Discussion | Articles | Blogs | Books | Contact Us | Chat | Shop |
  WrongPlanet.net
User Stats

   Members: 31,077
   Online Now: 378



People Online:
Visitors: 314
Members: 64
New Today: 3
New Yesterday: 16
Latest: dorthyh5

  Aspie Affection
Support Wrong Planet Awareness!
String Theory
1, 2  Next  
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> General Autism Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bland
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jan 03, 2006
Posts: 1430
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:50 pm    Post subject: String Theory Reply with quote

I don't know if this is the right place to ask this question and I've never seen anyone ask this kind of question before, but:

Could someone who is better informed than I please explain what String Theory is? Then the rest of us can ask questions or add information and have a little scientific discussion here. I am curious and clueless. (Please, no smart a** remarks about violins or spaghetti, etc.)
_________________
"Honey, would you buy me some boobles for my 40th b-day?" "No way, they're too expensive. Your own baubles will have to do."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Serissa
Ex-Moderator
FEED ME A STRAY CAT


Joined: Jul 11, 2005
Posts: 4570
Location: A DEN OF INIQUITY!!!

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

It's way over MY head.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bland
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jan 03, 2006
Posts: 1430
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 1:40 pm    Post subject: String Theory Reply with quote

Thanks for the link, Serissa. It's over my head, too. That is why I was hoping someone who understands it well could explain it in terms that could at least bring it into my grasp.
_________________
"Honey, would you buy me some boobles for my 40th b-day?" "No way, they're too expensive. Your own baubles will have to do."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Emettman
Microferroequinologist
Phoenix


Joined: Dec 19, 2005
Posts: 1027
Location: Cornwall, UK

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Understand it well? No, but I might just be able to see where it's coming from. What follows is a very broad brush depiction.

The basic continuing thread (no pun intended) is finding phenomena, scientific events, that the existing view of physical substance cannot account for.

In trying to understand the nature of the world, we might start with the idea of the four elements "Earth, air, fire, water" (centered around a fifth element? No, that was a film!)

The limitations here were soon apparent, but the idea that heat was a "substance" that flowed from one object to another (Phlogiston theory) lasted quite a long time.

Then came the first ideas of atoms: little hard balls of matter that could be combined in different ways. A model that is almost instinctive now, and still works at a basic level in chemistry.

The discovery that there was a structure inside an atom, a nucleus and electrons, was the next development. (Bouncing radiation off material showed it was *mostly* empty space) This led to the familiar "solar system" models, developing into electron shells which gave a better understanding of the periodic table of elements. A very good working model. But there were problems.
One, the ultraviolet catastrophe, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultraviolet_catastrophe) was a major factor in realising that the fine nature of the unverse was not divisible into finer and finer parts (the old idea that the atom was indivisible having long been abandoned) but came in definiote lumps, "quanta". This was first applied to electromagnetic energy, but was soon found to be useful elsewhere too, for example with wave-particle duality. Quantum theory became essential, down among the small stuff.

It didn't tidy everything, quite. In finding particles and forces making up the subatomic world, variant theories predicted different numbers of elements, "The quantum zoo", some of which had never been found, or did not behave as might be expected. The more particles that were uncovered, or predicted, the more there was a desire, and a hope, to find the fundamental particle behind fundamental particles. The one lego brick from which all bigger blocks could be made up, especially if the nature of this "brick" predicted and limited the variety of subatomic particles that can be seen.

It currently looks as though something which, mathematically, has the properties of a vibrating string may fulfill this concept. Down at this level there is only the maths, and the predictions.


Offered only subject to improvement by those knowing better.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Liorda
Blue Jay
Blue Jay


Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Posts: 88
Location: West Ga, USA

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 5:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote



Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
_________________
*42*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Emettman
Microferroequinologist
Phoenix


Joined: Dec 19, 2005
Posts: 1027
Location: Cornwall, UK

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 5:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

*42*

"What do you get if you multiply six by nine?"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Liorda
Blue Jay
Blue Jay


Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Posts: 88
Location: West Ga, USA

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 8:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ahhhhhh........ "Six by nine. Forty-two."
"That's it. That's all there is."



The Ultimate Question


The Ultimate Answer
_________________
*42*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
snowman
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse


Joined: Oct 07, 2005
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

it is 6 times 7, 6 times 9=54
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MindOfOrderedChaos
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Sep 27, 2005
Age: 22
Posts: 769
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 10:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

snowman wrote:
it is 6 times 7, 6 times 9=54


lol yep. I don't think he tryed to work it out before he posted it.


Anyway about the string Theory. The string theory is a confusing piece of work that I am not even sure if there are on the right track with. The String Theories (its a plural because there is actually 6 string theorys not just one) are a attempt to try and merge the theory of relitivity with the Quantium theory.

The Quantium theory deals with the universe at a very small scale and the theory of Relitivity deals with the univerese on a very large scale. The theory of relitivity says that Time and Space can be bent where as the Quantium theory requires time and space to be stable.

