marshall
Under the whirlwind
Joined: Apr 15, 2007
Posts: 9167
Location: Western Michigan
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:02 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| visagrunt wrote: | | Raptor wrote: | | And the left has done nothing to control what we do in our homes? As far as the bedroom goes I have yet to hear of any law requiring surveillance cameras in bedrooms. |
How many jurisdictions continue to criminalize homosexual behaviour? How many social conservatives call for restoration of laws criminalizing it in those jurisdictions that have decriminalized it?
Limiting access to marriage is far more invasive than anything that you can complain of. Social conservatives seek to use the coercive power of government to control adult, consensual sexual behaviour. Until you can demonstrate liberals doing something comparable I will continue to reject your argument.
| Quote: | Money managed by the government is being misused one way or another. If it’s not being used to fund things you don’t believe in it’s being misused in the process of funding things you do believe in. Even if the government ran a lemonade stand the lemonade would taste like piss and they’d spend five times their profits making more lemonade that tastes like piss that won’t sell.
Government exists only to serve and perpetuate itself.
"Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."
George Washington |
But government is not in the business of doing business. That is not its purpose, and it should not be measured as if that was the case.
Business is easy. There is one, and only one, metric for success: making money. Every investment can be measured against its net present value and a decision taken on a very simple basis. Now that's not to say that the analysis isn't complex, and it's not to say that business doesn't get it wrong from time to time. But businesses can come and go without the whole house of cards falling.
Government, on the other hand, has dozens of measures for success. Suppose a decision has to be made about where to put health care money--does that go into providing more emergency care, cancer treatment or health prevention? When spending new education money should that go into more classrooms for arts and music, physical education or expanding sciences?
Public policy making is a daily litany of these decisions where there is no right answer, and rarely even a best answer. There are always more priorities than there is money to spend on them.
So don't try and tell me that government couldn't run a lemonade stand, because any moron can run a lemonade stand, but it takes the wisdom of Solomon and the patience of a saint to put up with the host of pressures that exist in the public policy world, and no easy path to decision making. |
It seems to me that American government is dysfunctional because American politics is dysfunctional. The general public is not interested in detailed policy and the efficacy of government programs. They're only interested in broad ideological mantra's. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Longshanks
Phoenix
Joined: Feb 03, 2012
Posts: 513
Location: At an undisclosed airbase at Shangri-la
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Delphiki wrote: | | Longshanks wrote: | | Delphiki wrote: | | Longshanks wrote: |
The howling begins. In answer to your question, liberals are. Liberals force their views down peoples throats more than conservatives would ever dream of doing. Again, I have history to back me up on this. And you yourself have condemned and mocked many of my previous posts. In Wisconsin, we have liberals shoving their viewpoint down our throats all the time! Just look at the Walker recalls. Only now, the liberals are beginning to learn that people get ticked off when liberals do that - so they vote conservative. And Barack Obama is shoving his viewpoints down our throats now, which is why he is dropping in the polls. And as far as I'm concerned, he's a more urbane version of Hitler, Stalin, and Mao Tse-Tung.
Longshanks |
That is your opinion. I get many emails from my very republican family everyday. You are acting like 50% of the population are completely different than the other (at least that is how it seems to me) |
You're just as bad.
Longshanks |
Just as bad with what? When have I forced my views? |
If you have not the foresight to see what you advocate in your own posts, what good would it do me to explain it? If you can't see your own condescending remarks and mockery, why waste my time? You have a seething hate about you, sir, and it blinds you. Get past the hate, and you may see for yourself one day.
Longshanks
_________________
Supporter of the Brian Terry Foundation @ www.honorbrianterry.com. Special Agent Brian Terry (1970-2010) was murdered as a direct result of Operation Fast & Furious - which Barry O won't discuss - wonder why? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Delphiki
Launchie
Joined: Apr 15, 2012
Age: 23
Posts: 1350
Location: My own version of reality
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Longshanks wrote: | | Delphiki wrote: | | Longshanks wrote: | | Delphiki wrote: | | Longshanks wrote: |
The howling begins. In answer to your question, liberals are. Liberals force their views down peoples throats more than conservatives would ever dream of doing. Again, I have history to back me up on this. And you yourself have condemned and mocked many of my previous posts. In Wisconsin, we have liberals shoving their viewpoint down our throats all the time! Just look at the Walker recalls. Only now, the liberals are beginning to learn that people get ticked off when liberals do that - so they vote conservative. And Barack Obama is shoving his viewpoints down our throats now, which is why he is dropping in the polls. And as far as I'm concerned, he's a more urbane version of Hitler, Stalin, and Mao Tse-Tung.
