F.F.S., Fear Mongering Again

Post Reply New Topic

-.-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... laims.html

Here we go again.

Lovely that they don't run with the headline: "NEW STUDY FINDS MAJORITY OF EXTREME MASS MURDERERS ARE NEUROTYPICAL"

It's what the data shows, but not what the journos want to see.

I get really angry at the allistic supremacist media saying that autism or anything similar being a factor in acts of criminal violence including child molestation being linked to autism. I know really that this is just Neo Nazi propaganda and excuses that they do not understand autism/Asperger syndrome. Really the vast majority of serial killers and nonces are allistic that means that most serial killers and nonces are on the neurotypical spectrum. I know that if this was put in the Sun, daily Mirror or the Daily Mail then allistic people would not buy them. I also know that in the past the Daily Mail has supported the British Union of Fascists under Oswald Mosley in the 1930s and also started the UKs reefer madness ( off topic here, sorry). If I labelled allistic people the way the media portray us then I would be banned from this website. That is because we are just demanded that we just take the insults and be as nice as pie. Alsom we are expected to take their pathetic excuses for this Nazi proapganda that allistic people would like to believe as fact. Also in relation to the Asperger syndrome person who was killed by a thick allistic or educationally subnormal person. The man only got four years bird for that, An Asperger syndrome person would have been given life without parole and arse raped in the showers for less. I would love to read in a paper that says THE MAJORITY OF SERIAL KILLERS AND PAEDOPHILES ARE ON THE NEUROTYPICAL SPECTRUM. But there is about as much chance of that as my mum becoming America's next president.

Where is the fear mongering exactly?

Anyone who assumes that the higher crime rate among autistics is related to genetics, but not the higher crime rate among blacks, is a hypocrite; so everyone who believes this crap must be either that or a racist. Saying that autistic genes make someone more likely to be violent isn't that far separated from saying that people of a particular ethnicity are more likely to be violent because of their genes. Genes are a spectrum like autism, thus autism can't be genetically related to violence, without ethnicity also being genetically related to violence to some degree. The way I see it, the only rational choice that people have is either to assume that environmental factors are the main cause of violence, or to just be a bigot.

The Trivialising of neurobigotry including aspiphobia can open the door to racism and/or anti Semitism. and It must be known that the State sponsored anti Semitism in Germany from 1933 to 1945 used the state sponsored neurobigotry as a blueprint for atrocities and genocide. I think that propaganda against autistic people and those with learning disabilities should be a criminal offence and the media should be punished hard for their hate mongering because inciting racism, anti Semitism, and homophobia is a criminal offence in the UK so should be inciting neurobigotry and aspiphobia should be as well as well as pathologising some aspects of neurodivergent people and their issues. It does not matter whether it is some nutter on a soap box or a journalist should be brought to book.

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I thought that most mass murderers and indeed most violent criminals were sociopaths.

The confusion between ASD and ASPD continues to cause problems for people with autism, and everyone should work to clear that confusion away. However, I see a lot of good reasons to fear people with ASPD, or at least to become aware of the signs and avoid such people. They seem likely to pose more of a threat to people with ASD than to NTs.

How depressing. They used to think poor people had a genetic predisposition to crime in the popularised eugenics movement in America, I think in the early part of the 20th century. Sad that they're trying to demonise people on the autism spectrum and somehow attempting to justify why "normalising" people on autism spectrum by imposing neurotypical standards is acceptable

Here's a thing to bear in mind about journalism...

Here's a headline from today's google news stream:

Chimpanzees? Intelligence Hugely Dependent On Genes They Inherit From Parents
http://www.ibtimes.com/chimpanzees-inte ... ts-1625288

Earlier today that headline said "Mostly Dependent"

But here is the same story from one of the sources that article cites:

Like in Humans, Genes Drive Half of Chimp Intelligence, Study Finds

And the story goes even farther from the silly IBTimes piece:

the real shame is that anyone thinks that any outlet owned by rupert murdoc's newscorp is actually a legitimate news organization. all they are are lies, fear-mongering, and sensationalism. but the NT's eat that $#!7 up, so what ya gonna do?

Yes, most journalism about autism is crap, as is most journalism.

Fun fact folks,

Margaret Sanger, one of Planned Parenthood's founders, was really into eugenics, and there's also a nasty eugenic streak running through some prominent radfem ideas.

As in the Marcottes and Valentis of this world...

Oh - also that Krista woman...

Interesting when you track down... we're in a fascist age, folks..