WrongPlanet.net
WP Members: > 75,000



Aspie Affection

New Today: 2
New Yesterday: 35

Censorship Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Autism Forum Index -> Politics, Philosophy, and Religion     

censorship
Censorship should never be used
50%
 50%  [ 25 ]
It should only be used if it protects the public from harm
28%
 28%  [ 14 ]
Censorship prevents stupidity and opposition so I am all for it
2%
 2%  [ 1 ]
Not sure
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Should be used in moderation if the situation calls for it
20%
 20%  [ 10 ]
Total Votes : 50

Vigilans
Orgasm Donor
Phoenix


Joined: Jun 20, 2008
Age: 25
Posts: 12113
Location: La belle province

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 6:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

edgewaters wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Mummy_of_Peanut wrote:
I wonder what this place would be like, with the spammers and trolls being allowed to roam freely (that's what no censorship would entail). As an example, one troll could easily churn out a whole page of topic headings, in minutes. I don't think I'd use places like this at all, if they weren't censored somewhat.


Banning trolls, spammers, and locking violating threads, is not censorship, it is enforcement of the rules. Is it censorship to refuse a violent television show on a family friendly channel?


I don't see it so much that way exactly ... it's more like WP is someone's megaphone or other communication tool. They share it under certain conditions. They're not robbing you of freedom of speech if they attach conditions to using the megaphone; it's their stuff.

Censorship is when you're forbidden from using any megaphone, including your own, to communicate something. No website can take your freedom of speech away. They can attach conditions to sharing their stuff, because it's theirs, but that's not censorship.


That is another valid way of looking at it.
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Dox47
Consigliere
Phoenix


Joined: Jan 29, 2008
Posts: 5344
Location: Seattle Area

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 6:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vigilans wrote:
Furthermore, the TOS is not really a matter of opinion.


Actually, a lot of it is a matter of opinion, as it contains numerous squishy terms that can be readily interpreted to cover just about any situation; it's a classic CYA boilerplate and subject to plenty of interpretation (see: swearing).

Also, I'm kinda with panda on this one; you're showing up in a lot of threads lately to mock and belittle people who are questioning moderator calls. I'm not making any insinuation about your motives, just pointing out that the pattern is plainly visible and not a figment of anyone's imagination.
_________________
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. - H L Mencken
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ruveyn
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Sep 22, 2008
Age: 76
Posts: 29709
Location: New Jersey

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 6:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ArrantPariah wrote:
Vigilans wrote:

Banning trolls, spammers, and locking violating threads, is not censorship, it is enforcement of the rules


Your nose is looking mighty brown, lately. Wink

Vigilans wrote:

. Is it censorship to refuse a violent television show on a family friendly channel?


For the government to refuse it? Or for the owner of the channel to refuse it?


Censorship is restriction of speech, press or media output ordained by government. A the owner of a privately owned newspaper, auditorium, station or website is at liberty to refuse whatsoever he wishes.

ruveyn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vigilans
Orgasm Donor
Phoenix


Joined: Jun 20, 2008
Age: 25
Posts: 12113
Location: La belle province

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 6:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dox47 wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Furthermore, the TOS is not really a matter of opinion.


Actually, a lot of it is a matter of opinion, as it contains numerous squishy terms that can be readily interpreted to cover just about any situation; it's a classic CYA boilerplate and subject to plenty of interpretation (see: swearing).

Also, I'm kinda with panda on this one; you're showing up in a lot of threads lately to mock and belittle people who are questioning moderator calls. I'm not making any insinuation about your motives, just pointing out that the pattern is plainly visible and not a figment of anyone's imagination.


Actually, I am mocking what amounts to poorly thought out and ridiculous positions. I don't care about people's personal relations with the mods. If you and others would prefer I don't contribute to these threads, because of whatever reasons, well... too bad, unless you would prefer to censor me Wink I am not concerned with who likes me or not
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Kjas
Onçinha
Phoenix


Joined: Feb 27, 2012
Age: 23
Posts: 5196
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 7:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dox47 wrote:
Also, I'm kinda with panda on this one; you're showing up in a lot of threads lately to mock and belittle people who are questioning moderator calls. I'm not making any insinuation about your motives, just pointing out that the pattern is plainly visible and not a figment of anyone's imagination.


I have seen him do that, but only in situations where the person doing the questioning clearly doesn't have a leg to stand on, and is being absurd.

I have not seen him do that when someone has a half way viable point.
_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HerrGrimm
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Mar 19, 2011
Posts: 963
Location: United States

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 7:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dox47 wrote:
Also, I'm kinda with panda on this one; you're showing up in a lot of threads lately to mock and belittle people who are questioning moderator calls. I'm not making any insinuation about your motives, just pointing out that the pattern is plainly visible and not a figment of anyone's imagination.


I would like to point out I also did that to you using a Flash Gordon video, and (I'm dead serious about this, honestly, if I do this I expect some retaliation) I am sorry you did not get a chance to defend yourself. The reason why I am bringing this up is actually so you can respond to me after I said it on another thread, and I had to wait until a relevant topic I wanted to post in happened and you did this again to let you have a chance. This might be another "WTF HerrGrimm?" moment, but seriously, if I am going to do this to people, I expect some backlash in return. So let me explain my position and then you can respond:

It was not because I was defending the moderators. I was mocking you because you are trying too hard. And this trying too hard is useless, because if this is happening you have no control over it, and I am amazed how people want the rules loosened so they can say what they want, when in reality it gives the moderators a better chance to ban you over how vague the rules would be for this to happen.

