Discussion | Articles | Blogs | Books | Contact Us | Chat | Shop | Search
  WrongPlanet.net
User Stats
   Members: 22,680
   Online Now: 250



People Online:
Visitors: 162
Members: 88
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 21
Latest: mortsttam

Search
Google
Web WP.net



  Aspie Affection
Support Wrong Planet Awareness!
What are some specific characteristics of girls/women with
1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next  
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> General Autism Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
EarthAngel19
Emu Egg
Emu Egg


Joined: Sep 19, 2008
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 6:40 pm    Post subject: What are some specific characteristics of girls/women with Reply with quote

Asperger's that guys don't have or don't exhibit much? I know there isn't much supported evidence out there but thoughts and opinions on the matter would be nice too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tim_Tex
WP's Resident Simpsons and South Park Aficionado


Joined: Jul 03, 2004
Age: 28
Posts: 22319
Location: San Marcos, Texas

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 6:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I always thought it would be the same.
_________________
When you need something, that's a responsibility, that only an adult...of my maturity...Bunnies!!!

~Meatwad, Aqua Teen Hunger Force
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
pandd
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Posts: 509

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One article I have come across indicates girls are more likely to engage in apparently imaginative play (for instance incorporating themes like princesses, unicorns) according to the anecdotal experience of the author.

Other literature I have read indicates that females are more likely to be better 'social mimics' (ie they might laugh if others in a group laugh, or hang back and copy-alongside others when they do not understand long lists of instructions (for instance during classroom tasks).

Girls as a group are speculatively suggested as being more passive and less prone to 'acting out' when their problems do not receive attention. There is some suggestion that where a male might dig in and throw temper-tantrums and refuse to cooperate (thus forcing the point where their sensory/routine etc issues are concerned), girls might be more inclined to submit and 'grin and bear it', with resulting negativity turned inward rather than outward.

I've also read that some experts have speculated that females as a group have a higher propensity toward 'soft science' interests, for instance languages, literature, sociology, history/historic figures, individual persons, than do males as a group.

Over-all, there is some anecdotal evidence, and opinions inferred by 'experts' on the basis of their experience, but ultimately not a lot is actually known from comprehensive or robust study/research. It's an area that needs urgent investigation in my view.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
release_the_bats
Velociraptor
Velociraptor


Joined: Jul 14, 2008
Posts: 458
Location: deep in the woods

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 9:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The way I've heard it explained is that girls are often "little philosophers" while boys are "little professors", but I don't know if I agree with that.

Anyway, apparently, there is not much (if any?) research on the subject.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SeaBright
Chargé d'affaires Attaché


Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Posts: 1398
Location: Halfway back

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 9:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

outraegous beauty and maddening charisma.
_________________
"I'm sorry Katya, my dear, but where we come from, your what's known as a pet; a not quite human novelty. It's why we brought you.... It's nothing to be ashamed of, my dear, but here you are and here you'll sit."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sgrannel
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Feb 21, 2008
Posts: 550
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The ability to find spouses anyway, if they want to, because of market conditions that make this easier for women in general.
_________________
You should get to know me better. No one's ever what they seem.-- Shirley Manson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jun 19, 2008
Posts: 1762
Location: US, midmap

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pandd wrote:
One article I have come across indicates girls are more likely to engage in apparently imaginative play (for instance incorporating themes like princesses, unicorns) according to the anecdotal experience of the author.


WOW I cannot believe that. When I was little I was completely obsessed with princesses, horses, unicorns, Pegasus. Never knew why exactly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jun 19, 2008
Posts: 1762
Location: US, midmap

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="pandd"]
Quote:
I've also read that some experts have speculated that females as a group have a higher propensity toward 'soft science' interests, for instance languages, literature, sociology, history/historic figures, individual persons, than do males as a group.


That's true too. My favorite subject in high school was Psychology, next, English/Lit.
In college I excelled at English/Lit and Art.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jun 19, 2008
Posts: 1762
Location: US, midmap

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="pandd"]
Quote:
I've also read that some experts have speculated that females as a group have a higher propensity toward 'soft science' interests, for instance languages, literature, sociology, history/historic figures, individual persons, than do males as a group.


That's true too. My favorite subject in high school was Psychology, next, English/Lit.
In college I excelled at English/Lit and Art.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lionesss
The Queen of not your typical kind of jungle


Joined: Aug 22, 2008
Age: 33
Posts: 1013
Location: not anywhere near you

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo"]
pandd wrote:

Quote:
I've also read that some experts have speculated that females as a group have a higher propensity toward 'soft science' interests, for instance languages, literature, sociology, history/historic figures, individual persons, than do males as a group.


That's true too. My favorite subject in high school was Psychology, next, English/Lit.
In college I excelled at English/Lit and Art.


