Autism is a "mental" disorder??
Awiddershinlife
Velociraptor
Joined: 4 Jul 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 403
Location: On the Continental Divide in the Gila Wilderness
Mental is a perfectly good word.
Uhh.... Yeah, it actually is a pejorative term. I can't agree that it's a good word. For the vast, vast, vast majority, when you say to them "Mental", they hear that as "Crazy", even if you put something on the end of it. Very easy for someone who doesn't know better to think it's mental illness. Even if it means something entirely different professionally, I don't think it's possible to clearly define AS while using the word "Mental" because people are already using that word for something else.
No, it isn't a pejorative term.
It may be in your experience. But it is not in mine.
Nor is a positive connotation limited to a tiny professional or technical class.
Mental power. Mental prowess. Mental strength. Mental agility. Mental Flexibility.
Google search results
Mental illness about 2.2 * 10^6 results
Mental Flexibilty about 3.0 * 10^6 results
Mental strength about 1.8 * 10^6 results
You can check for yourself.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mental
There is no reason to try to enforce the impoverishment of a language because a few ignorant people misuse it.
Mental is a vague word that means "of [or relating to disorders of] the mind.
It is vague because the best neuroscientists in the world have not yet adequately defined "mind", but it is generally accepted that it is not a separate entity (as in "mind, body, soul"). The best definition of mind I have heard so far is the cognitive processes that combine attention, awareness, and the internal "voice". Awareness and attention need to be carefully defined in this description.
"Mental" is not directly pejorative, but people can use any word insultingly and Moromillas provided some good examples.
I argue with the OP (and anyone else), not about mental vs developmental, but with
disorder vs difference
and the
LFA/HFA dichotomy.
These terms would be insulting if not used so naively, but they have been over-discussed on WP already. Anna_K seems a bit out of the loop. I hope she keeps learning about the politics of autism.
_________________
~
We sour green apples live our own inscrutable, carefree lives... (Max Frei)
~
Definition of DISORDER
1
: to disturb the order of
2
: to disturb the regular or normal functions of
So let me get this straight you don't think autism disturbs normal functions?
The above comment gives the definition of the VERB disorder. In this case, we need to look at the definition of the NOUN disorder.
The definition of the noun 'disorder' as it relates to medicine and psychiatry is: "A derangement or abnormality of function; a morbid physical or mental state.
One may draw ones own conclusions
Source: http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com
This is my understanding of how those fields relate:
Psychology is: Stuff people made up to explain and describe behaviors they observed.
Neurology is: The science of the brain's structure, which attempts to answer the apparently unanswerable question of how the mind actually works in the first place.
Psychiatry is: A bridge between the two. Psychiatry takes the observations and theories of neurology and combines them with current psychological understanding to reverse-engineer a link between neurology and psychology.
One may draw ones own conclusions.
Awiddershinlife
Velociraptor
Joined: 4 Jul 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 403
Location: On the Continental Divide in the Gila Wilderness
So let me get this straight you don't think autism disturbs normal functions?
I do as often as possible (and keep a job) - but I function competently in my own world. Autism is a "disorder" to NTs
_________________
~
We sour green apples live our own inscrutable, carefree lives... (Max Frei)
~
Awiddershinlife
Velociraptor
Joined: 4 Jul 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 403
Location: On the Continental Divide in the Gila Wilderness
Mental yes, disorder no because its situational.
_________________
~
We sour green apples live our own inscrutable, carefree lives... (Max Frei)
~
If anything is in your head, it is a mental disorder.
AS is in your head.
Therefore the AS is a mental disorder.
Sorry, it doesn't add up, look:
If anything is in your head, it is a mental disorder.
Neurotypical is in your head.
Therefore neurotypical is a mental disorder.
If anything is in your head, it is a mental disorder.
A passing thought is in your head.
Therefore a passing thought is a mental disorder.
If anything is in your head, it is a mental disorder.
Basic arithmetic is done in your head.
Therefore basic arithmetic is a mental disorder.
If anything is in your head, it is a mental disorder.
Your memories are in your head.
Therefore your memories are a mental disorder.
Awiddershinlife
Velociraptor
Joined: 4 Jul 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 403
Location: On the Continental Divide in the Gila Wilderness
[/quote]
Perhaps everything in your head is a disorder (particularly the redundancy that you think wins arguments), but not in mine.
_________________
~
We sour green apples live our own inscrutable, carefree lives... (Max Frei)
~
League_Girl hasn't stated that.
No no, here it is here: It's in your head and anything in your head is mental so of course this would be a mental condition so mental disorder.
Perhaps everything in your head is a disorder (particularly the redundancy that you think wins arguments), but not in mine.[/quote]
Oh, my sincerest apologies. I wasn't aware that pointing out fallacy and providing examples as to why it's a fallacy would cause the vapors.
League_Girl hasn't stated that.
No no, here it is here: It's in your head and anything in your head is mental so of course this would be a mental condition so mental disorder.
Correct argument:
AS is a disorder (implicit);
If anything is in your head, it is mental;
AS is in your head;
Therefore the AS is a mental disorder.
Without the implicit premise:
If anything is in your head, it is mental;
AS is in your head;
Therefore the AS is mental.
League_Girl hasn't stated that.
No no, here it is here: It's in your head and anything in your head is mental so of course this would be a mental condition so mental disorder.
Correct argument:
AS is a disorder (implicit);
If anything is in your head, it is mental;
AS is in your head;
Therefore the AS is a mental disorder.
Without the implicit premise:
If anything is in your head, it is mental;
AS is in your head;
Therefore the AS is mental.
Hmm, it's still fallacy though, they're both still invalid. It's even worse now as what's tacked on beforehand is begging the question, and also the conclusion doesn't fit the consequent at all.
In the original argument, it goes from "mental" to "mental disorder" via a string on non-sequiturs. "Mental" would be a "mental condition" so is a "mental disorder". So the premise would be "If anything is in your head, it is a mental disorder".
I don't know where you're going with the second one.
In the original argument, it goes from "mental" to "mental disorder" via a string on non-sequiturs. "Mental" would be a "mental condition" so is a "mental disorder". So the premise would be "If anything is in your head, it is a mental disorder".
I don't know where you're going with the second one.
Strictly, the conclusion is "AS is a disorder and is mental", which is, pragmatically, a quite odd tense (hence the correction).
With that detail, both arguments are valid. And so yours. But your initial argument is not logically derived from League_Girl's statement.
If anything is in your head, it is a mental disorder.
AS is in your head.
Therefore the AS is a mental disorder.
Sorry, it doesn't add up, look:
If anything is in your head, it is a mental disorder.
Neurotypical is in your head.
Therefore neurotypical is a mental disorder.
If anything is in your head, it is a mental disorder.
A passing thought is in your head.
Therefore a passing thought is a mental disorder.
If anything is in your head, it is a mental disorder.
Basic arithmetic is done in your head.
Therefore basic arithmetic is a mental disorder.
If anything is in your head, it is a mental disorder.
Your memories are in your head.
Therefore your memories are a mental disorder.
Oh excuse me,
It's in your head and anything from the DSM that is in your head is mental so of course this would be a mental condition so mental disorder.
Better?
See if you can twist that.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Ruby Franke mental disoder?
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
20 Mar 2024, 11:02 am |
Question about fear about calling 911 for mental health
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
06 Apr 2024, 7:09 pm |
Neurodiversity affirming practice and mental health |
04 Mar 2024, 10:43 am |
Inpatient Mental Health Facility for Autistic Adults? (US) |
12 Apr 2024, 5:26 pm |