shrox Phoenix


Joined: Aug 12, 2011 Posts: 3254 Location: OK let's go.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
ruveyn Phoenix


Joined: Sep 22, 2008 Age: 76 Posts: 29317 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:16 pm Post subject: Re: Did Muhammad Exist? |
|
|
Mohammed is written about by people who knew him in his own time and he had descendants and blood relatives. In fact the split the between Shi'iah and Sunni is a Family Feud.
Unlike Jesus, the God on a Stick, there is first person written testimony supporting the existence of Mohammed.
ruveyn |
|
| Back to top |
|
Subotai Phoenix


Joined: Sep 25, 2010 Posts: 1036 Location: 日本
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Muhammed's tomb is in Medina though right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Masjid_al-Nabawi _________________ ...and his prowess on the battlefield is surpassed only by his skill in the bed chamber. |
|
| Back to top |
|
abacacus Rock 'N Roll Outlaw


Joined: Apr 16, 2007 Age: 21 Posts: 3317
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not sure. Never did enough research. Wouldn't be overly surprised either way. _________________ A shot gun blast into the face of deceit
You'll gain your just reward.
We'll not rest until the purge is complete
You will reap what you've sown. |
|
| Back to top |
|
shrox Phoenix


Joined: Aug 12, 2011 Posts: 3254 Location: OK let's go.
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| abacacus wrote: | | Not sure. Never did enough research. Wouldn't be overly surprised either way. |
An honest answer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
CrazyCatLord Phoenix


Joined: Oct 25, 2011 Posts: 2177
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting Although I think in case of Muhammad, it makes little difference if he existed or not. We know that someone in the Arab world had a look at Judeo-Christian religious texts, liked what he saw, and wrote his own, somewhat plagiaristic book that came to be known as the Quran. That could have been Muhammad or somebody who made up Muhammad as a story character. In the end, it doesn't really matter.
I think the questionable historicity of Jesus is different insofar that Jesus was supposed to be the superpowered son of god who returned from the dead. That makes his existence a lot less believable than that of any mortal person mentioned in the Bible, the Tanakh or the Quran. There is little reason to doubt that the existence of Abraham or Saul/Paul of Tarsus, for example. Whereas Jesus' believability is more akin to that of the Greek demigods Heracles and Perseus. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Joker Sinn Fein


Joined: Mar 20, 2011 Age: 24 Posts: 7593 Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Muhammad did exist and you can find the tomb of Jesus in the city of Bethelham where is was laid to rest. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Kraichgauer Phoenix


Joined: Apr 13, 2010 Age: 47 Posts: 12770
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CrazyCatLord wrote: | Interesting Although I think in case of Muhammad, it makes little difference if he existed or not. We know that someone in the Arab world had a look at Judeo-Christian religious texts, liked what he saw, and wrote his own, somewhat plagiaristic book that came to be known as the Quran. That could have been Muhammad or somebody who made up Muhammad as a story character. In the end, it doesn't really matter.
I think the questionable historicity of Jesus is different insofar that Jesus was supposed to be the superpowered son of god who returned from the dead. That makes his existence a lot less believable than that of any mortal person mentioned in the Bible, the Tanakh or the Quran. There is little reason to doubt that the existence of Abraham or Saul/Paul of Tarsus, for example. Whereas Jesus' believability is more akin to that of the Greek demigods Heracles and Perseus. |
Like Islam, Christianity just couldn't have appeared out of nowhere without a founder, even if you believe Christ was only a man.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer |
|
| Back to top |
|
Joker Sinn Fein


Joined: Mar 20, 2011 Age: 24 Posts: 7593 Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kraichgauer wrote: | | CrazyCatLord wrote: | Interesting Although I think in case of Muhammad, it makes little difference if he existed or not. We know that someone in the Arab world had a look at Judeo-Christian religious texts, liked what he saw, and wrote his own, somewhat plagiaristic book that came to be known as the Quran. That could have been Muhammad or somebody who made up Muhammad as a story character. In the end, it doesn't really matter.
I think the questionable historicity of Jesus is different insofar that Jesus was supposed to be the superpowered son of god who returned from the dead. That makes his existence a lot less believable than that of any mortal person mentioned in the Bible, the Tanakh or the Quran. There is little reason to doubt that the existence of Abraham or Saul/Paul of Tarsus, for example. Whereas Jesus' believability is more akin to that of the Greek demigods Heracles and Perseus. |
Like Islam, Christianity just couldn't have appeared out of nowhere without a founder, even if you believe Christ was only a man.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer |
I believe Christ was a man just like any other and I accept him as the founder of my faith all religions are man made. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Kraichgauer Phoenix


