Why is love and dating extremely courtship and strategic-bas

Page 1 of 4 [ 59 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Azereiah
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 237

14 Aug 2014, 9:53 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Toy_Soldier wrote:
Although humans can conceive of different motives and ideals you have to remember we are also just higher forms of animal and developed under natures rules for survival. So that means as 'machines' so to speak, our bodies and minds still retain much of the natural mechanics (hormones, stimuli) that are geared towards natural selective breeding. At least that would be true if you ascribe to current scientific theory.

So with relationships multiple things are at play. Generally I believe physical attraction is usually the first main component and then mental compatibility. At least in RL encounters. Online meeting often seems to have it reversed. But basically it is there, that mutual drawing together, or it is not. It won't happen just because it seems logical or one wants it really badly. Persuing a relationship when it is not there is mostly wasted time. Better to forget it as best as possible and look towards meeting someone new.


No, it doesn't, if they don't find you cute it won't happen.


Depends. In my experience, I've only ever gotten attached to people who I later find out are definitely my type, after pictures are swapped, or we go on webcam, or something. That might be a fluke, but after a fair number of times that this has happened, I'm pretty sure it's not. Sometimes personality heavily influences how much people care for themselves, and in what ways.



Shebakoby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2009
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,759

14 Aug 2014, 5:32 pm

FrankiDelano wrote:
Not every gal or guy believes in a friend zone. Many of the female friends I have are actually staunchly against the idea of "friend-zoning," and believe in dating long term friends if the opportunity arises. People are very nit-picky though about who they want to sleep with and date, that's why in actuality there are A LOT LESS people getting laid in the world right now, than you'd think.


Friendzoning isn't even a thing with me because I have no male RL friends and nobody who wanted to date me, let alone one that theoretically could be relegated to said friend zone.

I dunno if I'm nitpicky, but it's always been moot as there's been no-one to nitpick over. :lol:



FrankiDelano
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2013
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 408

14 Aug 2014, 6:34 pm

Shebakoby wrote:
FrankiDelano wrote:
Not every gal or guy believes in a friend zone. Many of the female friends I have are actually staunchly against the idea of "friend-zoning," and believe in dating long term friends if the opportunity arises. People are very nit-picky though about who they want to sleep with and date, that's why in actuality there are A LOT LESS people getting laid in the world right now, than you'd think.


Friendzoning isn't even a thing with me because I have no male RL friends and nobody who wanted to date me, let alone one that theoretically could be relegated to said friend zone.

I dunno if I'm nitpicky, but it's always been moot as there's been no-one to nitpick over. :lol:


A lot of people think that men and women struggle with love differently, but that's not right at all, er it's kind of sort of right, but IMO not on the level most would think. I don't know if any of the girls I ever wanted to date, who ended up just remaining friends (but also don't believe in the friend-zone) simply didn't want to date me for physical and/or personality reasons.

By nit-picky, I just meant the feeling you get when someone is attracted to you, and you aren't attracted back, and how often most people feel that in there lives.



Outrider
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2014
Age: 25
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,007
Location: Australia

14 Aug 2014, 9:33 pm

FrankiDelano wrote:
Shebakoby wrote:
FrankiDelano wrote:
Not every gal or guy believes in a friend zone. Many of the female friends I have are actually staunchly against the idea of "friend-zoning," and believe in dating long term friends if the opportunity arises. People are very nit-picky though about who they want to sleep with and date, that's why in actuality there are A LOT LESS people getting laid in the world right now, than you'd think.


Friendzoning isn't even a thing with me because I have no male RL friends and nobody who wanted to date me, let alone one that theoretically could be relegated to said friend zone.

I dunno if I'm nitpicky, but it's always been moot as there's been no-one to nitpick over. :lol:


A lot of people think that men and women struggle with love differently, but that's not right at all, er it's kind of sort of right, but IMO not on the level most would think. I don't know if any of the girls I ever wanted to date, who ended up just remaining friends (but also don't believe in the friend-zone) simply didn't want to date me for physical and/or personality reasons.

