Page 12 of 16 [ 247 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next

luanqibazao
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2014
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 754
Location: Last booth, Akston's Diner

20 Aug 2014, 10:31 pm

eric76 wrote:
unless either the officer had really long arms


Surely you've heard of the long arm of the law?? 8)



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

20 Aug 2014, 10:41 pm

Misslizard wrote:
I'm not turning this into a Martin/Zimmerman thing.I haven't brought up either of their names.
But really,how many suburban white teens get shot by the cops compared to black teens?
Do you really believe if he had been lilly white and in a wealthy neighborhood he would have been shot?I doubt it.I'm not saying the kid wasn't in the wrong in the store,he was.He should have gotten community service and restitution to the store owner,not shot down in the street.

Or we could cease jumping to conclusions and wait for the findings of the investigation or even trial if there's going to be one. This doesn't look like it's going to be some little thing that just passes in a few weeks and gets swept under the rug. And stop pulling the race card. We already have one white person on this forum that pretends to be blacker and more offended than most black people.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,470
Location: Aux Arcs

20 Aug 2014, 10:46 pm

I'll stop pulling the race card when the deck isn't stacked against people of color.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


khaoz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Apr 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,940

20 Aug 2014, 10:56 pm

Why is it necessary for police officers to shoot to kill when dealing with these situations? Cant put 6-8 shots into his legs at that range? Officers don't understand any fundamental martial arts to neutralize people? Why is shooting to kill the only option? Especially unarmed people. Even Zimmerman, wrestling with a scrawny teenager, first response is to pull out his gun and shoot him. He was a damned kid. Throw his ass off. People have no composure. Put a firearm in peoples hands and first instinct when dealing with argumentative or physical aggression is to shoot and kill. Even the guy with a knife they shot. Two police officers are not even brave enough or trained adequately to attempt to subdue or neutralize a man with a knife? We are a society of wimps and excuse makers who have no respect for human life.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

20 Aug 2014, 11:19 pm

khaoz wrote:
Why is it necessary for police officers to shoot to kill when dealing with these situations? Cant put 6-8 shots into his legs at that range? Officers don't understand any fundamental martial arts to neutralize people? Why is shooting to kill the only option? Especially unarmed people. Even Zimmerman, wrestling with a scrawny teenager, first response is to pull out his gun and shoot him. He was a damned kid. Throw his ass off. People have no composure. Put a firearm in peoples hands and first instinct when dealing with argumentative or physical aggression is to shoot and kill. Even the guy with a knife they shot. Two police officers are not even brave enough or trained adequately to attempt to subdue or neutralize a man with a knife? We are a society of wimps and excuse makers who have no respect for human life.


Cops are not expert marksmen and it is not very easy to shoot to wound, you only shoot center mass. Cops end up shooting bystanders all the time actually, few years ago they shot like 9 bystanders firing on some guys in New York City. Martial arts can subdue some people that are unarmed and untrained but that's not that's not always the case.

The key really is that these cops need to not initiate confrontations like they do, violence and use of force shouldn't be the first answer. Body cameras really need to be mandated, that way cops know they're not above the law but they're also protected from bogus reports complaints too. Police could be better trained to if their actions are monitored and studied, the bad eggs could be weeded out. Police violence would plummet and it would be a win for everyone involved except for the corrupt cops.



Dillogic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,339

21 Aug 2014, 12:08 am

sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

21 Aug 2014, 12:11 am

Misslizard wrote:
I'm not turning this into a Martin/Zimmerman thing.I haven't brought up either of their names.
But really,how many suburban white teens get shot by the cops compared to black teens?
Do you really believe if he had been lilly white and in a wealthy neighborhood he would have been shot?I doubt it.I'm not saying the kid wasn't in the wrong in the store,he was.He should have gotten community service and restitution to the store owner,not shot down in the street.


bunches of whit kids get shot by cops, it just doesn't get out of regional news area. cause a whit cop shooting a white kid doesn't evoke the racial divide.

apparently the people down the street kid was killed by cops last augustu. and I didn't even hear much about it.

when i was in middle school a kid was shot playing with a orange see thru water gun. another shot when in a car reaching for his cell phone.

but its white shooting white. don't matter
black shooting black don't matter
black shooting white don't matter
whit shoots black. omg run it all over the network 24/7



eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

21 Aug 2014, 12:40 am

khaoz wrote:
Why is it necessary for police officers to shoot to kill when dealing with these situations? Cant put 6-8 shots into his legs at that range?
Nope.

Any cop who shoots at anything but the center of mass in that kind of situation is too stupid to be a cop.



Dillogic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,339

21 Aug 2014, 1:16 am

The only time you shoot is to stop the threat (the good guys anyway).

Shooting someone in the leg or arm doesn't stop the threat, and it's also a potentially lethal shot anyway. Plus, it's too hard to do under stress (also if you miss, there's a potentially lethal round going down range).

It's why you just aim center of mass and fire until the threat has stopped.