Longshanks |
That is your opinion. I get many emails from my very republican family everyday. You are acting like 50% of the population are completely different than the other (at least that is how it seems to me) |
You're just as bad.
Longshanks |
Just as bad with what? When have I forced my views? |
If you have not the foresight to see what you advocate in your owns posts, what good would it do me to explain it? If you can't see your own condescending remarks and mockery, why waste my time? You have a seething hate about you, sir, and it blinds you. Get past the hate, and you may see for yourself one day.
Longshanks |
That startled me. The last time I felt really angry was a few months ago, and I realized it was inconsequential later on. I have not gotten angry with you or other posters on here. Frankly I do not understand why I would have a seething hate all because I disagree with you on a debate. I thought it would be good for you to explain it so I would see your reasoning of how I have forced my views on you or others. Perhaps I have and it would be good to see where I have done so. Or you are misinterpreting what I wrote, or slightly different, we are reading different meaning out of what I wrote.
I do not think that I have been condescending, now I will agree that I have used mockery. But that cuts both ways. There are countless times that I have seen your posts littered with condescending remarks. I didn't think that pertained to this topic, but since you brought it up I thought I would point that out.
_________________
Trolls exist! They steal your socks, but only the left ones. I wonder what is up with that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
ArrantPariah
Phoenix
Joined: Mar 31, 2012
Posts: 4807
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, I see what's going on here. pretty clever.
Mr. Longshanks, is, in fact, a LIBERAL, who is doing a witty parody of Conservatives.
Well done, Sir. You had most of us convinced for a while. |
|
| Back to top |
|
marshall
Under the whirlwind
Joined: Apr 15, 2007
Posts: 9167
Location: Western Michigan
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Longshanks wrote: | | ArrantPariah wrote: | | Delphiki wrote: | | Longshanks wrote: | | Delphiki wrote: | | Longshanks wrote: |
The howling begins. In answer to your question, liberals are. Liberals force their views down peoples throats more than conservatives would ever dream of doing. Again, I have history to back me up on this. And you yourself have condemned and mocked many of my previous posts. In Wisconsin, we have liberals shoving their viewpoint down our throats all the time! Just look at the Walker recalls. Only now, the liberals are beginning to learn that people get ticked off when liberals do that - so they vote conservative. And Barack Obama is shoving his viewpoints down our throats now, which is why he is dropping in the polls. And as far as I'm concerned, he's a more urbane version of Hitler, Stalin, and Mao Tse-Tung.
Longshanks |
That is your opinion. I get many emails from my very republican family everyday. You are acting like 50% of the population are completely different than the other (at least that is how it seems to me) |
You're just as bad.
Longshanks |
Just as bad with what? When have I forced my views? |
Southern Whites felt that Civil Rights was "being forced down their throats." It was indeed a bitter pill to swallow. |
You're as selective as Kirchgauer - and as easy to impeach. 1. You failed to mention that Eisenhower, a republican, got that ball rolling. He also desegregated the armed forces, something that Roosevelt and Truman, who were democrats, refused to do. 2. Are you not also forgetting that the "southern whites" that you are refering to, such as George Wallace, were democrats? 3. Are you also not forgetting that it was a republican dominated congress and a republican president who passed the constitutional amendments banning slavery, allowing blacks to vote, and the fourteenth amendment as well? 4. Are you not forgetting that those who attempted to seccede from the union were led by prominent democrats (Davis, Breckinridge, Cobb, Yancey, Benjamin, Floyd, Wise, Pickens, Thompson, and many others) and did so because of slavery? 5. Are you not forgetting that the writers of the constitution had the law banning slavery in the original document, but it was taken out to ensure that the southern states would sign it? Your statement is not only inflamatory but entirely disingenuous. All Eisenhower did was enforce the laws he was sworn to uphold. They were already in place since the end of a war that cost America more lives than any other. Your attempt to re-write history is failing. |
How many times must it be repeated? Dixiecrats were not liberal! They were conservatives with a D next to their name!
