Discussion | Articles | Blogs | Books | Contact Us | Chat | Shop | Search
  WrongPlanet.net
User Stats
   Members: 22,681
   Online Now: 236



People Online:
Visitors: 155
Members: 81
New Today: 1
New Yesterday: 21
Latest: LibertyChan

Search
Google
Web WP.net



  Aspie Affection
Support Wrong Planet Awareness!
dissturbing
1, 2  Next  
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> News and Current Events
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
matsuiny2004
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Mar 23, 2008
Posts: 1443

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 12:27 am    Post subject: dissturbing Reply with quote

http://www.wwltv.com/topstories/stories/wwl092408cblabruzzo.a931c79f.html
_________________
A person that does not think he has problems already has one-Me
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DocStrange
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jan 13, 2008
Age: 18
Posts: 862
Location: rhode island

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 12:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You know, this sounds slightly familiar (minus the whole baby eating part).
_________________
"We can't stop here, this is bat country." - Hunter S. Thompson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
twoshots
Honorary Vertebrate


Joined: Nov 27, 2007
Posts: 2115
Location: NJ

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 12:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What's so disturbing about it?
_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dantac
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jan 22, 2008
Age: 30
Posts: 535
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The author of that article should be fired.


'Sterilized' and 'have her tubes tied' is not the same thing. The 1st is irreversible, the 2nd is 100% reversible and is very safe.


In fact, all it is, is a very effective method of birth control. The result of this would be that all the women that VOLUNTARILY do this, will not be popping out unwanted kids they cannot support.


On the other hand, $1000 does not cover the cost of the surgery to un-do the procedure. So most likely these women of low income may not be able to pay for the reversal. But then again, that's where laywers come in handy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Berk
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker


Joined: Sep 17, 2008
Posts: 52
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 4:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good idea IMO. I wish these 'civil rights' people would feck off as well, they don't say anything about the rights of the unwanted/unloved kids that are brought into this disgusting overpopulated dump of a planet, no, all they care about is that people have the right to bear children. I guess they did'nt see the VOLUNTARY part. This is what is so wrong with the world in general, far too many thoughtless, selfish people who only care about themselves and their rights with no concern about the impact of their actions on the planet and those around them - no sense of collective responsibility - and plenty PC, violin playing liberals to defend their precious rights. Where are these idiots when people's basic human rights are really infringed?

Another thing that pisses me off is IVF treatment, what a pointless waste of money and science when there are millions of kids who are unwanted/parentless in the world. Who cares as long as these selfish vain people get to burden their own little bundle of misery upon the world. Evil or Very Mad
_________________
The media is the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power, because they control the minds of the masses - Malcom X
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jenk
Deinonychus
Deinonychus


Joined: Jul 02, 2008
Posts: 325

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ShadesOfMe
Kivatesavam The Pink Bunnay!


Joined: Jul 01, 2004
Age: 17
Posts: 16103
Location: California....or the cuteness place with One-winged-angel

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 6:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dantac wrote:
The author of that article should be fired.


'Sterilized' and 'have her tubes tied' is not the same thing. The 1st is irreversible, the 2nd is 100% reversible and is very safe.


In fact, all it is, is a very effective method of birth control. The result of this would be that all the women that VOLUNTARILY do this, will not be popping out unwanted kids they cannot support.


On the other hand, $1000 does not cover the cost of the surgery to un-do the procedure. So most likely these women of low income may not be able to pay for the reversal. But then again, that's where laywers come in handy.


Yes, the switch in terms really confused me. I didn't find anything disturbing about it though. These women would not be forced, it would be voluntary.
_________________
My Bunny will *eet* your bunny for brekfist!

Wolfs are for loving.

One winged Angel is my boyfriend. Heart

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Berk
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker


Joined: Sep 17, 2008
Posts: 52
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well Jenk, that's great that they are good parents but would they not have been the same with an adopted child? I just don't get this 'need' to have a child only if it is created from your own dna, like that matters. The key considerations should be - am I committed, able and fit to love and care for a child for the rest of my life? If the answer is yes then what importance does the source of the kid's genes really hold? Why go through a costly treatment for a mini-me when you could put that money and effort towards easing the suffering of a child that already exists? Maybe I was harsh calling it vanity but that is the way I see it, this obsession to have perfect little babies in our own image above all else. It has gone way over the top IMO. You just have to look at what this quest for perfection has done to the kids growing up in modern society. A similar example of a total lack of common sense these days are the increasing amount of couples who believe that having a baby will 'save' their relationship - if your relationship needs saving then ffs don't bring a child into it! This is why humainty is going down the pan, nobody thinks about the consequences of their selfish desires. This is why I HATE city living and modern societal trends. At least society used to be about community and commitment to each other, now it's just all about self fulfilment (the american dream?), the bottom line is if the individual is getting all they want, then screw the consequences. That is one of the key reasons the world is in such a mess and we are going to end up living on a giant wasteland in the near future.

