Science vs Religion which is more correct?
Aside from the fact that that's pretty much tautology, you're missing the point that you can't be objective if you've already decided which approach you're going to take on the world.
I'd say it's closer to critical realism that relativism, albeit perhaps with a sprinkling of the latter.
Richard Dawkins is an absolute joke. He's little more than the 'scientistic' side of the fundamentalist coin.
We should acknowledge that there is a difference between function and fact.
Says who? It really seems to me that you've already made up your mind about both science and religion.
It adapts at the same rate with equal affect from the tides of time.
You're setting standards by which to dismiss religion. Religion itself, evidently, does not subscribe to these standards.
wittgenstein
Veteran
Joined: 13 May 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,522
Location: Trapped inside a hominid skull
If inflammatory means taking on the big controversial subjects then inflammatory is a good thing.
I have never enjoyed conversations about the weather and/or if burger king or McDonalds have the better hamburger.
_________________
YES! This is me!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gtdlR4rUcY
I went up over 50 feet!
I love debate!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtckVng_1a0
My debate style is calm and deadly!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-230v_ecAcM
lol what? Religions change all the time. Literally all the time.
Tell that to the religous and they will crucify you!
Literally all of the time crucify you!
"God never changes" according to the religious.
So neither can the revealed word of God. Don't you know THAT you godless heathen blaspheemer you!
sonofghandi
Veteran
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)
Honestly, what is NOT inflammatory to a Muslim?
Um . . .
The same things that are not inflammatory to a Christian, for the most part.
_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche
sonofghandi
Veteran
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)
Honestly, what is NOT inflammatory to a Muslim?
Um . . .
The same things that are not inflammatory to a Christian, for the most part.
I doubt that.
Evolution (often times), doubters the faith, non-believers having any authority, atheists, laws not based on that religion's teachings, those dismissive of their beliefs, those who make sweeping stereotypes based on the words/actions of a minority, persecution (real and imagined) being mistreated/insulted because of their faith, desecration of their holy symbols/texts, etc.
What exactly do you think upsets Muslims more than someone belonging to a different faith?
_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKNd_S3iXfs[/youtube]Heres a long video debate of science vs religion.
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
Depends on what you want it for, doesn't it?
Science can tell me what is messed-up about me. It can tell me how it's messed-up, how it got messed-up, and how it would work if it weren't messed-up.
It cannot tell me why it's messed-up. All science can say is that it's hereditary, or bad luck, or an environmental toxin or collection thereof. Random. Whatever. It cannot supply me with a Big Why.
For that, I need philosophy, or religion.
Philosophy and religion can give me good whys that make me feel better (indeed, even not messed-up at all) or bad whys that make me feel even worse. But at least they can give me answers.
Science is probably more correct if you need data.
If you're looking for gestalt, or raison d'etre, or whatever word you prefer for what I call Big Why or "a reason to keep getting out of bed in the morning," then religion/philosophy is probably more likely to yield useful results.
_________________
"Alas, our dried voices when we whisper together are quiet and meaningless, as wind in dry grass, or rats' feet over broken glass in our dry cellar." --TS Eliot, "The Hollow Men"
Science can tell me what is messed-up about me. It can tell me how it's messed-up, how it got messed-up, and how it would work if it weren't messed-up.
It cannot tell me why it's messed-up. All science can say is that it's hereditary, or bad luck, or an environmental toxin or collection thereof. Random. Whatever. It cannot supply me with a Big Why.
For that, I need philosophy, or religion.
Philosophy and religion can give me good whys that make me feel better (indeed, even not messed-up at all) or bad whys that make me feel even worse. But at least they can give me answers.
Science is probably more correct if you need data.
If you're looking for gestalt, or raison d'etre, or whatever word you prefer for what I call Big Why or "a reason to keep getting out of bed in the morning," then religion/philosophy is probably more likely to yield useful results.
Religion can't tell you why. Having answers doesn't mean they are the right ones. Unless there is some method to ensure the answers are right, they are useless.
Philosophy is science. Science even used to be called Natural Philosophy. It uses logical systems to arrive at conclusions.
sonofghandi
Veteran
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)
What exactly do you think upsets Muslims more than someone belonging to a different faith?
Cartoons and apostasy.
^So the outrage over Aaron McGruder's Black Jesus doesn't compare? How about the anger and hostility over the recent Noah's Ark movie?
And as for apostasy, do you know someone who grew up in an extremely religious household who became an atheist? If you have, ask them how their family likes their loss of faith. Quite likely it was not taken well.
_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Intelligent design has no place in science classrooms. |
17 Mar 2024, 8:20 pm |
The Science Behind the "Spinach Mouth Phenomenon" |
09 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm |