Okay let's say they discover a Super Earth Planet.

Page 1 of 3 [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

26 Sep 2014, 2:07 am

Only it's 600 light years away.


So?



TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

26 Sep 2014, 3:02 am

We'll club together to make a rocket to send you there. :P


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,143
Location: temperate zone

26 Sep 2014, 8:09 am

We would then know where THEY are coming from!

We could warn 'em that "we now know where you live!

So stop mutliating our cattle!".



Last edited by naturalplastic on 26 Sep 2014, 8:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

drh1138
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 2 Dec 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 498

26 Sep 2014, 8:12 am

TallyMan wrote:
We'll club together to make a rocket to send you there. :P


We'll leave the LHC on, to keep that hole in the Van Allen Belt punched open.



Venger
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,519

26 Sep 2014, 8:20 am

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Only it's 600 light years away.


So?


So then NASA needs to hurry up and invent this thing.

http://earthweareone.com/nasa-admits-al ... -of-light/



mezzanotte
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Apr 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,506
Location: Washington, D.C.

26 Sep 2014, 11:37 am

We should simply be taking care of our Earth so that we don't have to travel for a very long time.



andrethemoogle
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,254
Location: Sol System

26 Sep 2014, 12:15 pm

mezzanotte wrote:
We should simply be taking care of our Earth so that we don't have to travel for a very long time.


I would say it's too late for that.

Space travel should be the focus nowadays.



ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

26 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm

TallyMan wrote:
We'll club together to make a rocket to send you there. :P


Sure ya will :lol:



ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

26 Sep 2014, 12:54 pm

mezzanotte wrote:
We should simply be taking care of our Earth so that we don't have to travel for a very long time.


We are humans and I believe it is part of genetic heritage to explore everywhere. We are a weed species, not that I am judging them. The weed species seem to be the hardiest and most successful which is good from a Darwinian pov.



Persevero
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 245

26 Sep 2014, 3:59 pm

Well according to time dilation, if we were to travel at 90% of the speed of light, it would take us 267 in-spaceship years to get there. If humanity could produce an engine that ran that long and that fast, it's not to difficult to assume the spaceship could also harbor an ecosystem for two or three additional generations of passengers

Source: ftp://www.fourmilab.ch/pub/cship/timedial.html

Of course FTL travel would be even better :P



mezzanotte
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Apr 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,506
Location: Washington, D.C.

26 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm

It would be far easier to develop technology that improves habitation on Earth than to develop technology to travel 600 light years.

But space travel is a lot more entertaining to discuss, I'll give you that much.



ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

26 Sep 2014, 5:49 pm

mezzanotte wrote:
It would be far easier to develop technology that improves habitation on Earth than to develop technology to travel 600 light years.

But space travel is a lot more entertaining to discuss, I'll give you that much.


Well...my proposal for that is purely genetic.



The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,811
Location: London

26 Sep 2014, 6:41 pm

Persevero wrote:
Well according to time dilation, if we were to travel at 90% of the speed of light, it would take us 267 in-spaceship years to get there. If humanity could produce an engine that ran that long and that fast, it's not to difficult to assume the spaceship could also harbor an ecosystem for two or three additional generations of passengers

Source: ftp://www.fourmilab.ch/pub/cship/timedial.html

Of course FTL travel would be even better :P

An optimistic generation time is 40 years; a more realistic one is 35 years. It will take seven or eight generations rather than two or three.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,143
Location: temperate zone

26 Sep 2014, 6:58 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
Persevero wrote:
Well according to time dilation, if we were to travel at 90% of the speed of light, it would take us 267 in-spaceship years to get there. If humanity could produce an engine that ran that long and that fast, it's not to difficult to assume the spaceship could also harbor an ecosystem for two or three additional generations of passengers

Source: ftp://www.fourmilab.ch/pub/cship/timedial.html

Of course FTL travel would be even better :P

An optimistic generation time is 40 years; a more realistic one is 35 years. It will take seven or eight generations rather than two or three.


Even book authors (like Jared Diamond, no less) make that same annoying mistake: using the word "generation"(the timespan between your birth, and the birth of your children) to mean "lifetime" (the timespan from your birth to your death). Like they get a sudden illiteracy attack.

It would take about three lifetimes to do that trip.

But if your astronauts are like Loretta Lynn (mother at 14, grandma at twenty eight) or the residents of the Cabrinni Green Projects (the average age of GRAND mothers also twenty eight) then you would have atleast 19 "generations".

Lol!



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

26 Sep 2014, 8:07 pm

Quote:
Only it's 600 light years away.

Currently the USA does not even have the capability to put anyone in low earth orbit..


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,014
Location: New Orleans

26 Sep 2014, 8:25 pm

Humans are not good at getting into space. Few have spent a half year there. There were problems. We fall apart.

Humans are also not good at building things that can run for hundreds of years.

It takes a long time to get to Mars, because going faster takes more energy, then even more to stop.

Soon the mass increases much faster than the increase in speed can.

We will stay here, now pick up your litter.