Page 2 of 5 [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,784
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

14 Apr 2014, 11:21 am

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I think a case can be made that if the angels had arrived as women, the crowd would still have wanted to rape them. The sin of Sodom wasn't homosexuality, but rape and murder.

And it was also a corrupt place where the women, who were traditionally thought of as the caregivers and workers of charity, were only concerned with themselves and self indulgent.

I do have an insight as to why the passages about Sodom are so strange. People who read it wonder how Lot could ever think of giving his unwed, young daughters to the raping mob. He must have not cared about them.
What has to be kept in mind is, the reason for this heinous offering is actually to make Lot look like a more righteous man. He is so determined to care for his guests, he would sacrifice his own flesh and blood to protect them. This is why God saves him and his family, until his wife disobeys God and is turned into salt.
This is why the passage reads the way it does and appears so bizarre and inhuman. It's to illustrate a point. Lot was a righteous man. Lot deserves to be saved. If you are righteous like Lot, God will save you. God favors those who protect others rather than harm, especially those they don't know passing unawares through their town. It is a sacred duty to protect and care for them, not cast them aside, raping them, or throwing them to the wolves just because pressure is applied and coercion is abundant.
So we get the picture of Sodom being a place where people are defiled on a regular basis and the women only care about themselves and their own appetites, not the welfare of others (which was a woman's traditional duty.)

Of course what is written later is even more bizarre. It's like the Bible is giving men permission to copulate with their daughters.


While Lot was considered righteous by Bronze Age Middle Eastern standards, he'd be thought of as a callous, sick old bastard today.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

14 Apr 2014, 12:13 pm

I can understand this story from a vigilante point of view. Someone goes into one of these cities, something bad happens, then they talk others into avenging. I am guessing these cities have walls or maybe not? Without walls any city back then was vulnerable to being sacked regardless of how much sin.

What I can't understand is the last part about Lot. Maybe it's revenge for him offering his daughters to the mob? If I think of it like that, makes sense. They got justice for it. It was a way of dishonoring him?



simon_says
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,075

14 Apr 2014, 3:51 pm

The later stories are a kind of creation myth. The daughters conceive the fathers of the nations of the Moabites and Ammonites. Enemies of the Israelites in real historical time. They may be slandering their enemies with the story. The Moabites worship Chemosh and defeat Israel in battle in one of those strange stories that seems to imply that others gods have power. Both the bible and the Moabite Mesha Stele seem to agree on that point.

And for all the talk about S&G, their deity never uses that method again. In the story he begins using other nations to destroy Israel and Judah when he wants to teach lessons. Events that can usually be confirmed and seem pretty ordinary.



Last edited by simon_says on 14 Apr 2014, 4:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

AspergianMutantt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Oct 2011
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,782
Location: North Idaho. USA

14 Apr 2014, 4:12 pm

No, what happens, is people use history as they live it, like when they see anther country they couldnt defeat nor defend them selves against, rise or fall. as even those we defeat. they only see the hope that is left in their desperately as they survive those moments that come and go in history. and interpret their own salvation to god wills according to their own survival or that of their enemies. we create excuses for our gods and other humans as our selves, or we condemn them, because we refuse to understand our selves, based upon what we feel are our own prosperities and for our children's prosperities and that of what we consider correct because of them. or that of our own failings.

There is no god, only us. no salvation nor condemnation other then our own of each other and our selves.. oblivion is ours when we die. no hell nor heaven. our future for our children is what we make it. we are evolving from animal, man-up.


_________________
Master Thread Killer


ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

15 Apr 2014, 12:01 am

simon_says wrote:
The later stories are a kind of creation myth. The daughters conceive the fathers of the nations of the Moabites and Ammonites. Enemies of the Israelites in real historical time. They may be slandering their enemies with the story. The Moabites worship Chemosh and defeat Israel in battle in one of those strange stories that seems to imply that others gods have power. Both the bible and the Moabite Mesha Stele seem to agree on that point.

And for all the talk about S&G, their deity never uses that method again. In the story he begins using other nations to destroy Israel and Judah when he wants to teach lessons. Events that can usually be confirmed and seem pretty ordinary.

That makes more sense now. The Israelis want to say their enemies are born of close incestuous unions.



zer0netgain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2009
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,613

16 Apr 2014, 6:54 am

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Of course what is written later is even more bizarre. It's like the Bible is giving men permission to copulate with their daughters.


If you read correctly, they get their father (Lot) drunk so they can get him to have sex with them...although I really question how drunk you'd have to be to be okay with fathering your own kids' children. Now, if he got drunk enough that he didn't remember anything the next day....



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,101
Location: temperate zone

16 Apr 2014, 9:28 am

zer0netgain wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Of course what is written later is even more bizarre. It's like the Bible is giving men permission to copulate with their daughters.


