hyperlexian
loves the man who typed too much and ran outta spa
Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Age: 41
Posts: 21969
Location: with bucephalus
|
 Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 3:33 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| LKL wrote: | | hyperlexian wrote: | | why would there be a limit on how much birth control a person used? |
There's a natural limit in that taking more than one hormonal bc prescription at a time would play physiological havoc with a woman's physiology. |
yeah, my question didn't come out properly. i was unsure what Burzum was asking - i thought he was saying there should be an external limit placed on a person as to how much birth control they could have, and that wasn't making sense to me. i think i've completely misunderstood.
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postp5043493.html#5043493 |
|
| Back to top |
|
jojobean
sacred clown
Joined: Aug 13, 2009
Posts: 3341
Location: In Georgia sipping a virgin pina' colada while the rest of the world is drunk
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am all for govt providing birth control cause if people cant afford birth control, then they certainly cant afford kids which then will mean they will be on some sort of govt assistance. 30 dollars a month is alot cheaper for the govt than over a thousand dollars a month in benefits.
And yes I been so poor at one time that 30 dollars a month seemed like alot of money.
This war on contraceptives makes absolutely no sense to me. The US cant seem to provide for the children it has as 1 in 4 children are hungry, so why should we encourage more to be born??
Jojo
_________________
All art is a kind of confession, more or less oblique. All artists, if they are to survive, are forced, at last, to tell the whole story; to vomit the anguish up.
-James Baldwin |
|
| Back to top |
|
NeantHumain
Phoenix
![]()
Joined: Jun 25, 2004
Posts: 5119
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Funny thing is most of us have the most effective birth control of them all: Asperger's syndrome. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Vexcalibur
Proud to be smug as heck
![]()
Joined: Jan 18, 2008
Posts: 5378
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| NeantHumain wrote: | | Funny thing is most of us have the most effective birth control of them all: Asperger's syndrome. |
Are you so quite sure that AS people have significantly less chances to reproduce?
_________________
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Burzum
Indeed
Joined: Apr 27, 2011
Posts: 1205
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hyperlexian wrote: | | why would there be a limit on how much birth control a person used? |
It is simple. If there is no limit to the amount of birth control I can have for free, then what is stopping me from walking into a birth control outlet and demanding one million condoms? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Vexcalibur
Proud to be smug as heck
![]()
Joined: Jan 18, 2008
Posts: 5378
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
For once you wouldn't be able to take them out of the store yourself.
It is a tad ridiculous to oppose giving insured birth control because supposedly it is impossible to limit how much people would take (Begging the question are we?).
_________________
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Oodain
big chief wulla bamboom alakaway
Joined: Jan 31, 2011
Age: 23
Posts: 5022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Burzum wrote: | | hyperlexian wrote: | | why would there be a limit on how much birth control a person used? |
It is simple. If there is no limit to the amount of birth control I can have for free, then what is stopping me from walking into a birth control outlet and demanding one million condoms? |
decency as a human being and the knowledge that such an act would serve no purpose but to prove a point about you, not contraception and the payment thereof?
_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//
the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
MjrMajorMajor
Phoenix
Joined: Jan 16, 2012
Age: 37
Posts: 2997
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Burzum wrote: |
| MjrMajorMajor wrote: | | Where is the limit for the amount of children born to parents unable or unwilling to financially support their offspring? |
That is nonsensical and completely unrelated to my question.
|
The only reason to impose limits on birth control that I can see would be financial. I was comparing the cost of that birth control on public resources to the cost of welfare beneficiaries that might have otherwise used prevention. As for limits on types of birth control offered, why not provide all? At least some type of coverage.
Last edited by MjrMajorMajor on Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:09 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
Vexcalibur
Proud to be smug as heck
![]()
Joined: Jan 18, 2008
Posts: 5378
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Oodain wrote: | | Burzum wrote: | | hyperlexian wrote: | | why would there be a limit on how much birth control a person used? |
It is simple. If there is no limit to the amount of birth control I can have for free, then what is stopping me from walking into a birth control outlet and demanding one million condoms? |
decency as a human being and the knowledge that such an act would serve no purpose but to prove a point about you, not contraception and the payment thereof? |
Plus if condoms were free, there would be no way to make a profit with them, in fact, you would be wasting a lot of energy and money in transportation and storage-
_________________
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
noname_ever
Phoenix
Joined: Dec 26, 2011
Posts: 500
Location: Indiana
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AstroGeek wrote: | | Burzum wrote: | | Vexcalibur wrote: | | You are an utter idiot if you think birth control is a leisure activity |
It is risible that you would call me an idiot after somehow managing to interpret my comment as implying that birth control itself is a leisure activity. 