Joined: Apr 13, 2010 Age: 47 Posts: 12770
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Joker wrote: | | Kraichgauer wrote: | | CrazyCatLord wrote: | Interesting Although I think in case of Muhammad, it makes little difference if he existed or not. We know that someone in the Arab world had a look at Judeo-Christian religious texts, liked what he saw, and wrote his own, somewhat plagiaristic book that came to be known as the Quran. That could have been Muhammad or somebody who made up Muhammad as a story character. In the end, it doesn't really matter.
I think the questionable historicity of Jesus is different insofar that Jesus was supposed to be the superpowered son of god who returned from the dead. That makes his existence a lot less believable than that of any mortal person mentioned in the Bible, the Tanakh or the Quran. There is little reason to doubt that the existence of Abraham or Saul/Paul of Tarsus, for example. Whereas Jesus' believability is more akin to that of the Greek demigods Heracles and Perseus. |
Like Islam, Christianity just couldn't have appeared out of nowhere without a founder, even if you believe Christ was only a man.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer |
I believe Christ was a man just like any other and I accept him as the founder of my faith all religions are man made. |
I'm pretty certain Christ the man existed. My faith tells me he was also God.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer |
|
| Back to top |
|
Joker Sinn Fein


Joined: Mar 20, 2011 Age: 24 Posts: 7593 Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kraichgauer wrote: | | Joker wrote: | | Kraichgauer wrote: | | CrazyCatLord wrote: | Interesting Although I think in case of Muhammad, it makes little difference if he existed or not. We know that someone in the Arab world had a look at Judeo-Christian religious texts, liked what he saw, and wrote his own, somewhat plagiaristic book that came to be known as the Quran. That could have been Muhammad or somebody who made up Muhammad as a story character. In the end, it doesn't really matter.
I think the questionable historicity of Jesus is different insofar that Jesus was supposed to be the superpowered son of god who returned from the dead. That makes his existence a lot less believable than that of any mortal person mentioned in the Bible, the Tanakh or the Quran. There is little reason to doubt that the existence of Abraham or Saul/Paul of Tarsus, for example. Whereas Jesus' believability is more akin to that of the Greek demigods Heracles and Perseus. |
Like Islam, Christianity just couldn't have appeared out of nowhere without a founder, even if you believe Christ was only a man.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer |
I believe Christ was a man just like any other and I accept him as the founder of my faith all religions are man made. |
I'm pretty certain Christ the man existed. My faith tells me he was also God.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer |
As does mine also I do accept Muhammad as one of the many prophets. |
|
| Back to top |
|
mikecartwright Deinonychus


Joined: Sep 16, 2007 Age: 25 Posts: 359
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:21 pm Post subject: Yes he existed. |
|
|
| Yes he existed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
ruveyn Phoenix


Joined: Sep 22, 2008 Age: 76 Posts: 29317 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kraichgauer wrote: |
I'm pretty certain Christ the man existed. My faith tells me he was also God.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer |
When Christ, the man, took a dump, did he produce Holy Sh*t?
ruveyn |
|
| Back to top |
|
shrox Phoenix


Joined: Aug 12, 2011 Posts: 3254 Location: OK let's go.
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ruveyn wrote: | | Kraichgauer wrote: |
I'm pretty certain Christ the man existed. My faith tells me he was also God.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer |
When Christ, the man, took a dump, did he produce Holy Sh*t?
ruveyn |
You know what, you might get a message here soon. I did request that this thread be to spur interesting discussion, not juvenile remarks. Must I quote the rules to a man as wise as yourself? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Kraichgauer Phoenix


Joined: Apr 13, 2010 Age: 47 Posts: 12770
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ruveyn wrote: | | Kraichgauer wrote: |
I'm pretty certain Christ the man existed. My faith tells me he was also God.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer |
When Christ, the man, took a dump, did he produce Holy Sh*t?
ruveyn |
He was human, so he defecated as his body required.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|