WrongPlanet.net
WP Members: > 80,000



Aspie Affection

New Today: 1
New Yesterday: 27

Multitasking test 1, 2, 3, 4  Next  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Autism Forum Index -> General Autism Discussion     
rchoc
Butterfly
Butterfly


Joined: Feb 26, 2012
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 11:19 pm    Post subject: Multitasking test Reply with quote

Kind of interesting; tests your multitasking/executive function ability.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/06/07/technology/20100607-task-switching-demo.html

the methodology behind the results seems kind of strange though; I wonder what it reveals other than the possibility that a lot of people who consider themselves multitaskers aren't very self-perceptive. What do you think?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
goodwitchy
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Dec 29, 2011
Posts: 785
Location: Interplanetary

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very interesting.
That was a difficult test for me (very confusing, and I was very slow responding), but oddly, the test after that one - Test Your Focus, with colored rectangles, was easy:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/06/07/technology/20100607-distraction-filtering-demo.html

But I'm not a multitasker. Confused
_________________
Aspie score: 161 of 200
Neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 38 of 200
Autistic/BAP -123 aloof, 124 rigid and 108 pragmatic
Autism Spectrum quotient: 41, Empathy Quotient: 19

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alohilani
Blue Jay
Blue Jay


Joined: Feb 16, 2012
Age: 31
Posts: 81
Location: The northern capital

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

goodwitchy wrote:
Very interesting.
That was a difficult test for me (very confusing, and I was very slow responding), but oddly, the test after that one - Test Your Focus, with colored rectangles, was easy:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/06/07/technology/20100607-distraction-filtering-demo.html

But I'm not a multitasker. Confused


I don't quite understand my result in that test though. It said I scored 100% in both 2 distractions and 6 distractions.. so apparently I can focus on a specific thing while ignoring the others? I don't think so... usually I'm having a hard time finding out what is relevant and what's not. And I didn't quite understand the other test, the multitasking one, either the instructions are misleading or I'm too slow to understand.
Anyway, I don't like multitasking anyway. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alexender
Dodo bird
Phoenix


Joined: Jan 03, 2012
Age: 21
Posts: 1194
Location: wrongplanet

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

goodwitchy wrote:
Very interesting.
That was a difficult test for me (very confusing, and I was very slow responding), but oddly, the test after that one - Test Your Focus, with colored rectangles, was easy:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/06/07/technology/20100607-distraction-filtering-demo.html

But I'm not a multitasker. Confused


I got the same thing.

I had to redo the first thing about the numbers and letters after I rapid fire clicked, knowing I must have done it wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cogs
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Feb 13, 2012
Age: 22
Posts: 847

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I found that multitasking really hard...and scored terribly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
camelCase
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl


Joined: Nov 17, 2011
Posts: 128

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I scored above the high-multitasking marker considerably but I feel like this is a different kind of multitasking then I usually consider multitasking to be... It strikes me as a singular task to just follow a series of rules.

If x do y, then if a then b ETC

If I am actually trying to manage two tasks at once I usually just forget what I'm doing altogether at some point.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tuttle
Not a bird, a turtle.
Phoenix


Joined: Mar 27, 2006
Age: 24
Posts: 3046
Location: Massachusetts

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My results on that are somewhat odd I think.

Switching took me longer than both low and high multitaskers, as did doing the same task.

However, the odd part. It took me 48 milliseconds less on average when I was swapping tasks then when I was doing the same task.

Edit:

For the other test, I got 100%. That was a really easy test.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mayel
Velociraptor
Velociraptor


Joined: Jul 31, 2011
Posts: 462

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was slower than high and low multitaskers in the switching- and doing the same-task. I don't know what this means.
In the focus test, I got 100% for everything which means better than low and high multitaskers.
Again, not sure what those results mean.

According to this low multitaskers hold more items in their short term memory and thus focus better while high multitaskers take longer to switch tasks and do the same task over again....which means roughly speaking, that I would be a low and high multitasker accoriding to this test...which doesn't make sense.

Anybody else got a better interpretation of similar results?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RazorEddie
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jan 19, 2012
Age: 43
Posts: 611

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting. I was pretty slow (>2000ms) but there was almost no difference between switching and repeating. Like camelCase the tests seemed like a singular task to me.

On the distractions test I lost my focus for a second and missed one. Second time round I got 100% on both.
_________________
I stopped fighting my inner demons. We're on the same side now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mindmapper
Blue Jay
Blue Jay


Joined: Feb 17, 2012
Posts: 86
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The tests seem to be too simple to actually draw conclusions from. I'm not a multitasker.

According to the task juggling test, I seem to be 400ms slower on average than low multitaskers (1422ms for switching tasks).

The distractions test was rather easy, I scored 100%. It went to fullscreen to minimize other distractions, then displayed just a few objects at a time. The test was short, and I had no external distractions (except me looking at the test progress every time). It's easiest for me to remember things visually. Real life tasks however, are usually longer and there are more distractions. It's longer tasks where my attention usually starts to shift away to other things.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KittyCommand0r
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker


Joined: Jan 20, 2012
Posts: 64

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

oh geeze, I did really bad. I always thought I was a decent multi-tasker, but this test was somewhat difficult for me. I didn't get much wrong, but my times were very slow.

Switching Between Letters and Numbers: 4043
Repeating the same task: 2311
Additional Time for switching: 1732
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LittleBlackCat
Toucan
Toucan


Joined: Sep 11, 2011
Posts: 268
Location: England

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I did shockingly badly on the first test; my times were really slow. The second test I got 100%.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
arko5
Raven
Raven


Joined: Jul 19, 2010
Age: 25
Posts: 108

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had no difference for switching/same task on the multitasking test, both rather slow. For each one I just had to think my way through 'letter'->/u/->'vowel' as though I was thinking of a shopping list, maybe better multitaskers can do it automatically?
_________________
Your Aspie score: 146 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 51 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie (confirmed w/ diagnosis)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
heavenlyabyss
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Sep 10, 2011
Posts: 629

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I did pretty badly. Speed is not my strong suit especially for these confusing types of questions. I didn't even understand what the test was asking before I got through the first five problems or so. I think I could slightly better if I took it again but not much better.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dillogic
angry hermit
Phoenix


Joined: Nov 25, 2011
Posts: 4365

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bad for 1
good for 2
_________________
Dill don't do PM.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Autism Forum Index -> General Autism Discussion   
1, 2, 3, 4  Next  

 
Read more Articles on Wrong Planet



Wrong Planet is a Registered Trademark.
Copyright 2004-2014, Wrong Planet, LLC and Alex Plank. Alex does public speaking for Autism.

Advertise on Wrong Planet

Alex Hotchalk / Glam 

Alex Plank  Aspie Affection 

Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet | Privacy Policy

Subscribe: RSS Feed  Wrong Planet News  Wrong Planet Forums




fine art