Cornflake Rattles when shaken


Joined: Oct 31, 2010 Posts: 30561 Location: Hertfordshire, UK
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
With respect to the purpose of this website, I think the main reason why mass deletion isn't readily available or encouraged is because of the mess it makes of threads, irrespective of whether a means already exists or one could be written. I don't mean a technical mess, from a logical database viewpoint (although it's a risk, of course), but simply from the viewpoint of a user viewing a shredded conversation.
A removal process would be blind: it would happily demolish chatter amongst friends along with very useful, serious articles or links to others.
Plus, there would be little point unless quoted posts were also properly handled, but that would have to go beyond database manipulation and into grepping post content, stripping bits out, and rewriting the content.
Finally, as sliqua-jcooter touches on, deletion is ultimately pointless unless every single reader and potential cache of that information can be traced and erased - hardly a practical proposition.
Alternatively the whole website could be accessible to members only - but that shuts out the easy, anonymous search for information/help and I think would be a backward step.
This place is actually an incredibly useful resource and as ol' timers, I think we tend to lose sight of that aspect a little. _________________ Giraffe: a ruminant with a view. |
|
| Back to top |
|
sliqua-jcooter Phoenix


Joined: Jan 26, 2010 Posts: 814 Location: Burke, Virginia, USA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MrXxx wrote: | A very good point about web histories. ^^^^^
Interfacing directly with the database however is almost always very limited for good reason (as I'm sure you know). Web page interfaces are specifically designed so the average user can manipulate the database without (hopefully) screwing it up badly and breaking the entire site, but even the tools available to phpBB forums can still sometimes do just that if mass editing tools are available to moderators, which is why said tools are often configured so as not to be so freely available to but a few admins who understand the possible consequences of using them and how to avoid the bad consequences. I know you understand this sliqua-jcooter but the average member probably does not. |
True - the point I was trying to make is more one of "even when there isn't a tool, it's still possible". I absolutely agree with all the points on why it *shouldn't* be done, but for the sake of completeness/correctness I thought I'd point it out. _________________ Nothing posted here should be construed as the opinion or position of my company, or an official position of WrongPlanet in any way, unless specifically mentioned. |
|
| Back to top |
|
MrXxx Moderator/Enigmatus Paradoxius


Joined: May 12, 2010 Posts: 5678 Location: New England
|
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sliqua-jcooter wrote: | | ...for the sake of completeness/correctness I thought I'd point it out. |
You sure you're not an Aspie?  _________________ MrXxx is taking a long sabbatical, and no longer moderating. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|