Also, Teddy Roosevelt, a Republican, was arguably the forefather of the modern liberal movement. He was a trust-buster and an environmentalist. He was not the corporate big-business lackey today's Republicans are. You're particular brand of conservatism only goes back to Ronald Reagan and perhaps Barry Goldwater.
| Quote: | | And lest we not forget, the courts have ruled that atheism is also a religion. And now the atheists are attempting to force theirreligious views on we Chrisitians. And the judges of the liberal left are letting them - even encouraging them to do it. Seems to me that is an infringement of the first amendment because liberal judges are not empowered to create a state religion, which is what they are attempting to do with atheism. It is the same with gay-marriage. Marriage is a religious institution. How dare they attempt to force Christians to change their religion by forcing them to recognize something repugnant to their religious beliefs - thus forcing them to ignore their conscience - again violating the first amendment. And now Obama care seeks to do the same thing with birth control and abortion. |
Apparently not allowing you to have your Christian beliefs institutionalized through government is atheistic oppression. In your bizarro world, telling you that you can't force your views down everyone's throat via government is the same as forcing a non-belief down your own throat. I simply have no response to this. By your logic it's either you or me getting something forced down our throat, in which case you don't admit the possibility for mutual tolerance and peaceful coexistence. It's simply your way or the high way. I suppose all politics ultimately comes down to this. But at least in this country we can vote to resolve our differences rather than having it come down to physical violence and other nastiness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Longshanks
Phoenix
Joined: Feb 03, 2012
Posts: 513
Location: At an undisclosed airbase at Shangri-la
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| visagrunt wrote: | | Longshanks wrote: | The howling begins. In answer to your question, liberals are. Liberals force their views down peoples throats more than conservatives would ever dream of doing. Again, I have history to back me up on this. And you yourself have condemned and mocked many of my previous posts. In Wisconsin, we have liberals shoving their viewpoint down our throats all the time! Just look at the Walker recalls. Only now, the liberals are beginning to learn that people get ticked off when liberals do that - so they vote conservative. And Barack Obama is shoving his viewpoints down our throats now, which is why he is dropping in the polls. And as far as I'm concerned, he's a more urbane version of Hitler, Stalin, and Mao Tse-Tung.
Longshanks |
No, the howling continues. Minorities have been complaining about majority repression for centuries--this is merely the newest face on an age old problem.
And still, I am left with the question: What, precisely, is being forced down your throat? A viewpoint? Is your intellectual foundation so precarious that you are threatened by a viewpoint?!? I welcome dissent--I think our societies are made richer by the fact that we don't all agree on a single set of values. I would not tolerate a society in which your freedom to worship as a Southern Baptist and your right to call me a sinner was not vigourously protected. But you complain of a viewpoint being shoved down your throat?
Now as for practical impacts of liberalism, I will not deny that liberal administrations seek to put regulations in the workplace, and see a larger role for government in the delivery of certain programs. I respect the view of small-government conservatives, but I cannot agree with it. However, the religious right seeks to regulate in the home and in the bedroom to a degree that is far more offensive, to my way of thinking, than any liberal program that you would seek to complain of. |
Oh, boy. I just have to rip this one to shreds. To begin with, you may want to check out my latest response to Arrant - I can't remember the second part of the handle - what it does is it outlines the true history of the liberal democrats in their support of slavery and their fight against civil rights - which as been documented by historians on both sides of the aisle.
Second - Since Eisenhower's enactment and enforcement of laws on the books placed into effect by Republican administrations and Republican dominated congresses and since the drastic changes made in the seventies and eighties, the minority complaints of "repression" have been truly false and nothing but hype. And if people woud truly educate themselves instead of watching football and drinking vast amounts of beer, this discussion wouldn't even be occuring.
Third - You welcome dissent as much as Hitler welcomed the Russians into Berlin. I cite your past posts as proof of that point. Your arrogant condescendtion and mockeries would make Obama proud. I have yet to meet any liberal that welcomes dissent at any time.