By nit-picky, I just meant the feeling you get when someone is attracted to you, and you aren't attracted back, and how often most people feel that in there lives.


A lot of the replies didn't exactly get what I meant, but oh well. There has been very interesting replies here.

I personally do not actually believe in the friendzone, I only believe in rejection. The "friendzone" is an excuse to continue pursuing someone who has rejected you, but in a more subtle and strategic way.

Really I guess I'm just a little frustrated by confusing dating mechanics.

Confident men can flirst and chat with a random woman then get her number when she's only JUST met him, but a shyer guy who she knows a little better (not friends but at least acquaintances) tries to ask her out for coffee she can be very picky and say no.

For some reason it's easier to get a phone number and date in the street from a random person than your co-worker at the office or classmate at school/college. But that's only if you're a CONFIDENT male.

If you're shy, you're hopeless in both of these aspects...

Which brings me back to my original point...

It's very strategic and "choose-impress"-based for when you first meet someone.

But for someone you know a tiny bit and they want to get to know you on a more personal level, these people don't stand a chance in the dating world most of the time.

The system is BACKWARDS. Someone at work who seems nice enough may be rejected, but someone you barely know and can't even trust yet will get a date easily.



tarantella64
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,850

14 Aug 2014, 9:56 pm

dilanger wrote:
"I want to take you out and treat you like a lady." I ask.

"I just want to be friends" she says.

"Where is the fun in that?" I say.

They either give you excuses, or an okay.

Please do not put up with excuses.


Excellent start to your chivalry there, dude. Dismiss what she says, then decide what she wants isn't worth anything. Happy courting.



tarantella64
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,850

14 Aug 2014, 10:02 pm

Outrider, there's no system. You really are overanalyzing. Two people who fancy each other...what happens depends on who they are. There are couples who spot each other, seal the whole deal with their eyes, and go find a closet or a car. There are others who write long letters to each other for 20 years. If there were any kind of a system, we'd all be using it by now and living happily ever after.



Outrider
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2014
Age: 25
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,007
Location: Australia

14 Aug 2014, 11:16 pm

No real system, but let's say in terms of social interaction there really are pre-existing social norms that cannot just be ignored.

For instance, it is traditional for a male to ask out a female and pay for the first date; and many men prefer to pay fully instead of splitting the bill.

Although not all men may be like this, it is traditional and still somewhat expected of young males to behave in this way, and young females to accept their invitation and be thankful for a free date.

There's no rules or systems in reards to dating, but there are little social biases and double standards that we can't just sweep under a rug.

But yes I see what you mean. If two people are attracted to each other they make it work in their own way. I agree. That's not my argument however. My argument is if two people do not yet have these feelings but want to simply get to know each other and see if things can work out and if feelings will build-into something more; more often then not the other person is someone you barely know; as in you may have only met them a few days ago, a week at the most. And instead of legitimately getting to know them like promised, it's merely tedious little dating minigames and exchanging messages on email/text back and forth. Little gestures.

Rarely have I met a girl my own age (15) who would just like to walk around the city, taking in the ambience, having long and deep conversations and really building a connection. Instead it's cheesy little movies, poor quality restaurants, and instead of building a connection it's childish playful little flirting, etc. Very tedious and repetitive.

And if you don't engage in these little choose-impress games and cheesy-minigames, you probably won't build a connection fast.

And if you actually prefer a more deep and meaningful way of befriending or possibly dating someone new; it apparently doesn't work out...



tarantella64
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,850

15 Aug 2014, 12:54 am

Well, wait a few years then (I know) till you get to uni; you'll find plenty of girls who want long walks and conversation there. And in the meantime...no, I mean connections aren't usually built fast. And you're right, it often doesn't work out, that's humans. It sounds like you're in a group of people who play at dating, and you're not going to find what you're after there. But the whole world is not like this. Just be careful not to get so embittered about it over the next few years that by the time you do get to uni and find nice, interesting women who want to walk around and build a connection, you're so negative and slicing about either relationships or girls that you drive the ones walking along beside you away. (Also don't spend entire walks complaining about how crap dating is and obsessing over how awful it was trying to date this girl or that -- pay attention to the woman who's actually there meaning to enjoy your company.)