If you read correctly, they get their father (Lot) drunk so they can get him to have sex with them...although I really question how drunk you'd have to be to be okay with fathering your own kids' children. Now, if he got drunk enough that he didn't remember anything the next day....


Yes.

His daughters get him drunk to- in essence- gang rape him.

But they did it for the good of humanity because they mistakenly thought that they were the only people left on the planet (the family had just survived what we moderns wouldve taken to be a nuclear holocaust).

The trouble is thats easier to take advantage a drunken woman than a drunken man. Yes- he might have lost his inhibitions and been persuaded that he was with a pair of hawt strangers. But if you get a guy too ploughed he wont be able to 'rise' to the occasion.



ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

16 Apr 2014, 11:27 am

naturalplastic wrote:
zer0netgain wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Of course what is written later is even more bizarre. It's like the Bible is giving men permission to copulate with their daughters.


If you read correctly, they get their father (Lot) drunk so they can get him to have sex with them...although I really question how drunk you'd have to be to be okay with fathering your own kids' children. Now, if he got drunk enough that he didn't remember anything the next day....


Yes.

His daughters get him drunk to- in essence- gang rape him.

But they did it for the good of humanity because they mistakenly thought that they were the only people left on the planet (the family had just survived what we moderns wouldve taken to be a nuclear holocaust).

The trouble is thats easier to take advantage a drunken woman than a drunken man. Yes- he might have lost his inhibitions and been persuaded that he was with a pair of hawt strangers. But if you get a guy too ploughed he wont be able to 'rise' to the occasion.

Well the entire "lot" of them were from Sodom so what can you realistically expect?



Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,014
Location: New Orleans

16 Apr 2014, 12:07 pm

There are a few loose ends.

Leave this place now and do not look back. Start walking now.

Lot's wife looks back, and is turned into salt, but unless she was in the lead, how would anyone know?

Her weight in salt would be a high price. Salt was money before money. Salery, worth his salt, derive from this.

Second, where did they get the wine? Did they pay for it in salt?

Even the best of pack daughters cannot haul a lot. Living in a cave in the wilderness they seem to have been well supplied, food, bedding, wine.

Like most, it is from an older story. Sumarians had a slave revolt problem. Raised to positions of trust, the slaves killed the gods and said they were now gods. The first few times, the chariots came and killed most, and put the rest back to work.

About the third time they did nothing, and letters from literate slaves begged the gods to return, and no one prepared the fields, cleared the irrigation ditches, and they spent their time in rape and murder. After twenty years of this the gods agreed to return. Everyone was happy for a hundred years, then they killed all the gods.

The gods no longer trusted the slaves, thought teaching them a waste, and this is when the Semites come into history. They were bandits, stole grain, did some rape and murder of slaves, so they were rounded up, and made and offer. Drive the slaves like animals into the fields for a cut of the production, or we will just kill you now.

Not only did they take the offer, and enjoyed being slave masters and the benefits thereof, but other tribes of bandits who raided them thought it was a great job, so killed them, and showed the gods they were better suited for the work.

The gods smiled upon them, and the killingist bandits took the job as a prize, which reduced the number of bandits.

There is a town in northern Iraq, a work camp, nothing fancy, mud brick, that is vitrified. It takes a lot of heat to melt a town, but someone did. It is the only evidence that has come to light of "Next time the fire."

Perhaps some Semites failed to send the gods their share, as other markets were developing.

The last messengers of the gods, saying where is ours? Things turn bad, Lot gets them out, playing both sides, sells his wife for salt and vanishes in the night. Two daughters loaded down with food, wine, household goods, off to a mountain cave, then the town burns. It would be easy to give the girl wine and take her to bed, and who could they object to? He had just offered them to the whole town.

So Lot gets out, makes some points with the gods, has two girls and a well stocked cave.

The town could have taken Lot, but did not, and the offer of his daughters came with the meaning, and I will kill you. Lot had some cred in town, and likely a cut of the goods stolen from the gods.

Lot got the messengers out, and and said, I will bring goods to the gods and avert their wrath. He left his wife as security he would return, loaded a string of asses, and his daughters, as gifts for the gods. He knew all would die that night,

Once he was in the clear he went into the mountains to a cave, and kept everything for himself.

The original Noah sided with the gods, Gilgamesh, informed them of the evil plans of his people, and was spared when everyone else was killed.

Those who side with the gods survive and prosper.

The original story, Bible, has gods, the sons of god, and the Lord god. Only after leaving the land of four quarters did the have to invent a tribal god who lived in the sky.

While Semites were a cut above the field slaves, the gods chosen people, they still had a nasty job history. They cheated the gods, killed each other for the job of slave overseer, and not only did the gods kill them, so did several slave revolts.

As Babalon developed into skilled trades and a standing army, they were pushed out. People from the north with chariots and iron weapons took over.

