Free Will and The Subconscious...
Woodfish
Deinonychus
Joined: 22 Aug 2009
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 382
Location: alternating between Lothlórien and Rivendell
again i have to accept .. very very limited verbal capacity here .. reading just snippets of thread ..
consciousness mentioned .. what popped up ..
discussing consciousness .. one image i've heard .. The Simpsons intro .. Marge and Maggie in the car .. BOTH turn their steering wheels in time .. looking just like they both drive the car .. Marge turning the actual real steering wheel .. and Maggie turning her toy steering wheel ..
probably .. to Maggie it feels every bit as real as to Marge .. an image of our consciousness, maybe .. it feels real and in control .. because we need and want it to .. perhaps .. consciousness as self-fulfilling ..
_________________
If we concentrate on accepting ourselves, change will happen. It will take care of itself. Self-acceptance is so hard to get you can't do it a day at a time. I've found that I need to run my life five minutes at a time. --Jess Lair
if "free will" is given to us due to forces beyond our personal crafting, then how free is it really?
before i was born i was nothing. i had no intentions or will. but when i was conceived as a human, i magically became endowed with a sentience that i had no part in designing.
i did not choose to have free will, so my idea of my "free will" is an illusion that distracts me from the otherwise futile realization that i am just an object that flows inevitably in the current of time, devoid of true choice.
i guess to deny the concept of free will is also to deny the concept of spontaneity. is anything truly spontaneous or is it just an unexpected but inevitable eruption caused by previous events that culminated in it?
it all boils down to the question of whether we really have a soul that is divorced from all physical manifestation. i feel like i am seeing things from inside my head, but there is a deeper seat of consciousness that is where i truly am which has no physical location.
something i always wondered was why is my consciousness trapped within the boundaries of my body? i have a seeing eye that is deeply me, but why is it always attached to my physical body?
why can i never see through anyone elses eyes? why am i always me? if the soul is not in the same realm as physical manifestation, then why is my soul trapped in my physical body?
i think also that curiosity is an expression of free will. i am curious to know the answers to many things, and i think curiosity is something artificial intelligence will never achieve.
i want to know "why" and that is fundamental to me having a will.
wanting to learn about the world in which one treads is beyond the scope of my idea of "inevitability" and i think that adaptation is quite spontaneous.
" i have a seeing eye that is deeply me, but why is it always attached to my physical body?"
Because it is you.
Here is my reasoning for believing there is free will. Living things will instinctively do whatever will help them survive. Regarding the earlier discussion of being in a fight, if you are about to get beat up you will instinctively run away, or fight if you have to. But people sometimes decide to engage in behavior that is destructive to their well-being, even to the point of committing suicide, and their instincts would never tell them to do something like that.
Yep.
Your instincts are actually innate attributes, while your subconscious has evolved based on your previous experiences.
I certainly agree but feel the subconscious is also influenced by instinct (to a lesser or greater degree depending on the individual). Instincts are used in the rapid processing that passes as subconscious decision making, even though they may not be available to change. I can't conceive of a subconscious that wouldn't use instinct as a basic tool.
I just thought I'd pass that on.
"Free will" is often described as a persistent illusion. In other words you believe you have free will but whatever course of action you "choose" is determined by the bioelectrical processes within your brain at the time of choosing. How could it be otherwise? fMRI studies have actually shown that the brain reaches a decision up to a second before that decision reaches your conscious mind. So yes, you are ultimately controlled by your subconscious. The conscious mind is just a spectator to the decision - but the illusion persists that your conscious mind made the decision.
But I wonder about the recent (no offence intended) "kitchen" science studies I see popping up lately.
"fMRI studies have actually shown that the brain reaches a decision up to a second before that decision reaches your conscious mind."
I've observed a study in which this was "proved" while studying a subject calling the flip of a coin. This is quite interesting, but tell me...have YOU ever called a coin flip (and lost) and determined next time you would choose the opposite or the same (you've pre-chosen your next flip?); would this be conscious or subconscious control or a partnership? I feel selection of a proper test goal is of major importance when making these assertions and unfortunately the "kitchen science" I've observed doesn't go nearly far enough to support the conclusions.
I would like to see this test duplicated in a more complex way, with decision making requiring abstract (or what passes for it) thinking for decision making. Otherwise it seems like a curiosity rather than a working hypothesis.
The idea of a modified subconscious being dominant is interesting. How/when/from where do you think the subconscious "arises, or would you feel, as with instincts, the subconscious arose before the conscious?
I hope this isn't too trivial for you but my "Zen hat" is a pointed cone shape similar to one I wore throughout kindergarten.
Yep.
Your instincts are actually innate attributes, while your subconscious has evolved based on your previous experiences.
I certainly agree but feel the subconscious is also influenced by instinct (to a lesser or greater degree depending on the individual). Instincts are used in the rapid processing that passes as subconscious decision making, even though they may not be available to change. I can't conceive of a subconscious that wouldn't use instinct as a basic tool.
Since our instincts are experienced they will affect our subconscious. I guess you could say that.
Yep.
Your instincts are actually innate attributes, while your subconscious has evolved based on your previous experiences.
I certainly agree but feel the subconscious is also influenced by instinct (to a lesser or greater degree depending on the individual). Instincts are used in the rapid processing that passes as subconscious decision making, even though they may not be available to change. I can't conceive of a subconscious that wouldn't use instinct as a basic tool.
Since our instincts are experienced they will affect our subconscious. I guess you could say that.
Especially if we consider the subconscious as ascendant or "in charge."
If we were to follow the theory that supposes three forms of thought we can say the conscious, subconscious and ID (???????) are at least semi-independent/semi co-dependent.
Instincts and consciousness are very understandable to me (I think ) but I can not fathom how a separate ascendant process would arise from pure awareness + instinct unless it was only a convenient tool created/used by the conscious mind process for memory/data access/storage/retrieval.
Can someone get me past the "hump?"
I liken the process to what the photographer Ansel Adams, and other famous photographers of the time, called "The Decisive Moment."
For Ansel, standing alongside his huge view camera with his finger on the shutter release, this was the culmination of all his years of learning and experience.
All he'd learned about chemistry and light and people: How he would acquire, prepare and use them, both in the camera, in the field or studio, in the darkroom were all ideas whose understanding and preparation had brought him to this moment.
He used all of his previously acquired experience (memory of same) to "decide" on a direction which (if deemed correct) would indicate memory and subconscious merely tools.
This is the process I believe most people use.
Of course you could say his subconscious did the choosing but a simple light-handed application of Occam's Razor says otherwise.
This would treat the subconscious more as memory with a (personally) self-generated "attitude."
I liked this so I thought I'd throw it in.
Those who see into the Unconscious have their senses cleansed of defilements, are moving toward Buddha-wisdom, are known to be with Reality, in the Middle Path, in the ultimate truth itself. Those who see into the Unconscious are furnished at once with merits as numerous as the sands of the Ganges. They are able to create all kinds of things and embrace all things within themselves. --Shen-hui (as translated by D.T. Suzuki)
It's about mindfulness.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Free Will or Otherwise |
21 Feb 2024, 10:14 am |
Gluten Free recipe ideas Needed |
10 Apr 2024, 10:03 am |