AspieOtaku
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,051
Location: San Jose

15 Aug 2014, 1:13 am

Best bet is ignore them or at least pretend to show no interest in them then they will wonder why and if they like you they will make an effort and approach you and if you like them enough thats when its jack pot women these days prefer to be the ones to make the moves.


_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

15 Aug 2014, 1:58 am

Stargazer43 wrote:
sly279 wrote:
hurtloam wrote:
Please don't say: "...and treat you like a lady." That's a bit cringy.

"I'd like to get to know you better. Do you want to go for a coffee?" is fine.

Or if you're somewhere with her: "I've enjoyed this conversation. Do you want to go for a coffee?"

You don't need any fancy-schmancy mock chivillary. It's creepy.

But yeah, if she says no, she means no and just accept that.


what about for the masses of people who don't drink or like coffee. its ewwy.

not that I can approach or ask out random women anways. but the whole lets have coffee is a negitive to me. though not the sole reason I would ignore a woman's proflie.


I hate coffee and don't drink it, but it doesn't mean I won't meet up for "coffee" with someone. When I do, I usually just drink tea or water. The reason you're meeting in the first place isn't so much to drink coffee, but to get to know the other person in a comfortable setting.


yeah but you show up and at the place, first you aren't buying anything from them. lame, she shows up, shes loves coffee and drinks it alot, you not drinking it is now the first thing she notices you don't have in common. you might even seem weird to her for not drinking it(have had a few people point this out to me) most people drink coffee. its a regular thing that is expected everyone does.

i'd rather just go for a walk and talk then sit in a noisy coffee place anyways.
I met the one girl at a coffee place and felt so weird being there and not buying anything.

hurtloam wrote:
sly279 wrote:
what about for the masses of people who don't drink or like coffee. its ewwy.

not that I can approach or ask out random women anways. but the whole lets have coffee is a negitive to me. though not the sole reason I would ignore a woman's proflie.


"Coffee" isn't always coffee. It's just a tool people use to spend time together. You can order whatever drink you like. Don't get hung up on the coffe, it just means that the other person is saying they want to spend time with you.

If someone invites you up to their apartment after the date for coffee, well that can mean something else entirely:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnV3uFO4Nm8[/youtube]


i get the ideal, but it just seems loaded.
starbucks(common meet up place here) doesn't offer any drinks I like. and dutch bros has no sitting area, pluse for $4.50 i could make 20 creamosa's at home.

would you not find it odd and weird if your date didn't order anything and just watched you drink yours while talking?

does that line actually happen outside of shows/movies lol.



Outrider
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2014
Age: 25
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,007
Location: Australia

15 Aug 2014, 5:41 am

sly279 wrote:
Stargazer43 wrote:
sly279 wrote:
hurtloam wrote:
Please don't say: "...and treat you like a lady." That's a bit cringy.

"I'd like to get to know you better. Do you want to go for a coffee?" is fine.

Or if you're somewhere with her: "I've enjoyed this conversation. Do you want to go for a coffee?"

You don't need any fancy-schmancy mock chivillary. It's creepy.

But yeah, if she says no, she means no and just accept that.


what about for the masses of people who don't drink or like coffee. its ewwy.

not that I can approach or ask out random women anways. but the whole lets have coffee is a negitive to me. though not the sole reason I would ignore a woman's proflie.


I hate coffee and don't drink it, but it doesn't mean I won't meet up for "coffee" with someone. When I do, I usually just drink tea or water. The reason you're meeting in the first place isn't so much to drink coffee, but to get to know the other person in a comfortable setting.


yeah but you show up and at the place, first you aren't buying anything from them. lame, she shows up, shes loves coffee and drinks it alot, you not drinking it is now the first thing she notices you don't have in common. you might even seem weird to her for not drinking it(have had a few people point this out to me) most people drink coffee. its a regular thing that is expected everyone does.

i'd rather just go for a walk and talk then sit in a noisy coffee place anyways.
I met the one girl at a coffee place and felt so weird being there and not buying anything.

hurtloam wrote:
sly279 wrote:
what about for the masses of people who don't drink or like coffee. its ewwy.

not that I can approach or ask out random women anways. but the whole lets have coffee is a negitive to me. though not the sole reason I would ignore a woman's proflie.


