Did the 9/11 truth movement really die?

Post Reply New Topic

- the building was on fire
- metals thermally expand
- the building fell down

Therefore, with my current knowledge it seems wholly plausible that the thermal expansion of the steel in the building, caused by the heat of the fires, itself caused the building to collapse.

Except that it is conclusively proven there were no fires burning hot enough to do just that. For fire to be hot enough to do that kind of damage, nobody on those floors would have been alive. The color of the smoke coming out of both towers establishes a SMOLDERING (cool) fire, not a hot one, and photographs show survivors looking out of the holes created in the towers.

Did the 9/11 truth movement die or did it offload its excess baggage?

It's undeniable that the 9/11 truth movement is much quieter and less prominent than it was around 7 or 8 years ago, but the theory I have is that it attracted far too many people who were just curious inquirers or those who were of no use and credibility because they lacked any real knowledge or experience that could be used to reveal the truth and debunk the official story. I'm only interested in people being in the 9/11 truth movement if they have some useful knowledge to offer - like controlled demolition specialists; civil engineers; or airline pilots. Over the years the 'dead wood' in the movement has fallen away but critics of 9/11 truth have used this to create a misleading message that the 9/11 truth movement has died. I also think that intelligence services were behind certain sections of the 9/11 truth movement in order to create misinformation and decoys that would help to reduce credibility of genuine factions of the movement and destroy the trust by the public. My experience of 9/11 truth conventions and local meetups is that most are a complete waste of time and are probably detrimental to the cause. There was a local 9/11 truth group but I left after finding that none of its members had any useful knowledge or experience and just tended to believe sensationalist junk like Loose Change.

The culture of 9/11 truthers was very poor.

And even if that is not so, it would be not be difficult for their detractors to portray them as such.

Hire a bunch of people to post online as various people to spew garbage that makes the desired group look like morons.

Hell, the Tea Party was consistently derided in the media while Occupy Wall Street was treated like the second coming of Christ...even though the Tea Party rarely had anything negative to say about how they conducted themselves and OWS were pretty much a bunch of anarchists leaving behind a trail of destruction wherever they went.

Media perception is everything.

ile Occupy Wall Street was treated like the second coming of Christ...even though the Tea Party rarely had anything negative to say about how they conducted themselves and OWS were pretty much a bunch of anarchists leaving behind a trail of destruction wherever they went.
Media perception is everything.