansion of federal government power.
Truman dropped the ball in Korea by relieving MacArthur to keep him from whipping up on China.
I’m afraid your two examples of “hard right” don’t have much merit…
As half Japanese, I don't have warm fuzzy feelings toward Roosevelt. Pedant mode here, Japanese internment probably was due to corrupt California politicians and officials wanting to buy up the farmland of Japanese-American farmers cheaply.
Credence to this was there were few internments of Japanese in Hawaii, which was far more strategically vulnerable.
You can find the whole sad story in Strawberry Days by David Neiwart. Whether Arabs would have been interred is any one's guess. I would say no. Few Arab Americans are farmers or large land owners, and Arab countries are important as allies, while Japan is an isolated nation both ethnically and religiously.
On a personal note, how can you stay in the party of Michelle Malkin who defended Japanese internment quite recently?
Don't mean to be mean or "gotcha," but really, Malkin is a cancer that the Republicans should remove but haven't.
Joined: Apr 15, 2007 Posts: 9196 Location: Western Michigan
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:48 pm Post subject:
Raptor wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Is it time for the Monty Python drill team again?
Yeah, you tend to show us that whenever you get Pwn3d by me...
The right-wing conservative idea of "Pwning" someone in a political debate is stuffing banana peels in your ears and yelling "neener neener neener, not listening".
Joined: Mar 09, 2007 Posts: 4481 Location: Southeast U.S.A.
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:31 pm Post subject:
MagicToenail wrote:
Quote:
On a personal note, how can you stay in the party of Michelle Malkin who defended Japanese internment quite recently?
First I’ve heard of her but then again I don’t spend all of my time looking for republicans to wring my hands over. No matter what she says it’s not going to drive me to become a democrat and that's the simple truth...
Quote:
Don't mean to be mean or "gotcha," but really, Malkin is a cancer that the Republicans should remove but haven't.
Why not just go ahead and say what you mean; that all republicans are a cancer.
Marshall wrote:
Quote:
The right-wing conservative idea of "Pwning" someone in a political debate is stuffing banana peels in your ears and yelling "neener neener neener, not listening".
If you get all wrapped around the axle over my posts but I get a kick out of yours then you DO get pwn’d.