Fourth - You advocate larger government and more programs, huh? Now here's reality slapping that approach on the mat hard! From 1990 to 1994, I was an investigator for the Civilian Health and Medical Program for the Uniform Services (CHAMPUS), now known as Tri-Care. My biggest fraud case involved some $72.4 Billion defrauded tax dollars. And that was just one of 68 cases on my desk at any given time. There were, during my tenure, 115 investigators nationwide. The average amount of cases was also 68 per investigator. The average fraud case was worth $403 Million. Now do the math. 115 x 68 x $403 Million. None of this money ever gets recouped. This is nothing compared to what Medicare/Medicaid is now dealing with. And now Obama wants to create his own program with the only fraud control is one sentence saying fraud is illegal? Get real! White-collar crime may be the easiest crime to prove but it takes the longest to investigate. This is because you have to prove a series of patterns in a court of law. What's more, is, in order to control medical fraud, we would have to literally double the size of government as it is now - and even then - we will never recover the money. Now do you understand why we're in a deficit? Are so uneducated that you can't do simple math? This is the result of your programs. Oh, but there's more! Many of the people defrauding the government were paying off the very politicians supporting the programs! I've had to lock horns with Ted Kennedy, Jay Rockefeller, Gov. Bill Clinton of Arkansas, and a number of other democrat wackos. Conversely, the rupblican attitude was, "If they're innocent, clear them. If they did it and they're found guilty - hang 'em high!" This stuff is all a matter of public record. My case was on 60 Minutes and 20/20.
Having said all of that, "What are you thinking?"
Longshanks
_________________
Supporter of the Brian Terry Foundation @ www.honorbrianterry.com. Special Agent Brian Terry (1970-2010) was murdered as a direct result of Operation Fast & Furious - which Barry O won't discuss - wonder why? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Delphiki
Launchie
Joined: Apr 15, 2012
Age: 23
Posts: 1350
Location: My own version of reality
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Since it got brought up- preserving the sanctity of marriage...I do not remember Giving cattle being mainstream anymore. How well has the sanctity of marriage really been preserved? Not all christians disagree with gay marriage, my family doesn't.
_________________
Trolls exist! They steal your socks, but only the left ones. I wonder what is up with that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Longshanks
Phoenix
Joined: Feb 03, 2012
Posts: 513
Location: At an undisclosed airbase at Shangri-la
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ArrantPariah wrote: | Okay, I see what's going on here. pretty clever.
Mr. Longshanks, is, in fact, a LIBERAL, who is doing a witty parody of Conservatives.
Well done, Sir. You had most of us convinced for a while. |
You have just proved yourself delusionsal. Get some help.
Longshanks
_________________
Supporter of the Brian Terry Foundation @ www.honorbrianterry.com. Special Agent Brian Terry (1970-2010) was murdered as a direct result of Operation Fast & Furious - which Barry O won't discuss - wonder why? |
|
| Back to top |
|
ArrantPariah
Phoenix
Joined: Mar 31, 2012
Posts: 4807
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Longshanks wrote: | | ArrantPariah wrote: | Okay, I see what's going on here. pretty clever.
Mr. Longshanks, is, in fact, a LIBERAL, who is doing a witty parody of Conservatives.
Well done, Sir. You had most of us convinced for a while. |
You have just proved yourself delusionsal. Get some help.
Longshanks |
You're good! Staying in character, now that I've ripped your mask off  |
|
| Back to top |
|
marshall
Under the whirlwind
Joined: Apr 15, 2007
Posts: 9167
Location: Western Michigan
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Longshanks wrote: | | Delphiki wrote: | | Longshanks wrote: | | Delphiki wrote: | | Longshanks wrote: |
The howling begins. In answer to your question, liberals are. Liberals force their views down peoples throats more than conservatives would ever dream of doing. Again, I have history to back me up on this. And you yourself have condemned and mocked many of my previous posts. In Wisconsin, we have liberals shoving their viewpoint down our throats all the time! Just look at the Walker recalls. Only now, the liberals are beginning to learn that people get ticked off when liberals do that - so they vote conservative. And Barack Obama is shoving his viewpoints down our throats now, which is why he is dropping in the polls. And as far as I'm concerned, he's a more urbane version of Hitler, Stalin, and Mao Tse-Tung.
Longshanks |
That is your opinion. I get many emails from my very republican family everyday. You are acting like 50% of the population are completely different than the other (at least that is how it seems to me) |
You're just as bad.
Longshanks |
Just as bad with what? When have I forced my views? |
If you have not the foresight to see what you advocate in your own posts, what good would it do me to explain it? If you can't see your own condescending remarks and mockery, why waste my time? You have a seething hate about you, sir, and it blinds you. Get past the hate, and you may see for yourself one day.