| Vexcalibur wrote: | | Birth control reduces government spending and thus there are no rational arguments against using tax payer money on it |
There are very rational arguments against it that vary depending on how you plan to spend tax payer money on it. Are you advocating making it free to anyone that wants it? |
It would probably reduce the number of unplanned pregnancies and thus single mothers if it is free. Single mothers make up a hug portion of welfare recipients, so the government very well could save money in the long run if free birth control is available. |
We could save much more money if we implanted welfare recipients with Norplant as a condition of receiving welfare. |
|
| Back to top |
|
MjrMajorMajor
Phoenix
Joined: Jan 16, 2012
Age: 37
Posts: 2997
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| noname_ever wrote: |
We could save much more money if we implanted welfare recipients with Norplant as a condition of receiving welfare. |
Ouch, definite money saver, but haven't the eugenics boards already been disbanded on moral grounds? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Oodain
big chief wulla bamboom alakaway
Joined: Jan 31, 2011
Age: 23
Posts: 5022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Vexcalibur wrote: | | Oodain wrote: | | Burzum wrote: | | hyperlexian wrote: | | why would there be a limit on how much birth control a person used? |
It is simple. If there is no limit to the amount of birth control I can have for free, then what is stopping me from walking into a birth control outlet and demanding one million condoms? |
decency as a human being and the knowledge that such an act would serve no purpose but to prove a point about you, not contraception and the payment thereof? |
Plus if condoms were free, there would be no way to make a profit with them, in fact, you would be wasting a lot of energy and money in transportation and storage- |
no you wouldnt be able to jack up prices to much more than the cost of production, there will still be jobs making them.
same goes for many surgical supplies in socialized nations and defense contracts in the us(they however serve as an argument that people make too much on these kinds of deals)
furthermore i really do think there are some areas where the price of goods should NOT be based on profits in any way, i would even go so far as to regulate the maximum profit of any company providing health services, again there will still be plenty of jobs left.
_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//
the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
hyperlexian
loves the man who typed too much and ran outta spa
Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Age: 41
Posts: 21969
Location: with bucephalus
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Burzum wrote: | | hyperlexian wrote: | | why would there be a limit on how much birth control a person used? |
It is simple. If there is no limit to the amount of birth control I can have for free, then what is stopping me from walking into a birth control outlet and demanding one million condoms? |
i cannot imagine very many people doing that, so it's kind of an absurd question. also, most birth control outlets do not keep a million condoms on hand.
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postp5043493.html#5043493 |
|
| Back to top |
|
visagrunt
Polymath
Joined: Oct 17, 2009
Age: 45
Posts: 5754
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So what of the woman who takes oral contraceptives for a medical reason?
I can think of several conditions for which oral contraceptives would be a strategy that I would recommend to a patient. Are these women to forego coverage from their drug plans?
_________________
--James |
|
| Back to top |
|
Burzum
Indeed
Joined: Apr 27, 2011
Posts: 1205
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Oodain wrote: |
decency as a human being and the knowledge that such an act would serve no purpose but to prove a point about you, not contraception and the payment thereof? |
So you're relying on human decency for it to work? If it is freely available without any limitations, then people are going to exploit it. You cannot possibly deny that.
| Vexcalibur wrote: | | supposedly it is impossible to limit how much people would take |
I'm not making that argument at all, otherwise I wouldn't be asking for a limit. Which for some reason no one has yet provided me with.
| Vexcalibur wrote: | | Plus if condoms were free, there would be no way to make a profit with them |
Absolutely not true. You can sell them to other countries on eBay, which in effect would mean that your country would be subsidizing the use of contraception in other countries. And I'm sure people will find plenty of ways of using the materials in condoms in the production of other goods.
We're only at the tip of the iceberg here, I was expecting someone to just give me a limit so I could make further arguments.
| hyperlexian wrote: | | i cannot imagine very many people doing that, so it's kind of an absurd question |
You're focusing on the intentional hyperbole of the question and ignoring the principle. How about if I demand five hundred condoms? Is that feasible? What if I demand five hundred condoms per day? |
|
| Back to top |
|
