Page 11 of 13 [ 193 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

29 Sep 2014, 12:32 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
AntDog wrote:
That's a 2% increase from similar polls in 2012. The South, breadbasket, and mountains are getting increasingly tired of Washington's ever increasing grab of powers that should be left to the states.


What like providing healthcare to those citizens too poor or disabled to get coverage, or for defending the rights of ethnic or sexual minorities? Yeah, that evil, intrusive federal government looking out for people who those red states won't look out for! :P


how about enslaving us into debt, spying its own citizens, prosecuting whistle blowers, and waging illegal war?


As a big part of that list had happened under Bush's administration, the Obama haters wanting to secede usually don't complain about that - or imagine it was all Obama's doing.
Besides, that list of government offenses don't include disrespecting states rights, which is supposed to justify secession..


Obama has double down on all those, you can't blame Bush. He's is an awful president.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,783
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

29 Sep 2014, 12:46 am

Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
AntDog wrote:
That's a 2% increase from similar polls in 2012. The South, breadbasket, and mountains are getting increasingly tired of Washington's ever increasing grab of powers that should be left to the states.


What like providing healthcare to those citizens too poor or disabled to get coverage, or for defending the rights of ethnic or sexual minorities? Yeah, that evil, intrusive federal government looking out for people who those red states won't look out for! :P


how about enslaving us into debt, spying its own citizens, prosecuting whistle blowers, and waging illegal war?


As a big part of that list had happened under Bush's administration, the Obama haters wanting to secede usually don't complain about that - or imagine it was all Obama's doing.
Besides, that list of government offenses don't include disrespecting states rights, which is supposed to justify secession..


Obama has double down on all those, you can't blame Bush. He's is an awful president.


But none of that is the reason why certain people want to secede. It has to do with the "evils of socialism" - that is, caring for people who can't care for themselves, just because Limbaugh and Fox tell them caring for the needy is bad. And it's about gay rights - people have to tolerate those horrible sinners having civil rights. And it's about the feds fighting against disenfranchisement of African American voters. And most of all, it's about the President being black - though most of them won't admit that publicly.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

29 Sep 2014, 1:25 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
AntDog wrote:
That's a 2% increase from similar polls in 2012. The South, breadbasket, and mountains are getting increasingly tired of Washington's ever increasing grab of powers that should be left to the states.


What like providing healthcare to those citizens too poor or disabled to get coverage, or for defending the rights of ethnic or sexual minorities? Yeah, that evil, intrusive federal government looking out for people who those red states won't look out for! :P


how about enslaving us into debt, spying its own citizens, prosecuting whistle blowers, and waging illegal war?


As a big part of that list had happened under Bush's administration, the Obama haters wanting to secede usually don't complain about that - or imagine it was all Obama's doing.
Besides, that list of government offenses don't include disrespecting states rights, which is supposed to justify secession..


Obama has double down on all those, you can't blame Bush. He's is an awful president.


But none of that is the reason why certain people want to secede. It has to do with the "evils of socialism" - that is, caring for people who can't care for themselves, just because Limbaugh and Fox tell them caring for the needy is bad. And it's about gay rights - people have to tolerate those horrible sinners having civil rights. And it's about the feds fighting against disenfranchisement of African American voters. And most of all, it's about the President being black - though most of them won't admit that publicly.


oh glad you can speak for all of them



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,783
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

29 Sep 2014, 1:57 am

Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
AntDog wrote:
That's a 2% increase from similar polls in 2012. The South, breadbasket, and mountains are getting increasingly tired of Washington's ever increasing grab of powers that should be left to the states.


What like providing healthcare to those citizens too poor or disabled to get coverage, or for defending the rights of ethnic or sexual minorities? Yeah, that evil, intrusive federal government looking out for people who those red states won't look out for! :P


how about enslaving us into debt, spying its own citizens, prosecuting whistle blowers, and waging illegal war?


As a big part of that list had happened under Bush's administration, the Obama haters wanting to secede usually don't complain about that - or imagine it was all Obama's doing.
Besides, that list of government offenses don't include disrespecting states rights, which is supposed to justify secession..


Obama has double down on all those, you can't blame Bush. He's is an awful president.