Longshanks |
The irony meter is simply off the charts with you.  Adding the odd "sir" here and there does not make your posts appear any more respectful or non-condescending. The most condescending thing of all is when you have to place your own imaginary thoughts and beliefs into other people's heads in order to shoot them down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Longshanks
Phoenix
Joined: Feb 03, 2012
Posts: 513
Location: At an undisclosed airbase at Shangri-la
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| marshall wrote: | | Longshanks wrote: | | ArrantPariah wrote: | | Delphiki wrote: | | Longshanks wrote: | | Delphiki wrote: | | Longshanks wrote: |
The howling begins. In answer to your question, liberals are. Liberals force their views down peoples throats more than conservatives would ever dream of doing. Again, I have history to back me up on this. And you yourself have condemned and mocked many of my previous posts. In Wisconsin, we have liberals shoving their viewpoint down our throats all the time! Just look at the Walker recalls. Only now, the liberals are beginning to learn that people get ticked off when liberals do that - so they vote conservative. And Barack Obama is shoving his viewpoints down our throats now, which is why he is dropping in the polls. And as far as I'm concerned, he's a more urbane version of Hitler, Stalin, and Mao Tse-Tung.
Longshanks |
That is your opinion. I get many emails from my very republican family everyday. You are acting like 50% of the population are completely different than the other (at least that is how it seems to me) |
You're just as bad.
Longshanks |
Just as bad with what? When have I forced my views? |
Southern Whites felt that Civil Rights was "being forced down their throats." It was indeed a bitter pill to swallow. |
You're as selective as Kirchgauer - and as easy to impeach. 1. You failed to mention that Eisenhower, a republican, got that ball rolling. He also desegregated the armed forces, something that Roosevelt and Truman, who were democrats, refused to do. 2. Are you not also forgetting that the "southern whites" that you are refering to, such as George Wallace, were democrats? 3. Are you also not forgetting that it was a republican dominated congress and a republican president who passed the constitutional amendments banning slavery, allowing blacks to vote, and the fourteenth amendment as well? 4. Are you not forgetting that those who attempted to seccede from the union were led by prominent democrats (Davis, Breckinridge, Cobb, Yancey, Benjamin, Floyd, Wise, Pickens, Thompson, and many others) and did so because of slavery? 5. Are you not forgetting that the writers of the constitution had the law banning slavery in the original document, but it was taken out to ensure that the southern states would sign it? Your statement is not only inflamatory but entirely disingenuous. All Eisenhower did was enforce the laws he was sworn to uphold. They were already in place since the end of a war that cost America more lives than any other. Your attempt to re-write history is failing. |
How many times must it be repeated? Dixiecrats were not liberal! They were conservatives with a D next to their name!
Also, Teddy Roosevelt, a Republican, was arguably the forefather of the modern liberal movement. He was a trust-buster and an environmentalist. He was not the corporate big-business lackey today's Republicans are. You're particular brand of conservatism only goes back to Ronald Reagan and perhaps Barry Goldwater.
| Quote: | | And lest we not forget, the courts have ruled that atheism is also a religion. And now the atheists are attempting to force theirreligious views on we Chrisitians. And the judges of the liberal left are letting them - even encouraging them to do it. Seems to me that is an infringement of the first amendment because liberal judges are not empowered to create a state religion, which is what they are attempting to do with atheism. It is the same with gay-marriage. Marriage is a religious institution. How dare they attempt to force Christians to change their religion by forcing them to recognize something repugnant to their religious beliefs - thus forcing them to ignore their conscience - again violating the first amendment. And now Obama care seeks to do the same thing with birth control and abortion. |
Apparently not allowing you to have your Christian beliefs institutionalized through government is atheistic oppression. In your bizarro world, telling you that you can't force your views down everyone's throat via government is the same as forcing a non-belief down your own throat. I simply have no response to this. By your logic it's either you or me getting something forced down our throat, in which case you don't admit the possibility for mutual tolerance and peaceful coexistence. It's simply your way or the high way. I suppose all politics ultimately comes down to this. But at least in this country we can vote to resolve our differences rather than having it come down to physical violence and other nastiness. |
A law professor of mine once said "You can't explain crazy." This post in response to mine certainly falls into this catagory. To begin with, your so-called Dixie-crats advocated some pretty liberal stuff for their day to be called conservatives - and I cite the various bills they put through Congress as proof - and that is already on the record. I've seen some liberal lies but that one is a doozy!
