Discussion | Articles | Blogs | Books | Contact Us | Chat | Shop |
  WrongPlanet.net
User Stats

   Members: 31,131
   Online Now: 632



People Online:
Visitors: 488
Members: 144
New Today: 18
New Yesterday: 20
Latest: twelve_oclock

  Aspie Affection
Support Wrong Planet Awareness!
Question about the Riemann zeta function

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> Computers, Math, Science, and Technology
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Sovemp
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse


Joined: Jan 16, 2008
Age: 29
Posts: 27

PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 12:21 pm    Post subject: Question about the Riemann zeta function Reply with quote

Hello all. So I'm basing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_zeta_function for most of my understanding of this.

The Wikipedia article states that the Riemann Zeta function Z(s) is a function of a complex variable s initially defined by the infinite series:

for values of s with real part greater than 1.

So, in a listing of common values, for example it says Z(1) = 1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + ..., the harmonic series. Fine, cool, pretty straightforward.

However, it says that Z(0) = -1/2. Now, how is this? Obviously this doesn't seem to work for the initial equation I posed above, as by that Z(0) would be 1 + 1 + 1 + ... I'm assuming that Z(0) is defined differently since it states the initial equation is valid for only s > 1 in the real numbers. So, can anyone explain to me how this function is calculated for z = 0?

Thanks.
_________________
"Too few utilize the greatest freedom they have, the freedom of thought. Perhaps they demand freedom of speech as compensation."
-Soren Kirkegard
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
lau
Really nice person to know. :)
Administrator


Joined: Jun 18, 2006
Age: 60
Posts: 9482
Location: Somerset UK

PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 1:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think you just stopped reading the Wikipedia article too early...
...and then analytically continued to all complex s ≠ 1.

See this bit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_zeta_function#Hadamard_product

Other than the infinite pole at s=1, it is a well behaved function.
_________________
"Striking up conversations with strangers is an autistic person's version of extreme sports." Kamran Nazeer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
wolphin
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Aug 16, 2007
Posts: 502

PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 11:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are a couple alternative ways to do it.

The "modern" way to do it is to consider the infinite series as giving the values of the zeta function on a subset of the complex plane - namely the part of the complex plane with real part greater than 1. In this domain, the infinite series defines a so-called "analytic function" - meaning it can be expanded in a taylor series around any point s with Re(s) > 1.

Now, it's a property of analytic functions that you can perform a trick called analytic continuation - you can take those taylor series (whose radius of convergence will always be the distance to the nearest singularity) and expand those series around points far away from the singularity at s = 1. The region of convergence of these series, crucially, will include points with real part less than or equal to 1, which now defines values on those regions - such values are called a direct analytic continuation of the original function. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_continuation)

With the function defined by the zeta series, you can use repeated applications of direct analytic continuation to so-called "analytically continue" to the rest of the complex plane (that is, to find taylor series at every point), except for at s=1. It is this "analytic continuation" that most people refer to as the "riemann zeta function".

There are other methods to get it, such as riemann's original method (which unfortunately I'm not that familiar with) as well as non-cauchy summation methods, which are alternative ways to define sums of infinite series (i.e. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramanujan_summation)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sovemp
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse


Joined: Jan 16, 2008
Age: 29
Posts: 27

PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the replies. That makes a lot more sense now.
_________________
"Too few utilize the greatest freedom they have, the freedom of thought. Perhaps they demand freedom of speech as compensation."
-Soren Kirkegard
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> Computers, Math, Science, and Technology All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Wrong PlanetTM Copyright 2004-2009, Alex Plank and Yellow Sneaker Media, LLC
Alex Plank  Aspie Affection 

Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet

RSS Feed Add to Google Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe: Wrong Planet News  Wrong Planet Forums

Privacy Policy

Asperger's is not a disease

fine art