But none of that is the reason why certain people want to secede. It has to do with the "evils of socialism" - that is, caring for people who can't care for themselves, just because Limbaugh and Fox tell them caring for the needy is bad. And it's about gay rights - people have to tolerate those horrible sinners having civil rights. And it's about the feds fighting against disenfranchisement of African American voters. And most of all, it's about the President being black - though most of them won't admit that publicly.


oh glad you can speak for all of them


So far, those are the only ones with those opinions who want to secede. Real Americans would rather stay with their country and try to make it better.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


ScrewyWabbit
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Oct 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,154

30 Sep 2014, 1:31 pm

Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
AntDog wrote:
That's a 2% increase from similar polls in 2012. The South, breadbasket, and mountains are getting increasingly tired of Washington's ever increasing grab of powers that should be left to the states.


What like providing healthcare to those citizens too poor or disabled to get coverage, or for defending the rights of ethnic or sexual minorities? Yeah, that evil, intrusive federal government looking out for people who those red states won't look out for! :P


how about enslaving us into debt, spying its own citizens, prosecuting whistle blowers, and waging illegal war?


Yikes. Most people who are unhappy now were perfectly happy with all of those things when Bush was doing them.

Enslaving us into debt? Its not like the debt did not skyrocket under Bush after it had started being reduced under Clinton. http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

Spying on its own citizens? Most of that was started under Bush.

Prosecuting whistle blowers? How about abusing political power to seek retribution against them? See: Plame, Valerie (among others).

Waging illegal war? Uh, that one doesn't even deserve a response.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

30 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm

ScrewyWabbit wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
AntDog wrote:
That's a 2% increase from similar polls in 2012. The South, breadbasket, and mountains are getting increasingly tired of Washington's ever increasing grab of powers that should be left to the states.


What like providing healthcare to those citizens too poor or disabled to get coverage, or for defending the rights of ethnic or sexual minorities? Yeah, that evil, intrusive federal government looking out for people who those red states won't look out for! :P


how about enslaving us into debt, spying its own citizens, prosecuting whistle blowers, and waging illegal war?


Yikes. Most people who are unhappy now were perfectly happy with all of those things when Bush was doing them.

Enslaving us into debt? Its not like the debt did not skyrocket under Bush after it had started being reduced under Clinton. http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

Spying on its own citizens? Most of that was started under Bush.

Prosecuting whistle blowers? How about abusing political power to seek retribution against them? See: Plame, Valerie (among others).

Waging illegal war? Uh, that one doesn't even deserve a response.


Obama has been president 5 going on 6 years and his supporters still find use of blaming Bush. Obama is responsible for EVERYTHING he does, he has doubled down on every Bush policy, there is no real difference between them, yet "b-b-b-but BUSHHHHHHHHHHHHHH" is still the main defense people use in defending him as if that somehow resolves him of blame. You are stuck in this fake duopoly of American politics, they're two sides of the same coin. Who cares who started what? It didn't start with Bush either, it has been going on much long, he is just the one that acted most offensively up until that point, all of which has seemed to be normalized now. Hitler wasn't the first one to start hating Jews in Germany.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,783
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

30 Sep 2014, 3:48 pm

Jacoby wrote:
ScrewyWabbit wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
AntDog wrote:
That's a 2% increase from similar polls in 2012. The South, breadbasket, and mountains are getting increasingly tired of Washington's ever increasing grab of powers that should be left to the states.


What like providing healthcare to those citizens too poor or disabled to get coverage, or for defending the rights of ethnic or sexual minorities? Yeah, that evil, intrusive federal government looking out for people who those red states won't look out for! :P


how about enslaving us into debt, spying its own citizens, prosecuting whistle blowers, and waging illegal war?


Yikes. Most people who are unhappy now were perfectly happy with all of those things when Bush was doing them.

Enslaving us into debt? Its not like the debt did not skyrocket under Bush after it had started being reduced under Clinton. http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

Spying on its own citizens? Most of that was started under Bush.

Prosecuting whistle blowers? How about abusing political power to seek retribution against them? See: Plame, Valerie (among others).

Waging illegal war? Uh, that one doesn't even deserve a response.


Obama has been president 5 going on 6 years and his supporters still find use of blaming Bush. Obama is responsible for EVERYTHING he does, he has doubled down on every Bush policy, there is no real difference between them, yet "b-b-b-but BUSHHHHHHHHHHHHHH" is still the main defense people use in defending him as if that somehow resolves him of blame. You are stuck in this fake duopoly of American politics, they're two sides of the same coin. Who cares who started what? It didn't start with Bush either, it has been going on much long, he is just the one that acted most offensively up until that point, all of which has seemed to be normalized now. Hitler wasn't the first one to start hating Jews in Germany.