Second, my brand of conservatism goes back to George Washington. Obvioulsy you have no idea what conservatisim really is. Oh, and Washington freed his slaves.
Third, after seeing your past posts, you're far from tolerant.
Longshanks
_________________
Supporter of the Brian Terry Foundation @ www.honorbrianterry.com. Special Agent Brian Terry (1970-2010) was murdered as a direct result of Operation Fast & Furious - which Barry O won't discuss - wonder why? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Longshanks
Phoenix
Joined: Feb 03, 2012
Posts: 513
Location: At an undisclosed airbase at Shangri-la
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| marshall wrote: | | Longshanks wrote: | | Delphiki wrote: | | Longshanks wrote: | | Delphiki wrote: | | Longshanks wrote: |
The howling begins. In answer to your question, liberals are. Liberals force their views down peoples throats more than conservatives would ever dream of doing. Again, I have history to back me up on this. And you yourself have condemned and mocked many of my previous posts. In Wisconsin, we have liberals shoving their viewpoint down our throats all the time! Just look at the Walker recalls. Only now, the liberals are beginning to learn that people get ticked off when liberals do that - so they vote conservative. And Barack Obama is shoving his viewpoints down our throats now, which is why he is dropping in the polls. And as far as I'm concerned, he's a more urbane version of Hitler, Stalin, and Mao Tse-Tung.
Longshanks |
That is your opinion. I get many emails from my very republican family everyday. You are acting like 50% of the population are completely different than the other (at least that is how it seems to me) |
You're just as bad.
Longshanks |
Just as bad with what? When have I forced my views? |
If you have not the foresight to see what you advocate in your own posts, what good would it do me to explain it? If you can't see your own condescending remarks and mockery, why waste my time? You have a seething hate about you, sir, and it blinds you. Get past the hate, and you may see for yourself one day.
Longshanks |
The irony meter is simply off the charts with you. Adding the odd "sir" here and there does not make your posts appear any more respectful or non-condescending. The most condescending thing of all is when you have to place your own imaginary thoughts and beliefs into other people's heads in order to shoot them down. |
Ladies and Gentlemen, introducing Marshall, Master of Condescention and Intolerance. His response to me is proof.
Longshanks
_________________
Supporter of the Brian Terry Foundation @ www.honorbrianterry.com. Special Agent Brian Terry (1970-2010) was murdered as a direct result of Operation Fast & Furious - which Barry O won't discuss - wonder why? |
|
| Back to top |
|
ArrantPariah
Phoenix
Joined: Mar 31, 2012
Posts: 4807
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Longshanks wrote: | A law professor of mine once said "You can't explain crazy." This post in response to mine certainly falls into this catagory. To begin with, your so-called Dixie-crats advocated some pretty liberal stuff for their day to be called conservatives - and I cite the various bills they put through Congress as proof - and that is already on the record. I've seen some liberal lies but that one is a doozy!
Second, my brand of conservatism goes back to George Washington. Obvioulsy you have no idea what conservatisim really is. Oh, and Washington freed his slaves.
Third, after seeing your past posts, you're far from tolerant.
Longshanks |
Satire at its best.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
ArrantPariah
Phoenix
Joined: Mar 31, 2012
Posts: 4807
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Longshanks wrote: | Ladies and Gentlemen, introducing Marshall, Master of Condescention and Intolerance. His response to me is proof.
Longshanks |
Are you glorifying Marshall, or yourself? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Longshanks
Phoenix
Joined: Feb 03, 2012
Posts: 513
Location: At an undisclosed airbase at Shangri-la
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ArrantPariah wrote: | | Longshanks wrote: | | ArrantPariah wrote: | Okay, I see what's going on here. pretty clever.
Mr. Longshanks, is, in fact, a LIBERAL, who is doing a witty parody of Conservatives.
Well done, Sir. You had most of us convinced for a while. |
You have just proved yourself delusionsal. Get some help.
Longshanks |
You're good! Staying in character, now that I've ripped your mask off |
You may want to look at my latest post to viasgrunt. You're not as claravoyant as you think.
Longshanks
_________________
Supporter of the Brian Terry Foundation @ www.honorbrianterry.com. Special Agent Brian Terry (1970-2010) was murdered as a direct result of Operation Fast & Furious - which Barry O won't discuss - wonder why? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