Reduced to herding sheep they stole the herd and headed west, and were starving by the time they reached Egypt. The best job they could get was making bricks. That did not work out and one night they made a rapid exit.

Altogether it is a great historical work, a tale that changed in the telling, but did keep true to the original meaning.



ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

16 Apr 2014, 12:53 pm

Thanks Inventor, that was very informative reading and it helps me understand the story when thinking in terms of the poor actually being slaves and the rich women and men, the slave owners.

Lot's wife just became a pillar of salt which is how they knew she looked back toward the town. The wine might have been purchased at Zoar. Lot asked God to spare this town so he wouldn't be completely lost without any civilization. He questioned his ability to survive without a little town so God spared it.

I notice in the Biblical story Genesis 18 there is no mention of what became of the salt.



AspergianMutantt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Oct 2011
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,782
Location: North Idaho. USA

16 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm

Its the survivors tail that is heard while all others fall silent, and the survivors can tell the tail how ever that of those individuals see fit to their needs to be true for them. and back then they had no scientific answers to questions, only that of faith and seeing with their own eyes. what they may have seen for them only translated into what they could understand of it. and their own justifications they felt they had to give others for their own part in it , or that of the failings of others to justify them selves or their believes, for that which had happened.

Even the survivors of Pompeii sought and created their own justification for their gods actions.
as well as for their own during such tragedy.


_________________
Master Thread Killer


Last edited by AspergianMutantt on 16 Apr 2014, 2:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,101
Location: temperate zone

16 Apr 2014, 2:55 pm

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Thanks Inventor, that was very informative reading and it helps me understand the story when thinking in terms of the poor actually being slaves and the rich women and men, the slave owners.

Lot's wife just became a pillar of salt which is how they knew she looked back toward the town. The wine might have been purchased at Zoar. Lot asked God to spare this town so he wouldn't be completely lost without any civilization. He questioned his ability to survive without a little town so God spared it.

I notice in the Biblical story Genesis 18 there is no mention of what became of the salt.


Lots wife didnt just "look back". The word used in the original Hebrew is word that connotes a long yearning stare. So her heart was still in her hometown. She couldnt get with the program to leave the place. Or thats what one book said.

The salt is still there. Sodom, and Gomorrah are thought to have been in the valley of the dead sea. There there are vast salt flats. These flats even have little tall pillars of salt. One of the biggest is known locally as "Lot's Wife". I dont think anyone really believes that it contains the remains of Lot's wife, but in the land of all three Old Testament reading religions -ofcourse the locals are gonna give it that name (makes it a good tourist attraction).



simon_says
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,075

16 Apr 2014, 3:20 pm

Right. It's like a Paul Bunyan story to explain a lifeless region. And they kill two mythological birds with one stone. The bible specifically prohibits Israelites from having anything to do with the male Moabites and Ammonites, the descendants of S&G, and that lasts "forever". Peace is not permitted. So they hated them and the Moabite territory included the eastern shore of the dead sea. They hate them not for S&G but for inhospitality during the supposed Exodus. Which is also the primary sin of S&G according to some scholars.

So they are essentially slandering them three times in the bible. Why is a mystery. We do (or might) know that they fought a war in the 9th century and Israel took a beating.



GregCav
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Apr 2013
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 679
Location: Australia

16 Apr 2014, 7:25 pm

I take it from the comments so far, that no one actually believes that God is real. You're all trying to explain the event via humanistic cause and effect.

If you were to accept that God is real and re-read the account, it would probably make more sense.

Trying to imagine a place like Sodom and Gomorra is difficult for us today. I guess a free love hippy camp where nothing is prohibited, beast, children, each other, and whatever drugs you can get hold of, is as close as I can get.

Towns/cities of any size needed walls, as they were both strategic and a generator of your enemy’s armies. Small towns wouldn't have needed walls, as they are neither. There is always a risk of being robbed or destroyed. I guess it comes down to lifestyle choice.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,784
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

16 Apr 2014, 8:22 pm

GregCav wrote:
I take it from the comments so far, that no one actually believes that God is real. You're all trying to explain the event via humanistic cause and effect.

If you were to accept that God is real and re-read the account, it would probably make more sense.

Trying to imagine a place like Sodom and Gomorra is difficult for us today. I guess a free love hippy camp where nothing is prohibited, beast, children, each other, and whatever drugs you can get hold of, is as close as I can get.

Towns/cities of any size needed walls, as they were both strategic and a generator of your enemy’s armies. Small towns wouldn't have needed walls, as they are neither. There is always a risk of being robbed or destroyed. I guess it comes down to lifestyle choice.


Actually, I'm a practicing Lutheran, so yes, I'm a believer. I just happen to disagree with my particular church body on certain matters not pertaining to grace and salvation, such as homosexuality (I'm pro gay rights, if my posts hadn't made that clear).


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

17 Apr 2014, 10:36 pm

I think people have the right to disagree. It's their choice.