Besides, I am more of a creepy stalker than you anyway. We did both pass the Test of Manhood, it is just that you use your powers for the force of justice, while I use mine for mockery and trickery.
_________________
"You just like to go around rebuking people with your ravenous wolf face and snarling commentary." - Ragtime
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
enrico_dandolo
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Nov 21, 2011
Posts: 866

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 4:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DC wrote:
enrico_dandolo wrote:
It is more useful that there be a free press. It lets out steam. It's not like newspapers change anything.


Have you been living under a rock the last year?

Murdoch phone hacking inquiry pass you by?

The one where celebrities, politicians and the police all admit to being terrified of the press and their power to destroy careers with false gossip or bury potentially career ending indiscretions so that you sail on unscathed?

Or how after the press created the MMR scare, parents stopped vaccinating their children and case of fatal measles, mumps and rubella went up hugely? etc, etc, etc.

Similar things happened too before the printing press. More slowly, perhaps, but just as destructively.

Admittedly, I was not thinking at all about such cases, more about politics, and my last sentence was to be understood as "the press doesn't change anything at all about which groups hold real power in the long run". Even if, in specific instances, the press can be dangerously stupid (as opposed their typical benign stupidity), I believe it is still more dangerous to prevent them uttering their non-sense than to let it go through, since the press will unite in expressing their feelings of oppression, with many people in agreement, which could cause unrest. To be precise, so long as a regulation is not perceived as oppressive to anyone, I am in full agreement, even if it limits freedom of expression.

(I corrected a typo in my first post.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
heavenlyabyss
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Sep 10, 2011
Posts: 530

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 4:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Censorship should be used when the person talking is an idiot. When I say idiot, I don't mean low IQ, I mean the person is an as*hole.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Oodain
big chief wulla bamboom alakaway
Phoenix


Joined: Jan 31, 2011
Age: 23
Posts: 5022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 7:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

heavenlyabyss wrote:
Censorship should be used when the person talking is an idiot. When I say idiot, I don't mean low IQ, I mean the person is an as*hole.


and how do we determine that "objective sentiment"(read not)?
_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vigilans
Orgasm Donor
Phoenix


Joined: Jun 20, 2008
Age: 25
Posts: 12113
Location: La belle province

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 7:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

heavenlyabyss wrote:
Censorship should be used when the person talking is an idiot. When I say idiot, I don't mean low IQ, I mean the person is an as*hole.


Nah, don't censor them, censure them- they have the right to speak, but you have the right to point out how much of an as*hole they are! Everybody wins!
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ruveyn
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Sep 22, 2008
Age: 76
Posts: 29709
Location: New Jersey

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 10:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

heavenlyabyss wrote:
Censorship should be used when the person talking is an idiot. When I say idiot, I don't mean low IQ, I mean the person is an as*hole.


Is there an objective criterion for as*hole-icity?

ruveyn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TM
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Feb 04, 2012
Posts: 2122

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 11:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

During times of war its fine, since there are certain aspects that should not be made public due to security concerns and such. During "normal" life, censorship of any kind is an infringement on freedom of speech and expression and should not under any circumstance be curtailed outside of legal boundaries. Threats, libel and such do need to illegal acts though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Oldout
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Feb 10, 2012
Posts: 1539
Location: Reading, PA

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 11:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you were being held hostage during a bank robbery, would want the local TV station broadcasting the images of the swat team about to enter the bank?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ArrantPariah
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Mar 31, 2012
Posts: 5086

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 4:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vigilans wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
Vigilans wrote:

Banning trolls, spammers, and locking violating threads, is not censorship, it is enforcement of the rules


Your nose is looking mighty brown, lately. Wink


Really? I have nothing to gain by voicing my opinion. Furthermore, the TOS is not really a matter of opinion. Feel free to go and read it any time you like, or feel free to be a fool and throw insinuations around, I don't particularly care about your view on my motivations, though it says a lot about yours that you accuse me of brown nosing when my post was in disagreement with a mod's interpretation of censorship


Oh, you're good. Wink

Have you received your Gold Star, yet?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vigilans
Orgasm Donor
Phoenix


Joined: Jun 20, 2008
Age: 25
Posts: 12113
Location: La belle province

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 4:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ArrantPariah wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
Vigilans wrote:

Banning trolls, spammers, and locking violating threads, is not censorship, it is enforcement of the rules


Your nose is looking mighty brown, lately. Wink


Really? I have nothing to gain by voicing my opinion. Furthermore, the TOS is not really a matter of opinion. Feel free to go and read it any time you like, or feel free to be a fool and throw insinuations around, I don't particularly care about your view on my motivations, though it says a lot about yours that you accuse me of brown nosing when my post was in disagreement with a mod's interpretation of censorship


Oh, you're good. Wink

Have you received your Gold Star, yet?


Do you have anything useful to say, or are you going to continue the butthurt induced by my pointing out how stupid whining about "censorship" on a private web page is.
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Autism Forum Index -> Politics, Philosophy, and Religion   
Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next  

 
Read more Articles on Wrong Planet



Wrong Planet is a Registered Trademark.
Copyright 2004-2013, Wrong Planet, LLC and Alex Plank. Alex does public speaking for Autism.

Advertise on Wrong Planet

Alex Hotchalk / Glam 

Alex Plank  Aspie Affection 

Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet | Privacy Policy

Subscribe: RSS Feed  Wrong Planet News  Wrong Planet Forums




fine art