scubasteve
Phoenix
Joined: Dec 18, 2009
Age: 28
Posts: 993
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:05 pm Post subject: The terms "low-functioning" or "high-function |
 |
|
| How do you feel about these terms? Are you comfortable with one or either of these terms being used to describe you? Anything about them that would be uncomfortable? Is there another term you prefer that means the same thing? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Aharon
Phoenix
Joined: Dec 27, 2011
Posts: 633
Location: Kansas
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've always wondered that myself; is there a better name for it, because it sounds either deficient on one side or spaced out on the other. How about identifying which side of the spectrum, as left and right, blue and red, something like that.
_________________
If aliens come to get me, it won't be an abduction, but a rescue operation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Alexender
Dodo bird
Joined: Jan 03, 2012
Age: 20
Posts: 1194
Location: wrongplanet
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aspergers is synonymous with high functioning Autism (at least according to Tony Attwood)
_________________
www.wrongplanet.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
CockneyRebel
Mick Avory, Sensitive brown-eyed Sweet Pea
Joined: Jul 18, 2004
Age: 38
Posts: 87360
Location: In a quiet and peaceful garden, where gentle Mick Avory-like Sweet Peas grow.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
btbnnyr
Rabbit In Cat's Clothing
Joined: May 19, 2011
Posts: 3239
Location: Lost Angleles Carmen Santiago
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I like I-functioning. |
|
| Back to top |
|
AardvarkGoodSwimmer
Phoenix
Joined: Apr 27, 2009
Age: 50
Posts: 5002
Location: Houston, Texas
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Our education systems seem to "need" to define a person as either low- or high-functioning.
I think it's absolutely a political statement for a person to define himself or herself as middle-functioning. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Jory
Always in the wrong place at the wrong time
Joined: Jun 03, 2011
Age: 29
Posts: 6409
Location: Tornado Alley
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nobody likes being shoved into a category, and it's such a big spectrum that it's more complex than just high, mid, and low functioning. Having said that, I think it's the best possible system of classification.
"Asperger's" is a term that just needs to die. It sounds ridiculous, it means practically the same thing as HFA, and it's becoming a cultural byword for "annoying nerd." |
|
| Back to top |
|
lostgirl1986
There's a party in my head.
Joined: Feb 29, 2012
Age: 26
Posts: 6339
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I know that if I do have Asperger's Syndrome, which I'm quite confident that I do have it, I know that I would be high functioning. In a way it does kind of sound degrading because if you were classified as low functioning, how would you feel? Would that lower your self-confidence? I don't know what other term they could use though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
lostgirl1986
There's a party in my head.
Joined: Feb 29, 2012
Age: 26
Posts: 6339
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jory wrote: | Nobody likes being shoved into a category, and it's such a big spectrum that it's more complex than just high, mid, and low functioning. Having said that, I think it's the best possible system of classification.
"Asperger's" is a term that just needs to die. It sounds ridiculous, it means practically the same thing as HFA, and it's becoming a cultural byword for "annoying nerd." |
I agree, I think we should just use on the autism spectrum for everybody and autism. |
|
| Back to top |
|
idlewild
Pileated woodpecker
Joined: Nov 22, 2011
Posts: 176
Location: WI, USA
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My ability to function in society changes day by day, and is dependent on my circumstances and the amount of stress I am experiencing. If I am engaged in social activity with some degree of success all day on Monday, and then lock myself in my bedroom with my headphones on to avoid social interaction on Tuesday, which am I?
Maybe the labels are far too overarching and broad. Maybe we should be labeled by what we can do instead (verbal, lives independently, non-verbal, writer, visual artist, mechanic).
_________________
"My personal tragedy will not interfere with my ability to do good hair." - Steel Magnolias |
|
| Back to top |
|
noname_ever
Phoenix
Joined: Dec 26, 2011
Posts: 500
Location: Indiana
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lostgirl1986 wrote: | | Jory wrote: | Nobody likes being shoved into a category, and it's such a big spectrum that it's more complex than just high, mid, and low functioning. Having said that, I think it's the best possible system of classification.
"Asperger's" is a term that just needs to die. It sounds ridiculous, it means practically the same thing as HFA, and it's becoming a cultural byword for "annoying nerd." |
I agree, I think we should just use on the autism spectrum for everybody and autism. |
I disagree. There should be a way to differentiate between those that are mildly affected and can function more or less normally (they wouldn't know they were an aspie unless [self-]diagnosed) and those that require ear defenders and have a sign stating they're autistic when they go out in public.
Even the proposed updated manual has different levels of autism. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Jory
Always in the wrong place at the wrong time
Joined: Jun 03, 2011
Age: 29
Posts: 6409
Location: Tornado Alley
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| noname_ever wrote: | There should be a way to differentiate between those that are mildly affected and can function more or less normally (they wouldn't know they were an aspie unless [self-]diagnosed) and those that require ear defenders and have a sign stating they're autistic when they go out in public.
Even the proposed updated manual has different levels of autism. |
Yeah. Like I said, nobody likes labels, but the high, mid, and low functioning system is a simple way of getting across, quickly and easily, an estimate of your severity. It's sort of like movie critics with the four-star system – one is terrible, two is mediocre, three is good, and four is great. It's obviously much more complex than that, but it's the best way of quickly informing someone of how good the movie is. You may not enjoy personally labeling yourself high, mid, or low functioning, but if a psychologist asked you to pick the one you're closest to, you'd probably be able to do that. Classifying everyone on the spectrum as "autistic" isn't going to work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
anneurysm
Who needs birds when you have Lena Dunham.
Joined: Mar 26, 2008
Age: 25
Posts: 1945
Location: Barrie & Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I get annoyed with the use of functioning labels. Uneven skill sets are very common on the autism spectrum...the most notable cases being highly intelligent, articulate non-speaking individuals who come across as "unaware" or of low intelligence. Just because you excel at one particular skill set doesn't necessarily mean that you'll succeed at a wide range of skill sets. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Dillogic
boom bang pow
Joined: Nov 25, 2011
Posts: 3493
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
The official terminology is based on IQ:
Less than a set number; LFA
Higher than a set number; HFA
That's all. Researchers first used the term, and that was for studies to separate groups based on IQ scores.
The official levels in the DSM are mild, moderate and severe, for all disorders. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Shatbat
Fénix
Joined: Feb 20, 2012
Age: 20
Posts: 4509
Location: South America
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Dillogic wrote: | The official terminology is based on IQ:
Less than a set number; LFA
Higher than a set number; HFA
That's all. Researchers first used the term, and that was for studies to separate groups based on IQ scores.
The official levels in the DSM are mild, moderate and severe, for all disorders. |
That's an useful piece of information. I thought it meant how capable was an individual to interact with other people and society in general.
For me, well, I don't have a problem with the "high functioning" label, but those who get the other one might think otherwise.
_________________
Verily I have often laughed at weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws. - Nietzsche |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