Everyone is trained that way across the world to various degrees (at least civilians and civil services anyway. The general military is different; that's shoot, shoot and keep on shooting until the ground turns red and black).



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

21 Aug 2014, 9:35 am

khaoz wrote:
Cant put 6-8 shots into his legs at that range?

1) 6-8 shots to the legs and he'd probably bleed to death. Legs have arteries and veins in them in case you didnt know.
2) They do well enough to make center of mass shots.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,470
Location: Aux Arcs

21 Aug 2014, 10:09 am

sly279 wrote:
Misslizard wrote:
I'm not turning this into a Martin/Zimmerman thing.I haven't brought up either of their names.
But really,how many suburban white teens get shot by the cops compared to black teens?
Do you really believe if he had been lilly white and in a wealthy neighborhood he would have been shot?I doubt it.I'm not saying the kid wasn't in the wrong in the store,he was.He should have gotten community service and restitution to the store owner,not shot down in the street.


bunches of whit kids get shot by cops, it just doesn't get out of regional news area. cause a whit cop shooting a white kid doesn't evoke the racial divide.

apparently the people down the street kid was killed by cops last augustu. and I didn't even hear much about it.

when i was in middle school a kid was shot playing with a orange see thru water gun. another shot when in a car reaching for his cell phone.

but its white shooting white. don't matter
black shooting black don't matter
black shooting white don't matter
whit shoots black. omg run it all over the network 24/7

One reason it's all over the news is the way the police delt with the protestors and the press.
Anytime you have something in your hand or reach for something you can be perceived as a threat to an over anxious officer.A few years back a developmentally disabled man was shot by the police becuse he didn't remove his hands from his pockets when asked to.If I remember right it was caught on the dash cam so they ruled in favor of the cop.
Best advice,keep your hands in plain sight and don't make sudden movements,sometimes even this isn't enough to keep you safe.They can still grab ahold of you and put you in a choke hold.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

21 Aug 2014, 10:15 am

Dillogic wrote:
The only time you shoot is to stop the threat (the good guys anyway).

Shooting someone in the leg or arm doesn't stop the threat, and it's also a potentially lethal shot anyway. Plus, it's too hard to do under stress (also if you miss, there's a potentially lethal round going down range).

It's why you just aim center of mass and fire until the threat has stopped.

Everyone is trained that way across the world to various degrees (at least civilians and civil services anyway. The general military is different; that's shoot, shoot and keep on shooting until the ground turns red and black).
Exactly.

With a handgun, it would be hard enough to hit someone in the leg just standing there. But in a shooting situation, they probably aren't just standing there. Hitting a moving target is much more difficult.

Imagine losing a family member because some officer thought he was some kind of expert marksman and shot at someone's leg, missed, and hit your family member instead.



eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

21 Aug 2014, 10:32 am

Misslizard wrote:
Anytime you have something in your hand or reach for something you can be perceived as a threat to an over anxious officer.


Or even sitting or standing in the wrong place.

While waiting for someone the day before a primary election several years ago I was sitting outdoors on a work platform that gave me a pretty good view over a nearby crowd that had gathered to see a Presidential candidate who was due to arrive later that morning. After a few minutes, a cop came over and told me that I was making their SWAT team nervous because of where I was sitting. I quickly got down from the platform and went back inside.



AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

21 Aug 2014, 12:35 pm

khaoz wrote:
Why is it necessary for police officers to shoot to kill when dealing with these situations? Cant put 6-8 shots into his legs at that range? Officers don't understand any fundamental martial arts to neutralize people? Why is shooting to kill the only option? Especially unarmed people. Even Zimmerman, wrestling with a scrawny teenager, first response is to pull out his gun and shoot him. He was a damned kid. Throw his ass off. People have no composure. Put a firearm in peoples hands and first instinct when dealing with argumentative or physical aggression is to shoot and kill. Even the guy with a knife they shot. Two police officers are not even brave enough or trained adequately to attempt to subdue or neutralize a man with a knife? We are a society of wimps and excuse makers who have no respect for human life.

They have more respect for their own life. Should they really take the risk that they will lose the fight? If you decide to use a gun, you are deciding to kill your opponent.

It's much better to defuse the situation before it gets to that.



The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,810
Location: London

21 Aug 2014, 3:38 pm

So, to summarise:

- Black man starts punching white man in the face
- Black man stops punching white man and walks away
- White man threatens black man with gun
- Black man moves towards white man
- White man kills him
- The great and good of the American right jump to the white man's defence

This is institutional racism. The white man has massively overreacted based on the evidence presented and should be facing a murder charge.

If the tables had been turned and Brown had shot a white man who had just assaulted him, he would be in deep trouble.

LoveNotHate wrote:
This is making people racist.

They see the looting/rioting/hate directed towards white people, and think, "I would never live among black people". Someone told me this the other day.

I suspect that millions of Americans of all races are thinking the same thing. It is like the saying that "hate begets hate".

That's it, blame the victim.



AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

21 Aug 2014, 3:42 pm

We don't know all the facts, it's certainly not so simplistic.