You're too smart & other jibes about being single
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
tarantella64 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
leafplant wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
I wonder if I am supposed to "know my own limit"
People always want to engage with their betters, but are relcutant to spend time on those who they consider lesser than themselves. Need we remind you of countless females you dismissed on OKC because of their stupidity or interests in shopping and gossip?
I don't belittle them nor I believe they should know their own limits, every one of them has the right and freedom to give a try with me.
Is it possible your entire orientation here is so competitive that you read everything through that filter, even when it's inappropriate?
I know my limits with skis: namely, I should not put them on my feet. Me and Mr. Olympic Skier - no chance, unlikely we'd even be in the same bar. Does that mean I suck? No. It means I'm a total klutz who doesn't want a torn ACL. Good luck to him with being beautiful on the trails with a good match.
I don't know how old you are, but I'm not interested in guys "giving a try" with me when it's obviously a bad match. It wastes both our time and energy. By midlife, it seems most guys value these things and are also aware that hey, the lady's time and energy might be worth something, too. So they recognize it's not going to work, say something nice about the profile, and wish me luck. It's nice. I don't have to deal so often anymore with guys trying to prove something.
Our chief accountant is extremely obsessed about snowboarding and surfing - he would check every morning the snow/wave level on a website and he completely rejoices if things are good for the upcoming weekend, and gets bad mood when things are not.
Yet his wife, an auditor, is not the sporty type at all nor she ever engages in these activities.
They are of two different religions too, He's Maronite Christian, she's Sunnite Muslim. None of them is atheist or totally non-religious.
They're completely understanding with each other in every way.
And they have been married for more than 4 years with a child.
Good for them but for the love of everything that is holy please understand that one example does not mean everyone else is the same. Or should be the same.
Everyone has a right to define their own personal happiness however they see fit, k?
I think pete is right; people are like a box of chocolates. You never know what you'll get. I know when you've know people a long time, interactions are predictable, but things do change over time.
_________________
People are strange, when you're a stranger
Faces look ugly when you're alone.
Morrison/Krieger
leafplant wrote:
Perhaps this doesn't bore you in the slightest, but some people are bored by it. Anyway, this is why we have customs and ideas of politeness etc. to prevent people who slinking off when bored mid conversation or interrupting the other person or otherwise behaving in autistic manner.
I think you're spot on about customs and politeness. etc. I hadn't thought of it that way.
As for me, I guess these things are just in my scope of "special interests". So it could well be just me.
_________________
AQ:37 FQ:105 ENTP
Your Aspie score: 141 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 78 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie
Ann2011 wrote:
I think pete is right; people are like a box of chocolates. You never know what you'll get. I know when you've know people a long time, interactions are predictable, but things do change over time.
Some things don't. A guy who at 30 finds happiness in a repetitive, non-intellectual job, comes home and wants to crack a beer, watch a game, play cards with his buddies, etc., and spend weekends at a barbeque or a family reunion is extremely unlikely to become a brilliant 50-year-old with deep, wide-ranging intellectual interests and articulate, high-level conversation about them. Should a woman who isn't happy with the 30-year-old guy marry him in hopes that he'll turn into the 50-year-old guy? I think most people would call that a bad idea. Only if she's happy with Guy A should she do that.
tarantella64 wrote:
Ann2011 wrote:
I think pete is right; people are like a box of chocolates. You never know what you'll get. I know when you've know people a long time, interactions are predictable, but things do change over time.
Some things don't. A guy who at 30 finds happiness in a repetitive, non-intellectual job, comes home and wants to crack a beer, watch a game, play cards with his buddies, etc., and spend weekends at a barbeque or a family reunion is extremely unlikely to become a brilliant 50-year-old with deep, wide-ranging intellectual interests and articulate, high-level conversation about them. Should a woman who isn't happy with the 30-year-old guy marry him in hopes that he'll turn into the 50-year-old guy? I think most people would call that a bad idea. Only if she's happy with Guy A should she do that.
That's not what I meant. I'm talking about people you see in passing and make conversation with. Not about life partners. If you're with someone who you don't find to be pleasant company than move on.
_________________
People are strange, when you're a stranger
Faces look ugly when you're alone.
Morrison/Krieger
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
]I would not accept them as partners if their life is just about shopping and gossip but I wouldn't have the "How dare you ask ME out??!" attitude.
Nor do I; you're reading that in, possibly because of your own insecurities. I do tell a guy when I don't think it's going to work, and at this point in life I do it right away. If he insists on knowing why, I'll tell him. If he finds that insulting -- as our woman at the bar did -- then that's too bad, but I don't give such guys the chance to prove themselves anymore. If I can already see in their online talk that I'm not going to enjoy the conversation, I don't draw things out and make it painful for both of us. It do appreciate it when a guy doesn't show up indiscriminately, panting-dog-style, all over everything that's female and local. The guys I have most trouble with these days are laughably bad matches, and given a month together they'd be desperate to leave too, but they're busy playing the numbers and figure it doesn't matter so long as the person has the right body parts. That's annoying because it does put the burden on me to let them down immediately and as nicely as possible, and more annoying if they won't take the first "thanks, no, good luck" for an answer. At this point I just block those guys.
For that matter, if someone doesn't respond to me, I don't go off in a huff, deciding he's an arrogant prick. He's just interested in something else, something I'm not. Whether or not I have any control over that thing isn't an issue -- if he wants a tall 30ish woman who's passionate about partner dancing, that's not me.
Ann2011 wrote:
tarantella64 wrote:
Ann2011 wrote:
I think pete is right; people are like a box of chocolates. You never know what you'll get. I know when you've know people a long time, interactions are predictable, but things do change over time.
Some things don't. A guy who at 30 finds happiness in a repetitive, non-intellectual job, comes home and wants to crack a beer, watch a game, play cards with his buddies, etc., and spend weekends at a barbeque or a family reunion is extremely unlikely to become a brilliant 50-year-old with deep, wide-ranging intellectual interests and articulate, high-level conversation about them. Should a woman who isn't happy with the 30-year-old guy marry him in hopes that he'll turn into the 50-year-old guy? I think most people would call that a bad idea. Only if she's happy with Guy A should she do that.
That's not what I meant. I'm talking about people you see in passing and make conversation with. Not about life partners. If you're with someone who you don't find to be pleasant company than move on.
Ah. The thread is about life partners, though.
tarantella64 wrote:
Ah. The thread is about life partners, though.
I do wander sometimes.
But if two people in a relationship are not on the same level intellectually, then it will grate over time.
_________________
People are strange, when you're a stranger
Faces look ugly when you're alone.
Morrison/Krieger