"Coffee" isn't always coffee. It's just a tool people use to spend time together. You can order whatever drink you like. Don't get hung up on the coffe, it just means that the other person is saying they want to spend time with you.

If someone invites you up to their apartment after the date for coffee, well that can mean something else entirely:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnV3uFO4Nm8[/youtube]


i get the ideal, but it just seems loaded.
starbucks(common meet up place here) doesn't offer any drinks I like. and dutch bros has no sitting area, pluse for $4.50 i could make 20 creamosa's at home.

would you not find it odd and weird if your date didn't order anything and just watched you drink yours while talking?

does that line actually happen outside of shows/movies lol.


@sly: I know exactly how you feel.

I myself don't like cheesy and poor quality places like movie theatres or cheap takeaway restaurants. I also have no interest in drinking or clubbing.

A coffee place is the ideal date for me. I do prefer actually doing something fun, not just walking but anything where I can really get to enjoy my time with the person, something like a show, festival, or something more adventurous, but if I want something simple then I would just sit down and relax at a coffee place.

I have no interest in coffee either however. Never actually tried it, but just don't plain want to. lol. I think I remember tasting coffee, and it was quite plain/bad to me.

It sure would be awkward going for "coffee" to not actually get anything. They better have water at least lol...



hurtloam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,743
Location: Eyjafjallajökull

15 Aug 2014, 6:35 am

Sly, you are right, sitting and watching her drink would be a bit odd. You could order a piece of cake, a sausage roll or a granola bar or just get a glass of water or juice.

But Outrider has some good ideas too. I definately think that going somewhere that you can actually talk to each other is a good idea. I've never seen the point of a cinema date. You go to the cinema to watch a film, not to be socialble. It's maybe a better date later on when you know each other a bit better and just want to chill out together in front of a movie, but for a first date the cinema sucks.

If a man asked me to go to an art gallery or museum or an exhibition with him then I would be delighted. You can always talk about the exhibits if you get stuck for conversation.

I've got a gut feeling that some men may retort that they don't meet women like that and only meet the kind who like clubbing. Don't get hung up on that. Don't feel like you should pretend to love clubs to get girls, you'll only meet the kind you don't really get along with if you do that and they are probably at clubs to meet people like them and that's why you strike out because you're not similar kinds of people and that's ok, everyone is different and gets on with differnt sorts of people. Go to museums and things like that, the kind of things you actually enjoy and meet like minded people.

Yeah, yeah, I know easier said than done.

To the OP. If you feel like you're going to have more success approaching strangers then do what you feel works. Some people end up with friends, some get together after a random meeting. There is no "correct" way to date. Just go with what you feel works for you.



AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

15 Aug 2014, 12:45 pm

Chivalry as applied to courtship/dating is dead. It has been replaced by being polite.

I would not go the whole date a stranger straight to love at first sight route. That has become ingrained in dating culture, and it needs to hurry up and die, too.

Your first step should be make a lot of friends. Next, be proactive in arranging meetups. From that crowd, find ways to hang out with single folks you'd be interested in going out with. This will establish your dating pool. Keep that pool open. Ask one or two new people out every week. When you get turned down, go to the next person on the list. Rinse and repeat often.

What will start to happen is out of those who accept dates, some will show more interest in you than others. Your dating pool will become a lot more shallow at this point. Of those who really like you, you're going to want to spend more time with some than others. The one who really, REALLY likes you and somehow stands out over the others is the one you're going to explore the possibility of a commited LTR with. If that doesn't work, i.e. he or she keeps options open, go to the next one. Repeat until romantic feelings are reciprocated and you achieve LTR status. Meet the parents. Get your families together. Still cooking after 6 months of being an "official" couple? Everything good among prospective in-laws? Had the talk about making babies? Get married, and don't waste time getting there, either.