ScrewyWabbit wasn't trying to justify Obama's policies, but was simply pointing out how the people who complain the loudest about those policies didn't complain when it was Bush doing it. For them, it's the complexion of things.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

30 Sep 2014, 4:37 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
ScrewyWabbit wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
AntDog wrote:
That's a 2% increase from similar polls in 2012. The South, breadbasket, and mountains are getting increasingly tired of Washington's ever increasing grab of powers that should be left to the states.


What like providing healthcare to those citizens too poor or disabled to get coverage, or for defending the rights of ethnic or sexual minorities? Yeah, that evil, intrusive federal government looking out for people who those red states won't look out for! :P


how about enslaving us into debt, spying its own citizens, prosecuting whistle blowers, and waging illegal war?


Yikes. Most people who are unhappy now were perfectly happy with all of those things when Bush was doing them.

Enslaving us into debt? Its not like the debt did not skyrocket under Bush after it had started being reduced under Clinton. http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

Spying on its own citizens? Most of that was started under Bush.

Prosecuting whistle blowers? How about abusing political power to seek retribution against them? See: Plame, Valerie (among others).

Waging illegal war? Uh, that one doesn't even deserve a response.


Obama has been president 5 going on 6 years and his supporters still find use of blaming Bush. Obama is responsible for EVERYTHING he does, he has doubled down on every Bush policy, there is no real difference between them, yet "b-b-b-but BUSHHHHHHHHHHHHHH" is still the main defense people use in defending him as if that somehow resolves him of blame. You are stuck in this fake duopoly of American politics, they're two sides of the same coin. Who cares who started what? It didn't start with Bush either, it has been going on much long, he is just the one that acted most offensively up until that point, all of which has seemed to be normalized now. Hitler wasn't the first one to start hating Jews in Germany.


ScrewyWabbit wasn't trying to justify Obama's policies, but was simply pointing out how the people who complain the loudest about those policies didn't complain when it was Bush doing it. For them, it's the complexion of things.


It goes in the reverse as well, I think an even starker contrast is how so called liberals seemingly forgot their anti-war/pro-civil liberties/pro-rule of law positions which propelled them into power the second their man took office. Partisan politics is a joke that way and most people are seemingly stupid, there are many people that have consistently stood up for these principles only to be droned out by some lying partisan Johnny-come-lately who inevitably sells them out. The videos I posted of Bush and Cheney on this thread are perfect examples, Obama is no different from them.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,783
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

30 Sep 2014, 7:07 pm

Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
ScrewyWabbit wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
AntDog wrote:
That's a 2% increase from similar polls in 2012. The South, breadbasket, and mountains are getting increasingly tired of Washington's ever increasing grab of powers that should be left to the states.


What like providing healthcare to those citizens too poor or disabled to get coverage, or for defending the rights of ethnic or sexual minorities? Yeah, that evil, intrusive federal government looking out for people who those red states won't look out for! :P


how about enslaving us into debt, spying its own citizens, prosecuting whistle blowers, and waging illegal war?


Yikes. Most people who are unhappy now were perfectly happy with all of those things when Bush was doing them.

Enslaving us into debt? Its not like the debt did not skyrocket under Bush after it had started being reduced under Clinton. http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

Spying on its own citizens? Most of that was started under Bush.

Prosecuting whistle blowers? How about abusing political power to seek retribution against them? See: Plame, Valerie (among others).

Waging illegal war? Uh, that one doesn't even deserve a response.


Obama has been president 5 going on 6 years and his supporters still find use of blaming Bush. Obama is responsible for EVERYTHING he does, he has doubled down on every Bush policy, there is no real difference between them, yet "b-b-b-but BUSHHHHHHHHHHHHHH" is still the main defense people use in defending him as if that somehow resolves him of blame. You are stuck in this fake duopoly of American politics, they're two sides of the same coin. Who cares who started what? It didn't start with Bush either, it has been going on much long, he is just the one that acted most offensively up until that point, all of which has seemed to be normalized now. Hitler wasn't the first one to start hating Jews in Germany.


ScrewyWabbit wasn't trying to justify Obama's policies, but was simply pointing out how the people who complain the loudest about those policies didn't complain when it was Bush doing it. For them, it's the complexion of things.