I didn't realise I had forgotten so much about this stuff. Sad
_________________
Unfortunately being human is a genetic disorder, and ultimately fatal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Emettman
Microferroequinologist
Phoenix


Joined: Dec 19, 2005
Posts: 1027
Location: Cornwall, UK

PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MindOfOrderedChaos wrote:
snowman wrote:
it is 6 times 7, 6 times 9=54


lol yep. I don't think he tryed to work it out before he posted it.


Sorry, as Liorda can confirm, the answer is "42", the question IS "What do you get if you multiply six by nine?" (The answer comes first, if that's any help)

"I always said there was something fundamentally wrong with the universe."


But you are right about the other. One theory, understanding, which reconciles quantum and relativity, is much sought, because it leaves a gaping hole in our understanding. It did not trouble previous generations of scientists, because they did not know it was there.
The same still holds for the vast majority of the public.
"If you are not shocked by quantum theory, you have not understood it."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Bland
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jan 03, 2006
Posts: 1430
Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:55 am    Post subject: String Theory Reply with quote

If time and space are bent, does that affect the calculations of distances between stars and galaxies and the time it takes to travel to them? Do scientists already take this into consideration?

How much would string theory affect long-established theories?

(I am very curious about science, but a real "science dummy") Someone should write a book, "Science for Dummies"!
_________________
"Honey, would you buy me some boobles for my 40th b-day?" "No way, they're too expensive. Your own baubles will have to do."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DrizzleMan
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 854

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bland wrote:
If time and space are bent, does that affect the calculations of distances between stars and galaxies and the time it takes to travel to them? Do scientists already take this into consideration?

Yeah, it does - it's called Special Relativity and it means you can't go faster than the speed of light, but you could still travel to planets lightyears away in a few months (to you) if you went fast enough because the distance to them would contract. But if you came back everyone else would've aged more than you. General Relativity is even twistier Wink

Technologies like GPS have to include relativistic effects to keep their clocks so accurate. So while you aren't going to use it to calculate the path of a bouncing ball (that isn't going near light speed), where it's needed, it's used.

Bland wrote:
How much would string theory affect long-established theories?
All I know about String Theory is that it sounds very cool and uses lots of dimensions. But since it extends existing theory, it shouldn't contradict previously tested parts.

Bland wrote:
(I am very curious about science, but a real "science dummy") Someone should write a book, "Science for Dummies"!
Steven Hawkin has written a few books which are supposed to introduce modern physics ideas without involving much math.
_________________
-to the best of my knowledge I am NA/NT, INTP/j-

Signature quote: "I apologise in advance for the cliches."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Emettman
Microferroequinologist
Phoenix


Joined: Dec 19, 2005
Posts: 1027
Location: Cornwall, UK

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:36 pm    Post subject: Re: String Theory Reply with quote

Bland wrote:


(I am very curious about science, but a real "science dummy") Someone should write a book, "Science for Dummies"!


Quite fun, but with a lot of real science packed into it is "The Cartoon History of Time" by Kate Charlesworth & John Gribbin (ISBN: 0747406804)


It's a few years out of date on cosmology now, but will get you within striking istance of the latest stuff. Hmm. It has some value: starting at $30-40 dollars on
http://dogbert.abebooks.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Bland
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jan 03, 2006
Posts: 1430
Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 5:27 pm    Post subject: String Theory Reply with quote

Hey, thanks for the leads, Drizzle and Emmet men. My "must read" list is growing ever longer. I wish that I had been taught better in high school.
_________________
"Honey, would you buy me some boobles for my 40th b-day?" "No way, they're too expensive. Your own baubles will have to do."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ancientofdaze
Raven
Raven


Joined: Dec 10, 2005
Posts: 103
Location: west wales, uk, overlooking the ocean

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's a readable and comprehensive brief intro to quantum physics and string theory here.

And there's news this week of awesome discoveries about so-called dark matter, the 95% of matter in the universe about which up to now we have known only that it is there. Dark matter, it seems, is not cold and dark at all (at 10,000C it is far hotter than the sun's surface); it is made of particles which are not slow and sluggish as had been thought, but zoom around at 9km/sec; and ! it clumps together in "building blocks" with a minimum size of 1000 light years across, with 30 million times the mass of the Sun. Large galaxies are built by combining these blocks and the stars they contain - but this process doen't work for small galaxies.

State-of-the-art cosmology which will change our understanding of the universe and ourselves, and change our lives in the future in ways we can hardly begin to imagine... read about it here and here.
_____________________________
it's the global warming gonna getya
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> General Autism Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
1, 2  Next  
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Wrong PlanetTM Copyright 2004-2009, Alex Plank and Yellow Sneaker Media, LLC
Alex Plank  Aspie Affection 

Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet

RSS Feed Add to Google Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe: Wrong Planet News  Wrong Planet Forums

Privacy Policy

Asperger's is not a disease

fine art