namaste Enigmatic Charismatically Odd


Joined: Apr 15, 2011 Posts: 1841 Location: Hindustan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Zhane Yellow-bellied Woodpecker


Joined: Jan 22, 2012 Posts: 53 Location: SUNSHINE STATE
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Both my grandparents had my mother and father over the age of 35. My father's parents were in their forties and my mother's father was in his late 30's early 40's. _________________ Remember were you walk because your footprints will last forever. |
|
| Back to top |
|
DaBeef2112 Snowy Owl


Joined: Dec 19, 2011 Age: 42 Posts: 144 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Can't be true in every case. My parents were married @18 & 19. I was born I was born 2 years later. |
|
| Back to top |
|
OliveOilMom Queen of cans and jars


Joined: Nov 12, 2011 Posts: 6783 Location: Living in Faulkner's nightmare
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I had always heard that mothers over 35 have a greater chance of having a baby with Downs. I hadn't heard that about Autism. _________________ Frances
I can be a little much sometimes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
ADoyle90815 Deinonychus


Joined: Feb 17, 2011 Age: 37 Posts: 325
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Not true in my case, my mom was 25, and my dad was 28 when I was born. My brother who was born 3 years later, is NT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Rhiannon0828 Velociraptor


Joined: Apr 21, 2011 Age: 44 Posts: 434
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is one of the reasons my husband and I deciced not to have in vitro fertilization done when we were both 41 ( I had a tubal ligation done after my 19- year-old was born). Not because we didn't want an autistic or otherwise disabled child; we were concerned that if we had a child with any kind of serious physiological problem that we would not have the resources to care for them properly. _________________ "Meddle not in the affairs of dragons; for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup." |
|
| Back to top |
|
Kraichgauer Phoenix


Joined: Apr 13, 2010 Age: 47 Posts: 12787
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe. Or maybe it has more to do with the fact that people with either diagnosed or undiagnosed autism only become socially skilled enough in later life, and get married. And thus will more likely have autistic children, as well. At least that's what had happened with me, and very likely to my parents - both of whom I strongly suspect of having been autistic.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer |
|
| Back to top |
|
tcorrielus Phoenix


Joined: Jun 30, 2006 Age: 26 Posts: 576 Location: Buffalo, NY
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm hearing lots of stories about men in their 50s marrying ladies that are much younger than them and are producing babies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Jono Phoenix


Joined: Jul 11, 2008 Age: 33 Posts: 2926 Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 1:51 am Post subject: Re: Autism and Late marriage |
|
|
Is have having children later the cause of the children being autistic or is the correlation due to the fact that people with mild autism are more likely to marry later? I think it's probably the latter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Kraichgauer Phoenix


Joined: Apr 13, 2010 Age: 47 Posts: 12787
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 1:55 am Post subject: Re: Autism and Late marriage |
|
|
| Jono wrote: |
Is have having children later the cause of the children being autistic or is the correlation due to the fact that people with mild autism are more likely to marry later? I think it's probably the latter. |
I essentially said just that in my post.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer |
|
| Back to top |
|
namaste Enigmatic Charismatically Odd


Joined: Apr 15, 2011 Posts: 1841 Location: Hindustan
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
even i have decided not to go for second child
as im in mid 30's now and already diagnosed with thyroid _________________ The only thing right in this wrong world is
WRONG PLANET |
|
| Back to top |
|
LadySera Velociraptor


Joined: Jun 02, 2011 Posts: 417
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I just read about that study as well. Both of my parents were older when they had me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
johansen Deinonychus


Joined: May 16, 2011 Age: 24 Posts: 321
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ADoyle90815 wrote: | | Not true in my case, my mom was 25, and my dad was 28 when I was born. My brother who was born 3 years later, is NT. |
genes don't work that way anyway.
permanent DNA damage on the other hand would, but it would seem to me that it would be very obvious and testable.
It would be nice if they made public the actual paper so rational thinking people could look at the real numbers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
MrXxx Moderator/Enigmatus Paradoxius


Joined: May 12, 2010 Posts: 5678 Location: New England
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If this is true, it would certainly be a strong indicator that Autism is most probably caused by something in the DNA. It's already been known for a long time that Downs Syndrome is more frequent in children born of mothers over forty. At least, that was already considered well-established back in the Sixties.
I don't doubt much at all this could be true.
My parents were 19 and 22 when I was born, which would seem to contradict that, but I was 35, and my wife was 22 when our first son was born, and all three of our kids are on the spectrum.
Of course there may be another explanation. I recall reading somewhere recently that Autistics with kids often marry later too. Since there are also already indicators that Autistic parents are more like to have Autistic kids, if there is also a higher probability that they marry later, that would most certainly contribute to a higher percentage of Autistics having at least one parent over 35, with the age of the parent having nothing to do with it.
As another poster mentioned, it would be good to see the actual study.
Did they bother to look at whether the parents over 35 were Autistic themselves? If they did, did they factor in how that may have affected the probabilities? _________________ MrXxx is taking a long sabbatical, and no longer moderating. |
|
| Back to top |
|
OliveOilMom Queen of cans and jars


Joined: Nov 12, 2011 Posts: 6783 Location: Living in Faulkner's nightmare
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My mother was 30 when I was born. I married briefly at 18 and then married my husband now at 22. I had my kids at 25, 29, 31, and 32 and they are all NT.
I don't know how that has anything to do with anything, but I just thought I'd post it. _________________ Frances
I can be a little much sometimes. |
|
| Back to top |
|