It goes in the reverse as well, I think an even starker contrast is how so called liberals seemingly forgot their anti-war/pro-civil liberties/pro-rule of law positions which propelled them into power the second their man took office. Partisan politics is a joke that way and most people are seemingly stupid, there are many people that have consistently stood up for these principles only to be droned out by some lying partisan Johnny-come-lately who inevitably sells them out. The videos I posted of Bush and Cheney on this thread are perfect examples, Obama is no different from them.


When I said it was the complexion of the thing, I was implying that Obama's critics who so easily dismissed Bush do so because of the President's race and color. But I agree, we liberals should be less tolerant of Obama's abuses of civil liberties and such - - but hardly to the point of advocating secession.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

30 Sep 2014, 7:59 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
ScrewyWabbit wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
AntDog wrote:
That's a 2% increase from similar polls in 2012. The South, breadbasket, and mountains are getting increasingly tired of Washington's ever increasing grab of powers that should be left to the states.


What like providing healthcare to those citizens too poor or disabled to get coverage, or for defending the rights of ethnic or sexual minorities? Yeah, that evil, intrusive federal government looking out for people who those red states won't look out for! :P


how about enslaving us into debt, spying its own citizens, prosecuting whistle blowers, and waging illegal war?


Yikes. Most people who are unhappy now were perfectly happy with all of those things when Bush was doing them.

Enslaving us into debt? Its not like the debt did not skyrocket under Bush after it had started being reduced under Clinton. http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

Spying on its own citizens? Most of that was started under Bush.

Prosecuting whistle blowers? How about abusing political power to seek retribution against them? See: Plame, Valerie (among others).

Waging illegal war? Uh, that one doesn't even deserve a response.


Obama has been president 5 going on 6 years and his supporters still find use of blaming Bush. Obama is responsible for EVERYTHING he does, he has doubled down on every Bush policy, there is no real difference between them, yet "b-b-b-but BUSHHHHHHHHHHHHHH" is still the main defense people use in defending him as if that somehow resolves him of blame. You are stuck in this fake duopoly of American politics, they're two sides of the same coin. Who cares who started what? It didn't start with Bush either, it has been going on much long, he is just the one that acted most offensively up until that point, all of which has seemed to be normalized now. Hitler wasn't the first one to start hating Jews in Germany.


ScrewyWabbit wasn't trying to justify Obama's policies, but was simply pointing out how the people who complain the loudest about those policies didn't complain when it was Bush doing it. For them, it's the complexion of things.


It goes in the reverse as well, I think an even starker contrast is how so called liberals seemingly forgot their anti-war/pro-civil liberties/pro-rule of law positions which propelled them into power the second their man took office. Partisan politics is a joke that way and most people are seemingly stupid, there are many people that have consistently stood up for these principles only to be droned out by some lying partisan Johnny-come-lately who inevitably sells them out. The videos I posted of Bush and Cheney on this thread are perfect examples, Obama is no different from them.


When I said it was the complexion of the thing, I was implying that Obama's critics who so easily dismissed Bush do so because of the President's race and color. But I agree, we liberals should be less tolerant of Obama's abuses of civil liberties and such - - but hardly to the point of advocating secession.


Obama's supporters dismiss almost all criticism as racism. Likewise, most will seamlessly transition into quashing dissent against Hilary by labeling it misogynist. It is basically racial McCarthyism. Do you really believe he would be judged any less harshly if he were white?

As for secession there is nobody seriously talking about it, what we have today is no different that what we had during the Bush administration. What do you think the Jesusland/United States of Canada maps were advocating?



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,783
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

30 Sep 2014, 8:51 pm

^^^

As a matter of fact, I do believe he'd be judged much differently if Obama was white. There certainly wouldn't be any paranoid conspiracy theories about the place of his birth or religion if he was white. And while it's untrue that everyone who dislikes Obama is a racist, it's also equally untrue that none of his critics are motivated by racism.
And the Jesusland maps were only pointing out the political divide that has been drawn largely along geographical lines.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,461
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

30 Sep 2014, 9:32 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
AntDog wrote:
That's a 2% increase from similar polls in 2012. The South, breadbasket, and mountains are getting increasingly tired of Washington's ever increasing grab of powers that should be left to the states.