There are some comments on the article about Eugenics, well what is described in the article would be a form of Eugenics (offering women without means to support a child an incentive to have their 'tubes tied') well is'nt IVF also a form of Eugenics? The insistance of an infertile person/couple (to pay) to have a child with their genes through a laboratory when there is the option of adoption is just another form of selection via human intervention. Next people will want to pick and choose the best of themselves to pass onto their kids and so on. A desire to cut down on children being born into shitty lives lived out in poverty to parents who probably don't give a damn about them or can't provide for them is just simple common sense imo. One is considered a human right the other is considered an infringement of human rights. Rolling Eyes

FWIW the only viable alternatives to eugenics I can see are 1) abstinence 2) turn catholic Laughing
_________________
The media is the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power, because they control the minds of the masses - Malcom X
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pezar
Sea Gull
Sea Gull


Joined: Apr 06, 2008
Age: 33
Posts: 237

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My parents are greatly opposed to me being snipped. I try to explain to them that I couldn't raise a kid, and I wouldn't want to bring a kid into this world, but all they can think of is that they'd never have grandchildren to love. Well, tough sh*t. My mom wanted a baby because "babies are so cute", well she sure got more than she bargained for, and she forgot that cute babies grow up. Now she wants me to have a grandchild. Sorry, but no.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mage
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Oct 11, 2006
Posts: 839

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 2:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hell, I'd PAY to get my uterus taken out, that thing has given me nothing but pain and will continue to do so until menopause. Seems doctors don't like to do elective surgery to remove useless organs though...

Hypothetically I could just get my tubes tied instead, I wouldn't mind, but that wouldn't do anything to cure cramps or menstrual migraines.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Anemone
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Mar 18, 2008
Age: 43
Posts: 790
Location: Vancouver, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 2:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That article is poor-bashing, pure and simple. A country as wealthy as the US shouldn't have any poverty. The poverty it does have is created by bad legislation (e.g. low minimum wage, policies that encourage layoffs and discourage full employment) and bad attitudes towards the less powerful, not by there not being enough to go around. There is enough to go around.

Of course all women should have access to safe, effective birth control, regardless of whether they can afford it or not. Duh. But that's not the same as what this article is about. It's about denying people economic opportunity and then punishing them and their genes for it.

Personally I don't have a problem with IVF. Those women are caught in a Catch-22. They're encouraged to wait to have children (which is a good thing) but if they wait too long, they can't have them. And genes do matter. I wouldn't adopt a baby. If I were going to adopt, I'd probably take in a teenager I knew rather than adopt someone else's genes to raise. Then I'd know what I was getting. (But being in foster care or an orphanage can be really bad for development, so adoptions have to go through asap once a kid is up for adoption - I'm not advocating leaving babies in the lurch.) It's a personal choice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
silentbob15
Toucan
Toucan


Joined: Mar 16, 2008
Age: 33
Posts: 273
Location: Bowness, Alberta

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eugenics on the poor, well they are homeless why not. This is just another slap in the face to the people of Louisiana, it won't end till New Orleans is turned into a Disney themed city, filled with white faces and bulging wallets. Mad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AngryReptileKeeper
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse


Joined: Oct 10, 2008
Age: 25
Posts: 44
Location: St. Louis, MO

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sign me up! I've been begging to get fixed since my mid teens, and all I get is, "oh, you'll change your mind." Evil or Very Mad Damn doctors.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dbzgirl
Deinonychus
Deinonychus


Joined: Jul 23, 2006
Posts: 334

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shocked That is very disturbing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Eggman
das Freak'n Techno Viking!


Joined: Jul 18, 2008
Posts: 1866

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 4:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok, as soon as those parts start working, make everyone get their varius tubes tied, and then if you want a child you have to pass a test
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> News and Current Events All times are GMT - 5 Hours
1, 2  Next  
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Wrong PlanetTM Copyright 2004-2008, Alex Plank and Yellow Sneaker Media, LLC
Alex Plank  Aspie Affection 

Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet

RSS Feed Add to Google Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe: Wrong Planet News  Wrong Planet Forums

Privacy Policy

Asperger's is not a disease

fine art