The friendship stages will take the most time. You need to know how people act when they don't know someone is watching. When a guy breaks up with a girl and starts chatting you up, you'll already know if he abuses drugs and beats women. If a woman you're acquainted with trashes her bf in front of her friends comes available, you'll want to stay away so the same doesn't happen to you. Keeping those boundaries early on will bring the crazies up to the surface and reveal them for who they really are. Only then do you need to start looking at how successful a romantic relationship would be. Since you already know things can work out, you can cut a lot of "courtship" corners that often trap couples in bad relationships.



rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,089
Location: Sweden

16 Aug 2014, 5:31 am

Personally, I prefer a lengthy procedure (months or years) of just flirting. That procedure will automatically weed-out abusers, narcisists and psychopaths as they won't invest that much in a single relationship. Traditional dating is a perfect setup for the bad guys/gals as they can quickly form abusive relationships.



Outrider
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2014
Age: 25
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,007
Location: Australia

17 Aug 2014, 7:09 am

AngelRho wrote:
Chivalry as applied to courtship/dating is dead. It has been replaced by being polite.

I would not go the whole date a stranger straight to love at first sight route. That has become ingrained in dating culture, and it needs to hurry up and die, too.

Your first step should be make a lot of friends. Next, be proactive in arranging meetups. From that crowd, find ways to hang out with single folks you'd be interested in going out with. This will establish your dating pool. Keep that pool open. Ask one or two new people out every week. When you get turned down, go to the next person on the list. Rinse and repeat often.

What will start to happen is out of those who accept dates, some will show more interest in you than others. Your dating pool will become a lot more shallow at this point. Of those who really like you, you're going to want to spend more time with some than others. The one who really, REALLY likes you and somehow stands out over the others is the one you're going to explore the possibility of a commited LTR with. If that doesn't work, i.e. he or she keeps options open, go to the next one. Repeat until romantic feelings are reciprocated and you achieve LTR status. Meet the parents. Get your families together. Still cooking after 6 months of being an "official" couple? Everything good among prospective in-laws? Had the talk about making babies? Get married, and don't waste time getting there, either.

The friendship stages will take the most time. You need to know how people act when they don't know someone is watching. When a guy breaks up with a girl and starts chatting you up, you'll already know if he abuses drugs and beats women. If a woman you're acquainted with trashes her bf in front of her friends comes available, you'll want to stay away so the same doesn't happen to you. Keeping those boundaries early on will bring the crazies up to the surface and reveal them for who they really are. Only then do you need to start looking at how successful a romantic relationship would be. Since you already know things can work out, you can cut a lot of "courtship" corners that often trap couples in bad relationships.


You have gotten exactly what I've been saying. I can't help but strongly agree with your ideals. Sadly, this is exactly where the problem lies.

For some reason society idealizes the first method; shallow, superficial relationships sprung out of strangers getting to know each other. The second method however; the one you have thought of where you actually expand your friendship and dating pool and build relationships out of trial-and-error but also improving on existing connections doesn't work in societies eyes.

Many posters have said you can't force attraction. This is very true. What you also can't force however is stopping a connection when you really feel one is building. The issue is if a mutual attraction or connection between two people that you feel SHOULD go beyond friendship to "test the waters" so to speak, you are crossing a pre-established line that for some reason society thinks is uncomfortable and wrong... :?: Am puzzled...

I said earlier people are too scared to leave their comfort zones. This is what I meant really. A mutual connection/chemistry cannot advance further due to people remaining comfy in their little boxes and strict social guidelines.



rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,089
Location: Sweden

17 Aug 2014, 7:29 am

Outrider wrote:
Many posters have said you can't force attraction. This is very true.


At least I can force a connection (with a little help from the girl). We'll do a study on this some time to check if it is something many neurodiverse people can do or not.

Outrider wrote:
What you also can't force however is stopping a connection when you really feel one is building.


Yes, that's the really problematic issue.