What like providing healthcare to those citizens too poor or disabled to get coverage, or for defending the rights of ethnic or sexual minorities? Yeah, that evil, intrusive federal government looking out for people who those red states won't look out for! :P


how about enslaving us into debt, spying its own citizens, prosecuting whistle blowers, and waging illegal war?


As a big part of that list had happened under Bush's administration, the Obama haters wanting to secede usually don't complain about that - or imagine it was all Obama's doing.
Besides, that list of government offenses don't include disrespecting states rights, which is supposed to justify secession..


Obama has double down on all those, you can't blame Bush. He's is an awful president.


But none of that is the reason why certain people want to secede. It has to do with the "evils of socialism" - that is, caring for people who can't care for themselves, just because Limbaugh and Fox tell them caring for the needy is bad. And it's about gay rights - people have to tolerate those horrible sinners having civil rights. And it's about the feds fighting against disenfranchisement of African American voters. And most of all, it's about the President being black - though most of them won't admit that publicly.


oh glad you can speak for all of them


So far, those are the only ones with those opinions who want to secede. Real Americans would rather stay with their country and try to make it better.


How do we make it better though? :scratch: I mean people can vote all they want but it doesn't seem to be changing the course of things or creating any real improvements in the way things are. Either way I don't hold much of those views you mention but I really dislike the federal government so I would not be opposed to the idea of not being a part of that anymore, though my state government isn't the greatest either....


_________________
We won't go back.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,783
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

30 Sep 2014, 10:25 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
AntDog wrote:
That's a 2% increase from similar polls in 2012. The South, breadbasket, and mountains are getting increasingly tired of Washington's ever increasing grab of powers that should be left to the states.


What like providing healthcare to those citizens too poor or disabled to get coverage, or for defending the rights of ethnic or sexual minorities? Yeah, that evil, intrusive federal government looking out for people who those red states won't look out for! :P


how about enslaving us into debt, spying its own citizens, prosecuting whistle blowers, and waging illegal war?


As a big part of that list had happened under Bush's administration, the Obama haters wanting to secede usually don't complain about that - or imagine it was all Obama's doing.
Besides, that list of government offenses don't include disrespecting states rights, which is supposed to justify secession..


Obama has double down on all those, you can't blame Bush. He's is an awful president.


But none of that is the reason why certain people want to secede. It has to do with the "evils of socialism" - that is, caring for people who can't care for themselves, just because Limbaugh and Fox tell them caring for the needy is bad. And it's about gay rights - people have to tolerate those horrible sinners having civil rights. And it's about the feds fighting against disenfranchisement of African American voters. And most of all, it's about the President being black - though most of them won't admit that publicly.


oh glad you can speak for all of them


So far, those are the only ones with those opinions who want to secede. Real Americans would rather stay with their country and try to make it better.


How do we make it better though? :scratch: I mean people can vote all they want but it doesn't seem to be changing the course of things or creating any real improvements in the way things are. Either way I don't hold much of those views you mention but I really dislike the federal government so I would not be opposed to the idea of not being a part of that anymore, though my state government isn't the greatest either....


I'd think change might occur through political activism with enough like minded people - it certainly worked for the civil rights movement, which was composed mostly of people who were treated as second class citizens in all walks of life.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Last edited by Kraichgauer on 30 Sep 2014, 10:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

30 Sep 2014, 10:26 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
^^^

As a matter of fact, I do believe he'd be judged much differently if Obama was white. There certainly wouldn't be any paranoid conspiracy theories about the place of his birth or religion if he was white. And while it's untrue that everyone who dislikes Obama is a racist, it's also equally untrue that none of his critics are motivated by racism.
And the Jesusland maps were only pointing out the political divide that has been drawn largely along geographical lines.



Nonsense, if Obama were actually African-American of slave descent then there wouldn't be questions about his birthplace or religion. Obviously this comes from the fact that Barack Obama's father is Kenyan, he has a Muslim name, and he spent much of his youth growing up in a Muslim country. The primary factor here isn't the color of his skin obviously. I imagine if Ted Cruz runs for president there will be plenty of question about his eligibility to be president, I don't think it will motivated by racial animus towards Canadian born Cubans. The real motivating factor here is partisanship if anything.