Psychology was definitely very interesting to me. Also social studies and geography but English was not one of my favorite subjects. But I have to say I was a good creative writer.
_________________
I was told that I have PDD-NOS and ADHD- in other words, mild AS with a history of speech delay. I personally think its best to say that I am just plain under the spectrum!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
wrongshoes
Blue Jay
Blue Jay


Joined: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 82

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I can fake normal pretty well. It is excruciating and exhausting, but I know how to do it.

Also, I always had lots of friendships. They all happened to be with guys, I think because they were "interested" in me (my unfriendliness didn't seem to matter). I can imagine that not happening for guys with AS.

I got a computer science degree because I could, but if I had it all to do over again I'd focus on psychology and/or neuroscience. Computer science is super boring to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
LostInSpace
Queen of the Gargoyles


Joined: Apr 17, 2007
Age: 24
Posts: 2127
Location: New York

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
pandd wrote:
One article I have come across indicates girls are more likely to engage in apparently imaginative play (for instance incorporating themes like princesses, unicorns) according to the anecdotal experience of the author.


WOW I cannot believe that. When I was little I was completely obsessed with princesses, horses, unicorns, Pegasus. Never knew why exactly.


Aren't all little girls? When I was 3, all I wanted to do was watch "Sleeping Beauty" and build castles out of Legos. I think those are pretty common interests. Princesses are a stereotypical interest for younger girls, and horses are stereotypical interests for girls a bit older (like elementary and middle school). I was never into horses, but it seemed like everyone else was.

Of course, although my obsession with "Aladdin" at ages 8-9 may have been normal, the form it took was not necessarily very typical. I would spend hours pouring over samples of Arabic (from books, from the Saudi Arabian flag), convinced that if I worked at it hard enough, I would be able to decipher the "code" and learn to speak Arabic.
_________________
"We are all more human than anything else."
-Harry Stack Sullivan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
poopylungstuffing
"Ultimate Creative Oddball"


Joined: Mar 09, 2007
Age: 33
Posts: 4234
Location: not otherwise specified

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Our "Super Male Brains" (minor hint of sarcasm here)make it easier for us to relate to men and that makes it easier for us to have relationships with men if that is our inclination.....perhaps.....

When I was little I was obsessed with male Disney characters and I "WAS" those characters. I would appear in character as them in public, and if asked what my name was I would respnd that I was Pinnochio or Mowgli...or whoever i was obsessed with being at the time. I was not into girly stuff till i was a bit older.
_________________
Winged Gnome Goddess prevent me from killing this thread
http://www.myspace.com/wingedgnomegoddess

http://www.youtube.com/poopylungstuffing

"If the fool would persist in his folly, he would become wise" -William Blake
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Nan
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Mar 02, 2006
Posts: 3158
Location: left coast

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LostInSpace wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
pandd wrote:
One article I have come across indicates girls are more likely to engage in apparently imaginative play (for instance incorporating themes like princesses, unicorns) according to the anecdotal experience of the author.


WOW I cannot believe that. When I was little I was completely obsessed with princesses, horses, unicorns, Pegasus. Never knew why exactly.


Aren't all little girls? When I was 3, all I wanted to do was watch "Sleeping Beauty" and build castles out of Legos. I think those are pretty common interests. Princesses are a stereotypical interest for younger girls, and horses are stereotypical interests for girls a bit older (like elementary and middle school). I was never into horses, but it seemed like everyone else was.

Of course, although my obsession with "Aladdin" at ages 8-9 may have been normal, the form it took was not necessarily very typical. I would spend hours pouring over samples of Arabic (from books, from the Saudi Arabian flag), convinced that if I worked at it hard enough, I would be able to decipher the "code" and learn to speak Arabic.


Uh, no. Laughing I wanted to be an astronaut and had no use whatsoever for those wimpy princess typed. Wink At kindergarten I wanted to play baseball, like the boys were doing. But the girls had to play jump rope because girls did not play baseball. I refused to jump rope and just went over and sat under a tree and decided I was a pirate.

I wanted a pony, though.
_________________
Novinson's Revolutionary Discovery: When comes the revolution, things will be different - not better, just different.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Danielismyname
Troglodyte descended


Joined: Apr 03, 2007
Posts: 5926

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I haven't seen anything written in literature that's specific, other than that females with Asperger's can lack the all-encompassing cerebral obsession, and that females with Autism tend to have a greater prevalence of severe mental retardation than males.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> General Autism Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next  
Page 1 of 5

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Wrong PlanetTM Copyright 2004-2008, Alex Plank and Yellow Sneaker Media, LLC
Alex Plank  Aspie Affection 

Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet

RSS Feed Add to Google Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe: Wrong Planet News  Wrong Planet Forums

Privacy Policy

Asperger's is not a disease

fine art