One classic technique of squashing dissent is by questioning the patriotism of your opponent and we saw that a lot under Bush and you employ it now in defense of Obama. It really is no different. FWIW, The Jesusland stuff and the whole threatening to move to Canada were much bigger memes than any talk of secession now under Obama. Principally I've explain why I find secession to be legal and moral, I think it is something that should be apart of the political process and one of the final checks and balances in our system. Secession is American as apple pie, that's how our country was born. Tyrants don't want secession, they want domination. This country and the world would be probably be better off with a decentralized more democratic America. Our states are as big or bigger than many fully independent countries, they all have their say so why not Texas or Vermont if the majority of their people want that right?



Last edited by Jacoby on 30 Sep 2014, 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,577
Location: Seattle-ish

30 Sep 2014, 10:31 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
^^^

As a matter of fact, I do believe he'd be judged much differently if Obama was white. There certainly wouldn't be any paranoid conspiracy theories about the place of his birth or religion if he was white. And while it's untrue that everyone who dislikes Obama is a racist, it's also equally untrue that none of his critics are motivated by racism.
And the Jesusland maps were only pointing out the political divide that has been drawn largely along geographical lines.


The attacks would be different, but they'd still be there. Bush was mercilessly mocked and attacked his entire time in office, and had he been a minority as well, I'm sure that would have found its way into the attacks. Do you remember Bill Clinton having Vince Foster killed, or all the drug running he did out of the Little Rock airport, or that time he launched a bunch of cruise missiles to distract from a sex scandal? (ok, that last one might have actually happened...) Do you think the people behind those attacks, on either Bush or Clinton, would have passed up an opportunity to disqualify either man from office right from the start if they'd had a foreign name and international parentage? Out of what, decency?

Just as you can't prove that Obama would have been treated better if he was white, I can't prove that Bush or Clinton would have been treated worse had they been black, the difference is that I don't try and smear people I disagree with the way you constantly smear everyone who opposes Obama as racists, only walking it back a little to 'mostly racists' when repeatedly called on it. All you have is "Bush did it too!" and "racism!", it's really pathetic at this point, and I doubt I'm the only one sick of it.


_________________
“The totally convinced and the totally stupid have too much in common for the resemblance to be accidental.”
-- Robert Anton Wilson


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,783
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

30 Sep 2014, 10:45 pm

Jacoby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
^^^

As a matter of fact, I do believe he'd be judged much differently if Obama was white. There certainly wouldn't be any paranoid conspiracy theories about the place of his birth or religion if he was white. And while it's untrue that everyone who dislikes Obama is a racist, it's also equally untrue that none of his critics are motivated by racism.
And the Jesusland maps were only pointing out the political divide that has been drawn largely along geographical lines.



Nonsense, if Obama were actually African-American of slave descent then there wouldn't be questions about his birthplace or religion. Obviously this comes from the fact that Barack Obama's father is Kenyan, he has a Muslim name, and he spent much of his youth growing up in a Muslim country. The primary factor here isn't the color of his skin obviously. I imagine if Ted Cruz runs for president there will be plenty of question about his eligibility to be president, I don't think it will motivated by racial animus towards Canadian born Cubans. The real motivating factor here is partisanship if anything.

One classic technique of squashing dissent is by questioning the patriotism of your opponent and we saw that a lot under Bush and you employ it now in defense of Obama. It really is no different. FWIW, The Jesusland stuff and the whole threatening to move to Canada were much bigger memes than any talk of secession now under Obama. Principally I've explain why I find secession to be legal and moral, I think it is something that should be apart of the political process and one of the final checks and balances in our system. Secession is American as apple pie, that's how our country was born. Tyrants don't want secession, they want domination.


Sure, he was born of a Kenyan father and has a Muslim sounding name - and he's black. It's those first two things that feed ammunition to racists.
As for questioning the patriotism of your opponents - when they want to split off from the country for trivial reasons, such as the President's race, or how tax money is spent (such as for caring for the needy) - you damn betcha I call their loyalty into question. None of the reasons why people advocating secession today fills the bill of real tyranny, while many given reasons are actually anti-freedom, such as opposition to LGBT rights, while still others, such as belief that Republican evangelicals are going to be rounded up into FEMMA camps and gassed, are not even based in reality.
As for secession being as American as Apple pie - America rebelled against British taxation because the colonists had had no voice in being taxed. That, and while the founders often referred to themselves as British, the truth was British rule was so lax for such a long time that the taxation might as well have been coming from a foreign country. The only other secessionist revolt had arisen in defense of slavery - hardly the stuff of American liberty.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer